Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 53 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 130 38.0%

  • Total voters
    342
Drinking, Kayla freely drinks with him and supplies him with booze.

Drugs, Nick is on drugs when he's out partying with Kayla.

Porn, Kayla is actively feeding Nick pictures of other women and participating in lewdposting.

Degeneracy, as they both don't recognize their non-monogamous proclivities as such, and are (at best) overly comfortable with including others in the sexual aspects of their marriage. This includes exhibitionist activities of a sexual nature, since the purpose is to include the public in what is private therefore making it naughty and fun (that's the whole appeal).
Seems to me like they are each other's enabler in at least some of those.
 
230 applies to nearly anything. It even once applied to an email sent by one person that just pasted an allegedly defamatory email sent by someone else. Running a forum or a chat is way more clear-cut than that. His choice to moderate or not moderate makes no difference.

Here's a case from just last year about someone suing over a chat:
And one from just a couple weeks ago about someone forwarding another person's email and accusing them of "blackface."

The protections are ridiculously broad and cover essentially all media where someone exercises a moderation function or even forwards other people's content.
It's hard to say for sure because the posts were unclear and lacking context, seemingly targeted for consumption by Locals rather than KF members, but as far as I can tell,the allegations relate to a Discord server other than the official Rekieta Law Discord. No idea if Nick was running it or had moderation powers. My assumption was it was some private server the Locals clique made to hold discussions away from prying eyes.

Thus, I'm not exactly sure where 230 protections would apply to an ordinary member of a chat room who sits in the chat without saying anything. I also am not exactly sure where a cause of action would arise such that said member would need protection from it. This does seem a lot like the Faith Vickers journal situation where you have guy in a Discord chat who does something sketchy -> ??? -> CONSPIRACY, CROSSES STATE LINES, etc.

But I wonder at what point does Nick go so far off the deep end, that people start distancing themselves from him? I guess the orbiters don't go big at him until they can outgrow him, and at that point, you don't punch down- you just ignore the small/old fish, no point in going after the has-been.
If it hasn't happened yet, it probably won't happen unless Nick does something stupid like lash out at another content creator.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
There isn't really any kind of case there at all. To sue Nick, there would have to be more than just "he knows" involved. The more normal path for something like this would be to sue the actual person or persons who defamed and then through depositions get enough information - if it exists - to sue Nick.
One route I guess would be a civil conspiracy to defame. It would have to be shown that Nick directly encouraged, organized or participated in a plan to defame. He has Section 230 protections over material published in the forum. So the mere act of something being in the forum can't be used against him. Proving an actual conspiracy would obviously be very difficult.
It's a LOLsuit. Why would there be any rational legal grounds?
 
No idea if Nick was running it or had moderation powers. My assumption was it was some private server the Locals clique made to hold discussions away from prying eyes.
Then there's just no way you could sue him at all, and you couldn't have even before 230. Unless there was some conspiracy where he was secretly directing people to attack her it's pure retardation even to think you could sue him. And you couldn't sue him for Locals because of 230, even if you could have beforehand.
 
I've watched quite a bit of Joe over the years. I find him a bit whiny at times, but his IRL community around him for sure has kept him in line, for which he is even thankful for. I assume his loyalty to what Nick has done for him, keeps him on stream with awkward shit like happened a few nights ago.

But I wonder at what point does Nick go so far off the deep end, that people start distancing themselves from him? I guess the orbiters don't go big at him until they can outgrow him, and at that point, you don't punch down- you just ignore the small/old fish, no point in going after the has-been.

Most of the lawtubers who have decent-sized channels have already distanced themselves from Nick, though. He used to have streams with people who have real law degrees and 100k+ subscribers, and now his hangers-on are much less successful, and are just trying to grab at what remains of his viewer base.
See Emily D. Baker and Viva for those who have outgrown him.

Even Eric Hunley has not invited him on in an age. What about Uncivil Law? Where are the law people at?

When will Barnes show up on stream? Ron Coleman?
My assumption was it was some private server the Locals clique made to hold discussions away from prying eyes.
This is correct. They have a secret hug-box DISCORD while Nick ignores his old one. It is pretty hilarious.
 
See Emily D. Baker and Viva for those who have outgrown him.

Even Eric Hunley has not invited him on in an age. What about Uncivil Law? Where are the law people at?

When will Barnes show up on stream? Ron Coleman?

I don't disagree that creators like Viva and Emily Baker have distanced themselves from Nick, but it's also harder to know for sure since Nick has abandoned trial/daystreams.

A lot of his more normie guests only ever appeared on his Rittenhouse and less so Depp daystreams.

Given Nick's regular show is now solely 11pm CST Mon-Fri with no weekend streams, this is going to rule out most lawyers who actually practice law, guests with wives and kids, anyone who isn't solely a streamer themselves, etc.

Even loyalists like Branca traditionally were limited to daystreams. The whole "No Tie Branca" meme was all about how difficult it was for Branca at the time to make Nick's night show even for a rich, self-employed, WFH contractor with a wife and child.

Nick specifically did a Saturday night stream BITD just to get a drinking Branca on in the timeline before "No Tie Branca" started appearing regularly on late night Drex and Nick streams to sperg out on Faran and her sister, Dick Masterson, Chrissie Mayr, etc.
 
See Emily D. Baker and Viva for those who have outgrown him.

Even Eric Hunley has not invited him on in an age. What about Uncivil Law? Where are the law people at?

When will Barnes show up on stream? Ron Coleman?
I don't even remember how much Emily crossed over with Nick. Maybe she dropped in a few times on Rittenhouse? Viva for sure has not been on in a while, because he's a family man on the east coast and doesn't keep insane hours. (And was a practicing litigator before the move, although that was winding down.) Barnes did mention Nick's GSG on last Sunday's stream with Viva, but it was pretty briefly mentioned.

Eric and his streaming cohort Mark Groubert were both at Viva and Barnes' Vegas meetup, the one that VivaBarnes postponed (so that it would not be a shit show with Nick's). Rackets was scattershot about making Eric's Friday show, with Nick somehow not understanding time zones.

Ron showed up to the Rekieta Vegas live show, but opined on twitter, wtf he was doing there. To be fair, Ron was not a regular, only occasionally showing up on live court streams and maybe 2 or 3 late night shows?

It will be interesting to track how the seats continue to shift around Nick. Andrew "Legal Mindset" still has Drexel on regularly (monthly?), despite Drex's move off of streaming. Heck, he probably has Drex on more often than Nick does.
 
This is correct. They have a secret hug-box DISCORD while Nick ignores his old one. It is pretty hilarious.
Any more details you have at this time beyond the fact that it exists?

I don't disagree that creators like Viva and Emily Baker have distanced themselves from Nick, but it's also harder to know for sure since Nick has abandoned trial/daystreams.

A lot of his more normie guests only ever appeared on his Rittenhouse and less so Depp daystreams.
It will be interesting to track how the seats continue to shift around Nick. Andrew "Legal Mindset" still has Drexel on regularly (monthly?), despite Drex's move off of streaming. Heck, he probably has Drex on more often than Nick does.
It does seem very much to me like the bigger name creators aren't showing up on Nick's channel anymore.

The reality is Nick is now in a worst-of-both-worlds situation where he expresses political and social views that people like Emily Baker (whose content is largely apolitical as far as I can tell) will not want to be too tightly linked to, but demonstrates libertinism in his personal life that people like Viva won't want to be linked to either.
 
The reality is Nick is now in a worst-of-both-worlds situation where he expresses political and social views that people like Emily Baker (whose content is largely apolitical as far as I can tell) will not want to be too tightly linked to, but demonstrates libertinism in his personal life that people like Viva won't want to be linked to either.
And utter hypocrisy and poseur bullshit that has lost him the respect of his previous audience.
 
kjoym​
Doxx the doxxers!!!!
I would genuinely like to see how far these retards get. I don't imagine many twitter handles and FB names match Himedall ALL-seeing Waifu.
lmao somebody is using 2lolis1cup for a handle.

Seems to me like they are each other's enabler in at least some of those.
This is unfortunately the most likely and boring scenario. They can reinforce each other's confirmation biases. "you can drink babe" "you don't need those judgemental relatives" "I will be us"
628735_i4lv2u7e1dkrxi7.jpeg
 
Drinking, Kayla freely drinks with him and supplies him with booze.

Drugs, Nick is on drugs when he's out partying with Kayla.

Porn, Kayla is actively feeding Nick pictures of other women and participating in lewdposting.

Degeneracy, as they both don't recognize their non-monogamous proclivities as such, and are (at best) overly comfortable with including others in the sexual aspects of their marriage. This includes exhibitionist activities of a sexual nature, since the purpose is to include the public in what is private therefore making it naughty and fun (that's the whole appeal).

All of this is speculation as well, but it's speculation that's grounded in experience.
If I had to level a guess, my guess would be that alcohol is Nick's primary drug of choice. He'd be more than happy to just get blotto in front of his computer screen every night. I strongly suspect that the excursions into MDMA, shrooms and what have you are driven by Kayla, rather than Nick. It's my guess that she has experience of recreational drug use prior to her marriage -- but I don't believe this is true of Nick. A young man who has never had sex isn't going to be going out snorting coke, dropping molly and smoking weed. It just doesn't ring true.

But Kayla had been in a long term relationship. Of course her previous boyfriend was banging her, and it's highly likely that he was getting high as well. Now that her child bearing years are all done and she doesn't have to worry about giving birth to a brain damaged kid, why wouldn't she reminisce fondly about the days when her and Chad used to drop a tab and go out raving? I imagine they'd have been at college just at the time when the whole rave scene and associated drug use thing was just getting big in the USA?

I think Nick is definitely looking to Kayla for guidance and leadership in the sexual realm as well. Anyone who drinks as much as Nick does isn't likely to be that sexually adventurous. He's going to be lucky if he can get it up -- performance is likely to be limited to a perfunctory roll on/roll off mish posish. But Kayla will be at the peak of her sexual urges. The woman's got needs and they'll need fulfilling. Whether that's getting serviced by our bull Drex, some kind of sexual exhibitionism down at the local gay bar, swinging at Hedonism II or all of the above, we can only really speculate, but remember what Faran Balanced said: it's Kayla who wants to do the swinging. Not Nick.
I believed her then, I believe her now.

Kayla is ripe for a predatory man to come along and pluck her out of domestic tedium and into a passionate affair. I've seen no evidence that it's happened so far, but I think Nick is worried about it, and I think he's correct to be worried. Sadly, he lacks the moral and spiritual authority to correct her.
 
I would genuinely like to see how far these retards get. I don't imagine many twitter handles and FB names match Himedall ALL-seeing Waifu.
lmao somebody is using 2lolis1cup for a handle.


This is unfortunately the most likely and boring scenario. They can reinforce each other's confirmation biases. "you can drink babe" "you don't need those judgemental relatives" "I will be us"
View attachment 4920138
Damn! I didn't even realized the red welts/bruises were letters until now.
Are we sure the lady is LR? Seems a little tall to be her no? Just kidding, I'm still shaking my head from the red parts.
 
I think Nick is definitely looking to Kayla for guidance and leadership in the sexual realm as well.
Worst mistake a man can make. A man must lead in all aspects at all times or women lose respect for you.

performance is likely to be limited to a perfunctory roll on/roll off mish posish.
Hence the need for the balldo. Probably the first time he has been able to penetrate his wife since his last kid. Limp dick loser.

Kayla is ripe for a predatory man to come along and pluck her out of domestic tedium and into a passionate affair. I've seen no evidence that it's happened so far, but I think Nick is worried about it, and I think he's correct to be worried. Sadly, he lacks the moral and spiritual authority to correct her.
God I hope so. This cow hasn't been very interesting lately. Losing his wife will really send him off the deep end.
 
Last edited:
Nick and Kayla think the problem is
The problem is probably something really gay and its all in Kayla's head.
Example:
"I just feel like the spark is gone like I just don't enjoy our relationship like I use to. You aren't spontaneous enough. I mean things are good, it just feels like the magic is gone."

I know that probably doesn't explain everything but I went through that excuse in a relationship. It basically translates to "I'm done with the relationship but I want to try a few things to see if it will fill the vacuous space I call a soul temporarily while I decide whether to end the relationship".
 
Last edited:
Then there's just no way you could sue him at all, and you couldn't have even before 230. Unless there was some conspiracy where he was secretly directing people to attack her it's pure retardation even to think you could sue him. And you couldn't sue him for Locals because of 230, even if you could have beforehand.
But do you really think any of the old woman's shrill claims are true? I think it was just defensive lying Rekieta style to try and justify or excuse her constant gonnadoxing.
 
Kayla is ripe for a predatory man to come along and pluck her out of domestic tedium and into a passionate affair. I've seen no evidence that it's happened so far, but I think Nick is worried about it, and I think he's correct to be worried. Sadly, he lacks the moral and spiritual authority to correct her.
To be fair to Nick, I'm not sure in his current state he would be able to stop her from an affair even if he wanted to. He can't beat her like they say on MEMRI because he'd be fucked on DV charges, he can't leave her because his wife would probably claim he was at fault (Alcoholic) then take a shit ton of his stuff because lol 5 kids, he can't admonish her because she can just point to him thirsting over locals posting. What can he do? I guess get off the balldo and drugs but that's not something that would stop her from doing so if she really desired to cheat.
I don't even remember how much Emily crossed over with Nick. Maybe she dropped in a few times on Rittenhouse?
She was in for Rittenhouse as well as the Sophie Long thing (Withoutacrystalball or something?). Kinda like Legal Bytes in that she was very uncomfortable and silent (out of place) in Rittenhouse with majority going "FUCK YOU ANTIFA AND FUCK FUCK YOU BINGER! Rosenbaum a pedo and Kyle did the world a favor!"

Edit:
The problem is problem something really gay and its all in Kayla's head.
Example:
"I just feel like the spark is gone like I just don't enjoy our relationship like I use to. You aren't spontaneous enough. I mean things are good, it just feels like the magic is gone."
That's not a Kayla issue, that is a "get the government out of marriage and welfare (a fantasy barring total societal collapse and revolution)" and "fix the court system to stop screwing over men (a pipe dream)" issue.
 
She definitely doesn't have a problem with his drug use. She was taking MDMA at Anime Matsuri with Cecil. Coke too.
yeah the white knighting for his bug eyed trailer trash slut wife is hilarious. She's high rent high maintenance total whore territory. Overly strict family turns slut into nightmare fuel. A story as old as inbred communities of mixed blood semites.
 
Back