US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
  • Like
Reactions: wopirish, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, silverstacks and 16 others
Dr. Plussy Pounder said:
For people new to the thread, what's "fortification"? What page/post goes into it?
Click to expand...
In 2020 and 2022 the Neo-liberal Globalist Elites blatantly rigged our elections to "protect" us from making the "mistake" of voting the "wrong" way a second time. It was extremely blatant in 2020 (literally the vote count paused and shot up vertically repeatedly in multiple states as massive amounts of fake ballots were dropped into the system), still prevelant in 2022 but less so as the GOPe had gotten marching orders to intentionally throw the election lest they be expected to actually do their jobs.

Afterwards, their power secure and them with the confidence that not only would they never lose another election that there was nothing anyone could ever do about it, they crowed about it amongst themselves, most obviously in Time Magazine:

1680552972398.png

1680552856334.png

time.com

The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election

For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions
time.com time.com

Fortifying it is their smug little way of saying that they loosened up election laws and rules and got insiders in key places to do the counting and organized illegal ballot harvesting ("hey let me take that and drop it off for you") and ballot farming ("you're not voting right? Give me your ballot then") in order to ensure they'd win despite what those disgusting proles might want instead.

Examples of Fortifying:
  • Removing the chain of custody of ballots in order to make it easier for fake ballots to be submitted
  • Organizing ballot harvesting (going out and picking up ballots from other people to submit) efforts, which is illegal
  • Organizing ballot farming (going out and stealing ballots from mailboxes and filling out ballots for other people) efforts, which is VERY illegal
  • Systemically prohibiting one side of the political spectrum from speaking in public via state sanctioned domestic terrorism and big tech software
  • Applying election laws to one side but not another (for example, ballot dropboxes are allowed at LGBT bookstores despite being illegal, but not at Catholic churches)
  • Illegally extending voting times / voting count times (which are, by the constitution, required to end the night of the election) in friendly districts to infinity while shutting down unfriendly locations early
  • Violating the chain of custody of the voting machine software and hardware, including pushing illegal unvetted updates to the machine
  • Intentionally running ballots through the ballot counting machines multiple times
  • Deleting the access logs for the voting machines by intentionally logging 65,000+ times into the machine over the course of a few hours in order to prevent anyone from auditing it
  • Connecting the voting machines to the internet for no explainable reason
  • Making illegal software modifications in order to prevent signature verification from working against state election laws
  • Illegally prohibiting election observers from observing elections, especially if they are from the wrong political party
  • Prohibiting candidates and voters from being allowed to bring up any and all election issues in court via spurious grounds (laches, moot, no standing)
  • Encouraging domestic terrorist attacks to prevent candidates from speaking in public under the guise of it being a homegrown "anti-bad guy" movement that somehow no one can do anything about ever
  • Conspiring with large tech companies to intentionally limit the reach of communication efforts by one political party while intentionally amplifying the other.
All of this was to support "the good guys" while making sure we didn't "vote incorrectly" and "accidentally" let Trump trick us into letting him back into office. It's Banana republic bullshit of the highest order and there are many theories as to why they're doing this -- the ones I adhere to somewhat are they have some form of plan that needs to be done by 2030 and Trump not only delayed it but rewound part of the efforts towards it (which is why things are accelerating so much, they HAVE to get back on the timeframe) + the fact that the left wing in the US is currently under a massive entryism movement from Marxist idiots who don't care that it looks corrupt cause as long as they have power no one can stop them -- this combined with our left wing aging out of politics and "forgetting" to train the next generations left a massive hole for very, very stupid marxists to try and fill.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Hubelublub, wopirish, xoodyak and 53 others
The Last Stand said:
Is that a threat?
Click to expand...
I have no idea. It really just sounds like that Biden is promising equal internet access for all classes. So that poor people won't have to bum off public wifi from restaurants and what not.

"I'm Not Joking" and "I'm Serious" are verbal ticks of Biden. Usually when he says that, he's lying his ass off.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: World Famous Quasi Payer, DicksOutForKiwigglers, Super-Chevy454 and 12 others
  • Agree
Reactions: Gorillion others, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, World Famous Quasi Payer and 12 others
I-chi said:
I can't tell if you answering your own question was intended or not. Not mocking you when I say that.
Click to expand...
That's one answer but it doesn't explain the whole thing. Why would they care if we eat the bugs when they die? Their legacy is already set at this point, they can't do much to change it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shadfan666xxx000, World Famous Quasi Payer, More AWS-8Q Than You and 2 others
Catch The Rainbow said:
That's one answer but it doesn't explain the whole thing. Why would they care if we eat the bugs when they die? Their legacy is already set at this point, they can't do much to change it.
Click to expand...
They are under the false belief that if their New World Order were implemented in their lifetime, then it would lead to a neoliberal thousand year reich. Seeing it to completion before they die IS them trying to cement their legacy.

In reality, if they succeed, the system will collapse into chaos in, at maximum, a couple of decades, and likely pave the way for the rise of a wave of right-wing authoritarian dictatorships by 2100.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Gorillion others, StevieLasVegas, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob and 21 others
Catch The Rainbow said:
That's one answer but it doesn't explain the whole thing. Why would they care if we eat the bugs when they die? Their legacy is already set at this point, they can't do much to change it.
Click to expand...
If you really have to ask "Why do these people want to make sure their plans for society continue after their deaths?", you will continue to be confused when the left-wing keeps getting 99% of what they want and ask for.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
  • Feels
Reactions: Woe-B-Gon (TM), World Famous Quasi Payer, AnotherPleb and 3 others
Catch The Rainbow said:
That's one answer but it doesn't explain the whole thing. Why would they care if we eat the bugs when they die? Their legacy is already set at this point, they can't do much to change it.
Click to expand...

I don't believe it's any one concretely shared reason between them; simply a collective of mostly ancient fucks on death's doorstep that have sat on their little thrones for so fucking long that the idea of leaving the future to forthcoming generations - of which most have been irreparably fucking damaged by their hubris - absolutely terrifies them. For some like Schwab, maybe it's legit delusion that everything's going to break without them there to manage it; but I can just as strongly believe the majority are so obsessed with control and so full of hatred for the plebians and ESPECIALLY the young, that they'd rather load dynamite on any chance at a decent future and escape to what they believe is a cold oblivion than bear the thought of being forgotten.

You won't say shit about them because communication will be censored.

You will never have more than they did because you will own nothing and be forced to smile about it.

You will forever owe your existence to them and the monument of this sick and inhumane world they are building, and make sure that you will never forget it.
 
  • Feels
  • Disagree
  • Agree
Reactions: Woe-B-Gon (TM), Cyber Floyd, World Famous Quasi Payer and 4 others
Gar For Archer said:
They are under the false belief that if their New World Order were implemented in their lifetime, then it would lead to a neoliberal thousand year reich. Seeing it to completion before they die IS them trying to cement their legacy.

In reality, if they succeed, the system will collapse into chaos in, at maximum, a couple of decades, and likely pave the way for the rise of a wave of right-wing authoritarian dictatorships by 2100.
Click to expand...

The fatal flaw of our Globalist enemies is that like the Soviets of the 20th Century, they are foolishly trying to implement an unsustainable system that's bound to collapse, which is why I consider myself rationally optimistic on this topic. Now, that being said, like my example of the 20th Century USSR there's bound to be a lot of suffering and casualties before the collapse.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: not william stenchever, StevieLasVegas, Exterminatus and 13 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back