Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Not Who You Think]

LARPing jewish is a thing among certain evangelical christians. The worst of them eliminate christian holidays as un-biblical events. Easter is wrong because your supposed to be celebrating passover. Christmas is wrong because there is no religious reason to celebrate a birthday. And church is generally wrong too because its not jewish. But celebrating or transforming jewish things that these people don't really understand to their own purposes is great.

The worst of them have ideas about magic "jewish blood" and are often obsessed with creating questionable ancestries to prove their "bloodline". Their ideas tend toward the people "of the blood" being natural rulers over the rest of humanity after the second coming. And of course their "blood" makes them superior within their little religious group as well.

These people are generally weird and awful and don't really understand anything about either religion at all. Nick would fit right in with the christian jewish LARP community. And I'm sure all seems so much "real" to him that than "fake" christianity that the churches do.

It seems that Nick is trying to find a way for God to fit his lifestyle. A more sincere effort to follow God would have it the other way around.

Spoiler: Regarding the Christian/Jewish LARP for interested parties.

Though the Biblical Law can inform culture, it is a moral code first and foremost. People who supplant this moral code with a culture miss the point of why Jesus had a problem with the Pharisees who were preaching the jewish culture of the time over God's Law. It's not about becoming jewish, it's about obedience to God. Failure to make this distinction will only result in condemnation. People can/will hold to their respective cultures, but what a professing Christian does when there is a conflict between the Law and their culture will reveal where their values/beliefs truly lie.

That said, if all one is looking for is a moral framework for society and don't care much for the idea of God then moral solidarity becomes the goal. Either way, heretics in terms of God's Law or society's laws tend not to fare well and are often convinced of their own superiority, sometimes via a martyr complex (persecution = validation).

Also, God's Law states that there was nothing inherently special about the Hebrew people and the fact that the Lord would go on to punish them throughout the ages (even in their own texts) is further proof of this. The Biblical feasts are reminders of God's goodness/provision/power and not about how "special" the Hebrews were. The feasts are, in summation; remember the Lord and what He has done. I'll stop here.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

LARPing jewish is a thing among certain evangelical christians. The worst of them eliminate christian holidays as un-biblical events. Easter is wrong because your supposed to be celebrating passover. Christmas is wrong because there is no religious reason to celebrate a birthday. And church is generally wrong too because its not jewish. But celebrating or transforming jewish things that these people don't really understand to their own purposes is great.

The worst of them have ideas about magic "jewish blood" and are often obsessed with creating questionable ancestries to prove their "bloodline". Their ideas tend toward the people "of the blood" being natural rulers over the rest of humanity after the second coming. And of course their "blood" makes them superior within their little religious group as well.

These people are generally weird and awful and don't really understand anything about either religion at all. Nick would fit right in with the christian jewish LARP community. And I'm sure all seems so much "real" to him that than "fake" christianity that the churches do.

That's great and all but it's much simpler than that. Rekieta's a polish jew. He has no real religion but has a general drift now he's old towards the basic ghetto collectivism as manifested in bullshit "holy days" for rat-men.

 

[Wilhelm Bittrich]

Except it will be archived on Kiwi Farms.

In 4k? Asking for a friend.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Just noticed that GOOCH1001 a.k.a. Tub_Boss a.k.a. Donald Gooch has not been in LOCALS since @Cynthia Behave has called him out for possible CP under either of these names.

I have been waiting since then then to see what might happens in the LOCALS chat, but I believe a sufficient amount of time has passed to comment on this.

What does this mean? I do not know, but let me know what you think of this face?

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Just noticed that GOOCH1001 a.k.a. Tub_Boss a.k.a. Donald Gooch has not been in LOCALS since @Cynthia Behave has called him out for possible CP under either of these names.

I have been waiting since then then to see what might happens in the LOCALS chat, but I believe a sufficient amount of time has passed to comment on this.

What does this mean? I do not know, but let me know what you think of this face?

View attachment 5027220

Looks like Rekieta in about 5 years of hair loss and 50 more pounds.

 

[localsinsight919]

Balldo is about to go live with drex

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Here is the archive of the chat from last night that lasted through today's hearing in the Quest Lawlsuit. I figured it might be of more interest, so I went through the trouble of making it a PDF to be more accessible.

I do not have the time to look through it right now to make commentary, but there might be some quality milk or brain-dead legal takes, so here you all go.

 

[Chibitzen]

Elissa Clips put up the audio for the Montagraph court hearing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n09NtuKAD9Y

For the archive:

 

[localsinsight919]

Elissa Clips put up the audio for the Montagraph court hearing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n09NtuKAD9Y

For the archive:

View attachment 5027623

hopefully it goes to discovery, burn more holes in nick's pockets and his GSG

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Elissa Clips put up the audio for the Montagraph court hearing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n09NtuKAD9Y

For the archive:

View attachment 5027623

I nodded in agreement when Randazza called Rekieta a "legal comedian", but then I realized he was referring to Nick's show and not the total joke that is Nick's motion practice.

 

[Joggin Noggin]

Elissa Clips put up the audio for the Montagraph court hearing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n09NtuKAD9Y

For the archive:

View attachment 5027623

Two and a half minutes in and Randazza is talking about 2 girls 1 cup. This is gonna be a funny hearing, isn't it

 

[Pudding Night]

I just finished watching Divorce Attorney Shin last night. The inciting incident that causes him to give up classical piano and become a divorce lawyer is when his sister gets mowed down in a car accident caused by her husband's mistress.

It felt like it happened in the first ten minutes, but it may have been later. They showed it numerous times throughout the twelve episodes though.

My favorite accidents in the dramas are when a truck is beeping its horn from a block away and the person stands staring at it and gets hit. I've seen this countless times and it never gets old.

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

Looks like Rekieta in about 5 years of hair loss and 50 more pounds.

That was pretty much my first impression, except I was going to say that it was as though Nick ate Humpty Dumpty.

 

[sum ting wong]

Elissa Clips put up the audio for the Montagraph court hearing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n09NtuKAD9Y

For the archive:

View attachment 5027623

This poor judge having to sit through 2 internet retards slap fighting, talking about 2 girls 1 cup and Monty's weird video's. Frankly they should both have to pay the judge just for bringing it this far.

 

[MudPeople]

Elissa Clips put up the audio for the Montagraph court hearing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n09NtuKAD9Y

For the archive:

View attachment 5027623

Rekieta taunted a few times on his show to sue him. Would adding that mean anything/affect their case at all?
At the very least it'll show Rekieta meant what he said to be factual and was confident enough to go to court over it.

Edit:
His main defense seems to be he's always joking on his show. But he's also a lawyer and should know better.

If he looses, he'll have to pay up, but if he wins does that mean anyone can call him names as long as its in jest?

I hope it goes to trial and they live stream it. I also hope every Laytube people cover it including Law and Crime who does long overly detailed dive into case. It would be so funny if Legal Bytes and Hoeg did a Lawtube special tearing apart Rekieta's defence, cashing in and make her comeback.

 

[Daniel Wallace]

Rekieta taunted a few times on his show to sue him. Would adding that mean anything/affect their case at all?
At the very least it'll show Rekieta meant what he said to be factual and was confident enough to go to court over it.

You could also make the exact opposite argument, that Rekieta was confident enough to go to court over it because he knew it wasn't true and wouldn't be taken seriously.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

You could also make the exact opposite argument, that Rekieta was confident enough to go to court over it because he knew it wasn't true and wouldn't be taken seriously.

Rekieta both said it was opinion and that it was fact, and he has said over and over again he isn't joking. More recently he started with the "people think" ie he is trying to do the "some people think" / it's just opinion defense.

 

[MudPeople]

You could also make the exact opposite argument, that Rekieta was confident enough to go to court over it because he knew it wasn't true and wouldn't be taken seriously.

I don't know, if someone says something and then challenge the target to take him to court I'd assume what he said was so true it can be proven in court.
On the other hand if it wasn't true and wasn't meant to be taken seriously, why go to court? A retration and apology would be enough?

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

I don't know, if someone says something and then challenge the target to take him to court I'd assume what he said was so true it can be proven in court.
On the other hand if it wasn't true and wasn't meant to be taken seriously, why go to court? A retration and apology would be enough?

Listening to the audio of the hearing, I don't hear anything from Schneider that makes me think he's a fucking loon. And he was way more specific than Randazza. Unless Randazza is that big a hotshot he can literally walk into court, wink, and get the outcome he wants, Schneider did a great job I think.
People saying no questions means it slightly favors Rekieta are offbase imo. Schneider really brought his A game and went through arguments with citations. I know when we were in court (contract shit) the guys who did that - won. They were on the ball, they were switched on. Randazza seemed more out of it to me. Not negligent or Ty Beard tier but just not nailing it point by point.
And I thought Schneider made the right point - being a PDFile is not just a slur, it's a fucking crime and saying it is per se defamation.

Here is the archive of the chat from last night that lasted through today's hearing in the Quest Lawlsuit. I figured it might be of more interest, so I went through the trouble of making it a PDF to be more accessible.

I do not have the time to look through it right now to make commentary, but there might be some quality milk or brain-dead legal takes, so here you all go.

Anyone looking for Still-Life insanity, apparently Locals has started intervening and just deleting anything he or anyone else posts that they think is against their rules, assuming they have rules.
Rekieta should definitely attack Locals over that. They're not his dad!

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Rekieta taunted a few times on his show to sue him. Would adding that mean anything/affect their case at all?
At the very least it'll show Rekieta meant what he said to be factual and was confident enough to go to court over it.

Edit:
His main defense seems to be he's always joking on his show. But he's also a lawyer and should know better.

If he looses, he'll have to pay up, but if he wins does that mean anyone can call him names as long as its in jest?

I hope it goes to trial and they live stream it. I also hope every Laytube people cover it including Law and Crime who does long overly detailed dive into case. It would be so funny if Legal Bytes and Hoeg did a Lawtube special tearing apart Rekieta's defence, cashing in and make her comeback.

I doubt they will stream it. There is very little interest.

Interestingly enough, Nick tossed the idea of streaming it himself out there. I think it will be funny if he had to backpedal on that. He will probably have to come up with some excuses to not do it once it gets serious.

Remember, this was going to make him SO much money and he was going to LAUGH! Who is laughing now?

Anyone looking for Still-Life insanity, apparently Locals has started intervening and just deleting anything he or anyone else posts that they think is against their rules, assuming they have rules.
Rekieta should definitely attack Locals over that. They're not his dad!

Why do you think that? I haven't had a chance to check this log.