Ukrainian Defensive War against the Russian Invasion - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

Not really I think most people in this thread are self aware of the corruption in Ukraine, the people here are also aware that type of corruption is prevalent in most places on the globe. Nobody cares about the corruption. For me personally I support a country defending itself from an invader and wish for the Russians to stop shelling children.
I get you need to defend your side and I obviously agree shellings kids is always shit and invading is rarely justified but the Vatnigger thread will give plenty of reasons they believe it was justified and one of those reasons is they believe Ukraine was shelling kids in the Donbass for 6,000,000 years before this invasion special military operation but honestly you haven't really addressed anything other than saying "Russia bad" (I agree btw) which is the exact same thing they do about Ukraine in the other thread (also agree with them, both suck). You just proved my point.
 
I'd say maybe Pol Pot was worse, but you're talking about about a small shithole country killing its own people. The Soviet Union was bad, but it was limited to Eastern Europe. The worst thing the Soviet Union accomplished was with the direct help and assistance of the US and UK, or the Allies (led by the US) which became the UN (led by the US) and NATO (led by the US). I will refer to the United States and her property (which includes all members of NATO) as just the US, because the other countries are irrelevant and conquered vassals. However, when I refer to the US, know that I refer to its owners, not its residents.
Would these owners happen to also own China and Russia, seeing as how it was China that gave the world the abomination of the social credit score system? Everything you described as the future of America is the already existing reality of China. They've even updated their tyrannical financial system to include CBDCs with neat little expiration dates on their money.

Honestly, why even refer to it as "the US" at that point? Why not just say the "World Bank" or "The WEF" or "The Cabal?" Clearly you're not referring to the U.S. nation but the U.S. puppeteers.

As for those people who said they'd prefer to go back to China if given a choice, that choice is compelled and those people are indoctrinated, those who aren't are routinely disappeared.
 
reality of China
yes, a country that doesn't even want me in it. whereas the US wants to solidify its power over every other country, and already has over the entirety of White countries I want to live in. I have no where to go to escape the US.

The US is the most evil thing to ever exist because, in addition to what it is, it extinguishes any ability to even flee from it.

That there even exists a thing called a NATO shill who unironically believes that the US fights for freedom is astounding to me.
 
yes, a country that doesn't even want me in it. whereas the US wants to solidify its power over every other country, and already has over the entirety of White countries I want to live in. I have no where to go to escape the US.

The US is the most evil thing to ever exist because, in addition to what it is, it extinguishes any ability to even flee from it.

That there even exists a thing called a NATO shill who unironically believes that the US fights for freedom is astounding to me.
Globalism is a bit freaky to me but then I think about what it actually is and realize that no matter what happens, All NATO countries could get sucked into a black hole and no matter what, the concept of globalism will happen eventually. Blaming a country or gang of countries for this concept is weird since to me it is just what will naturally occur if given enough time. Like if the "West" all died tomorrow then a country like China would just become the globalist leader, If China died the day after then maybe Russia would be the leader ect... Like what are you arguing about? This all became inevitable when the first Europeans found the new world and is now even more viable with air travel.
 
And Russia is going to sell Siberian resources where? In Europe?
They didn't think about how and to whom they will sell their resources when they started current war. Why we should suppouse that they will not do this again?
THEY seek to eliminate everything you and your own people stood for, erasing centuries of history and tradtition of a culture while you get to watch and they won't stop until everyone is completely spiritually empty without a set of morals that aren't pre-approved by our neo-liberal elite. It leaves you with nothing higher to hold onto in life except the pursuit of "happiness" which tends to be the most hedonistic, degenerate form of physical pleasure under their definition.
You know that communism in soviet edition and 'traditionalism' currentday ruzzia is all about destroying every fuckin bit of culture and tradition? They only use some husks of tradition in certian fields.

In USA you can belive in whatever you want, read your bible or what the heck every day and neo-libs will nto give a shit if you keep this for yourself. In USSR you will have a good chance to be fucked up in work if you baptise your kid, be spotted at church or so - and I talk about post-stalin era, nto the Stalin era when you have just a fuckin lifetime trip into some ice hell just because you used to be from not-welcomed minority (like Poles in Ukraine).

In ruzzia you will be a fucking thing in most times. Not even a human, who can in worst case have a barrister when prosecuted. If you will be in USSR in court you will be executed or evicted to a hellish place in every single case. And the case can be something like 'you used newspaper with our leaders photo as a wrap for fish you na-na-nazi'.
The one single thing russia is actually right about is that we did promise that we wouldnt expand nato, and we did,
No one ever promised that to ruzzia (it was a small promise about East Germany not being a place for nuke force... when USSR was still alive), but as I see you are too agitated around Da Nuke to dispute about this.

Live peacefully and in rich.

It's a shame there's not a neutral thread
Before split it was a 'neutral' thread (or two), it worked just fine.
The "sprawy" guy is a bit aggressive in his hate for the russian people and is a bit retarded.
Only a bit? Fuck, I'm getting too old to be a sperg.
 
Not really I think most people in this thread are self aware of the corruption in Ukraine, the people here are also aware that type of corruption is prevalent in most places on the globe. Nobody cares about the corruption. For me personally I support a country defending itself from an invader and wish for the Russians to stop shelling children.
I support Ukranian independence in theory, but it'd be really nice if they got rid of their own Nazi Satanists. However, Russians might be Nazi Satanists, too, in which case Ukraine should still be free since the average citizen is not a Nazi Satanist and it's probably better to be run by your own Nazi Satanists than foreign Nazi Satanists.

 
yes, a country that doesn't even want me in it. whereas the US wants to solidify its power over every other country, and already has over the entirety of White countries I want to live in. I have no where to go to escape the US.

The US is the most evil thing to ever exist because, in addition to what it is, it extinguishes any ability to even flee from it.
This is just American Exceptionalism, but inverted. No, the US hasn't solidified its power over all white countries. It looks like that to you, because you consume American media, which is as parochial as any other national media and automatically assumes everything is about the USA. The media tells you that the US-run global domination is here to stay. It tells you that the nonces are free to run roughshod over everyone else in the world. It tells you that nobody has any choice, because the US is all-powerful and there's no way to stop it.

The US is rich and has huge natural resources, but its external projection of power relies on the cooperation and consent of a multitude of its allies. It has a great deal of influence over those allies, perhaps even to the point of appearing to completely control them, but those allies only try to stay in its good books because they want access to that wealth, and only because of that. Sure, the US can effortlessly beat up on some sandbox, or some adriatic pariah-state for a couple of decades, at the cost of thoroughly wrecking its economy in the long term, but that relies on cooperation with, or the tacit consent by non-opposition from, the rest of the US-allied world. The minute the US starts making more than token economic threats toward any western nation, even (or especially) NATO members, is the minute they all find their balls again, stop pumping oil, dump all their dollars, and close their markets to US products. And yes, maybe the US could then start throwing threats of nuclear hellfire around to get its way and turn itself into Russia mk 2, or talk about invading France and carpet-bombing Germany, but it is far more likely to recede back into its borders, to sulk on its piles of gold and farmland.
 
Honestly, why even refer to it as "the US" at that point? Why not just say the "World Bank" or "The WEF" or "The Cabal?" Clearly you're not referring to the U.S. nation but the U.S. puppeteers.
Because then folks will cotton on to the fact this is just a rehash of the exact same conspiracy theory thats been heard a thousand times before which has been mere moments away from total victory over humanity for several centuries now

The US is the most evil thing to ever exist because, in addition to what it is,
Which is pretty much ok compared to what passes for competition, and compared to what came before in terms of superpowers/superpower candidates

it extinguishes any ability to even flee from it
So to put it simply, the supreme *evil* you have waxed lyrical about as the worst in human history is infact....power and influence. Both real and hypothetical.

That there even exists a thing called a NATO shill who unironically believes that the US fights for freedom is astounding to me.
Assuming NATO/The West is entirely run by satanic ultra-evil talmudic rape monsters who seek nothing but to eternally torture each and every human on the planet for shits and giggles is not exactly better than believing the opposite extreme that those running NATO/The West are all idealistic freedom loving humanitarians who seek to bring the world into a new golden age
 
So to put it simply, the supreme *evil* you have waxed lyrical about as the worst in human history is infact....power and influence. Both real and hypothetical.
If power is evil, why does anything good ever happen? Good people and bad people both have power. The bad people might have more for the time being.
 
Assuming NATO/The West is entirely run by satanic ultra-evil talmudic rape monsters who seek nothing but to eternally torture each and every human on the planet for shits and giggles is not exactly better than believing the opposite extreme that those running NATO/The West are all idealistic freedom loving humanitarians who seek to bring the world into a new golden age
You are a fucking retard.

No, the US hasn't solidified its power over all white countries.
Completely wrong. The US has so thoroughly raped the rest of the white world that there is no freedom outside the US itself, except in those countries with governments so weak they cannot yet rape their own citizens. Countries like Ukraine are subject to CIA color revolution and are thrown into war, and Serbia has already been bombed and I am sure will be bombed again if they do not fold into the EU. When they do fold into the EU, they will brain rape their citizens for money just like Germany and France and the UK.

When I left ATL for Odessa, the radio was playing some shit pop song like Despacito. When I arrived in Odessa, the first thing I heard was Despacito at food stall near the gate. Americanism saturates and ruins everything. There is no escaping it.
 
Last edited:
United States never signed any treaty regarding the expansion of NATO with the USSR. Every member of NATO joined cause they wanted to a part of it. As no nation was forced into NATO against their will.
It's a bit more then that backstory is that when the soviet union collapsed everyone wan kinda fine with being at their own barricades sides and so on trying to rebuild and when Bush sr. met with Yelcin in I think 90 or 91 there was a discussion about NATO exspancion but nothing was signed on it. And NATO was fine without expanding and then 92 transistria conflict happend and when the rest of eastern euro block (primarily Poland, Hungary and Czechoslovakia) had their oh shit moment russia has not changed one bit.

Then those country's started to poke NATO leadership on please let us join due ruskies might go on another imperialistic rampage and it's back to another cold war. But even then US (then President Clinton) was trying to keep good relationships with Russia and maybie try to work out diplomatic way with them hence at first they chould only be considered alies of NATO (same as Ukrane now) not full fledged members and we whould not have article 5 button in case. So in turn if Poles decided to quite litlery blackmail their way into NATO, by getting Yelcin drunk enough to have a signed document that russia is cool with the NATO exspancion.

Ok tl.dr. is that NATO didn't force anyone to join their organization but the rest of eastern Europe had to blackmail our way into it.
 
Completely wrong. The US has so thoroughly raped the rest of the white world that there is no freedom outside the US itself, except in those countries with governments so weak they cannot yet rape their own citizens. Countries like Ukraine are subject to CIA color revolution and are thrown into war, and Serbia has already been bombed and I am sure will be bombed again if they do not fold into the EU. When they do fold into the EU, they will brain rape their citizens for money just like Germany and France and the UK.
Dude no offense but that retarded take my dude like cmon if NATO wanted to bomb Serbia or did some other shit it whould not let Serbs to build up their military agian, let alone have their own elections or have anti EU/NATO stance like cmon stop taking the blackpill on that everything is evil and shit

Plus both Germany and France were energetilcy dependent on Russia before the war.

And yes EU may not have as much freedom as US but we are working on it at our own pace not by US mandated pace and so on
 
When I left ATL for Odessa, the radio was playing some shit pop song like Despacito. When I arrived in Odessa, the first thing I heard was Despacito at a nearby stand. Americanism saturates and ruins everything. There is no escaping it.
You're conflating cultural influence (which I have complained about endlessly) with control. To a lot of the world, the US represents freedom. They emulate what they aspire towards, so they consume American culture. The influence is there, but that isn't control.

And again, like I said, you are ultimately taking your view of the world from American media and your position within American culture. That's the same media that marches in lock-step on just about every issue, frames everything in terms of how the US is affected or involved, and lies constantly about everything. That media is constantly trying to convince you that America owns the world. You're primed to only ever see confirmation of the claim and ignore anything that contradicts it. You are so deeply convinced of their lies that you actually believe nations outside the US have no agency.
 
You're conflating cultural influence (which I have complained about endlessly) with control. To a lot of the world, the US represents freedom. They emulate what they aspire towards, so they consume American culture. The influence is there, but that isn't control.
It's a slide. Do you not understand how the poisoning works?

 
Oh and one more thing about that CIA organized Maidan and so on here a meme about it
SmartSelect_20230327_134659_Gallery.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's a slide. Do you not understand how the poisoning works?
The poisoning being... what? That people look in from the outside and see that America seems better than where they're looking from? You're so convinced that the US is the great shaitan that you've blinded yourself to just how fucking awful most of the places you've fled to have been within just the last 30 years. How awful they are now. Much of the rot you're ascribing to American influence and control was already there, already embedded by decades of graft and oppression. You see that they're kind of crap now, that they consume American media and think it's pretty good, and decide that means the crap must be the result of American interventions, not seeming to understand that what you see now is an improvement over what was there before - an improvement that was brought about by the people in those countries themselves, who aspired toward the freedom they glimpsed from the west. Maybe it didn't live up to the idealisations, but it was a damn sight better than what they had.
 
Is like nobody here fucking understands how MAD works, here's a hint: the M stands for MUTUAL, as in "the other side has to have nukes for this to work".
Given the steady commitment of the Western Alliance to help support Ukraine with old systems and thereby neutralise a near century old threat (and longer for immediate neighbors), Putin using nukes of any sort would assuredly guarantee his Assured Destruction.
 
Globalism is a bit freaky to me but then I think about what it actually is and realize that no matter what happens, All NATO countries could get sucked into a black hole and no matter what, the concept of globalism will happen eventually. Blaming a country or gang of countries for this concept is weird since to me it is just what will naturally occur if given enough time. Like if the "West" all died tomorrow then a country like China would just become the globalist leader, If China died the day after then maybe Russia would be the leader ect... Like what are you arguing about? This all became inevitable when the first Europeans found the new world and is now even more viable with air travel.
Globalism is nothing more than the latest name for global hegemony. Back during the Victorian Era it went by the name of Empire and the people in charge boasted the sun would never set on theirs. What's bizarre is that the USA has wound up in charge not by intent but default following WW2. The UK's hold on the world was broken along with its empire, as too any other nation in Europe that would try and build one... except of course the Russian juggernaut everyone had been dreading in 1914 had taken form with Stalin the new Czar, and with them refusing to leave Eastern Europe, supporting China and North Korea, and engaging in the rest of the overseas shenanigans empires do, we were stuck opposing them just because... well... what else were we going to do when they started pushing us around? Cry like babies and hide under our covers?
And yes, maybe the US could then start throwing threats of nuclear hellfire around to get its way and turn itself into Russia mk 2, or talk about invading France and carpet-bombing Germany, but it is far more likely to recede back into its borders, to sulk on its piles of gold and farmland.
Which is not at all how empires have ever worked throughout history. They've always shamelessly reserved the ultima ratio regnum when interacting with others, and the USA has little desire for that, probably because we've never had a king and the whole idea disgusts us on what is probably a genetic level by now considering everyone here is because they were tired of that sort of thing. One of the biggest (relative) waves of immigration the USA had was in the 1850's following the collapse of the 1848 revolutions where we took in pretty much every German-speaking rabble-rouser in Europe.
The poisoning being... what? That people look in from the outside and see that America seems better than where they're looking from? You're so convinced that the US is the great shaitan that you've blinded yourself to just how fucking awful most of the places you've fled to have been within just the last 30 years. How awful they are now. Much of the rot you're ascribing to American influence and control was already there, already embedded by decades of graft and oppression. You see that they're kind of crap now, that they consume American media and think it's pretty good, and decide that means the crap must be the result of American interventions, not seeming to understand that what you see now is an improvement over what was there before - an improvement that was brought about by the people in those countries themselves, who aspired toward the freedom they glimpsed from the west. Maybe it didn't live up to the idealisations, but it was a damn sight better than what they had.
The irony is that the moral decay Null bitches about is the end result of the sheer material plenty and quality of life the USA has, which is something no other nation on Earth has ever close come to accomplishing. Our food-related problems come not from being starving to death, but because everyone is fat from overeating. Our poor are obese. Obese! I'm sure Haitians who live on mud cookies because there's less food there than even in Africa hate and despise the USA for being evil.... oh wait, we've got a bunch of them trying to cross the border because they hate starving to death from their own poor life choices back home.
 
Back