Female-to-male artist shoots up Presbyterian elementary school killing 6. - Female Troon (FTM) Shoots Up Christian School in Tennessee

What glows about it? Are there things don't match up like with Stephen Paddock? It's not hard to get a gun in Kansas and trannies are violently insane freaks completely unprompted. Does she have anything in her background that would trip a background check to where she couldn't legally obtain a firearm?

Like you, I'm pro-2A. But 2A advocates should treat these cases as they are rather than screaming FED! FED! any time there's a shooting.

Arguments should go something like this: "Yes, people will misuse their right to bear arms sometimes, and that's horrible. But those incidents are very rare and the benefits of that right far outweigh the risks. Bad guys with guns will get guns or find some other way to kill no matter what, so the rest of us need to be able to defend ourselves."
Anti 2A "survivors" from Highland Park showed up just after to give press attention. This glows more than Fukushima.
 
Your optimism is making me jealous. Trannies will continue to have their mutilated bodies lavished by the slavering tongues of society until the mega news corps decide they're done playing with them and tell normies the truth, and that won't happen for a loooooong time.
I share that optimism. The more 'violent rapist housed in women's prison' and' person with OBVIOUS mental health issues kills children' stories that proliferate, the quicker sentiment will turn towards blind and unquestioning acceptance.

Lobotomies were held up as a heckin' valid medical procedure for approximately 20 years or so. Repressed memories, another heckin' valid medical condition, was accepted as legal evidence in the 80s and 90s before being ruled unreliable in 1995. The Caitlyn Jenner Vanity Fair article, which is what I believe really accelerated this shit into the mainstream, came out in 2015.

It is my hope that we're another decade or so away, hopefully sooner, from this shit being washed down the shitter where it rightfully belongs, given how much faster we are at disseminating information these days. The only thing that worries me are the folks who will end up mutilated, dead, etc. because of society in general enabling mental illness.
 
The people who always talk about Stochastic Terrorism didn’t see this one coming, did they?
They openly say there should be an ethical/legal/political double-standard depending on identity. "Rules for thee but not for me" isn't even a sneaky implication - it's part of their fundamental worldview.

I think too many people on the right are obsessed with owning leftists with claims of hypocrisy but "hypocrite" is only a damning label to those who believe in some kind of universal morality in the first place.
 
I havent seen it posted here, threads moving too fast! Her reddit acc was found LOADS of red flags years in the making.
-polyamory
-raped
-etc
You can literally read the beginning of her grooming day by day.


Sorry if its late! Im trying to archive as much as I can!
Allegedly raped. FtM is rape victim what a surprise.
AidenRape.JPGAidenRape2.JPG
It seems that she has or had at some point a eating disorder. She posted this in a sub about eating disorders giving advice to other user.
AidenEating1.JPGAidenEating2.JPG
Kamala Harris and Pocahontas supporter
AidenWarrenHarris.JPG
Trans men and abortion
AidenAbortion.JPG
 

Attachments

  • AidenWarrenHarris.JPG
    AidenWarrenHarris.JPG
    59.7 KB · Views: 42
They openly say there should be an ethical/legal/political double-standard depending on identity. "Rules for thee but not for me" isn't even a sneaky implication - it's part of their fundamental worldview.

I think too many people on the right are obsessed with owning leftists with claims of hypocrisy but "hypocrite" is only a damning label to those who believe in some kind of universal morality in the first place.
Odds are good that *their* hyperemotional rhetoric made this seem like a good idea to the shooter. We don’t know that but I wouldn’t be surprised. It’s how this game usually goes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Essay2414778
They openly say there should be an ethical/legal/political double-standard depending on identity. "Rules for thee but not for me" isn't even a sneaky implication - it's part of their fundamental worldview.

I think too many people on the right are obsessed with owning leftists with claims of hypocrisy but "hypocrite" is only a damning label to those who believe in some kind of universal morality in the first place.

It's postmodernist theory. There is no discussion, there's no common framework, theres no talking it out, there is only power. Arguments are only as useful as far as they get their own power bloc. Once that fails, then the name calling and threats begin, then failing that, "direct action".
 
I think I'm like most normies in wondering why does it matter whether the shooter is trans or not? They'll be eternally tormented for the heinous crime they did and robbing innocent lives. Unless them being trans is a motive for their actions (which, I have some doubts as of now, but will happy to eat crow if proven otherwise), the shooting is just turning into another bullshit culture warzone.
I agree totally. I just hate the double-standards.

People with large platforms often use shooters/victims as political pawns, based on over-simplified reasoning. They start with the conclusion and whether they care about a shooting or not depends on whether the identity of the shooter is useful to their argument. If not, they just ignore it and move on.

Even if them being trans was a factor - which I suspect it probably was - it's hardly like there's an epidemic of nutty troons going on mass shootings, but the data/reality doesn't matter to a lot of people. They just want to push their agenda.
 
Back