Diseased Sanctioned Suicide - "Kill yourself" but unironically with sodium nitrite. Higher death count than the Farms. Targeted by parents, legislators, and journalists looking to alter Section 230.

The SS website has information about suicide on it, but it's a stretch to say that I put it there or even endorse much of the information there. Simply hosting the platform doesn't mean that you agree with everything on it.
You mentioned this before, as there is nothing illegal about hosting a platform for talking about things, but has SS ever received any official, proper legal take down notices or requests from authorities in your time?
 
But even if the outcomes of your actions are good a society cant tolerate something like this.

as you type this some cartel member is grooming a kid to join in Freefire, pedos are sharing videos on twitter dms and some girl is getting gangraped after getting catfished on Tinder. None of those platforms are ever held liable for anything, including most of the cyberbullying that leads kids to commit suicide which all happens of the most popular social media apps. Porn sites are not liable when kids lie about their age to access hardcore fetish videos in 4k HD.

Some rando saying they want to rope on the internet is not a crime and when it comes to private messages and agreeing on commiting felonies only the people involved are liable.

If i wanted to know how to tie a hangsman's knot and looked for it the first article i'd come acrosss would be Wikipedia explaining it in detail.
 
Its clear a parent who lost a child to suicide would act in irrational ways.

Of course, calling for public executions and going after suicidal people, threatening and doxxing them, is totally normal behavior...

It's been years. Sincere question. When does the victim card expire? Don't get me wrong, losing someone to suicide is a horrible experience but you can't justify their outright malicious behavior with grief. People who grieve don't act like that. Assholes do. And honestly, the moment you use your voice to push for repeal of section 230 or otherwise regressive legislation like the Online Safety Bill, you kinda stop being a victim, don't you think? They're trying to crack down on internet freedom with the help of politicans and that affects all of us. So no, I'm not just gonna sit down and let it happen.

And let's not forget, these people supported the "harmful but legal" clause of the Online Safety Bill. They would do anything to get rid of "bad" speech online. And maybe you shouldn't have grieving people in the process of lawmaking. Agreed?
 
Please don't bother replying to @TheAntiE-CelebLeague00, he's a rampant baitposting schizo. He probably didn't even read the OP and just started smashing out paragraphs of dreck to soak up attention with.
Well that's rather apparent by the very first paragraph he wrote in his first post schizoposting about satanists and jews out of nowhere.

Anyway I am not exactly sure what's the motivation behind telling other people that their lives are worthless and that they should kill themselves for supporting a site talking about a suicide.

Step 1: Tell the (former) owner of suicide forum to kill himself because talking about suicide is bad
Step 2: ???
Step 3: Suicide is no more
 
I briefly skimmed the SS just now and the ammount of recent accounts with anime profile pictures posting stupid crap is pretty high . Tantacrul's video with his anime girl thumbnail really paid off.
Troons found another outlet they could try to overrun and farm attention from. Many such cases.
 
I briefly skimmed the SS just now and the ammount of recent accounts with anime profile pictures posting stupid crap is pretty high . Tantacrul's video with his anime girl thumbnail really paid off.
It's an ironic thing that the so-called "opponents" of suicide forums routinely try to get suicidal people to kill themselves. This happened even back in the days of alt.suicide.holiday which had a troll/lolcow named Douglas Russell Wiser who not only tried to get suicidal people to kill themselves, but was also a pedophile who hit on suicidal underage girls.
 
It's an ironic thing that the so-called "opponents" of suicide forums routinely try to get suicidal people to kill themselves. This happened even back in the days of alt.suicide.holiday which had a troll/lolcow named Douglas Russell Wiser who not only tried to get suicidal people to kill themselves, but was also a pedophile who hit on suicidal underage girls.
Filling it with zoomers and trannies is a pretty good effective tactic to ruin a site too though. Or maybe Tantacrul just hates his young audience this much and just wants them to rope.
 
I wonder how many of the forum users who post those "CTB posts" actually end things up. My take - rarely any. Some posts and threads just reek of mental masturbation.
I'd suggest most fit your description. Despite the media screeching, suicide is simply not really all that common. The biggest tell for a future completed suicide is a previous attempt and even among that group less than a few percent carry it off, ultimately.

Though somebody's making a few shekels off of suicide "prevention" and it isn't the knuckleheads behind this site. From the most recent 990 for the AFSP:
1681036097605.png
Something to keep in mind the next time somebody comes around shaking a tin cup for "out of darkness" walks or whatever.
 
I am a user of SS, so I come to tell my testimony

After the NYT event, Marquis contacted me to agree on a possible transfer of the domain and servers, but later, this change of mind because he found a better qualified user for the position

But this shows how Marquis no longer has anything to do with the forum, and anyone who tries to link him to the forum today, are just baseless theories.

In fact, the participation of Marquis in the months before the event of the NYT was already quite low.
 
The Silk Road helped facilitate the sale of illegal drugs, but they did Ross Ulbricht wrong in the end. Free Ross Ulbritcht.
Yeah, the guy who hired hit-men to keep his site up deserves to go free. Also he only got caught by glow sting op by LEAVING HIS SILK ROAD LAPTOP UNLOCKED AND LOGGED IN A PUBLIC LIBRARY he deserves it for being dumb and retarded
 
Yeah, the guy who hired hit-men to keep his site up deserves to go free.
He didn't actually hire real hitmen. The genius (like most tales of hiring hitmen online) tried to hire some feds posing as hitmen.

Also he started out his crime career using his rossulbricht@gmail.com email address, his literal actual name, and posted to bitcointalk.org using this.
 
@afounder What is your position on lolicon/shota? Would you a host a site with it? Would you host an text based forum for pedophiles to discuss, no image sharing just plain text? People should be able to speak their minds without being judged?

"I just believe that people should be able to speak their mind (within the law) without being judged or sectioned." - @afounder
 
Last edited:
What is your position on lolicon/shota? Would you a host a site with it? Would you host an text based forum for pedophiles to discuss, no image sharing just plain text? People should be able to speak their minds without being judged?

No, that stuff is degenerate. I draw the line at content that could be illegal, such as lolicon/shota content. I do equate that stuff to CP, which is illegal. Even though lolicon/shota isn't illegal per say, I wouldn't host a forum with it.

I wouldn't even host text discussions for pedophiles, because that's not something I would be comfortable hosting.

I draw the line there.

You mentioned this before, as there is nothing illegal about hosting a platform for talking about things, but has SS ever received any official, proper legal take down notices or requests from authorities in your time?

The only requests I remember answering a request of a copy of Shawn Shatto's posts to the detectives that reaching out for them. The other time is when the Italian authorities reached out and I told them to kick rocks. Other than those 2 incidents, I haven't received any subpoenas or requests for user data.
 
I just believe that people should be able to speak their mind (within the law) without being judged or sectioned.
If this is what you meant to say then it’s retarded. Your speech being lawful should give you protection from legal harassment; it doesn’t mean that no one else gets to judge you, call you an immoral dickhead or to hope you flip.

I’m presuming you meant sanctioned rather than sectioned, but given that sectioning is what we call mental health holds in the UK then it seems appropriate to the topic anyway.
 
If this is what you meant to say then it’s retarded. Your speech being lawful should give you protection from legal harassment; it doesn’t mean that no one else gets to judge you, call you an immoral dickhead or to hope you flip.

I’m presuming you meant sanctioned rather than sectioned, but given that sectioning is what we call mental health holds in the UK then it seems appropriate to the topic anyway.

Someone saying something doesn't mean that you should involuntarily commit them. Far too many cases of people being involuntarily committed in these mental health cases instead of getting to the root of the problem. The government cares too much about people living, but not enough about making people's lives better. That's enough political sperging for me today.

But I will protect lawful speech regardless.

You have to understand that these people cant voice this opinions elsewhere, that's why they do so on the forum. If they voiced these opinions elsewhere, they would not be taken serious or they would have a suicide hotline shoved in their faces. I believe that have that space to vent without al of that is a good thing.
 
Back