Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 96 24.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 69 17.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 157 40.5%

  • Total voters
    388
The man dresses himself like some retard from reddits male fashion advice. He probably spends a ton of money to look like shit.
He pays for one of those"dress me I'm retarded" services. I'm going to guess that's where his homesexual beater came from. Probably not the suit though- too well put together for those services.
 
So... Here is the first set of #TheRekeitaFiles. Best as I can tell, the real crazy stuff went down in the November-December timeframe, so let us step through that period and see just how BAD the chat was at that point.

This new format of old archives is much more visually appealing and readable compared to a spreadsheet. Another thing you will notice is how much more diverse and BIGGER the participation in the chat was.

Anyway... November is the lead-up to the infamous ass posting that occurs on or about the 16th of that month.

I have a general plan for how to release these, but I am always looking to improve.

Thanks for doing this! This format is so much easier to navigate (for me anyway).
I skimmed through the first 500 pages - mostly the typical idiotic faggotry with this standout:

Lovely conversation about how women are to blame for any time a man cheats...

Poor @Brimstoneddd was cheated on and he's Big Mad:
1679720830374.png

From: FromHereOnIn
1679715403438.png[
1679718271744.png
Elie goes on to say that in 11 years of marriage, she's never withheld sex - EVER! Gold star, girl. Joseph Smith's luvs u.

And, the typical gross memes...

1679715308355.png
From MAPHanger:
1679716245966.png
From Turbogoat:
1679715718997.png

Disclaimer: : @CassieMaynard, @BugalooBaloo, and "@" did their best to do some rote (bar was low) defense of women but mostly got shouted down. Interestingly, I haven't seen any of them in chat in ages.... under those handles anyway.

And Nick wonders why a bunch of his normie YT fans came and went...


1679719292390.png
This copesplaining (IT'S THE RELATIONSHIP, NOT THE MAN)! from the wife of a serial cheater (Art: "I fucked all my ex's friends") is perfection.

It's okay, Egal, he'll cheat on you too. 'Once a cheater...'

Oh, but, hey she''d be good with some sanctioned cheating! (These Rekieta swinging theories are looking less and less far-fetched.)
1679720012757.png

Aaand I'd forgotten she's on her second marriage.
1679719727035.png

ANYWAY... A few questions @Himedall All-seeing Waifu

1) I assume these are not capturing the Locals chats when Nick is streaming on Locals? (He generally does those separately. Might not be worth tracking bc peeps r usually better behaved when he's around.)

2) Can u tell when a comment has been deleted? There's been a lot of BTS speculation that past chats have been "scrubbed" of super offensive stuff and personal info.)

3) "@" is still there in past chats despite being banned for spamming. (And his/her name was always "@" - questions were initially raised about whether that's the name you get when you've been banned.) I seem to not exist, including tags, however. (That's fine with me on a personal level EXCEPT it will make many of the arguments lost forever, I'm glad I screenshot many.) Thoughts?
.....

In other matters, apparently, there was a big fight a couple days ago bw ACompleteRandom and Carimachet. Keep your eyes peeled. They're both turbo-crazies. Should be entertaining.

Edit: Formatting
 
Can someone fork Free-DOS
And create Ball-DOS so nick don´t have to use Windows anymore..
:optimistic:
 
If you look at his night show titles (just the titles - not like I watch any of this shit) it looks like he's trying to do an off-brand Tim Pool, which is bad enough content in its original form. My guess is his "show prep" now is checking The Hill a few hours before his show and choosing a bunch of articles. The show is totally neutered now, it sucks, but whatever.
It's utterly nonsensical to me that he's giving up the niche format, that made him popular in the first place, in favor of copying hundreds of other streamers that do generic political content (and better!). Normally, you play to your strengths. And what he's doing now pretty clearly isn't one of them.

He'd probably do "okay" if he toned down the degenerate shit. Right now though, he's burning his candle at both ends by acting like a degenerate lolcow AND having turgid subject matter content.

But hey, his call. He claims he's more happy with what he's doing with the night show now. Even though I think we all know the negative audience response to the change has been eating away at him.
 
I came to the thread to vent about how bad the recent streams were, and you guys don't disappoint, you were thinking the same, too.
They're so bad I considered unsubscribing. Maybe he's giving in to the "ADHD" and has a hard time doing stuff that requires real attention span, like reading court filings.
His shows have become so monotone. And maybe the sex stuff was a symptom of that. He's only capable of talking about the 2-3 specific topics he doesn't even seem to like talking about.
Make his 300th rant about tyranny and freedom. I don't watch youtube to constantly hear basic stuff I agree with being repeated ad nauseam.
I just want him to review court papers, and it's not like he has the excuse of "there's nothing to review" anymore. And there's no other content creator to pick up the slack, otherwise I'd have switched over already.
 
It's utterly nonsensical to me that he's giving up the niche format, that made him popular in the first place, in favor of copying hundreds of other streamers that do generic political content (and better!). Normally, you play to your strengths. And what he's doing now pretty clearly isn't one of them.

He'd probably do "okay" if he toned down the degenerate shit. Right now though, he's burning his candle at both ends by acting like a degenerate lolcow AND having turgid subject matter content.

But hey, his call. He claims he's more happy with what he's doing with the night show now. Even though I think we all know the negative audience response to the change has been eating away at him.

I came to the thread to vent about how bad the recent streams were, and you guys don't disappoint, you were thinking the same, too.
They're so bad I considered unsubscribing. Maybe he's giving in to the "ADHD" and has a hard time doing stuff that requires real attention span, like reading court filings.
His shows have become so monotone. And maybe the sex stuff was a symptom of that. He's only capable of talking about the 2-3 specific topics he doesn't even seem to like talking about.
Make his 300th rant about tyranny and freedom. I don't watch youtube to constantly hear basic stuff I agree with being repeated ad nauseam.
I just want him to review court papers, and it's not like he has the excuse of "there's nothing to review" anymore. And there's no other content creator to pick up the slack, otherwise I'd have switched over already.
I think these two things are linked. Going with what everyone else is going lost the one draw he had. I think most poele stuck aroound because he used to be passionate about stuff he talked about. I don't think he wantes to do anything anymore, and simply doing it because the Rumble contract forced him to, so he went with the path of least effort.
 
Lovely conversation about how women are to blame for any time a man cheats...

Sorry... replying to myself. Forgot to add this lovely Locals screenshot on the topic of whether women should be compelled to have sex on demand with their partners:
1679740726674.png

Because women are meant solely to be a receptacle of sperm, OBV.
 
Sorry... replying to myself. Forgot to add this lovely Locals screenshot on the topic of whether women should be compelled to have sex on demand with their partners:

Because women are meant solely to be a receptacle of sperm, OBV.
Welcome to incel world. Luckily this dude will never cum into anything other than a kleenex.
 
I don't know if anybody else listened to MATI today, but Null made an overture to Rekiteta to cover Ralph's legal drama, and said that he would make a point to guest on such a show. He's suggested other legal topics he could cover (i.e. Onison) in previous recent shows.

I think maybe our Dear Feeder might be trying to keep Nick from descending further into cowdom.
More like he genuinely doesn't keep up with the thread. He doesn't understand that funny or interesting internet lawsuits are no longer what Nick covers. Null did just as good a job if not better job covering the Ralph legal filings than Nick would've in his current state.
 
Last edited:
Sorry... replying to myself. Forgot to add this lovely Locals screenshot on the topic of whether women should be compelled to have sex on demand with their partners:

Because women are meant solely to be a receptacle of sperm, OBV.
Not solely receptacle of sperm, there's also bukake and what Jack Murphy likes to do to reaffirm his dominance in the relationship. But I agree, women shouldn't be compelled into having sex on demand. Take it to the extreme, if every man is an incel, noone is an incel.

I think those locals people drank too much fo the Drex Coolaid.
 
Sorry... replying to myself. Forgot to add this lovely Locals screenshot on the topic of whether women should be compelled to have sex on demand with their partners:

Because women are meant solely to be a receptacle of sperm, OBV.
All that I'm getting from this other than continued affirmation that these are truly broken, fucked-up people, is that they're too stupid to figure out that sexual aids exist for both men and women. Not that anybody should willingly be in a relationship with the kind of control-freak that demands sex like that, but if they are I don't understand why you wouldn't just get the shitstain a fleshlight or a few dozen tenga eggs.
 
ANYWAY... A few questions @Himedall All-seeing Waifu

1) I assume these are not capturing the Locals chats when Nick is streaming on Locals? (He generally does those separately. Might not be worth tracking bc peeps r usually better behaved when he's around.)

2) Can u tell when a comment has been deleted? There's been a lot of BTS speculation that past chats have been "scrubbed" of super offensive stuff and personal info.)

3) "@" is still there in past chats despite being banned for spamming. (And his/her name was always "@" - questions were initially raised about whether that's the name you get when you've been banned.) I seem to not exist, including tags, however. (That's fine with me on a personal level EXCEPT it will make many of the arguments lost forever, I'm glad I screenshot many.) Thoughts?
1. These are whole stream archives, just like when Panoptes is running.

At least, the parts of the archives that will generate... I had a few goes at pulling them, and the LOCALS architecture would stroke out and refuse to go back in history further after a certain point. These old chats were MASSIVE with 10's of thousands of chats. Currently, we are lucky to get over 8k.

EDIT: I misunderstood the Q: I can pull the LOCALS hot tub stream and the kitchen stream chats after that fact like this as well. I did in fact pull everything up until the end of February.

As of now, I only pull the LOCALS stream chats if there was something interesting in the stream itself. They bitch about the same stuff in general chats and in their private DISCORD and DMs.

I can teach anyone who is interested in logging the LOCALS stream chats how to do it. It takes 0 skill or special knowledge.

2. I pulled these in the very recent past, so the only indication of a deletion is a 'reply-to' that isn't deleted itself. There is no way I have found to recall deleted comments other than live logging (cf. Charlie10101's self doxx fail)

There is plenty of personal info still there. Search 'I live', 'grew up', 'phone', [Insert two letter state acronym here]', 'down/out here in',, or similar if you want that information then scan the chat in that general area.

3. LOCALS dynamically generates chat history. That means OLD chats get updated with NEW names. (E.g. GOOCH is TUB_BOSS). All that name change super spy stuff...? Worthless...

I did not know that @ was a full username. When you click their profile, their page says 'this user no longer exists'. I assumed this was the default when you delete you account, but now I am not sure...

I did see your tag more than a few times when i was pulling the archives. Are yoh sure that you wouls have chatted in this stream?

Keep ans eye out and let me know. LOCALS might just be bad at assigning tags in long archives and both paragraph 1 and 2 in this secrion may be living together: Bad coding and @ picking the default deleted user username...

In other matters, apparently, there was a big fight a couple days ago bw ACompleteRandom and Carimachet. Keep your eyes peeled. They're both turbo-crazies. Should be entertaining.
I thought that was what I archived earlier in the week and highlighted?

Anyway, I have to check the Friday show log and post that.

I will do that after trilling the NOV 1 archive some more first.
I came to the thread to vent about how bad the recent streams were, and you guys don't disappoint, you were thinking the same, too.
They're so bad I considered unsubscribing. Maybe he's giving in to the "ADHD" and has a hard time doing stuff that requires real attention span, like reading court filings.
His shows have become so monotone. And maybe the sex stuff was a symptom of that. He's only capable of talking about the 2-3 specific topics he doesn't even seem to like talking about.
Make his 300th rant about tyranny and freedom. I don't watch youtube to constantly hear basic stuff I agree with being repeated ad nauseam.
I just want him to review court papers, and it's not like he has the excuse of "there's nothing to review" anymore. And there's no other content creator to pick up the slack, otherwise I'd have switched over already.
I liked to put him on in the background a lot. It didn't matter that a lot of the content was boring reading. It was just nice to have something that would not absorb too much of my attention whilst working and have the occasionally hilarious joke that would make me laugh out loud.

Most people seem to like DRAMA DRAM DRAMA and hearing their biases confirmed over, and over, and over... I actually appreciate that Nick DIDN'T jump on hype trains with mainstream stores and found little niche cases ans topics. Those days are gone...

I am really curious if anyone cares enough to watch and superchat a question to ask AZ (HeelVSBabyface) about what he learned about respecting his fans while he is on with Nick. It was a great story and lesson that Nick seems to ignore. AZ is great!
 
Sorry... replying to myself. Forgot to add this lovely Locals screenshot on the topic of whether women should be compelled to have sex on demand with their partners:

Because women are meant solely to be a receptacle of sperm, OBV.
Balldo's simps are indistinguishable from Fuentes' Groyper catboys at this point.

Their leaders have the same first name too and both roleplay as "le based trad Catholic".
 
Nick will be alright. He has a long way to go before reaching DSP or Ralph levels, and they still make six figure incomes. Well, Ralph did until he started converting his streaming time into nap time.
How funny would it be if Nick starts nodding during his streams?
Whoever sold Nick that suit, he should beat their ass.
If he stole that suit, he should give it back and apologize.
Nick stealing from another adult implies that he found a terribly dressed quadriplegic and then pecked him into submission with that giant honker of his. Or he offered him gay sex until the guy told him to just rob or kill him and then go away. I could see it going either way.
Just for future reference, I'm a northerner. People who talk like that are our mortal enemies.
We talk more like this where I live.

That means you either hate cunty cops, Londoners, or both. That's a win in my book.
 
Back