Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

[Oliver D Smith]

I'm not talking about an electorial platform, you dumbass, I'm much more interested in the policy implications that stem thereafter.

Of course, you would rather just spend your time on the internet doing nothing. Typing pointlessly about race and IQ and other crackpot subjects on forums. No one cares.

 

[Autphag]

Of course, you would rather just spend your time on the internet doing nothing. Typing pointlessly about race and IQ and other crackpot subjects on forums. No one cares.

Apparently the meaning of "policy implications" had swept far above your head so... lol.

 

[Rou]

What the hell is going on in this thread

lolcow threeway
We are going autism beyond autism. Of course, these people are just left wing plants going out to discredit the right, like if they need help doing it.

 

[Oliver D Smith]

Apparently the meaning of "policy implications" had swept far above your head so... lol.

Apparently you're so thick you don't understand what I posted.

 

[Autphag]

Apparently you're so thick you don't understand what I posted.

I understood perfectly, you're just a small-minded crypto-neolib trying to constrict the rightist movement by saying anything that doesn't pander to moderatism must be a leftist plant.

 

[Oliver D Smith]

lolcow threeway
We are going autism beyond autism. Of course, these people are just left wing plants going out to discredit the right, like if they need help doing it.

It doesn't take a genius to work that out. In Autphag's thread, he just posted he wants to be sodomised by children. Does that sound normal to you? Both Autphag and Mikemikev are only online to make the "right" appear as insane as possible.

 

[Autphag]

In Autphag's thread, he just posted he wants to be sodomised by children.

Er, no. People keep misinterpreting my most basic of remarks. This is what people like LagoonaBlue and other leftists have misconstrued of my writings.

My adult baby/infantilist/little fetishes are kind of immaterial to this thread but it's pretty fucking simple if you weren't a dense cunt.

 

[Oliver D Smith]

I understood perfectly, you're just a small-minded crypto-neolib trying to constrict the rightist movement by saying anything that doesn't pander to moderatism must be a leftist plant.

Show me where there is sensible discussion on your blog. Can you also explain why there are veteran nationalists saying exactly what i'm saying? In fact I was saying this, long before these people.

Save the white race & white genocide isn't working

British Nationalism is Finished

A Closer look at the White Nationalist Movement

 

[Autphag]

Show me where there is sensible discussion on your blog. Can you also explain why there are veteran nationalists saying exactly what i'm saying? In fact I was saying this, long before these people.

Save the white race & white genocide isn't working

British Nationalism is Finished

A Closer look at the White Nationalist Movement

Have you considered that it might have just been doomed from the beginning, based on what I can see of the video thumbnails, in which borderline-retarded Combat 18 members with the most gaudy of aesthetic appearances are making public fools of themselves? I don't assume for one second that you descend from that crowd, but of course, you might've been overestimating the potential of the movement to begin with.

 

[Oliver D Smith]

Anyone this late posting holocaust denial or race and IQ on internet forums is indeed a leftist plant, hence Metapedia and Rightpedia is run by the Southern Poverty law center. These crazy subjects are exactly what the liberal-left want. So-called "anti-racist" organisations like Hope not hate and the Southern Poverty law center would also notexist if this sort of talk wasn't online - that's why they encourage it and send their spies in like Mikemikev to sit on forums all day posting this sort of stuff. "its the jooz!" "mass immigration caused by jooz to genocide whites!"...

 

[Autphag]

Anyone this late posting holocaust denial or race and IQ on internet forums is indeed a leftist plant, hence Metapedia and Rightpedia is run by the Southern Poverty law center. These crazy subjects are exactly what the liberal-left want. So-called "anti-racist" organisations like Hope not hate and the Southern Poverty law center would also notexist if this sort of talk wasn't online - that's why they encourage it and send their spies in like Mikemikev to sit on forums all day posting this sort of stuff. "its the jooz!" "mass immigration caused by jooz to genocide whites!"...

Take your fucking anti-psychotics. They wouldn't want either me or Mikemikev in the SPLC or HnH for more glaringly obvious reasons than our ostensible politics. I, unlike the other, however, freely admit to my flaws.

 

[Oliver D Smith]

Have you considered that it might have just been doomed from the beginning, based on what I can see of the video thumbnails, in which borderline-retarded Combat 18 members with the most gaudy of aesthetic appearances are making public fools of themselves? I don't assume for one second that you descend from that crowd, but of course, you might've been overestimating the potential of the movement to begin with.

The public sees those chavs and hooligans as nationalists. So nationalism is demonised; made to look for violent thugs and the underclass. As for C18: it was created by M15 immediately after Dereck Beacon's victory; C18 carried out a knife attack on the BNP organiser who got Beacon elected. That BNP organiser is also saying exactly what i'm saying here: he's now a member of the English Democrats and knows race & IQ, holocaust denial etc. is stupid.

 

[Autphag]

Why are you so vehemently for race denialism despite the mountains of evidence in support of it? Maybe it isn't something to be promoted on an electoral platform but you're missing the point: it is for discussion outside of the political sphere but within the internal halls of our political discourse.

 

[Oliver D Smith]

Why are you so vehemently for race denialism despite the mountains of evidence in support of it? Maybe it isn't something to be promoted on an electoral platform but you're missing the point: it is for discussion outside of the political sphere but within the internal halls of our political discourse.

'Race realism' is antithetical to ethno nationalism/tribalism. For example it groups English with Poles and Italians. Why? Secondly, its a pseudo-science movement like creationism.

 

[Autphag]

'Race realism' is antithetical to ethno nationalism/tribalism. For example it groups English with Poles and Italians. Why? Secondly, its a pseudo-science movement like creationism.

Not really. In terms of gross racial typology, sure; the English, Pollaks, and Italians, are White Caucasoid. What they aren't is the same type of White Caucasoid, there exist sub-classifications beneath race. The Anglo-Saxons are Germanic, the Poles are Slavs, the Italians are Mediterranid, or to the North, Alpinid Mediterranid-Aryan admixtures, the rare "Olive-skinned blue-eye" type. Raciology did develop with meticulity so as to properly delineate distinctions in this respect.

Furthermore, it doesn't solely concern itself with racial typology, although the methodologies for it -- genealogical analysis, physio-anthropological meausrement -- are arguably far more cogent than the claim of UNESCO in the scientific consensus against race contrived by the left in the 1960s. This methodology extends to the intangible. IQ meausrement is unquestionably the only rubric we have for assessing the abilities of an individual's cognition, there is no reason why a group as large as race should be excluded from meta-analytically aggregating the results to determine the variegations not only in the level of thought, but the style of which each race specialises in (Negroids are good short-term memorizers, Jews are verbally adept, Whites are all-rounders, Mongoloids are good visuo-spatial manipulators and can see objects in their mind with seeming acuity).

This gives as a deeper understanding than the old fallacious cultural-essentialism arguments, which grow tired on closer inspection; biological essentialism can then be given way to a more sensitive treatment of the matter than the crass assumption that positive discrimination doesn't necessarily set up minority races for failed expectations (protip: it most certainly does, and it is from thence that they develop resentment for Whites).

 

[Adamska]

All this slapfight is proving to me right now is that the imaginary kikespiracy is right and whitey does deserve death by blueballs if these are the finest specimens of racial purity we got.

 

[Rou]

All this slapfight is proving to me right now is that the imaginary kikespiracy is right and whitey does deserve death by blueballs if these are the finest specimens of racial purity we got.

I'm just watching how many buzzwords they can spout.

 

[Strelok]

All this slapfight is proving to me right now is that the imaginary kikespiracy is right and whitey does deserve death by blueballs if these are the finest specimens of racial purity we got.

The Irish will rise above all. According to the white nationalists the Catholics are part of the kikespiracy too.

We've been playing the long con.

 

[Oliver D Smith]

Not really. In terms of gross racial typology, sure; the English, Pollaks, and Italians, are White Caucasoid. What they aren't is the same type of White Caucasoid, there exist sub-classifications beneath race. The Anglo-Saxons are Germanic, the Poles are Slavs, the Italians are Mediterranid, or to the North, Alpinid Mediterranid-Aryan admixtures, the rare "Olive-skinned blue-eye" type. Raciology did develop with meticulity so as to properly delineate distinctions in this respect.

Furthermore, it doesn't solely concern itself with racial typology, although the methodologies for it -- genealogical analysis, physio-anthropological meausrement -- are arguably far more cogent than the claim of UNESCO in the scientific consensus against race contrived by the left in the 1960s. This methodology extends to the intangible. IQ meausrement is unquestionably the only rubric we have for assessing the abilities of an individual's cognition, there is no reason why a group as large as race should be excluded from meta-analytically aggregating the results to determine the variegations not only in the level of thought, but the style of which each race specialises in (Negroids are good short-term memorizers, Jews are verbally adept, Whites are all-rounders, Mongoloids are good visuo-spatial manipulators and can see objects in their mind with seeming acuity).

This gives as a deeper understanding than the old fallacious cultural-essentialism arguments, which grow tired on closer inspection; biological essentialism can then be given way to a more sensitive treatment of the matter than the crass assumption that positive discrimination doesn't necessarily set up minority races for failed expectations (protip: it most certainly does, and it is from thence that they develop resentment for Whites).

Why are English, Poles and Italians, "Caucasoid"? This macro-grouping of ethnic groups like "Mongoloid" or "Negroid" is arbitrary. If someone wanted they could extend "Caucasoid" to cover any ethnic group. That's what happened in the 19th century and early 20th century, e.g. the Ainu people of Japan were once classified as "Caucasoid". Genetics has also falsified these macro-groupings because there is no genetic discontinuity between them; here is a PCA global plot from Tishkoff et al. (2009). Note the clear cross-continental genetic continuum. At no point can you objectively say where "Caucasoid"/"Negroid"/"Mongoloid" starts or ends on a geographical map. Mikemikev has failed for the past 5+ years when asked to show this.

 

[Autphag]

Why are English, Poles and Italians, "Caucasoid"? This macro-grouping of ethnic groups like "Mongoloid" or "Negroid" is arbitrary. If someone wanted they could extend "Caucasoid" to cover any ethnic group. That's what happened in the 19th century and early 20th century, e.g. the Ainu people of Japan were once classified as "Caucasoid". Genetics has also falsified these macro-groupings because there is no genetic discontinuity between them; here is a PCA global plot from Tishkoff et al. (2009). Note the clear cross-continental genetic continuum. At no point can you objectively say where "Caucasoid"/"Negroid"/"Mongoloid" starts or ends on a geographical map. Mikemikev has failed for the past 5+ years when asked to show this.

Ainus have discernably Caucasoid features, just because they'd found a Caucasoid exclave in Japan does not mean the franchise of that typology was there-extended. Besides, they're not technically Caucasoid but Aboriginal-Caucasoid hybrids, but that's besides the point.
I have a feeling you're misrepresenting the data. That doesn't look continuous at points, it's clear that they're clustered at the very minimum even if the continuum can viably run on a cladistic line down a linear ancestral lineage, it demonstrates phyletic branching, at which ends the continuum has discrete incontiguities. These discree incontiguities as well as representing abstract genetic distance will correspond with the geographical distance that inevitably comprises these occasional seperations. This is just common sense from an racial-anthropological evolutionary-biological standpoint.