ATI Escapee
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2022
Not unusual for girls to start even earlier than that too
Female-to-male artist shoots up Presbyterian elementary school killing 6. - Female Troon (FTM) Shoots Up Christian School in Tennessee
- Thread starter LaxerBRO
- Start date
Gondolindrim
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2020
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
*Adjusts tinfoil hat*
He was stopped and disarmed when a couple students took action. They didn't cower and wait for police, they jumped Kinkle and then held him until police arrived.
There's potential for a bigger kill count if people don't realize they can fight back.
Guns are just tools. They aren't magic. Shooters can be disarmed. Shh, don't let people know that. Just tell them to hide, be afraid, and vote against the 2nd Amendment.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Another castrato fanatic, even more propagandic praise.
I am sure this will all end well.
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2023
I'd make a wager and assume that @Gloria The Glorious 's implication was that childhood sexual abuse is what causes those activists to turn gay. It's either that or something else entirely.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2020
Look here, I hate the amount of bigotry on this website. Trans people are valid and are real people who will do nothing wrong. Never in history has a trans person raped, killed or even hurt people. They are a race of love and mutilation.
This tranny wanting to shoot up a place is a reaction to the trans genocide I keep hearing about on the news and reddit. It was only going to be a peaceful mass shooting, like dude who cares about white people anyway?
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Tbf, rushing a person with a gun is a good way of getting shot. If you get a drop on the person or have friends rushing with you it might achieve something that is not a senseless sacrifice. Also considering that lately the targets are elementary schools, the only ones really in a position are teachers (who's better off staying with the students to get them out) and faculty members (who need to even get to a position to attack the shooter).
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
That's when it starts for girls. Boys usually start later.
Druveer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2018
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2022
How is this recent troon an Audrey Hale copy cat when he’d been making plans for months before the Hale shooting?
ATI Escapee
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2022
Writers were low on clicks
AutoClownMaker
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2020
Considering this claim is being made by a blue bearded deathfat drunkard who's latest grift is gonna be showing people how to act as men the "how" is 'suffering retardation'.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2022
The issue with my original comment was trying to settle it down to just a 2/3 year period, when people can from a variety of factors have that affected (there's studies suggesting that the growth hormones in beef and chicken has resulted in women especially now go through puberty about 3 years sooner than they used to. It's not definitive proof, but it's an interesting read). It's not a light-switch, it's a slow process that takes a while (from 2 to 5 years, which would actually make 14-16 a fair guess of when it ends, which is probably where I made that stupid mistake). But you guys are still right on your corrections, so let me give a better answer this time:
At the age of 7, they knew they were sexually attracted to the same person when they didn't know what sex was (dear god I hope not at least). If somehow age 7/8 is when puberty begins for all these celebrities, you wouldn't think of sexual relationships the moment it happens, you're probably having a small crush on someone with feelings you can't really describe. That's not just sexual, but also romantic attraction at play. But now, at a time when coming out as gay is now a protected stance to take, suddenly a lot of "famous" people realize how gay they totally were when going through elementary school, but seldom every remember or are willing to share what made them realize.
Not willing to share what made them is dumb because we don't need to know how long they "knew" they were "gay" to begin with; they could just say they were "in the closest and in denial" and keep the rest to themselves. And you don't need to explain every detail in public. "So there was this girl that I always liked more than the guy I was dating, and in hindsight I totally would have been going out with her instead if it were the norm back then." You think those kind of stories would at least naturally come up more, right?
And as for not remembering, how is it that bottom-tier weebs can still remember the characters who made them realize that sex appeal is quite appealing (the amount of Last Airbender fans who learned about fanservice from Ty Lee is almost scary), and yet these celebrities who want to know how much being gay/bi/not straight has always defined them but cannot remember what actually instigated that?
All of that is what makes it come off as attention whoring for the press.
Not willing to share what made them is dumb because we don't need to know how long they "knew" they were "gay" to begin with; they could just say they were "in the closest and in denial" and keep the rest to themselves. And you don't need to explain every detail in public. "So there was this girl that I always liked more than the guy I was dating, and in hindsight I totally would have been going out with her instead if it were the norm back then." You think those kind of stories would at least naturally come up more, right?
And as for not remembering, how is it that bottom-tier weebs can still remember the characters who made them realize that sex appeal is quite appealing (the amount of Last Airbender fans who learned about fanservice from Ty Lee is almost scary), and yet these celebrities who want to know how much being gay/bi/not straight has always defined them but cannot remember what actually instigated that?
All of that is what makes it come off as attention whoring for the press.
captkrisma
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
TN Bureau of Investigations director indicated in an interview this week that the shooter did not appear to target any individual or religion and that the manifesto had no obvious political agenda.
Sounds like suicide by cop if you ask me.
Sounds like suicide by cop if you ask me.
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2023
Any link or better indication where you came across this? My googlefu is failing me tonight.
captkrisma
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
EDIT: also says she wrote several journal entries idolizing school shooters.
HabeusCorPuss
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2022
The cretinous hacks who write headlines and edit front-page news, will call anything a "manifesto" as long as it's 1+ pages long and its author is controversial.
The media almost universally referred to James Damore's google/gender memo as a manifesto, and often as The Google Manifesto. He wrote it as an internal memorandum and didn't make it available to the public, it wasn't a manifesto.
Likewise with this crazy bitch. If she had written a "manifesto", then by definition she would have published it.
The media almost universally referred to James Damore's google/gender memo as a manifesto, and often as The Google Manifesto. He wrote it as an internal memorandum and didn't make it available to the public, it wasn't a manifesto.
Likewise with this crazy bitch. If she had written a "manifesto", then by definition she would have published it.
manifesto
măn″ə-fĕs′tō
noun
1. A public declaration of principles, policies, or intentions, especially of a political nature.
2. A public declaration, as of a sovereign or government, or of any person or body of persons, making known certain intentions, or proclaiming certain opinions and motives in reference to some act or course of conduct done or contemplated; in general, a proclamation.
3. A public declaration, usually of a prince, sovereign, or other person claiming large powers, showing his intentions, or proclaiming his opinions and motives in reference to some act done or contemplated by him.
4. A public declaration of principles, policies, or intentions, especially that of a political party.
5. a public declaration of intentions (as issued by a political party or government)
măn″ə-fĕs′tō
noun
1. A public declaration of principles, policies, or intentions, especially of a political nature.
2. A public declaration, as of a sovereign or government, or of any person or body of persons, making known certain intentions, or proclaiming certain opinions and motives in reference to some act or course of conduct done or contemplated; in general, a proclamation.
3. A public declaration, usually of a prince, sovereign, or other person claiming large powers, showing his intentions, or proclaiming his opinions and motives in reference to some act done or contemplated by him.
4. A public declaration of principles, policies, or intentions, especially that of a political party.
5. a public declaration of intentions (as issued by a political party or government)
anti SJW
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2016
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2021
I wasn't sure if I should bring this up at all, but since I don't need to necro the thread for it, I might as well.
So one of the pictures of her in particular caught my attention several times. You may find the reasons retarded and they might be, but here goes anyway.
It might just be my facial blindness, but I could swear I once knew someone who looked just like this irl. No it definitely wasn't Audrey, neither of us is a burger and she spoke a completely different language accent-free.
She was the kind of person that will spite you at every turn and actively look for some excuse to snap at you, even if she needs to pretend to mishear things just to contrive said excuse. She had that exact same thing going on as every dyke I've ever met irl (every mtf tranny is included as well as some but not all gay men), where every interaction seemed to have some baggage over it even though rationally on a personal level, there should be none. I'm not even sure how to summarize it, just saying 'she has a chip on her shoulder' doesn't do it justice.
Tell me if the following sounds in any way familiar to you. Have you ever met a person who from your first encounter with them, will treat you like you're guilty of something really really bad, on the level of burning orphanages or dismembering innocents, even though you haven't actually done anything like that and you've only just met them so it's not even like there's some personal history to explain this? Spiteful glares, choosing to word everything in the most accusatory way possible, suddenly raising her voice and shouting you down when nobody was saying anything hostile to begin with, stuff like that. When you ask them outright what their problem with you is, they will either claim that there is no problem or refer to some non-issue that only arose in reaction to their aforementioned behaviour. It's like they're constantly seething, quietly and without wanting to let you know why.
I occasionally wonder if asking about this phenomenon warrants its own thread.
So one of the pictures of her in particular caught my attention several times. You may find the reasons retarded and they might be, but here goes anyway.
She was the kind of person that will spite you at every turn and actively look for some excuse to snap at you, even if she needs to pretend to mishear things just to contrive said excuse. She had that exact same thing going on as every dyke I've ever met irl (every mtf tranny is included as well as some but not all gay men), where every interaction seemed to have some baggage over it even though rationally on a personal level, there should be none. I'm not even sure how to summarize it, just saying 'she has a chip on her shoulder' doesn't do it justice.
Tell me if the following sounds in any way familiar to you. Have you ever met a person who from your first encounter with them, will treat you like you're guilty of something really really bad, on the level of burning orphanages or dismembering innocents, even though you haven't actually done anything like that and you've only just met them so it's not even like there's some personal history to explain this? Spiteful glares, choosing to word everything in the most accusatory way possible, suddenly raising her voice and shouting you down when nobody was saying anything hostile to begin with, stuff like that. When you ask them outright what their problem with you is, they will either claim that there is no problem or refer to some non-issue that only arose in reaction to their aforementioned behaviour. It's like they're constantly seething, quietly and without wanting to let you know why.
I occasionally wonder if asking about this phenomenon warrants its own thread.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2020