Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

Just a reminder that there is no pleasing these people and that they should not even try.

2023485356.png
 
When I was ten, I read fairy tales in secret and would have been ashamed if I had been found doing so. Now that I am fifty, I read them openly. When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up.” - C.S. Lewis
Tbh I'd rather go back and read Andrew Lang's Fairy Books again than Potter for the first time.
 
Tbh I'd rather go back and read Andrew Lang's Fairy Books again than Potter for the first time.
Potter isn't bad. Reading it when it was new, there were no movies and the story wasn't spoiled everywhere certainly helped a lot in enjoying them but Rowling knows her craft and the books still hold up.
Of course knowing classics is important too - because they are classics for a reason, and to understand references and comments on those stories in later works.
 
Just a reminder that there is no pleasing these people and that they should not even try.

View attachment 4988256
How is there even a question of this? From what I've seen everything on HBO Max is deliberately as pozzed as possible. It's their ESG containment zone. Not only will there be more than one tranny, but there's going to be a shitload of black people and lots of gay shit that has nothing to do with the story.
 
Only Targs are not human. They are literally dragon-human hybrids (and dragons themselves are hybrids) and their genetics work differently than ours. Long ago Martin wrote or co-wrote a sci-fi novel with white-haired, pyromant human-like alien race being the rulers of the world. Targ much? Knowing Martin affinity for Lovecraftian horror (which he included in big doses in asoiaf) it's really not a surprise. Asoiaf is not a historical drama book. It's fantasy and its world and its rules are different than ours, that's all.
 
You know, I can't help but feel like there's a correlation between the 10 years the internet spent shitting on cringe feminism and the rise of troonery. We told real women to fuck off and then a bunch of nut cases that want to be anime girls took over the world.
Troonery arose out of feminism, it uses the same cry bully playbook.
 
Technically it is, everyone is upfront and honest to you and if they don't seem like it you have to strength to beat them up and take their lunch money
I'd say being regular man or woman is playing on medium. Being a trust fund kid is playing on easy. Being a troon or some other mentally ill person is playing on hard. Being born in some third world shithole is playing on impossible.
 
You know, I can't help but feel like there's a correlation between the 10 years the internet spent shitting on cringe feminism and the rise of troonery. We told real women to fuck off and then a bunch of nut cases that want to be anime girls took over the world.
Maybe we are the victim of our own mistakes, I'd take feminism over this wave of fake women nutcases anyday. A raging feminazi is still more tolerable than the average troon. Most women aren't necessarily responsible for its rise because the vast majority really don't give a shit.
 
I'd say being regular man or woman is playing on medium. Being a trust fund kid is playing on easy. Being a troon or some other mentally ill person is playing on hard. Being born in some third world shithole is playing on impossible.
Being poor/disadvantaged is the true difficulty slider for society, but nobody gets to talk about that because it would unite the majority of people against those at the top.
 
Last edited:
Modern feminism tells women that being a man is playing on easy, therefore creating TIFs.
Manosphere and incel communities tell men that being a woman is playing on easy, therefore creating TIMs.
Right, but that's modern feminism, trannies have been a thing for a lot longer than the modern wave of feminism. Under the last wave of feminism we saw women who insisted they could do anything that a man could that gender didn't make a difference. We saw women fighting to get into men only spaces, (looking at you Augusta National Golf Club). Point out they were whores, it was "slut shaming" and you were the bad guy. That shit evolved into "kink shaming" because for some retarded reason everything was worth of respect so sure... you dress as a woman and that's your thing do you! It was femnist male allies who fucked them with modern troonery.

I dunno, it's very possible (and fucking likely) I'm wrong. Its just the longer I look at the modern troonery movement the more it begins to resemble what I saw during the 90s/2000s feminism movement.

Don't blame all women for the worst excesses of feminism, because not all women were even feminists at all, and even those who were were not all completely insane.
I'm not trying to friend. I know plenty of women who look at feminism and hate it.

Being poor/disadvantaged is the true difficulty slider for society, but nobody gets to talk about that because it would unite the majority of people against those at the top.
This is the kicker that modern progressives do their best to ignore. It's not your race, it's not your sex, it's not where you want to put your (or want put in your) sexual organs, it's the size (or lack there of) your bank account.

And the reason most of them fight so hard to ignore it is because they are from wealthy families.
 
I dunno, it's very possible (and fucking likely) I'm wrong. Its just the longer I look at the modern troonery movement the more it begins to resemble what I saw during the 90s/2000s feminism movement.
I don't think they were ever as obnoxious, as successful, as violent and enjoyed as much support as troons are today. Those super-radical feminists who wanted to exile or castrate all men usually existed somewhere on the fringe of society and rarely did something impactful and meaningful.
 
I don't think they were ever as obnoxious, as successful, as violent and enjoyed as much support as troons are today. Those super-radical feminists who wanted to exile or castrate all men usually existed somewhere on the fringe of society and rarely did something impactful and meaningful.
Take a look at the origins of the feminist movement, the suffragettes.

Also as for the first part of your comment, "I don't think they were ever as obnoxious, as successful, as violent and enjoyed as much support as troons are today." I won't argue that they are as violent but when it comes to being as successful and enjoying as much support... take a look at feminist in HR.
 
Take a look at the origins of the feminist movement, the suffragettes.

Also as for the first part of your comment, "I don't think they were ever as obnoxious, as successful, as violent and enjoyed as much support as troons are today." I won't argue that they are as violent but when it comes to being as successful and enjoying as much support... take a look at feminist in HR.
Wow, that's so convenient to point out now. What happened? :thinking:
 
Back