Disaster Principal resigns after Florida students shown Michelangelo statue - Cuckservatard brainrot attaq/The slippery slope of ancient Western architecture enjoying to buttseks

[Archive]
Screenshot 2023-03-26 231205.png
A principal of a Florida school has been forced to resign after a parent complained that sixth-grade students were exposed to pornography.
The complaint arose from a Renaissance art lesson where students were shown Michelangelo's statue of David.
The iconic statue is one of the most famous in Western history.
But one parent complained the material was pornographic and two others said they wanted to know about the class before it was taught.
The 5.17m (17ft) statue depicts an entirely naked David, the Biblical figure who kills the giant Goliath.
The lesson, given to 11 and 12-year-olds, also included references to Michelangelo's "Creation of Adam" painting and Botticelli's "Birth of Venus".
Principal Hope Carrasquilla of Tallahassee Classical School said she resigned after she was given an ultimatum by the school board to resign or be fired.
Local media reported that Ms Carrasquilla did not know the reason she was asked to resign, but believed it was related to the complaints over the lesson.
They also said Ms Carrasquilla had been principal for less than one year.
In an interview with US outlet Slate, the chair of the school's board, Barney Bishop III, said that last year the principal sent a notice to parents warning them that students were going to see Michelangelo's David - but that this wasn't done this year. He called it an "egregious mistake" and said that "parents are entitled to know anytime their child is being taught a controversial topic and picture".
"We're not going to show the full statue of David to kindergartners. We're not going to show him to second graders. Showing the entire statue of David is appropriate at some age. We're going to figure out when that is," Mr Bishop said.
On Thursday, Florida's governor, Ron DeSantis, moved to expand a law that banned public schools from teaching sexual education and gender identity.
Teachers who violate the law face being suspended or losing their teaching licences.
The David was completed by Michelangelo between 1501 and 1504. It was instantly hailed as a masterpiece, with Renaissance artist Giorgio Vasari saying the David "surpassed" any statue that had ever existed before.
Queen Victoria gifted a copy of the David to the South Kensington museum - later the V&A - in 1857. When she first saw the cast, she was apparently so shocked by the nudity that a fig leaf was commissioned to cover up the genitalia.
The V&A's website says that the leaf was kept "in readiness for any royal visits, when it was hung on the figure using two strategically placed hooks."
 
So naked, nonsexualized art is bad, but sexualized drag queens is ok because it's not naked, and books with people fellating a fake dick are ok because it's a fake dick. I got it. Just making sure I'm following along.

Also, fun history fact: David has a little pee-pee because he's scared.
1679861918755.png
 
A hallmark of obscene pornographic material is that it has no redeeming cultural or artistic value that arouses a prurient interest. To conceptualize the prurient interest component, it helps to think of it as ersatz prostitution, ie something to help achieve orgasm. Renaissance statues and other art do not fit that criteria.

This should not be so difficult.
 
Last edited:
A hallmark of obscene pornographic obscene material is that it has no redeeming cultural or artistic value that arouses a prurient interest. To conceptualize the prurient interest component it helps to think of it as ersatz prostitution, ie something to help achieve orgasm. Renaissance statues and other art do not not fit that criteria.

This should not be so difficult.
Stop typing like a faggot.




You're right tho.
 
So just slap some black bars on the images and continue the lesson. As long as the point of the lesson isn’t sex or drawing attention to the genitalia, it should be fine.
Even thinking about having to censor FUCKING David is pants on head retarded. Margaret Sanger was right & we’re living in Idiocracy.

Also the reason for smol pp is that’s what happens when your adrenaline dumps. All kinds of learning opportunities here.
 
I hope these parents dont let their kids play something as degenerate as Animal Crossing either 😱

(You can buy artwork to fill out your museum and David is one of them in his full glory, along with tiddy statues too)
 
Reminds me of the story of the mom who was outraged over her daughter having to draw a "graphic organizer" about a historical event and it turned out it meant writing a sentence or so about a PBS documentary.

With this story, the school is supposedly in a conservative area and a charter school. There genuinely have been a ton of conservatives acting retarded over the past year or so and treating all kinds of bullshit as pornography or grooming. There have even been parents asking to pull 1984 out of schools because they said it was pornographic, which makes it seem like there are parents trying to claim anything and everything is porn and an attempt at grooming their children to be twerking in strip clubs.

So this story isn't really that out of the ordinary and we'll probably only see more stories like it in the future because it's hard to get retards to tell the difference between porn and regular art.
 
I thought it was because the Renaissance artists were trying to be Greek, and the Greeks thought big penises were funny?
It's in line for conventions of the time, but Michelangelo had an autistic obsession with the human body and musculature. We knew of certain forearm muscles before actual anatomical observation because of the details in some of his work.

However, despite my excitement, it still just could be because he's trying to embody the Greek ideal. What I'm trying to get at is each layman interpretation is probably correct (i.e. scared v. greek ideal)

Either way, if you think seeing David is objectionable for kids, it probably says more about you.
 
Yeah I’d argue it’s only suitable for high school teens, taking a child to a museum with marble dicks and titties with zero context is pretty stupid. Obviously there are art prices that don’t have nudity which would be better suited, however children barley have the capacity to appreciate fine art.
 
Back