Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

There's a place in Oregon making 3 wheeled similar models.
Up to 75MPH.
View attachment 4968960

Range at 70MPH: 32 miles.
It looks like a drunk golf cart that decided it would drive on the road. At least with a gas powered Polaris, it can go fast without crippling it's range.
Holy moly you are not kidding. I was wondering how an electric car with a low center of gravity would tip over: A Citroen Ami weighs 1,069 pounds?!?!? Good God, man. That is nothing.

Just for reference:
2011 Smart Fortwo weighs 1808 pounds (~700 pounds heavier)
2015 Chevrolet Spark weighs 2246 pounds (~1400 pounds heavier)
2020 Honda Civic weighs 2762 pounds (~1700 pounds heavier)
1995 Chevrolet Caprice (similar to what I own) is 3995 pounds (~3000 pounds heavier!)

For people who don't know a whole lot about cars that is absurdly and dangerously light. And I didn't even mention trucks or SUVs, just regular passenger cars. Even a Geo Metro is 600 pounds lighter.

Oh, also apparently the Ami is not legally defined as a passenger vehicle, so it in fact does not have to contend with European crash safety standards. It's basically a plastic and aluminum box with a drivetrain. I pity the fool who's inside of that thing when it gets sandwiched between two Sprinter vans.
Weight is a important thing when it comes to vehicles. It can help with cars from flipping, or just crumpling on impact. They designed a go cart with that Citrion. Basically no safety systems.
 
Is someone who builds large scale construction projects for living I can tell you as a carpenter we have built walkable cities you know what they're called and they've been being built for about 20 years plan communities where we take our clients land we find a bunch of people who want to build on the land and right next to brand new apartment complexes we build strip malls with shopping centers like grocery stores coffee shops barbers restaurants.
And we build these sometimes in some places that are considered smaller cities and also we build these and sometimes an old Farmland in small towns.
It's almost like these things exist outside of major metropolitan areas
These can literally be built anywhere I've built these in small towns medium sized cities small cities college towns all sorts of places and they're not very expensive and then you can go to the grocery store go to the Barber and do all your needs without leaving a five block radius

It's almost like these people's lifestyle is already available through capitalism s*** it's almost like their entire urban planning ideas is just an excuse to rob people of the wealth that they've earned with their own two hands.
And distributed to the parasite class like themselves
The fundamental thing these leftists always argue about is the 'Right to the City', which is an amorphous term which in its purest essence today results in allowing the homeless to camp on your doorstep, trannies to publicly expose themselves, squatters to seize buildings, and criminals to freely crime away (all because of their socioeconomic backgrounds).

These Texas doughnuts or 'five-over-ones' you talk about are problematic to these folks because instead of being run by myriad different landowners, these tend to be owned by single landlords, who can chose their inhabitants and users. While the former has its benefits like different landlords being more permissive of more unique and less profitable/stable retail (i.e. a dentist vs a comic store) while also creating a more varied economic profile in a neighborhood, it also has its issues when you end up with slum landlords and crappy neighbors.

Same goes for lifestyle centers and other privately-developed districts, including Privately-Owned Publicly Accessible Spaces (PoPs)- all of these can be policed differently than the public realm, and can filter out their inhabitants to an extent.
 
Last edited:
These Texas doughnuts or 'five-over-ones' you talk about are problematic to these folks because instead of being run by a myriad of different landlords, these tend to be owned by single landlords, who can filter out problematic elements. While the former has its benefits (i.e. being more permissive of less safe and profitable retail and creating a more varied economic profile in a neighborhood), it also has its issues when you end up with slum landlords and crappy neighbors.
This comment from the source of the Texas Doughnut article was so based I had to copy it over here:
Sweet Afton said:
You can have the 5-minute walk rule...as long as your child has no particular interest or passion in any outside activity. You can just sign him up for whatever happens to be close. He wants dance? Too bad! Karate's what's close. Gymnastics? You have to be kidding me. Gymnastics is pretty much never within a 5 minute walk of any homes because it require cheap light industrial-type land to have a gymnastics facility. Music lessons? Sorry, you have to go to the terrible guitar teacher because there's no piano teacher near.

And how about adult activities? Marriage? I guess you can marry someone in one of a couple of nearby firms. Forget about compatibility. What matters is the 5-minute walk to work.

Real people with real jobs rarely work in such a close radius from any single place, much less a place where they want to live.

If you have no hobbies except getting drunk, eating out, and maybe seeing a movie or, a very distant possibility, seeing a live show of a very certain type (say, the playhouse where there are also orchestra performances, OR a big live concert venue), you can do that. If your favorite group comes to town and happens to pick another venue, then you'll get an Uber, right? But what if you have an actual interest or hobby that isn't the lowest common denominator. It's a specialized interest for a specialized group. Other than the ease of overeating in many different restaurants and getting drunk in many different bars, the whole POINT of living in or near a city is that you can find many different "clans" for almost any interest. But at most, you'll live within a 5-minute walk of 11,000 people (assuming that the area is the densest in the US in terms of population, which never happens near employment centers, AND you get all green lights) and more realistically within a 5-minute walk of closer to 6,000 people, tops. Do you really think you can find or create a Battle Bot club in a village of 6,000 to 11,000 people? A drone club? A modern board game club? Even a photography club? That population can support some general interest groups (like darts and pool, or poker or mah jong), but it can, at best, scrape together to make one or two special-interest groups, out of luck, chance, or similar socio-economics. Oh, you don't like Magic the Gathering? That's too bad, because you get that and amateur robotics in this near-university neighborhood. Find open night poetry mic night unbearable and have no interest in spiritualist lesbian activism? Sorry, that's the neighborhood you live in, so that's what you get.

And forget actually living like a responsible adult, who carefully makes a weekly shopping list and might choose to visit two or three different grocery stores (one has the best prices, one the freshest produce, and another that weird specialty ingredient). Can't do that with the 5-minute rule. It takes 10,000 people to support a grocery store with the kind of product choices that people want. Even if you're a lousy cook and careless with your money, if you have even one shred of time-management, you shop once a week--and good luck doing that for more than 2 people if you walk or take public transit, because it's not happening. Daily shopping only occurred parallel with daily deliveries and stay-at-home wives, who HAD to stay at home because home maintenance and food preparation took up to 13 hours a day before the 1930s. Cold storage was unreliable, so you had to get fresh food frequently, or you'd get poisoned.

You're living in a delusional world that only is of interest of the TV-bars-and-restaurants singles and (rarely, only if the moon aligns) couples crowd with your 5-minute walk. If you have no real interests, and you do no planning, then living near the only things that give you pleasure (bars, restaurants, and shopping) is of high interest.

What a sad, narrow, pathetic little life.
Source (Archive)
 
This comment from the source of the Texas Doughnut article was so based I had to copy it over here:
The club thing gets to me. In the future, I'd like to make something like a welding club, maybe a Gundam club, where people bring in some of their works, talk about their techniques , but if you only have the occupants of a city within walking distance that's like 5 dudes. Cars allow people to unite from many areas and walks of life
 
This entire urbanist movement, all this shit about walkable cities, etc, is all by and for bugmen. It assumes everyone WANTS to live in a city, like a bunch of ants, with apartments on 5 sides of you, or at best in single family homes with zero lot lines.
The interesting question, and especially the application of the answer, is what is going to happen to those who don't want to live in a giant crime and drug infested anthill that is overrun with niggers and surveillance from other bugpeople.
 
The interesting question, and especially the application of the answer, is what is going to happen to those who don't want to live in a giant crime and drug infested anthill that is overrun with niggers and surveillance from other bugpeople.
They will be made to move, especially the people in the suburbs. Whether it be at the point of a gun (as in China) or through punitive regulations and fees (what the want for the US), these people will learn to love living in a cube.
Screenshot 2022-08-22 at 12-17-10 Adam Kotsko on Twitter.png
 
New Breadtuber Faggot Xanderhal video just dropped about how he hates Cars. A 23 year old who works from YT and doesn't own a car nor who likely never even got his license (because he prefers his Mother or Methhead ex girlfriend driving him around.

So I understand that a road is basically the equivalent of a highway and then we have streets that are more of something you find in a high / medium density urban are but then we have what they call a stroad.

From what I can tell, they appear of be something between streets of dense urban areas and highways that pass by rural regions.

What I notice though is that stroads seem to develop due to growth of rural regions. Where the demand might not require a multi-story mixed use development but has out-grown the supply a small main / high street shop can provide.

If this is then case most countries have stroads once you get out of the downtown / old town area of the cities and into newer areas, with the US and Canada being main examples as they developed more towards the invention of the car than when people were building castles.

Add in that we never got butt fucked by WWI & WWII and you have pretty good explanation for why the US and Canada is the way they are. The real question is why these people on NJB Or FuckCars don't grasp this historical fact of both nations development.
 
They will be made to move, especially the people in the suburbs. Whether it be at the point of a gun (as in China) or through punitive regulations and fees (what the want for the US), these people will learn to love living in a cube.
View attachment 4978729
Does this bug boy unironically think food comes from the grocery store?
 
New Breadtuber Faggot Xanderhal video just dropped about how he hates Cars. A 23 year old who works from YT and doesn't own a car nor who likely never even got his license (because he prefers his Mother or Methhead ex girlfriend driving him around.

  • Never owned a car or drives
  • Works from home
  • Never lived in a non-"car dependent" city
  • Gets opionion from euro travel vlogs
Dude spent the first two minutes explaining why he is the absolutely worst person to have a take on this topic then proceeds to watch NJB while playing Minecraft for the rest of the video. QUALITY CONTENT!
 
  • Never owned a car or drives
  • Works from home
  • Never lived in a non-"car dependent" city
  • Gets opionion from euro travel vlogs
Dude spent the first two minutes explaining why he is the absolutely worst person to have a take on this topic then proceeds to watch NJB while playing Minecraft for the rest of the video. QUALITY CONTENT!
His methhead ex girlfriend owned a car (8-10 years older than him when he is early 20s). He then proceeded to kick her out, accused her of stealing money to buy drugs, which resulted in her living in her car with her cat(s).

The saga is well documented on the Breadtube thread.
 
They will be made to move, especially the people in the suburbs. Whether it be at the point of a gun (as in China) or through punitive regulations and fees (what the want for the US), these people will learn to love living in a cube.
View attachment 4978729
"haha people should only be allowed to do what i like and should be burned on a stake if they do something i hate"
Imagine being such a narcissicistic and egotistical asshole that you want to lord over others and micromanage all aspects of their lives. Imagine being that kind of a moralfaggot-commie-bugman. Thankfully, the chemical industry invented anti-bug sprays at some point in time...
 
New Breadtuber Faggot Xanderhal video just dropped about how he hates Cars. A 23 year old who works from YT and doesn't own a car nor who likely never even got his license (because he prefers his Mother or Methhead ex girlfriend driving him around.

Oh lord, is this one of those fucking guys who just reposts stream clips as "content" instead of making actual videos? I already don't like this dude.

Screenshot_39.png
Man what kinda weak excuse is that? Half of this thread is probably autistic and we all own cars. Get over it you pussy.
 
They will be made to move, especially the people in the suburbs. Whether it be at the point of a gun (as in China) or through punitive regulations and fees (what the want for the US), these people will learn to love living in a cube.
View attachment 4978729
I would love to see this bugman try and come out to where I live and try to enforce his "opinions". We all have acerage, we all have guns and most of us have tractors and/or backhoes.
 
Just was thinking about something the other night. The urbanists hate cars (and especially SUVs) because of all the "wasted space" of a vehicle that's rarely filled to capacity...yet they praise buses being on the road despite the fact that they're not always filled to capacity either. Doing some basic number crunching, according to the United States Department of Energy and the Oak Ridge National Lab (2022) Transportation Energy Data Book Edition 40, an average car usually carries 1.5 people, so if we assume that all cars have five seats (which most sedans do), that means that cars are 30% full on average.

So I decided to just look at the Houston bus network from 2019 (felt like that would be a fairer view of transit) to see how many bus routes there are and who's actually riding. (source, archive). The frequency map on page 3 is unreadable but if we look at some of the numbers, buses aren't exactly full either. On a given weekday in March 2019, the bus network carried 180,000 people...but since METRO operates 1,200 buses in the system it means each bus carries 150 people a day...which is pretty abysmal when you think about how many people it's carrying at any given time, but that's not particuarly helpful information. Rather, what would be more helpful information is the "boardings per revenue hour", so if we assume that as many people get on as they get off and the boardings per revenue hour is how many people are riding the bus at any given time, on average, that comes out to around 20-30 people on average for most lines. Some sources say that an average city bus fits 40-80 people, and about ten years ago METRO started to roll out higher-capacity buses that can fit up to 62 sitting (plus standing 84) as opposed to the older buses (37/65). So that means that even for the older buses, not including standing room (that's where the "efficiency" kicks in) you've got buses only around two-thirds full on average, and that's the best case scenario, if you factor in those same numbers for the S.R.O. on the larger buses, you've made buses have the same 30% capacity as cars do.

And that's only for the red route buses that get the most use. If you scroll down, you'll see bus lines that have less than 100 riders a day.

Privately-owned vehicles drive with a purpose to specific destinations and remain stationary (no energy consumed) for most of the day, meanwhile, far larger vehicles routinely drive around all day every day in circles with only a few people more often than not. Who's the more "efficient" vehicle again?
 
Privately-owned vehicles drive with a purpose to specific destinations and remain stationary (no energy consumed) for most of the day, meanwhile, far larger vehicles routinely drive around all day every day in circles with only a few people more often than not. Who's the more "efficient" vehicle again?
Well one type is meant for your average working and middle class person while the other is designed for Seniors, Youths, and those so autistic or criminal (Niggers) that they either refuse to get their license because anxiety or lost their licenses for criminal behaviour / drunk driving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Markass the Worst
They will be made to move, especially the people in the suburbs. Whether it be at the point of a gun (as in China) or through punitive regulations and fees (what the want for the US), these people will learn to love living in a cube.
View attachment 4978729
ALERT ALERT, THIS CLUELESS ASSHOLE DOESN'T KNOW HOW FOOD IS MADE

New Urbanism is the most classist shit I have ever seen. It's the insistence that the Western world has a right to build cities based around a useless service economy while all the manufacturing and pollution is outsourced to other countries.

"15 minute walkable cities" are impossible when a sizeable portion of the population needs to walk to work at a chemical plant.

Also the paternalistic "you can't always get what you want UWU" once again shows that this is not about sustainability, it's about control. Urban luxuries that take an ungodly amount of fuel from their logistical trains are okay but god forbid someone like to live where they can see the stars and have actual trees and animals around them.
 
Back