War GoFundMe removes page supporting Army sergeant who shot and killed armed Black Lives Matter protester - Kyle Rittenhouse trial on Veteran Difficulty for the Defendent, no pun intended

Article (Archive)

A United States Army sergeant facing a murder charge after shooting a Black Lives Matter protester who approached his vehicle with an AK-47 had his GoFundMe page removed from the site by the company.

Perry’s attorneys confirmed to Fox News Digital that the GoFundMe page for their client, Army. Sgt. Daniel Perry, has been removed.

"It’s an expensive trial to undertake with the need for expert witnesses and stuff and we had a GoFundMe site that’s been taken down and it’s been weighing on him," Perry Attorney Clint Broden told Fox News Digital, adding that Perry’s father had to pay a "significant bond" for his release and that the ordeal has taken a "significant toll" on the family.

On the night of July 25, 2020, at about 9:50 p.m., authorities say Sgt. Daniel Perry was driving for Uber when he encountered a Black Lives Matter protest in downtown Austin, Texas. Perry, an active duty soldier, was stationed at Ft. Hood at the time. The protesters did not have a permit and were reportedly clogging a busy intersection.

After making a right turn onto Austin’s Congress Avenue, Perry’s attorneys say he was swarmed by a group of Black Lives Matter protesters and a masked man, later identified as Garrett Foster, approached his vehicle armed with an AK-47 in the "ready position" as protesters began banging on Perry’s car and throwing bricks.

Believing that Foster was beginning to raise the rifle and that his life was in danger, Perry fired the handgun he kept in his car console multiple times at which point another protester opened fire on him.

The man with the AK-47, Garrett Foster, was fatally wounded.

Roughly a year later, Perry was indicted on murder and aggravated assault charges by Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza who claimed that over 150 pieces of evidence and testimony from 22 witnesses during a three-week court hearing led to the decision to press charges.

Perry’s attorneys say the shooting was a clear case of self-defense and have expressed serious concerns with how the case has been handled by Garza’s office.

"Garrett Foster either intentionally or accidentally pointed his rifle at Daniel Perry’s head and Daniel Perry fired in self-defense," Perry attorney Doug O’Connell told Fox News Digital. "And as a practical matter he had no ability to retreat nor was he required to."

"You have the right to defend yourself in a crowd and you feel like you’re in imminent danger of being shot," Broden added. "That’s what it’s all about. I ask people to put themselves in Sgt. Perry’s position and you have this masked man with an assault rifle ready starting to raise it. I think anybody that had access to a firearm would react the same way."

Texas castle law extends to one's vehicle in some circumstances.

Veteran Detective David Fugitt of the Austin Police Department, the lead investigator on the case who has been on the Austin police force for 27 years, concluded that the shooting was justifiable homicide, but charges were filed anyway, and the veteran detective said in a sworn affidavit that Garza’s office committed witness tampering by preventing the grand jury from seeing exculpatory evidence.

Perry’s attorneys say that those who wish to financially support Perry can still do so via the GoGetFunding crowdfunding platform.

"I can confirm that this fundraiser was reviewed and found to be in violation of GoFundMe Terms of Service, and subsequently removed. GoFundMe prohibits raising money for the legal defense of a violent crime," a GoFundMe spokesperson said in a statement to Fox News Digital.

The platform has previously stated multiple times that it removes pages supporting those who are accused of a "violent crime" but has declined to completely remove pages of others accused of violent crimes in the past.

A trial date has not been set for the case but Perry's lawyers have a call scheduled with a judge on December 15th to review concerns with the grand jury process.
 
Was this the "the other side isn't out there because they're pussys" and ended up getting shot? Because that was funny. Hopefully this man walks free
Something to that effect yes, its that guy. I also think this guy has a high probability of walking free though his lawyer fees are going to crush him for years to come. Its pretty telling that the only person to be shot during this encounter was a guy with a rifle who is recorded talking a big game about how he is going to use the rifle. Rittenhouse had a few optics problems in that he showed up to the scene with a rifle and a telegraphed intention that if you started smashing and burning this auto lot you were going to get shot by him. This guy has far better optics because he is just a guy in the military doing a side job for extra cash and got interdicted by a mob he had no idea was there, only for one of the mob to point a rifle at him.
 
Jesus that looks like shit compared to what these lot sell.


View attachment 2776955


I look forward to MSNBC and Stephen Colbert defending open carry on the streets of America.
The Kalash USA is trash, used a non-forged receiver. Purely sells on the name.

The PSAK Gen 3 and newer lineup is great for $600-$700
 
Dunno about that part, but the article mentions the investigating detective was called to the stand by the defense, which is unusual. He (the detective) previously accused the DA of witness tampering and concealing exculpatory evidence:

https://twitter.com/AntifaWatch2/status/1643768783624974336 / https://archive.ph/gRXcf (wip)
Yeah it seems like the prosecution is trying to argue with the detective that the fat soy faggot wasn't pointing the gun at Perry because he was a manlet.
 
PSA has a certain reputation regarding AK's whose trunnions are cast (and shittily at that) that are basically a grenade that could explode on your 1st round, or the 10,000th round.
So basically Russian roulette but it explodes on whomever is firing it.
Yeah it seems like the prosecution is trying to argue with the detective that the fat soy faggot wasn't pointing the gun at Perry because he was a manlet.
Wasn’t that an argument against Rittenhouse as well? ‘This poor pedo is such a manlet any reasonable person couldn’t take him as a threat.’ 🤣
 
Yeah it seems like the prosecution is trying to argue with the detective that the fat soy faggot wasn't pointing the gun at Perry because he was a manlet.
It's clear from the video that Perry was driving normally for Lyft, was surprised by the gaggle of protestors on the road in the dark, and reacted in self-defense when shorty brandished his AK-pattern rifle. As you say, seem like the defense's argument hinges on "well it was raised but not directly pointed at him."

Perry didn't seek out or provoke the attack. He was placed in a bad situation by the decedent, who brandished the AK at night in the middle of the street during an unplanned, unannounced protest.
 
Closing arguments are done and the jury is deliberating. Perry may have fucked himself with texts that could be construed as premeditation (Austin Chronicle is pozzed but these facts are accurate):
https://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2023-04-07/might-have-to-kill-a-few-people / https://archive.ph/ghLBG (wip)
The testimony confirming Perry's anger toward protesters came on the third day of the trial as prosecutors displayed text messages and social media comments showing that he thought about killing them. "I might have to kill a few people on my way to work, they are rioting outside my apartment complex," Perry wrote to a friend in June of 2020. "I might go to Dallas to shoot looters," he wrote on another occasion. Perry also encouraged violence in a variety of social media posts.
Retards retain the right to self-defense but an Austin jury won't see it that way.

On top of being a fedposting retard, Perry is also a furry:
https://twitter.com/dogpatchpress/status/1383925764756705288 / https://archive.ph/p6VzU
https://dogpatch.press/2020/07/31/texas-activist-murdered / https://archive.ph/PjZA6
https://archive.is/VN1Wo <--- archive of his FurAffinity page
Comments on his archived FurAffinity profile were largely supportive:
daniel purry.png

The actual events are not on video to my knowledge, you cannot see the guy raise the AK or him being shot, there is a crowd in the way in both videos I've seen. Unfortunately its an absolute pain to get raw footage off youtube after such time.
They are, the video was shown at trial. In addition to the video(s), the defense presented a shitty 3D recreation of events:

https://www.fox7austin.com/news/daniel-perry-garrett-foster-murder-trial-renderings / https://archive.ph/MFslw
I'd include thumbnails, but KF can't handle WebPs and I can't be fucked to convert them.
 
Last edited:
I completely forgot about this case. It looks open and shut, but Austin jury so who knows.

If he gets convicted the gop governor better immediately pardon him.
Hot wheels Abbot won't pardon him but the jury being out 24 hours and counting tells me someone on the pozze Austin jury knows how the justice system works. They understand what "beyond a reasonable doubt" means. They understand the laws. They understand the presumption of innocence. They understand this isn't social media or a blm protest. This is a man's life. God willing that person converts the other 11 retards.
 

Daniel Perry found guilty of murder in protester’s death​

by: Julianna Russ, Jala Washington, Sam Stark

Posted: Apr 7, 2023 / 04:34 PM CDT
Updated: Apr 7, 2023 / 05:01 PM CDT

AUSTIN (KXAN) — The trial for Daniel Perry ended Friday, and after jury deliberation, he was found guilty of murder for the death of a man during a 2020 Black Lives Matter protest.

Perry faced one count of murder and another count of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon after the deadly shooting of Garrett Foster in the streets of downtown Austin on July 25, 2020. While he was found guilty of murder, the jury found that he was not guilty of the aggravated assault charge.

Austin police report from July 2020 incident​

According to APD’s description of the incident, a car turned on Congress Avenue near 4th Street at 9:51 p.m. into where a group of protesters was marching against police violence. Protesters surrounded the car. Foster was armed with an assault-style weapon and was one of the protesters who surrounded the car.
Former Austin Police Chief Brian Manley said that is when the driver, later identified as Perry, fired five shots from inside the vehicle, hitting Foster multiple times. Foster never fired a shot. Another protester then shot at the car three times but did not hit anyone.

Perry and the other shooter were detained by police after the incident. Audio from Perry’s 911 call and video from his interview with APD were played during the trial.

Recap of the trial​

During the trial’s opening statements March 28, the defense argued Perry had to defend himself after he was swarmed by protesters. Perry, an Army sergeant, came in contact with the protesters after traveling to Austin from Killeen to drive for Uber for supplemental income.

Opening statements from the state revealed Foster was a frequent BLM protester, and prosecutors said he was protesting nearly every day that summer. The state argued Perry incited the crowd, causing protesters to respond by hitting and kicking his car, and also screaming at him.

According to state prosecutors, Perry openly discussed his anti-protest feelings on social media. They said he had a conversation with a family friend a few weeks prior to the Austin BLM protest on July 25, about a protest in Seattle, where a driver drove into a crowd and killed a protester. Prosecutors said in this conversation with his friend, Perry agreed someone could and should claim self-defense even if they incited a crowd.

Perry’s defense said he did everything he could to avoid the protesters as he dropped off one of his riders downtown. They said he was fully cooperative with police and turned over his phone and social media passwords right away, without a warrant.

The state argued Perry sped into the crowd of protesters, though that was disputed by the defense’s expert witnesses who used science and data to track the speed of his car. The expert testified he was slowing down when his car entered the demonstration.

The defense and state both rested Wednesday afternoon. During the trial, nearly 40 witnesses were called on to testify. Closing arguments were given Thursday before jurors began deliberations.

Jurors concluded their deliberations Friday evening.
Source (Archive)

Governor Abbott better pardon him. What happened to the constitutional right to trial by a jury of your peers?
 
Veteran Detective David Fugitt of the Austin Police Department, the lead investigator on the case who has been on the Austin police force for 27 years, concluded that the shooting was justifiable homicide, but charges were filed anyway, and the veteran detective said in a sworn affidavit that Garza’s office committed witness tampering by preventing the grand jury from seeing exculpatory evidence.
Prosecutors being so bound to politics is so fucking dumb, fuck off cunts
 
Every last one of these jurors need a loaded gun pointed at their head every day for the rest of their lives and if they attempt to defend themselves they should be jailed.
I will never feel bad for any of these when they whinge about "more guns cause more violence".

If good, ordinary people cannot be safe, then neither can feral abhumans or their enablers.
 
Back