- Joined
- Feb 4, 2022
They are two completely different things. You are correct there. It's not fear-mongering as much as it is just fascinating. GnRH agonists (ie. puberty blockers) come with a ton of risks, but in severe outlier cases like an 11-month old menstruating, the risk-reward balance is more clear. In the case of an appropriately pubescent-aged child, it's just dystopian science fiction shit.I can't quote your post Map-Kinase-Kinase-Kinase and I now understand I was wrong in the original post. But won't there be exceptions to the gender transition ban when it comes to these cases? Tranny kids getting their endocrine system unnecessarily fucked with and a case like you linked are two different things. That comment is just fear mongering like tranny's and their supporters always do.
I remember the days when it was LGBQ, and it always struck me as funny that they shoved the Q aside so that the T could come first, instead of tacking the T on the end to make LGBQT (instead of LGBTQ). It's a weird acronym sperg on my part, but I always found it kinda symbolic.I can't even tell if this is pro-tranny or pro-lgb without the T.
Trannies went from wanting equality to demanding preference. T was part of the original LGBT, then they demanded 1/3 of the flag for themselves, and now even corporations are using the trnany flag instead of the rainbow flag during pride month.
Yes, please do separate yourself from the LGBQ. Make it a lot easier to tell the world that you're fine with faggots but not child-grooming troons.