- Joined
- Jul 23, 2021
Several organizations whose members openly advocate adult sex with children have been active in the United States and Europe at least since the 1960s. The goals of these groups often are couched in legal and psycho-sexual arguments about 'age of consent' laws and prevailing social attitudes, but at the heart of each group examined by the Subcommittee was a basic obsession with justifying 'consensual' sex with children, regardless of age. In some cases, the groups' leaders were convicted child sex offenders. The groups range from anarchistic, underground clubs whose newsletters and philosophies are haphazard at best to well-organized, politically astute groups that march in parades and openly distribute literature.
- US Senate report on Child Pornography and Paedophilia, 1986
- US Senate report on Child Pornography and Paedophilia, 1986
Prostasia Foundation
18 Bartol Street, #995
San Francisco, CA 94133
Type of Charity:
501(c)(3) nonprofit public benefit corporation
EIN:
82-4969920
Phone: +1 415 650 2557
Twitter / archive
Tiktok / archive
Website / archive
Facebook / archive
Instagram /archive (I believe insta disables archival somehow)
LinkedIn / archive
18 Bartol Street, #995
San Francisco, CA 94133
Type of Charity:
501(c)(3) nonprofit public benefit corporation
EIN:
82-4969920
Phone: +1 415 650 2557
Twitter / archive
Tiktok / archive
Website / archive
Facebook / archive
Instagram /
LinkedIn / archive
Allow me to introduce you to the tax-exempt Paedophilia Advocacy group (posing as a child protection charity) Prostasia, which, among things, seeks for the dismantling of the US Sex Offender Registry; they publish writers who have argued for the decriminalisation of child pornography; have had members of their board who argue for and directly profit from the legalisation of child sex dolls; they have had at least two convicted sex offenders working for them; their general manager is an unrepentant paedophile who hoards CP; their founder has ties to UN Bodies, but the group also throw tantrums when the UN tried to argue against the legality of loli hentai.
They have an open forum, where pedos freely converse and mingle, including known lolcows documented on this very site. They are also one of the most shrill and self-righteous groups of insane people I have ever come across in my life. While on the surface they make all attempts to come across as a group fighting for the rights of children – as we will soon see, the only right it seems they truly care about, is children’s right to get raped by grown adults.
I apologise in advance for the length of this OP, there is a lot to cover, and no doubt I’ll have missed a lot, but I tried to make this as comprehensive as possible, while still maintaining some form of narrative. Get comfy, and maybe pour yourself a hard drink. It’s gonna get gross.
Part One: From the Ashes of Sodom and Gomorrah, or, I Fucking Hate The 1970s
Attacks on NAMbLA stink of politics, witchhunting for profit, humorlessness, vanity, anger and ignorance. I'm a member of NAMbLA because I love boys too - everybody does, who has a little humanity
- Allen Ginsberg
Let’s rewind a few decades, and contextualise Prostasia by tracing their intellectual origins, and the group that paved the way for us getting to this point. Like a Brazilian Jiujitsu fighter can trace the linage of their belt to Hélio Gracie, so too can Prostasia trace theirs to NAMbLA, the North American Man/Boy Love Association – lowercase ‘b’ for little boys. NAMbLA represented the first in several ongoing attempts at the most insidious social subversion in human memory; an attempt at paedophilia normalisation. It was the most visible and ‘important’ such group in the world, but by the late 1980s, the Boylovers eventually went the way of the KKK – generalised irrelevance among their core demographic, populated now primarily by spooks from various alphabet agencies looking to score their next entrapment. By ’95 they had less than 1,100 members, and today only a handful; a far cry from their eminence in the 70s. The 1970s, by the way were a hellish fucking time, where for a period of years, child porn was legal in America; videos featuring kids as young as toddlers were shown in X Rated cinemas, and there were as many as 400 magazines in circulation just dealing with CP (source).- Allen Ginsberg
Anyway, they’re yesterday’s news, a product of a sick and evil age. but it’s important to mention them because they – alongside with some others, like the one-man schizo gayops that was the René Guyon Society – paved the way for the monsters we find today: they were the first group in America (Europeans have their own sordid history with this shit) to put forward the idea for “paedophile rights”, and an attempt to attach their movement to the then nascent Gay Rights movement. While NAMbLA is dead and irrelevant, its consequences live on.
David Thorstad, founder of NAMbLA – he looks exactly like what you’d expect the father of paedophilia intellectualism to look like
Fun fact they have comics on the NAMbLA website (archive) written by a jailed paedophile. It is vomit inducing, but SFW:
These are apparently from a 166 page long book called StarGazing which is included with a $75 donation to NAMbLA - make sure to use your own debit card, so that your bank details are permanently linked with a paedophile group. You may get tax benefits! Here’s hoping the artist gets greeted by a friendly prison hello, right betwixt his ribs. At the very least, someone please take away this motherfucker’s crayons?
It has taken some time for the next group of brave and bold child fuckers to hold down the title, but a new champion of kiddie diddling advocacy has emerged: one built for the internet age. Enter: Prostasia, the new-age NAMbLA.
Even though threads on Virtuous Paedophiles and MAPs (“Minor Attracted Persons”) have already been written, I feel like this group specifically needs their own thread.
MAPs and VirPeds are decentralised – they are pedos who largely operate independently, having just chosen the same categorisational name for themselves. They may repeat similar talking points, and exhibit the same sexual dysfunctions as one another, but they are just individuals with no clout of their own. Roving bands of paedophiles prowl the apps, looking for unattended minors. This is all street level shit.
Prostasia is paedophilia at an organizational level: they are paedophile lobbyists. They have infiltrated academia like a tumour. These are paedophiles with clout. Whereas NAMbLA was unabashedly a group that fought for the rights of old men to fuck little boys, Prostasia is far smarter with their message: a casual observer would very easily be fooled into thinking they are a good faith organisation trying to do something for the rights of children: though their website doesn’t quite explain what rights those happen to be. For example, the Blocked & Reported podcast, which I think is kind popular on the farms, has an episode about Noah Berlatsky, the communications director of Prostasia; the organisation’s front has them totally tricked.
This has led to them cultivating an aura of legitimacy, and allowing them to spread their message of kiddie diddling far and wide.
Stills taken from their website (archive link) – pure jargon that does not actually elaborate on the specifics of their mission statement at all. Truly meaningless stuff!
Beneath the appearance of a legitimate organisation that seeks to help children in some nonspecific way, Prostasia is no different to NAMbLA; a selfish group of sick perverts that fight only for the right of adults to rape children; do kids ever want to be raped? Well, who gives a shit – at the end of the day, “MAPs” view children as little more than sex objects. And they’re gonna use all the fancy language tricks as they can to avoid saying that quiet part out loud. Here’s the closest they ever come a mission statement:
One of the least problematic social groups at whom secondary measures can be targeted — because they are not a protected class, and already face significant social stigma — are those who are sexually attracted to minors, such as pedophiles. Targeting pedophiles is by no means a perfect way to reach potential offenders, because a large majority of all sexual offending against children is committed by those who aren’t pedophiles.
[...]
if the right of a child to not be sexually abused is worth anything at all, it has to outweigh our disgust at having to work with pedophiles to help them avoid offending [...] How can they be helped to do so? Does peer support play a role? How about the availability of legal outlets for their sexual fantasies? These are questions that science can answer, which will have important implications for child protection law and practice.
Source / Archive
Okay with all the prologue out the way, let’s get on with it.
Part Two: Bad Touch
I wish to be the little girl
- moot
- moot
Let’s start at the beginning of this sordid affair, jumping forward now a couple decades from the sodomite 70s where we left NAMbLA. The Prostasia foundation was started in 2018 by a Freedom of Expression Attourney named Jeremy Malcom of Oakland, California (dox below).
A quick look on Google maps for the address the foundation lists on their website shows us this:
(They don’t have a physical address, this is their mailing address, but I found it too funny to not include- and I knew someone would mention it)
Among Jeremy's work experience, of note is the fact that, according to Engadget (a): “Malcolm is a member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group of the United Nations Internet Governance Forum, and was EFF's Senior Global Policy Analyst.” Interesting!
Yet, for all his CV was worth, our dear Jezza had zero experience in the field of child protection whatsoever, so it is a bit of a strange jump in career paths for a Lawyer to suddenly decide to have an overwhelming interest in starting a ‘child protection’ charity. He explains the rationale himself in this blogpost (a). Through the buzzwords and jargon, I eventually managed to discern that his main problem was that child advocacy groups aren’t kinky enough, and he wished to lobby in favour of porn consumers. If you don’t believe me, feel free to read it for yourself and you try to hazard a guess at what this dork is talking about. Also in his blogpost, he highlights the three things Prostasia stands for:
- We don’t wanna punish Pedos
- We’d rather listen to and work with Pedos (we’re a child protection agency btw)
- You can pry my Child Sex Dolls and Lolicon Hentai out of my cold, dead hands you bigot
But before anything else, if there is any doubt about Prostasia serving to normalise paedophilia, let me clear up those doubts for you right now.
Firstly, here is an article underlining their insistence on referring to pedos as ‘MAPs’, and in doing so they manage to make it seem like pedos are some inalienable subsection of the LGBT:
And here’s an article about being the girlfriend of a paedophile: read this and tell me this is not the very fucking definition of attempted normalisation:
Now let’s look at Jeremy, who founded the platform these articles are published on.
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
Quick question to the parents reading this: would you let this guy hang out with your kids?
Now, despite him saying over and over again that his foundation is for the protection of children, he nonetheless has some quirky views on who may volunteer to help protect kids:
You read that right. Here’s the founder of a self-described “Child Protection” organisation saying openly that paedophiles are free to volunteer, on a ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’ kinda basis. He also goes so far as to equate being a child fucker with “sexuality”, as if being a paedophile is the same to being gay, lesbian or bisexual. This is the kind of shit homophobic people say as a slur, and here’s the slimy cunt trying to say the same thing under the guise of inclusivity. He really doesn’t like it when actual gay people point this out though! (a)
Another fun fact about him, is that he may be a “little”, which means he likes to roleplay as a child when he has sex. Now isn’t that an interesting sexual perversion for one running a ‘child protection’ organisation? This may have been in his twitter bio, but he’s taken it out now, but here’s a screencap of a conversation about it:
Despite being a career professional, a man in charge of running an organisation that is meant to help victims of Child Sex Abuse is unaware of the fact that there exists such a concept of separating your personal and professional lives – he’s even offended you’d suggest such a thing. If I spent time at the watercooler chatting about how I like to pretend to be a little girl when I get pegged, HR would be on me quicker than a “MAP” on a minor; so why a “child protection professional” (or whatever he bills himself as) thinks this is alright is far fucking beyond me.
Some interesting accounts he follows – hey didn’t 8chan used to have a hebephilia board? He also follows many OF models, but at this point I feel like that goes without saying: oh and here’s an archive link of one of 8chan’s jannys showing his niece a hentai game, and in the same thread anons shill the Prostasia Foundation as providing legal help for pedos. Interesting.
But as you see: for Jeremy, his perversion is his profession, and Prostasia’s greatest hits in terms of clickcount are articles they’ve published defending the idea of ageplay. Now, far be it from me to be a prude about others’ tastes – me, I like brunettes. Shocking, I know. – but the idea of a ‘child protection’ organisation publishing multiple articles on the eroticisation of childhood, and fantasies about a child’s father raping them.. that ain’t right.
Advice on how to avoid law enforcement from catching you sexting to kids: (a) I will make no further comment. You can make inferences yourself as to why this kind of advice from a child protection charity is sus.
Fun fact: in the version of this article now available on their website, they changed the author’s name from Meagan Ingerman to “Ruth Allison”. Seems she’s tried to change her name. huh I wonder why. Good thing the internet never forgets.
Now isn’t that nice? So who is Meagan?
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
In addition to being an adult baby, Meagan spends some of her time running workshops wherein she discusses the ethics of fucking someone 2 decades younger than you in front of your own kids:
Here’s a hypothetical question Meagan posed to her audience at her 2019 webinar titled “Safewords and red lines: consensual kink and child protection”.
Rumour has it that she and Jeremy were boyfriend and girlfriend, at least at one time, though I can’t find solid proof of this. However, she did write an article about her fetish for older men (a) (containing the staggeringly paedophilic line: “I don’t believe it’s right to stigmatize teens who pursue sex or relationships with older people of any age”), and Jeremy is like a decade and a half older than her, with the article mentioning she had/has partners in the age range that Jeremy is in; this birthday photoshoot taken by Jeremy also kinda makes it seem like they’re very close:
Fat, would not sex, etc etc
So assuming they are dating, or at least were, that does put the previous paragraphs about Jeremy and her sexual proclivities into a new light. Makes you wonder who it was that was fucking her while she was pretending to be a raped child. All fantasy of course. Normal stuff for the people running a children protection charity to be into. If anyone has solid proof they can post about these two being in a relationship, that’d be much obliged. I’m sure there’s something obvious I missed
But for the sake of fairness, I have no way of knowing if it was Jeremy, and I am not saying it’s him. Merely hypothesizing. After all, she is polyamorous, and has multiple partners:
it could be any one of her multiple boyfriends that do the noncon roleplay with her. So, if you’re a femcel unable to get yourself a man, just remember: someone who looks like this has multiple. So, what are you doing wrong?
Much like all radlibs who post too much on twitter, Jeremy an his crew are wildly inconsistent in their views, willing to bend all moral standpoints so long as they benefit them. Prostasia try and smokescreen their ghoulish mission under the garb of leftwing identarian politics, as if paedophiles are one more minority voice that ought to be heard. Whenever anyone calls them out on this, they react with horror, and claim that only the alt-right and nazis would dare oppose their message. So I’d like to get this out of the way right now: I, the OP of this thread, am left wing and I can’t stand you pedo cunts. Hating paedophiles is a bipartisan issue. A leftoid doxed you and your coworkers.
Jeremy cares deeply about optics, and is willing to try and weaponise them. Case in point is how he calls Ayden Férdeline a transphobe (Aydenis the owner and author of a website I get much of my info from, prostasia.info (a): a great resource which details numerous shady things the organisation does, and who naturally Jeremy hates and has threatened to sue):
This is despite him hiring paedophile apologist James Cantor on the advisory council for Prostasia; Cantor loves paedophiles, but amusingly enough, he doesn’t like troons – which is something even the pedos on the prostasia forum are angry about (a). Rules for thee but not for me, eh Jeremy? I’m nitpicking, but I felt like it. Sorry lol.
Cantor is his own fucking bag of worms who we will delve into further later in the thread. And, while Jeremy and Fatty here are both gross, at the end of the day they’re guilty of being creeps and – in Jeremy’s case – having absolutely ghastly hiring protocol, but as far as members of Prostasia go, these two are almost tame.
Before we look at some of Prostasia’s unironically criminal members, let’s zoom out our focus to the foundation as a whole, and analyse their business practices. Because they do more than just publish articles.
Part Three: Diddling is my Business (And Business is Good!)
In the age of the Internet, child pornography is a booming business
-David Mcgowan, 2004
So, in 2018, the very same year they were founded, Prostasia received an exemption from paying taxes by our good friends at the IRS:-David Mcgowan, 2004
It is at this point that I would like to tender an apology for having told a mistruth. You see, I’ve been calling them a ‘child protection charity’, which is what they would like me to call them. But, in fact, they are not a registered child protection charity: as they admit in a blogpost (a), saying “the government refused to list Prostasia Foundation on its Child Welfare Information Gateway, and […] the NCMEC (which the US Court of Appeals has ruled is also a government actor) had [Prostasia] ejected from a meeting of the INHOPE network of child protection hotlines.”
So if they’re not a child protection charity, what are they? Well, whatever kind of charity they are, turns out they’re not a great at it.
Prostasia still takes donations, as you can see very easily by a quick glance at their website.
This is in contravention to California law, but when you consider that their entire goal is contrary to the laws of decency, I guess they figured they get a free pass from these more minor crimes. Another cool way they make money, other than illegal donations, is by issuing certificates “for websites, publishers, service providers, vendors, and event organizers, to certify that they are allies in the fight against child sexual abuse, and that they have taken reasonable steps to avoid harming children.” (source). Who buys these “No Child Harmed” seals of approval?
Ibid
Cool. So they’re profiting off of lolicon art. Makes sense that they try so hard to argue it should be legal. That link is them trying to debate a proposed UN ban on loli hentai.
Another example of their crusade for coomer rights (archive). I believe this image was commissioned specifically by them
Speaking of them profiting off of weird shit, let’s move on to the sexdolls. The hilariously named ‘Curbing Realistic Exploitative Electronic Pedophilic Robots’ (“CREEPER”) Bill in America seeks to “prohibit the importation or transportation of child sex dolls.” The punishment would be a fine and imprisonment of up to 5 years for first offence, and up to ten years for a repeated offence. The bill has not yet been passed, and hasn’t been voted on. However, both democrat and republicans are cosponsoring the bill, and no one in congress voiced disagreement, so maybe in the future it will work its way into statute.
Naturally, this made our good friends at The Foundation furious. Prostasia are vehement supporters of the idea that child sex dolls ought to be legal. They published an article arguing for the legality of child sex dolls (archive), and even published a letter to congress (a / a) begging them not to ban them, and maintain a list (archive) of every law in place in America (and a few other countries) banning child sex dolls.
Here’s ‘Larry’ posting on the forum about how Prostasia helped him get his kiddie sex toy from the tyrannical clutches of US Customs. I’d recommend keeping this fella in mind. We’ll get back to him! But his message is rather telling, as he reveals that Prostasia’s involvement in the child sex doll business is perhaps a bit more involved than they let on.
That said, let me introduce you to my absolute favourite character in the Prostasia-verse. Or better yet, let them introduce you to him:
Firstly, from an optics point of view, if you’re a group that’s constantly being accused of harbouring paedophiles, I’d probably refrain from posting pictures of a guy like this working for you. Despite what uggos say, morals do have an aesthetic component, and this guy don’t look like no do-gooder, if you catch my drift.
Don Delano is.. where do I begin with this fucking guy. He’s a renaissance man. If anyone from this whole sordid affair deserves a thread of their own, based purely on lulz factor, it’s this guy. But before I get into all that, let me explain why I’m writing about this guy in the section dedicated to Prostasia’s business practices.
Don’s twitter (a) is pretty sparce other than the interesting fact he follows Alan Dershowitz (a known associate of Epstein), but his bio tells us all:
This doll is 4 foot 9 inches tall, and costs nearly $2,800. For that price, you could get a pair of water buffalo, maybe three if you get a great deal or a shitty buffalo- just thought that was an interesting comparision. This is not the only child sex doll that Don sells, if “Corra” doesn’t do it for you, how about “Lily”?
Now, I’m not gonna go looking for anymore on his website, I’m probably on a watchlist now as is, but Lily and Corra are just the tip of the silicone iceberg. There are dolls resembling kids as young as 8, but I don’t know if Don sells those. I would however just like you to keep that little tidbit in mind.
Here’s a news article (a) which quotes Don (alongside our friend Jez) regarding his sale of, and stance on child sex dolls:
Surely campaigning to the US government to prevent child sex dolls from being banned, while your Development Officer’s day job is selling child sex dolls is just a pure coincidence.
I’m fucking fascinated by Don, so let’s get sidetracked a bit and look into this weird fucker:
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
You want to know what the fuck is going on with those pictures, right? I entered the rabbit hole of Don’s thespianism after finding his Dollsforum post (linked above) where he reveals his link to Prostasia, and in the same breath mentions some of his upcoming artistic endevours:
He also spends several paragraphs going on about how they shouldn’t be called ‘sex dolls’ but rather “Intimate Partner Alternative” and “Action Figure Model”. It’s deeply autistic shit and I recommend you read it all:
god, this picture goes so fucking hard it is insane
While I cannot find any videos of ‘Rock my Doll MTV’, I did find House of Dolls Midnight Horror Show (a) which was a weird variety show where Don, dressed like fucking Beetlejuice, alongside his computer-voiced “action figure” companion Charlotte, ramble about various topics like ghosts and vampires before playing various local short films from Florida.
Don’s segments are badly made, they have awkward cuts and zooms; it’s a ghoulish 50 year old talking to his sex doll while he’s dressed like a skeletal pimp and sitting on a throne. It is really fucking weird. I’ve got to admit, after watching one episode I nearly grew fond of Don. I almost forgot he sells child sex dolls. Almost.
Alas, all good things must end. Turns out not even Prostasia wants to work with him; by 2021 he was no longer working with them, and they have since deleted almost all mentions of ever having worked with him. No official statement was made. Makes you wonder what he might’ve done that led even them being gorssed out by him. I have no idea what the reason was, but maybe what we imagine isn’t far from the truth. Who fucking knows.
Child Sex Dolls and Loli Hentai are both legal though, and there’s definitely going to be people who don’t give a fuck about any of that, because it is not a crime. Alas, Prostasia’s members are far from model citizens. The legality stops here. Let’s talk about the paedophile rapists, and rape apologists who work for Prostasia.
Part Four: Nonce After Nonce
Mask on. Fuck it: mask off
- Nayvadius “Future” Cash, contemporary warrior-poet
One of the best judges of character is the quality of one’s peers. But at the same time, you can’t just assume someone’s guilt by association. If your friend turns out to be a pedo, that doesn’t mean you’re one.- Nayvadius “Future” Cash, contemporary warrior-poet
But what if you run a paedophilia advocacy group, and like fucking 3 or 4 or your employees in the past have turned out to unironically be pedos and on the sex offender registry. That’s a bit different, you’d agree? Couple steps up from ‘guilt by association’ to more, ‘guilt by being guilty’.
Though Prostasia really tries to deny it, there is lots of evidence that members of their directorial board and some of their writers are full on paedophiles.
Let’s begin on the softer end, with someone that might not fuck kids, but just wants to make child porn legal. Y’know. Regular stuff.
Years ago, Cathy writes a now baleeted blogpost where she asks some interesting questions: here’s the archive link.
Here’s Cathy Reisenwitz, who would go on to write for a Paedophilia Advocacy group, saying child porn possession should not be illegal. As far as I can tell, she is still associated with prostasia, too. They still proudly list her on their website.
Cathy makes a retarded argument that owning something does not violate anyone else’s rights, while forgetting that possession of CSAM is documented proof of the rape of a child. In the creation of child porn it is the inalienable fact that a child was raped to produce it. By possessing and disseminating CP, you deny that child the right to move on, to be forgotten, to try and live past the destruction of their innocence. You masturbate to the rape of a child. You can’t even argue that Cathy was young and naïve when she wrote it: she was 24 or 25. Older than me. Old enough to know better.
She would go on to write for a group that claims to protect children, who vehemently deny that they want to legalise CSAM, despite publishing an author who argues for that. Isn’t that interesting?
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
Now from one of their authors arguing that possessing CP is okay, lets go to one of their authors arguing for the end to the sex offender registry, and his rather involved reasons for wanting this.
In this article (a), the author Guy Hamilton Smith argues that you shouldn’t issue blanket bans online against people. While doing so, he somehow manages to find time to moan about the sex offender registry:
Now, his dox is already up there in that sex offender registration image, but for posterity, here it is:
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
Here’s him explaining how he was arrested:
The coomer to pedo pipeline is real, fellas. Dworkin was right about pornography.
I find it quite interesting how Guy blames pornography addiction for him becoming a paedophile, yet Prostasia’s whole platform is built upon insistence that pornography depicting children, and sex dolls depicting children have zero negative impacts on their consumers. It’s almost as if all the ‘research’ they claim to do is a bunch of bullshit.
Guy was already in the headlines in Kentucky, for wanting to enrol in the bar while being a pedo, so there’s a chance some of you have even heard of him. Local celeb!
The next nonce we’re gonna talk about is one who Prostasia very nearly managed to bury all evidence of, and one I could find annoyingly little about, but thanks to Ayden who wrote prostasia.info, we know this much: in 2018, they hired Jeff White as a researcher, and he was budgeted $3,000 a month for the privilege:
And thanks to Bristolian family lawyer Sarah Philmore, we know this about him:
Oh my, my. Sexual assault of a minor younger 13 years old. Prostasia hired someone who raped a child within the first fucking year of the foundation's existence.
Well, clearly, according to Jeremy Malcom, the real villain here is Sarah, cuz Jez threatened to fucking sue her:
“Stay out of our way and let us molest kids in peace. Or else.”
Very cool. At the moment I can’t find Jeff’s address (sorry), but i’m sure someone else can.
After Jeff was revealed to be a CHILD RAPIST WORKING FOR A “CHILDREN PROTECTION” CHARITY the group tried to revise their screening policy. Good work guys! Oh wait lmao:
Here’s Meagan (the 600lb adult baby)’s justification for this rule:
THAT’S RIGHT. NOT HIRING SEX OFFENDERS AND PEDERASTS AT YOUR ‘CHILD PROTECTION’ CHARITY IS LITERALLY NAZI GERMANY. Oh, my fucking god. Man, I have to sit down. How the fuck can anyone make this argument with a straight face.
But anyway!!! Finally, let’s talk about Larry! Remember Larry? The guy who was talking about his arduous custody battle for his child sex doll on the Prostasia forums?
Well, here he is:
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
While the dox above is my handiwork, what we know about Larry is thanks to Kiwifarms’ very own @yesthatanna (AKA Anna Slatz), who published this exposé (a) about him in January of this year. In it, she reveals that Prescott from the Board of Directors, and Larry from the Prostasia forum are one and the same; she then posts some of his greatest hits on the forum (without linking the original posts or archiving them. 5/10 effort, Anna). Through his posts, we can glean all sorts of delightful information about him. Using this as a jumping off point, I compiled some of the most interesting things he’s said:
So firstly, here’s his sexuality as he explains it. Sorry I have no clue what the ‘Tanner Stage’ thing he talks about is, and I don’t want to google it. But anyway, straight off the bat, here we have another self-admitted paedophile working as one of the highest ups in Prostasia.
Here’s Larry arguing that nudity of a child is not sexual, and is not obscene or x-rated in the slightest.
Here’s Larry contradicting himself about nude kids not being pornographic, by admitting to “legally” jacking off to CP. He then says he wouldn’t fuck a child because he’s old, and then immediately does a 180, and says he wants to have ‘wild meaningless sex’ with a child. He’s really good at constantly disagreeing with himself.
Interestingly enough he mentions that buying a child sex doll did nothing to help satiate his urges to fuck a child, despite that being the main argument Prostasia uses in favour of not banning child sex dolls. Yet, their own General Manager is living proof their theory didn’t work. In fact from reading what he says, it seems the child sex doll just increased his sexual frustration. Hmm.
Here he gives a more specific example of the CP he likes to ‘legally’ watch. He also suggests showing kids a similar movie. Something tells me Larry does not have the kids’ best interests at heart. Stop thinking so hard about the children!!!
Step aside, Cole Smithy! There’s a new film buff in town.
The next couple screenshots are all from the same thread, so I’ll just post the Archive link here. Anyway:
um???????
Well, uh, moving on from that- as revealed by Anna Slatz, Larry is also a frequent posted on an ancient fuckin web1.0 site populated by NAMbLA holdouts, named BoyChat, (though she barely includes any screenshots and zero archives, so thanks) where he posts a lot of even fucking creepier shit. Total mask off.
Now, lots of his posts are him sharing movies or videos on YT (I don’t know if they’re straight up CP, but apparently one includes a ‘bathtub scene’, so draw from that your own conclusions) and I’m not archiving that shit, or clicking his links. So sorry this section is gonna be less thorough, based on my own squicked-out-ness at this site and his posts, and also due to how clunky the site itself is to navigate.
Idk what YBC is, but in this post, he’s replying to some youtube video, and fantasizing about jewish boys’ penises. Normal.
Watching Neverending Story (NS) with a “little friend” under the covers.
Larry reminiscing (vaguepositing) over past sexual encounters with boys, which they call Boy Moments. HEY WAIT A SECOND THAT’S THE NAME OF THE FUCKING NAMBLA COMIC
On the Prostasia forums, larry said he likes women, too, but here he admits that when he fucks his wife, he imagines that she’s a little boy. Not so ‘non-exclusive’ a pedo are you, larry?
Larry says he invited another pederast (“bl” = “boy lover”) to come live with him some time in the past. I wish I knew more about this backstory.
More larry lore. Shame he couldn’t even kill himself properly. The stuff about Pakistanis makes sense in context probably
Larry hoarding CP.
Larry, much like Meagan who equated doing background checks with Nazi Germany, says that pedos are as oppressed as races that have suffered genocide. if only.
Getting horny about Malcom in the Middle??
Now, I’ve been going through the site chronologically and it’s taken me like 20 fucking minutes and I’m only at December 2022. Larry has been posting here for fucking DECADES. He has an unimaginable amount of posts, and by this point I think you get the point.
I don’t have the archive link to this one (thanks Anna) because I’m not gonna scroll through another 20 pages of this gross site, but here’s the post where Larry jokes about trapping young boys.
Finally, here’s a well-wisher of Larry’s, who seemingly read Anna’s article. I thought this was funny:
All the posts of his I’ve featured have just been from the past 3 months. He mentions that he has to be less explicit now since he got death threats, but if any curious kiwis want to do the work of digging up more of his posts from years ago, I don’t doubt you can find some truly fucking horrible things. Happy hunting, friends.
This man is the General Manager of Prostasia.
Once is unfortunate, twice is a coincidence, but what do you call it when the ‘child protection’ group has hired fucking paedophiles 4 fucking times (that we know of). The group doesn’t even have 100s of employees; 4 is a huge proportion of their workforce. This is systemic. They try and cloak their methods in the garb of social justice by claiming it would be immoral to do background checks based on someone’s sexuality. If you claim to be a child protection service it is imperative you do not let people with storied histories of being paedophiles have roles in your group. The point of protecting children is to protect them from those who would do them harm. Your fucking staff are those that would do them harm. Prostasia made only the most cursory and ineffective attempt to change their policies after Jeff was revealed to be a pedo, but Larry came like 4 years after Jeff. They made absolutely no sincere effort to change their ways, and their advocacy extends only as far to defending the strange and harmful perversions of grown adults who view children as objects of lust.
OP HIT CHARACTER LIMIT. FOLLOWING POST WILL CONTAIN PARTS 5, 6 AND CONCLUSION
Last edited:
