LORD IMPERATOR
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2020
Probably both. They just want to use it to call Conservatives fascist all over again.In other words leftists are either huge autists who can’t understand people not taking things 100% seriously or they are just arguing in bad faith to find anything to attack their enemies on.
Breadtubers keep whining about how 40K's satire is lost on conservative players, even though 40K conservative fans like Arch freely admit that they know the Imperium is shit and that they wouldn't want to live there.
@Sargon's wife's son
False. The nation-state as you know it did not exist until the Late Renaissance, when the kings started centralizing rule in a Roman fashion to focus all power on the throne. Prior to that, you had different city-states, aristocracies, feudal monarchies, bishoprichs, duchies, with people swearing allegiance to all sorts of sovereigns. You can have Frenchmen paying homage to the King of England, or Muslims paying homage to the Catholic King of Sicily.I can literally find people saying the exact same thing about racial nationalism from 300 BC the reason people will faithful to Kings and the church is cuz they represented the nation state.
Then as a reactionary, your job should be to disparage and denounce nationalism since it replaced God with a flag. God and the Church were at the center of social life until nationalism replaced religion with national identity, which led down the road to World War 1 and millions dying for nationalist causes. Prior to nationalism, wars between kings were a trifling affair; almost like soccer. Barring exceptions like the Thirty Years' War and the Hundred Years' War, most wars went on and off over small disputes and were resolved rather quickly. But 100 years after nationalism had taken root in Europe following the French Revolution, and you get two world wars where millions of people died because of nationalistic causes.No it is not reactionaries like myself believe in absolute monarchy We Believe equality is a myth because it is no one is actually equal the fact that anybody actually came up with the idea of egalitarianism is hilarious because you take one look at the world around you and you realize the world is inherently on Fair and that's fine.
The one difference is that the Church can hold the king's feet to the fire back in the Middle Ages. Supreme authority derived from God means that if God's middle-men decided that you're out of line, you lose that authority, and nobles and commoners alike can rebel against you in good conscience without violating their faith. You can't do that with Communism, where guys like Xi Jinping or Mao Zedong can do whatever they like and people line up for it.They believe in the supreme authority of their selected clique ("vanguard party") in the same way a king believes in his supreme authority derived from God. In practise, you cannot find many differences between the court of an absolute monarch and the inner circle of a communist party in terms of functionality.