Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[RotPockets]

You're Jeff's landlord Marty, right?

This might be apocryphal, but I've heard multiple times over the years that the Buffers only get aggressive with protecting the "Let's Get Ready to Rumble" trademark when it's used in something related to combat sports. A self-immolating lawyer streaming on the internet probably isn't high on their priority list.

He pays bounties to anyone that offers credible information regarding a potential infringement of his copyright. He pays the finders fee out of the settlement to whoever sends the info to info@LetsRumble.com.

Buffer Readies To Rumble in Court

LOS ANGELES (AP) _ Michael Buffer is ready to rumble in a court of law.

apnews.com

 

[instant]

Nick may be technically right if the standard is 'intent', but how do you know what someone's intent is? People go with what their interpretation of the evidence of his state of mind was. They largely make up their mind based on their own experience anyway, you are not changing it nor convincing them that *you* understand it as something else.

Was trying to put into words what was wrong with his argument and this part actually helped kind of put it into words.

Despite time and time again talking about how judges can be absurdly subjective with their read on "intent", he's really going out of his way to essentially ensure that there's no way for anyone who isn't an internet autist to read his intent the way he wants it to. Like, did he forget his statements are transcribed via texts? How does he expect the court to read the statement "he loves sucking boycocks" in a sarcastic way over the equally likely chance that the judge would read it with defamatory intent? He hired Randazza in the first place after realizing there's a non zero chance of not getting summary judgment after realizing Monty's lawyer did his fucking job and zealously defended his client, muh ethics be damned.

Did he forget he LITERALLY streamed the Lucas Gerhard apellate hearing? That was a perfect example of 3 (T H R E E) judges reading a joke as a threat, one of the judges even being an acquaintance of Lucas' defense attorney.

 

[Strix454]

I was watching the latest stream about the lawsuit earlier and I was wondering: How come Rekieta's lawyer has not told him to shut up yet? Not only he keeps saying that Montagraph is a pedophile but he's shitting on the guy's lawyer too.

He has done some tweets on occasion talking about the Nick, the challenges of a difficult client and clients doing things you would not necessarily advise them to do. Suggesting in essence that he would not advise him to do what he is doing, but that he cannot tell him what to do.

The only area where there was firm pushback was when lolcow Spectre06 was introduced to the lawyer. Spectre06 had been personally contacting Monty's attorney, interacting with him and passing information back to Nick. Nick tried to introduce Spectre to his attorney and according to Nick it resulted in some firm feedback. Nick's view was that the feedback was all to Spectre, but it could have been more than that.

 

[instant]

He has done some tweets on occasion talking about the Nick, the challenges of a difficult client and clients doing things you would not necessarily advise them to do. Suggesting in essence that he would not advise him to do what he is doing, but that he cannot tell him what to do.

The only area where there was firm pushback was when lolcow Spectre06 was introduced to the lawyer. Spectre06 had been personally contacting Monty's attorney, interacting with him and passing information back to Nick. Nick tried to introduce Spectre to his attorney and according to Nick it resulted in some firm feedback. Nick's view was that the feedback was all to Spectre, but it could have been more than that.

In case anyone wants the tweet in question.

https://twitter.com/marcorandazza/status/1627115264457457664?t=Pkvti0TJj9UXEWf9yUXV1w&s=19

I don't expect him to delete it or get suspended (for now), but I also archived it just in case.

https://archive.md/ukuiM

I don't remember what happened in February anymore, but I assume its essentially what we've been talking about and Nick just not resisting talking about Monty.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

And I was hoping to enjoy Crowder's stream today. Guess I'll have to watch commentary elsewhere.

I like Robert Goveia for this. He puts in real work and does not seem to sensationalise.

Was trying to put into words what was wrong with his argument and this part actually helped kind of put it into words.

Despite time and time again talking about how judges can be absurdly subjective with their read on "intent", he's really going out of his way to essentially ensure that there's no way for anyone who isn't an internet autist to read his intent the way he wants it to. Like, did he forget his statements are transcribed via texts? How does he expect the court to read the statement "he loves sucking boycocks" in a sarcastic way over the equally likely chance that the judge would read it with defamatory intent? He hired Randazza in the first place after realizing there's a non zero chance of not getting summary judgment after realizing Monty's lawyer did his fucking job and zealously defended his client, muh ethics be damned.

Did he forget he LITERALLY streamed the Lucas Gerhard apellate hearing? That was a perfect example of 3 (T H R E E) judges reading a joke as a threat, one of the judges even being an acquaintance of Lucas' defense attorney.

In a world where 'meme crimes' are a thing, I do not want to chance it.

 

[Strix454]

I don't remember what happened in February anymore, but I assume its essentially what we've been talking about and Nick just not resisting talking about Monty.

I suspect that it was after the stream where Nick addressed and responded to Monty's complaint in the case point by point. Essentially giving a free informal deposition to the other side. But I'd have to go back and look at the timing.

 

[KittyLoaf]

I was watching the latest stream about the lawsuit earlier and I was wondering: How come Rekieta's lawyer has not told him to shut up yet? Not only he keeps saying that Montagraph is a pedophile but he's shitting on the guy's lawyer too.

Nick is employing Ron Toye's strat.

Serious question, is there any legitimacy to the rumor/allegation that Monty is a pedophile. All I know is that he's a schitzoposter.

 

[instant]

Nick is employing Ron Toye's strat.

Serious question, is there any legitimacy to the rumor/allegation that Monty is a pedophile. All I know is that he's a schitzoposter.

In all honesty, I do consider Monty's underage nude photography thing to point in that direction. Nick aside, Monty is legitimately a creepy fuck with a major narcissism issue.

But in terms of the lawsuit defense, I honestly feel like it might be a little too un-intuitive. Since Monty hasn't really offended, calling him a pedophile doesn't apply for l "truth as a universal defense" argument. So instead Randazza has to argue for "Monty had an existing reputation of being believed to be a pedophile," which is a lot more nebulous.

 

[Swole McPole]

Serious question, is there any legitimacy to the rumor/allegation that Monty is a pedophile. All I know is that he's a schitzoposter.

I assume by legitimacy, you mean evidence? If there was ANY evidence to support the claim at all, Randazza would be mounting a defence based on truth, not going all around the houses attempting to pretend he's a public figure and that defaming him is a matter of serious public interest.

Edit: @instant beat me to it.

 

[Kopasea]

Listened to some of his locals stream cause I was curious after @Himedall All-seeing Waifu said something.

Nick is absolutely going to use his platform to publicly name and shame David Schneider in the name of "extremely bad or unethical lawyering". This seems like such a dumb thing to say publicly.

To paraphrase, Nick is going to use his platform to go after anyone that represents someone suing him. Because only extremely bad or unethical lawyers would represent someone against Nick. And we all know who the people who listen to Nick's platform are... They're the Still_life's of the world. So if you don't want his locals/platform turning on you, don't represent someone against me.

So how is it going? Well, some of Nick's fans are now weaponizing the Google reviews system and spamming Schneider and Madsen with 1 star reviews (only a few since his fanbase has crashed so hard recently)

 

[Spaded Dave]

In case anyone is still curious about the quality of assposters in Nick's Locals, they look so much worse in motion:

Spoiler: Gross

EDIT: Forgot to include the name. This is JessWeg.

 

[instant]

In case anyone is still curious about the quality of assposters in Nick's Locals, they look so much worse in motion:

Spoiler: Gross

View attachment 4977773

View attachment 4977785

Jesus christ she looks older than my 75 year old grandma

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Nick is absolutely going to use his platform to publicly name and shame David Schneider in the name of "extremely bad or unethical lawyering". This seems like such a dumb thing to say publicly.

To paraphrase, Nick is going to use his platform to go after anyone that represents someone suing him. Because only extremely bad or unethical lawyers would represent someone against Nick. And we all know who the people who listen to Nick's platform are... They're the Still_life's of the world. So if you don't want his locals/platform turning on you, don't represent someone against me.

So how is it going? Well, some of Nick's fans are now weaponizing the Google reviews system and spamming Schneider and Madsen with 1 star reviews (only a few since his fanbase has crashed so hard recently)

A cynic might speculate that that's exactly what Nick intended when repeatedly, many times, specifying Schneider's firm name and place of business. It's not like he's poisoning Schneider's SEO by saying that out loud on a livestream.

Those 3 tufts of hair are working overtime to cover that fivehead. He is either trying to simulate a hairline, or the one on the left just fell over from exhaustion. That’s a lot of ground to cover for a clump of 6 hairs.
View attachment 4974661
View attachment 4974580

After watching that clip the tufts are in even worse shape now.
View attachment 4974722
View attachment 4974726
View attachment 4974730

I need your analysis on Nick's current look. Below is a screenshot of how he looked appearing on Crowder today.

What's going on here? His hairline looked noticeably better in your pictures and I guess they're from the Twitch stream from Sunday night. How is he rapidly balding in such a short period of time?

Is he LITERALLY malding?

He addressed Still-Life and called ehat he posted 'stupid' and me dumb for 'concern trolling' Why should anyone care about what anyone posts?

I do not know. Maybe if it is a literal crime? I know YOU cared a lot about what @Cynthia Behave was posting...

Literal insanity. I don't know what to say.

 

[TheRaptorJesus]

is crowder so broke that he has to rely on nick for "legal" analysis. I thought he was done dealing with law stuff. Oh, he sees this as a Depp level cash cow.

 

[AnOminous]

need your analysis on Nick's current look. Below is a screenshot of how he looked appearing on Crowder today.

There's no analysis needed. He's drunk off his ass. He's just drunk. That's all that's needed. Drunk.

 

[Lady Rackets Ass]

In case anyone is still curious about the quality of assposters in Nick's Locals, they look so much worse in motion:

Spoiler: Gross

View attachment 4977773

View attachment 4977785

Which one of the locals goblins is this?

 

[Captain Manning]

- He addressed me specifically and MISGENDERED ME! I am big mad! He said I was stupid for announcing I was logging the chat. I could have done it quietly and it wouls have been better.

Does he think that me dropping archives here would go unnoticed? Should I have kept it to myself? That is a retarded take.

- He addressed Still-Life and called ehat he posted 'stupid' and me dumb for 'concern trolling' Why should anyone care about what anyone posts?

I do not know. Maybe if it is a literal crime? I know YOU cared a lot about what @Cynthia Behave was posting...

Yeah, I'm not surprised by any of this. Been there. Done that. Welcome to the club.

Be prepared for him to try and spin what you've been saying here as you trying to dictate who he can and can't associate with. At the end of the day, your point about Still-Life being a liability (along with any other fedposter) is well made, but if you ever expect him to see it or admit to that point, I got some bad news for you...

If the authorities decide to do anything about Still-Life, and that brings heat down on Locals and Nick, that's just more fodder for discussion.

 

[TheRaptorJesus]

Crowder is inflating nicks credentials, saying "he actually practices law", who on crowder's team vetted any of this?

 

[instant]

Crowder is inflating nicks credentials, saying "he actually practices law", who on crowder's team vetted any of this?

To be fair, not vetting people has kind of been a longstanding problem with Crowder. Its on brand for him to severely overstate the legitimacy of his guests to play up his own brand for securing them. This is the same dude who used to call tomi lahren a good journalist and Owen Benjamin a genius.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Crowder is inflating nicks credentials, saying "he actually practices law", who on crowder's team vetted any of this?

My initial guess for how Nick got on their radar was via Friday Night Tights Gary, who also had Quarter Black Garrett on, who at one point was one of Crowder's ... engineers? Producers? Performers? QBG has done producer work for Gary these days, but sounds like he may join up occasionally with Crowder again?

The only time before this I remember Nick being on was when the comedian who was in third chair a lot over the past year, was hosting and Nick had just been booted from youtube. Has there been much other interaction?