- Joined
- Sep 26, 2019
Lol, no it doesn't.The vaccine works, take it, dickheads.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol, no it doesn't.The vaccine works, take it, dickheads.
No it doesn't, natural immunity works.The vaccine works, take it, dickheads.
Signed, someone who got COVID in 2020 and was sick like a fucking dog
Right from "used in africa, not commercialized because ebola only exists in limited countries" to "developed more for the US, despite only existing in limited countries". I wonder why they never fully finished developing it.i concede that i couldn't find any source confirming their use in africa. it seems as though the MRNA version of the vaccine was developed more for the US while africa got the classic viral vector ones.
Your mom works my dick.No it doesn't, natural immunity works.
are you one of those vax guys who thinks infection-induced immunity isn't actually a thing?Your mom works my dick.
Your mom works my dick.
I think he's saying your mother plays with his dick.are you one of those vax guys who thinks infection-induced immunity isn't actually a thing?
oh that's pretty random and funnyI think he's saying your mother plays with his dick.
they were used on guinea pigs, though.Right from "used in africa, not commercialized because ebola only exists in limited countries" to "developed more for the US, despite only existing in limited countries". I wonder why they never fully finished developing it.
Don't blame you for misreading though, the author really wrote that in a way that implies the vaccines were actually used instead of just developed. Many such cases
That you were misled by it indicates it's misleading. Incidentally all guinea pigs in the mRNA vaccine trial were euthanized 28 days after getting the ebola injection.they were used on guinea pigs, though.you know, it's funny, because i am unable to find anything regarding human trials for the MRNA ebola vaccine. i did find another article that mentioned the guinea pigs, though. from what i am gathering, though, they've been testing this for years, and only recently did the US sign a deal with Moderna (the same ones doing the guinea pig tests) to develop various MRNA vaccines, including one for ebola. maybe there were human trials between the guinea pig tests and the US government paying them to develop MRNA vaccines, but if there were i can't find any definitive proof.
so it's not lying, per se. they are developing ebola MRNA vaccines and they DO work. on guinea pigs. which isn't misleading at all.
you got me there, partner. if there were no MRNA vaccines used in africa, then the covid-19 MRNA vaccine would be the first true rollout of an MRNA vaccine.
that was me being facetious. i don't know much about the magical world of animal testing, but i wonder if there's a policy where they euthanize an animal once it's been used for a test, since it no longer is "pure" or whatever. idk. one would think they'd maybe put the animal up for adoption but what do i know.That you were misled by it indicates it's misleading. Incidentally all guinea pigs in the mRNA vaccine trial were euthanized 28 days after getting the ebola injection.
You were being facetious when you saidthat was me being facetious. i don't know much about the magical world of animal testing, but i wonder if there's a policy where they euthanize an animal once it's been used for a test, since it no longer is "pure" or whatever. idk. one would think they'd maybe put the animal up for adoption but what do i know.
?we've used this technology before, during the ebola outbreak in africa. of course, because it was found in a limited number of countries, it wasn't commercialized.
You were being facetious when you said
?so it's not lying, per se. they are developing ebola MRNA vaccines and they DO work. on guinea pigs. which isn't misleading at all.
Oh we're talking about different things I guess, I meant the author of the John's Hopkins piece you linked was being misleading with
as you seemed to interpret this as saying we had actually used the vaccines, a reasonable reading.The first mRNA vaccines using these fatty envelopes were developed against the deadly Ebola virus, but since that virus is only found in a limited number of African countries, it had no commercial development in the U.S.
i mean you're not wrong, it's misleading.Oh we're talking about different things I guess, I meant the author of the John's Hopkins piece you linked was being misleading with
as you seemed to interpret this as saying we had actually used the vaccines, a reasonable reading.
You probably don't want to put up ebola-injected animals for adoption. I mean. . .seriously?one would think they'd maybe put the animal up for adoption but what do i know.
...well fuck you and your common sense, fattieYou probably don't want to put up ebola-injected animals for adoption. I mean. . .seriously?
not even after receiving an effective vaccineYou probably don't want to put up ebola-injected animals for adoption. I mean. . .seriously?
i wonder if it's an issue of they're being vaccinated, but still being exposed to, and possibly carrying, ebola, which a potential owner likely isn't vaccinated against. so it's not to say the vaccine didn't work, but rather they may still be able to carry ebola somehow.not even after receiving an effective vaccine
I think @Lurker has gone above and beyond to prove that she does not understand this concept.A technology can be worked on for a decade and still be experimental / new. This is the first large-scale rollout of this kind of vaccine.