In the same way Columbine opened the door for school shootings, I believe the Nashville shooting will make mass murder an option for trannies, especially those who are suicidal. The styling of Audrey as a victim who meted out righteous justice and instilled fear in an evil, unchecked society appeals greatly to the trans mindset. With no taboo on violence or collective punishment and ample justification provided by the sins of the cis, fear of retribution would be one of (perhaps the only?) reasons to hold back, but that's not an issue thanks to the response of the Biden administration, the media, and other pozzed n powerful institutions.
I have never seen this kind of deference and solicitous dick sucking EVER. No wonder the trans movement is gleefully unapologetic: their murderous behavior just got endorsed and their untouchable status has been confirmed.
I would like to point out too, that mass murder punishes family and loved ones, secures a legacy, serves the movement, grants martyr status, hurts society, draws scrutiny and shame onto enemies (in Audrey's case Christians in general and more specifically the Christian school), and fills a need for revenge in a way that suicide does not.
It looks like more mass shootings are inevitable and I'm disturbed by the lack of concern the trans movement has about it. Are things even worse than I think? They seem very confident that they'll never get punished.
What's curious about the Nashville shooting in particular relative to other incidents of mass violence is that the mass media is trying to bury the details surrounding the shooter's identity as much as possible, while still exploiting a tragedy for anti-gun politics where they can. They claim that the shooting couldn't possibly have been a trans person targeting Christians, they fight amongst themselves whether calling Audrey a "he" is misgendering her or whether she was never trans to begin with. It's a distinct difference from Columbine or Parkland in that the powers that be are attempting to stifle the narrative of "the trans shooter" as much as possible, because they know acutely well that mass shootings are a memetic virus and can inspire similar acts due to the notoriety of the perpetrators contrasted with the public incomprehension of their motivations.
And not to throw shade on the idea that Nashville was politically-motivated as an act of trans angst, but given what we know about Audrey Hale, we can sort of paint a picture that shares commonality with typical mass shooter traits - social isolation and incompatibility with society at large, possibly some sort of vengeful feelings against a particular group (in this case, Christians), etc - that suggests more personal motivations rather than this being overtly a political act. Not saying that trans politics aren't involved at all, we can't know that without reading the Tranifesto, but even if Audrey claims that this was about trans rights the circumstances point to something a little more than that.
With all that being said, I can't rule out the possibility that Nashville could inspire other lonesome tranny losers who have nothing else going for them in life to try going out in a blaze of homicidal glory, but allowing that type of social contagion to spread would contradict the establishment's desperation to elude responsibility for this shooting. Put another way, the pro-trans crowd will exploit this event where they can, they will attempt to victimize themselves as much as they can from this, and they will threaten people wherever possible that they must be obeyed or suffer the consequences - but they still aren't eager to explicitly take responsibility for killing kids as an act of political violence because they understand the optics of that would be incorrigible.
I think we can divide the Militant Trans Rights crowd into a few categories:
1. There are a large number of trans and pro-trans people who use identity politics as a replacement for the social cohesion of community, and hide behind the mob in real-life protests as a means of evading personal culpability while having a high chance of being able to get away with violent/criminal acts. There's definitely a huge overlap with militant anarchist/Communist/leftist groups who treat Trans Rights as political dogma (see the InRangeTV/Karl Kasarda thread). They are likely to accept, inspire and train people who might go on to be the next tranny mass shooter but they will never claim responsibility or direct involvement.
2. Many pro-trans ideologues are narcissists who are primarily concerned with their reputation and probably not interested in participating in actual acts of directed, physical violence as it would hurt their image and risk their personal circumstances too much but they are more than willing to participate in social pressure to eliminate you as a threat (like Keffals). These are the grifters.
3. You have socially-isolated outcasts who cling to trans identity as a means of escapism from their personal circumstances, but otherwise have very fragile ties to the rest of society or even the Trans Rights movement at large and would be the most willing to perpetrate random, mass violence due to really having nothing to lose. These are your Audrey Hales and your Randy Stairs. I would hesitate to tie them to the Trans Rights movement in general due to the fact that they share similarities with other non-politically motivated perpetrators of random mass violence, and indeed should be treated similarly to the rest of them. This isn't to discount the influence of Trans Activism on their eventual galvanization to committing their crimes, but instead to belabor the point that those could almost be tangential to their real motivations. Something is very, very wrong with American society in general and eliminating the threat of Trans Activism-aligned violence could reduce the chance of one of these people snapping, but there is no guarantee.
youtu.be
