Why are women always liberal?

  • 🔧 Actively working on site again.
Muh feelings. The liberal stance on a lot of stuff is often argued from an emotional stand point which works well against women, its why the discourse about LGBT is always about 'letting them live with dignity'.

Marketers discovered in the 90's that Women respond well to emotional pleas when it comes to advertising. This has, in turn translated to the rest of the market, including politics. Now that Women are at parity with Men in earning power and voting rights. They have a captive influential audience. Therefore they can push Women to any political objective as long as it is on emotional grounds. Sign up for your child to get their dick/breasts cut off, sterilized for life and other medical complications? You don't want them to die and be in misery do you?

trans-rights-protest-scotland-scaled.jpg
 
There was a time when the female psyche manifested into a politics of temperance and prohibition, eugenics, anti-immigration, racial purity and Christian moralism, and in Germany women were instrumental in getting Hitler elected. Women's politics are different from men and it's true that they are more attracted to soft and cushy liberal or progressive values, at least in the modern West, but it's more complicated than the idea that women are just inherently liberal.
 
Same reason why there are a lot of liberal men. Lack of God in their lives.

Yes, women are a bit more "emotional" leading them to want to be more empathetic and nurturing towards people, but they can do those things without necessarily agreeing with or supporting liberal politics. Especially if they're following scripture. God asks us to love others while also not following the paths of sinners. Those aren't mutually exclusive.

Where I live, I know some very young women who don't agree at all with the LGBT and can see the harm it's doing.
 
You mean 'girls'. Us old birds see through the manipulation. Youngsters are drawn in by the need to be 'good', then we learn that we've been lied to and a 'good girl' is a goddamn useful idiot poised against society by family hating monsters.

The older I get the more people I'd have my men folk line against the wall.

ALL shitlib old women are just retards stuck in arrested development or aging BPD whores who've discovered their sex don't sell any more, but their useful idiot bullshit does. They can meet the wall too, granny faggots.
 
Allow my nigger Arthur Shopenhauer to explain.

You need only to look at the way in which she is formed to see that woman is not meant to undergo great labour, whether of the mind or of the body. She pays the debt of life not by what she does but by what she suffers; by the pains of childbearing and care for the child, and by submission to her husband, to whom she should be a patient and cheering companion. The keenest sorrows and joys are not for her, nor is she called upon to display a great deal of strength. The current of her life should be more gentle, peaceful and trivial than man’s without being essentially happier or unhappier. Women are directly fitted for acting as the nurses and teachers of our early childhood by the fact that they are themselves childish, frivolous and short-sighted; in a word, they are big children all their life long – a kind of intermediate stage between the child and the full-grown man, who is man in the strict sense of the word. See how a girl will fondle a child for days together, dance with it and sing to it; and then think what a man, with the best will in the world, could do if he were put in her place.

With young girls Nature seems to have had in view what, in the language of the drama, is called a coup de théâtre. For a few years she dowers them with a wealth of beauty and is lavish in her gift of charm, at the expense of the rest of their life, in order that during those years they may capture the fantasy of some man to such a degree that he is hurried into undertaking the honourable care of them, in some form or other, as long as they live – a step for which there would not appear to be any sufficient warranty if reason only directed his thoughts. Accordingly Nature has equipped women, as she does all her creatures, with the weapons and implements requisite for the safeguarding of her existence, and for just as long as it is necessary for her to have them. Here, as elsewhere, Nature proceeds with her usual economy; for just as the female ant, after fecundation, loses her wings, which are then superfluous, nay, actually a danger to the business of breeding; so, after giving birth to one or two children, a woman generally loses her beauty; probably, indeed, for similar reasons. And so we find that young girls, in their hearts, look upon domestic affairs or work of any kind as of secondary importance, if not actually as a mere jest. The only business that really claims their earnest attention is love, making conquests, and everything connected with this – dress, dancing, and so on. The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower it is in arriving at maturity. A man reaches the maturity of his reasoning powers and mental faculties hardly before the age of twenty-eight; a woman, at eighteen. And then, too, in the case of woman, it is only reason of a sort – very niggard in its dimensions. That is why women remain children their whole life long; never seeing anything but what is quite close to them, cleaving to the present moment, taking appearance for reality, and preferring trifles to matters of the first importance. For it is by virtue of his reasoning faculty that man does not live in the present only, like the brute, but looks about him and considers the past and the future; and this is the origin of prudence, as well as of that care and anxiety which so many people exhibit.

This is why allowing women to vote, followed by the wholesale feminization of society was and is so important to the (((globo)))
 
Women rely on men to keep their existences sheltered from reality, very similar to children. All the back-breaking and hard work in the world is performed by men 99.9% of the time.

If women were required to actually work in these soul-hardening jobs, they'd probably change their tunes about societal leeches taking advantage of them.
 
The big five personality model does indicate that women are a lot more agreeable on average compared to men, it's by birth.
1680699640946.png

Which means that they are averse to confrontation. In sociology this translate to them usually being cooperative and agreeing with the mainstream culture (or what she think is the mainstream culture).

Women are not "liberal". Women are following the culture, what they believe to be the "norm" (this also goes with their natural anthropological extreme fear of ostracization).
In muslim countries, women are very muslim. In natsoc Germany, women were very pro-natsoc. In Christian countries, they are very Christian.

If the TV (perceived as representative of current culture and mainstream opinion) tomorrow decides that you have to vote "right" and be pro-war, they will vote right and be pro-war.
Look how they were all anti-war and anti-corporation during Occupy, and now they're pro Pfizer and pro Ukraine war.

As most men with a wife can tell you, the woman usually will slowly change her views on things to mimic those of the people around her.
If she's not glued to the TV or the news all day, she will slowly have the same opinions and political views as her husband, friends, father, etc.

(Note: everything I said is a gross generalization. Women are not golems nor are they a monolith, but they are on average a lot more malleable than men, because they are agreeable.)
 
The big five personality model does indicate that women are a lot more agreeable on average compared to men, it's by birth.
View attachment 4984500
Which means that they are averse to confrontation. In sociology this translate to them usually being cooperative and agreeing with the mainstream culture (or what she think is the mainstream culture).

Women are not "liberal". Women are following the culture, what they believe to be the "norm" (this also goes with their natural anthropological extreme fear of ostracization).
In muslim countries, women are very muslim. In natsoc Germany, women were very pro-natsoc. In Christian countries, they are very Christian.

If the TV (perceived as representative of current culture and mainstream opinion) tomorrow decides that you have to vote "right" and be pro-war, they will vote right and be pro-war.
Look how they were all anti-war and anti-corporation during Occupy, and now they're pro Pfizer and pro Ukraine war.

As most men with a wife can tell you, the woman usually will slowly change her views on things to mimic those of the people around her.
If she's not glued to the TV or the news all day, she will slowly have the same opinions and political views as her husband, friends, father, etc.

(Note: everything I said is a gross generalization. Women are not golems nor are they a monolith, but they are on average a lot more malleable than men, because they are agreeable.)


Mattress Girl:

emma.jpg
 
I feel like there are probably a lot more conservative women than you imagine, they just don't screech as loud as the latter.
But woman brain still prevents us from wanting to speak our real opinion and become social outcasts - so we lurk in the shadows and mind our own business. Men ain't as scared to be disliked for a wrong think.

But as a whole, yeah, whamen will always, as a majority, be on the side of "waaah don't hurmt any1 feewings :("
 
A biological predisposition to prioritize agreeableness and empathy.

Pretty much this. Women also value equity versus men who value competition. And when I say equity I do mean it in the libtard sense of equality of outcomes. I'm too lazy to post the stoodies for you niggers but women hate it if any woman does better than the rest of them at anything, it drives them crazy and they want to pull that person back down and keep everyone equal. This may be related to why social media is worst for teen girls who constantly are bombarded with images of people who have better lives than them.

Men by comparison are much more drawn towards competition and hierarchy because that is how they attract mates in an evolutionary sense.
 
Back