Dramacow Leah Albee - Reluctant Capitalist and Homeless Flag Burner

Rektgg said:
theyre on to me bois
f5f35a35e61a0c49e4ff320ce8609c37.png
Click to expand...

Blah blah blah Freedom of Speech. 50 bucks says she will block you if you respond to her with an opinion that doesn't agree with hers.

And yes, I get that ISN'T the point of the whole Freedom of Speech liberty that we are given, but it's extremely hypocritical when these fucks tout the whole Freedom of Speech angle, but in the very same breath, will use whatever means they have to silence YOUR freedom, since it's not what they want to hear

(their means, in this case, is the very passive aggressive "block button")
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Urban Superstition, glass_houses, Flamesoul the Diabolical and 10 others
Ginger Piglet said:
Also, freedom of speech doesn't work that way. You have the right to freedom of expression but that is only enforceable against the State and public bodies or people or organisations carrying out a public function in the course of their duties. So if you're arrested for saying something boneheaded, that's most likely an infringement of your human rights but if you post about how your boss is a cunt on Facebook and get fired when they find out, that isn't (thought it might, depending on local employment laws and the terms of your contract of employment, give rise to other redress outside of public law.)

Also, freedom of expression doesn't mean freedom from the consequences. If you say something boneheaded and lose out from some sort of opportunity or suchlike as a result, your freedom of speech has not been curtailed because you were never prevented from saying that boneheaded thing in the first place.

Back on topic, have you also noticed that with SJWs it's only free speech when they do it. If one of them gets up and shouts about how black lives matter, and someone takes umbrage to them and heckles them, they're being OFFENSIVE and TRAMPLING ON HUMAN RIGHTS and COMMITTING LITERAL VIOLENCE AGAINST POC, when in reality the heckling is little more than puerile attention seeking. But when Trigglypuff shouts and flaps her arms at Christina Hoff Sommers, that's sticking it to the kyriarchy and is Transgressive and Brave and Revolutionary, and isn't in any way puerile attention seeking.

This is what happens when you see everything in a hierarchy of privilege and oppression. This is also why your average online feminist will get really bent out of shape if you call them out for ignoring institutionalised misogyny in the Middle East and Africa (FGM, forced marriages, gender apartheid in Saudi Arabia, etc.) Because the Third World is oppressed, criticism of things that happen there is racist because you're applying Western values to a non-Western culture.)

(Which in itself is rather racist, to be fair. Smacks of the whole White Man's Burden thing. The Third World is less civilised so we have to indulge them; the soft racism of low expectations.)

And this is why Leah Albee and her mates are hypocrites. They seem to think that because they're somehow oppressed (which they aren't, they're wealthy white folks from upper middle class families) they are entitled to stuff. Newsflash - they're not. Most of the people who are criticising her are less well off and actually have to work for a living and don't have the luxury of time to go on insipid flagburnathons about nothing in particular or wealthy parents to pay for their existence, while she has probably been employed by Dr Dad because he reckons that she couldn't hold down a job anywhere else and is probably right.

The need to be oppressed is why I'm skeptical somewhat as to whether many of these Tumblrinas are TRUE AND HONEST transpeople.
Click to expand...

Nail, head, etc.

The social justice warrior perspective on free speech is remarkably hypocritical, all things considered.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: glass_houses, Flamesoul the Diabolical, Sanae Kochiya and 3 others
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: glass_houses, Sailor_Jupiter, Flamesoul the Diabolical and 9 others
Sinners Sandwich said:
What kind of abuser pays your bills, let your friends stay with you and respects your opinion?? She enjoyed lots of privileges and still insulted her father. He is the victim. The abuser is that ungreatful shithead of a daughter.
Click to expand...
The worst kind of abuser around: The White Cismale.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Flamesoul the Diabolical, Sailor_Jupiter, Sanae Kochiya and 3 others
Ruin said:
He's right. The majority of these types claim to be a "non binary" gender like Nora Reed rather than claiming to actually be transgender.
Click to expand...

I still don't know what "non-binary" even means. What, you think you're so unique your experience transcends the two genders? Demonstrates a pretty limited knowledge of gender if you ask me.
 
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: Silas, wifflypuff, Flamesoul the Diabolical and 7 others
What could have possibly happened to him going broke in Hawaii, which he appears to have been a native of:

-Went full tranny SJW
-Could have possibly spent his scholarship money on this endeavour.
-Poppa dukes doesn't approve, cuts him off financially.
-Fled to bumblefuck where it's cheap and to live with some losers he knew from tumblr.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Flamesoul the Diabolical, glass_houses, DirkBloodStormKing and 7 others
entropyseekswork said:
In which Jamie gaslights that a father cutting off financial support to his adult daughter is on par with conspiring to murder her.

s5W8iUm.png

9iEjUns.png
Click to expand...

Where did "I'd only love you if you were straight" come from?
Dr. Dad let her live with her partner free of charge, right? And even on the dad's status he used they pronouns for her, that seems like it's beyond respectful to whatever gender she is.
Obviously this whole thing is stupid but that part is even more baffling to me
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 666EVE666, wifflypuff, Flamesoul the Diabolical and 13 others
Fiddleford said:
Where did "I'd only love you if you were straight" come from?
Dr. Dad let her live with her partner free of charge, right? And even on the dad's status he used they pronouns for her, that seems like it's beyond respectful to whatever gender she is.
Obviously this whole thing is stupid but that part is even more baffling to me
Click to expand...

Maybe - and only just maybe - the good doctor expressed concern over how she was acting, or even expressed dislike over his daughters choice in partner.

I mean, the man very obviously has a much better sense of character than the daughter.

I'm more than willing to give the good doctor the benefit of doubt. He even used those silly pronouns, for fuck sake.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Flamesoul the Diabolical, sarcasticslipandslide, glass_houses and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back