Defendant: Ethan Oliver Ralph - Ethan Ralph's Documented Legal Troubles & Other Court Docs

[Mr E. Grifter]

It was just a convenient lie for both of them to give cover to behavior both knew was absolutely wrong and retarded.

Faith was desperate for some reason to go see her online boyfriend, so she decided to lie about being abused and stalked and needed her big, strong internet boyfriend to rescue her. Ralph wanted to have sex with Faith, he didn’t give a fuck about the dumb drama she was spinning. However he did need a good cover story for why he was flying a teenager across the country to live in his bedroom at his mom’s house and have sex with her.

They went with a dumb knight in shiny armor narrative to rationalize this shit to the public and it resulted in exactly what everyone predicted.

However, Faith was just a dumb teenage girl with a crush and Ralph was a predatory adult man acting despicably. He is a groomer and abuser.

I think with Faith it wasn't used as a justification, it seems to just be a pattern of attention seeking behaviour she employed throughout her mid to late teens - if her Twitter and prior online presence is anything to go by. She wanted sympathy, and for the weird gaggle of boys she spoke to online to fuss about her and her plight. Most of these boys were her age, younger or dribbling retards.

Ralph would have let her move in with him regardless, because his only aim was to have some easily abused teenager who would rub his micropeen on demand. That said, did he believe her? I think he did on some level, otherwise why would he bringing it up to Mr. Vickers in the "Rad Roberts" emails as part of the opening salvo? It may be motivated reasoning - but he still believed it.

Even if he did, it's no excuse - inviting a school girl to live with you to escape a broken home isn't the right course of action, calling a wellness check or alerting the proper authorities is. Except that wouldn't allow Ralph to get his pecker wet.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

These two men (Ralph and Vickers) have nearly 100 years (and 500 pounds) (I'm being kind) between them. And they choose to exploit and abuse a 20-ish year old young woman of questionable stability, and unquestionably immature and disordered judgment (and who needs to be focusing on her child and getting herself together better), as well as to waste public resources (the court system, social services, taxpayer money, and - sooner or later if not already - most likely public healthcare resources as well, at least for Ralph). All for some stupid blood feud on the level of two 9 11-year-old boys with no sense of honor, dignity, or accountability.

Ideally, the next judge to have the pleasure of their slap fight would issue sua sponte enhanced/new (as applicable) restraining orders on both of them, and sanctions* for frivolous and fraudulent/disingenuous filings, as applicable (Ralph for sure; dunno about Vickers).

And when the relevant RO is violated, the next judge (it would then be a criminal matter) should impose every available penalty (though the statute, for a DVRO at least, provides for a fine and/or up to a $1000 fine, judges can also/in lieu order probation with all kinds of requirements, including monetary penalties, compensation to the victim for expenses incurred as a result of the violation, and managed probation, to include any of unannounced probation officer visits, monitoring of online activity/statements, substance testing, completion of anger management and similar programs, counseling, and community service. Yes, pick up garbage by the side of the road, you fat babies.)

*there's more than one reason Ralph's attorney priced Ralph out of retaining her; pro se individuals are rarely monetarily sanctioned under Rule 11 (or the state equivalent, which in CA is California Code of Civil Procedure Section 128.7), but actual attorneys are not usually granted the same leniency.

Don't law me; I'm familiar and know the entirety of the above is probably not (yet) legally justifiable/in scope based on the filings/submissions and/or adjudicated matters to date. But at a certain point, there really ought to be an Irritation Tax. I also want a transcript of proceedings made available to the public, during which the court admonishes them both to shut their whore mouths.

 

[MadStan]

If I were the judge I'd sentence him to some quality time with Big Bad Bubba.

Ok now you see the problem with your suggestion is that it gets me all excited and I hate revealing what I'd really like to happen...you know how it is when you voice what you'd really like and it is like some higher power hears you and denies you your wish.

More than Bubba of Sing Sing, I'd like for Pedro of the Sinaloa in El Hongo to entertain Ralph for us.

 

[.iota.]

I think Ralph is gambling on the fact that if he can offload the crime to May then he can use the “cannot be forced to testify against your own spouse“ law when in his own litigation.

Ok Mr Ralph, this court would like to discuss this diary—
“Yuuuh Hawner, I can’tz be discussing dat wid y’all as dat wuz mah wife May. You probably read about it on Twitter dawt com that she did indeeeed cunfes so I can nawt be blamed or discus the matter further, I am very smart”

i previously posted about the two types of spousal privilege in california.

ianal, but i suspect that because they both publicly posted the confession video (meigh tweeted it, then the ragepig retweeted her post), they both have forfeited their spousal communication privilege because the confession was not a private conversation between spouses, it was a publication. and, i suspect that if either of them were to now sign and submit a declaration regarding meigh's confession, their testimonial privilege would also be forfeited, if that declaration were to be considered as testimony by the court.

 

[AnOminous]

And when the relevant RO is violated, the next judge (it would then be a criminal matter) should impose every available penalty (though the statute, for a DVRO at least, provides for a fine and/or up to a $1000 fine, judges can also/in lieu order probation with all kinds of requirements, including monetary penalties, compensation to the victim for expenses incurred as a result of the violation, and managed probation, to include any of unannounced probation officer visits, monitoring of online activity/statements, substance testing, completion of anger management and similar programs, counseling, and community service. Yes, pick up garbage by the side of the road, you fat babies.)

The judge could also (unlikely) find neither party is doing an adequate job representing the child and appoint a guardian ad litem, to be paid for by either or both of them.

 

[Zaryiu2]

A real man would have killed himself by now. Ralph is clearly a woman

That's a insult to womens, Ralph is a tranny

 

[Mr E. Grifter]

i previously posted about the two types of spousal privilege in california.

ianal, but i suspect that because they both publicly posted the confession video (meigh tweeted it, then the ragepig retweeted her post), they both have forfeited their spousal communication privilege because the confession was not a private conversation between spouses, it was a publication. and, i suspect that if either of them were to now sign and submit a declaration regarding meigh's confession, their testimonial privilege would also be forfeited, if that declaration were to be considered as testimony by the court.

From what I have read, this only applies when you are actually married - any communications that occurred prior to the marriage isn't privileged. So she could be called to testify.

I think what they're doing is going for the "Ralphamale din know ya owna", and ultimately without any direct evidence - minus some screenshots of DMs which may or may not be presentable in court on - there isn't enough to catch Ralph on...Yet.

In the chudbud leaks Vickers was talking about subpoenaing Daimyo - the DMs with him and Ralph, iirc, were where there is an insinuation Ralph is involved.

With that said, it seems to me to be immaterial - Ralph broke this order many, many times, so going through the effort to prove a specific case among many that has this many moving parts may be an inefficient use of time and effort.

 

[Sam Losco's Wife]

With that said, it seems to me to be immaterial - Ralph broke this order many, many times, so going through the effort to prove a specific case among many that has this many moving parts may be an inefficient use of time and effort.

It's because what they did could be considered extortion which would be a criminal offense and Ralph was party to that. It's a long shot I know but I'm just putting myself in Ralph's pilled out alcoholic mind.

 

[.iota.]

From what I have read, this only applies when you are actually married - any communications that occurred prior to the marriage isn't privileged. So she could be called to testify.

With that said, it seems to me to be immaterial - Ralph broke this order many, many times, so going through the effort to prove a specific case among many that has this many moving parts may be an inefficient use of time and effort.

you're right, i was mistaken, spousal communication privilege only extends after a marriage. i still suspect that they've forfeited both of their privileges, but if she is called to testify, which i truly hope and kind of doubt will happen, it will because of the absurd declarations that they submitted.

i agree with you that it's a moot point, though, because of all of the other violations. the diary was a huge violation because of all his lying about its whereabouts to the court, but there are still plenty of others.

he has two court appearances in april, and another in may. he better pray for more smeagolfan donations if he's going to be able to afford all of that traveling. i wonder if he'll try to lure chris chan onto his show for an interview. maybe he'll even be desperate enough to trot his "gender-questioning" whorse out as bait again ...

 

[Don'tAnalizeMeBro!]

From what I have read, this only applies when you are actually married - any communications that occurred prior to the marriage isn't privileged. So she could be called to testify.

I think what they're doing is going for the "Ralphamale din know ya owna", and ultimately without any direct evidence - minus some screenshots of DMs which may or may not be presentable in court on - there isn't enough to catch Ralph on...Yet.

In the chudbud leaks Vickers was talking about subpoenaing Daimyo - the DMs with him and Ralph, iirc, were where there is an insinuation Ralph is involved.

With that said, it seems to me to be immaterial - Ralph broke this order many, many times, so going through the effort to prove a specific case among many that has this many moving parts may be an inefficient use of time and effort.

Most of the DVRO violations are of the kind EOR can say "AH USED THE WRONG APP TO CONTACT FAITH BAH MISTAKE YER HONAH!". The diary is a whole 'nuther thing because Faith has repeatedly asked for it and several other items to be returned to her and EOR has repeatedly told the court "AH DON'T HAVE THAT, YER HONAH!". Then it suddenly shows up in the hands of The Dayimo with several pages ripped out, and showing both Pantsu's (and I thought someone recently said Ralph's as well) handwriting in various places at the same time Ralph asked The Dayimo where "a fan" could send him something and then took off to Portugal at very late notice to get his ass kicked again when the moron got up in Cog's face and tried to slap Cog's cell phone out of his hand. This thing with FaiFai's diary is supposedly what set the wheels in motion for EOR to move his family to Mexico and if it can be proven in a court of law it'd be a world of unpleasantness for EOR.

 

[Tiger Jack]

Most of the DVRO violations are of the kind EOR can say "AH USED THE WRONG APP TO CONTACT FAITH BAH MISTAKE YER HONAH!". The diary is a whole 'nuther thing because Faith has repeatedly asked for it and several other items to be returned to her and EOR has repeatedly told the court "AH DON'T HAVE THAT, YER HONAH!". Then it suddenly shows up in the hands of The Dayimo with several pages ripped out, and showing both Pantsu's (and I thought someone recently said Ralph's as well) handwriting in various places at the same time Ralph asked The Dayimo where "a fan" could send him something and then took off to Portugal at very late notice to get his ass kicked again when the moron got up in Cog's face and tried to slap Cog's cell phone out of his hand. This thing with FaiFai's diary is supposedly what set the wheels in motion for EOR to move his family to Mexico and if it can be proven in a court of law it'd be a world of unpleasantness for EOR.

"If it can be proven" being the operative term here.

I think it's reasonable to assume that he kept the diary and intentionally lied to the court about not having it given his track record (how many years did he hold on to Nora's dildo?). But again, can Vickers prove that?
Make no mistake though, Ralph was definitely involved in sending the diary to The Dayimo. We're talking about a man who's such a paranoid control freak that he installs keyloggers on his girlfriends devices. To claim that Pantsu managed to do this without him knowing is, on the face of it, absurd. He controls her devices, he controls her social media accounts. There is not a single thing she does or says online that escapes the Sauron-like gaze of his little pig slits. Pantsu may have been the one to mail it out, but only because Ralph told her to.

That being said, he's probably gonna get away with it. I don't think Vickers has enough evidence to prove Ralph's involvement, and I think Ralph has given himself enough plausible deniability. It'll really have to depend on what exactly is in those chatlogs between Ralph and Dayimo, but I'm not expecting much.
The court will give Pantsu a slap on the wrist, if they punish her at all, and Ralph will do a little victory truffle shuffle until the next round of legal tardfighting.

 

[Mr E. Grifter]

Most of the DVRO violations are of the kind EOR can say "AH USED THE WRONG APP TO CONTACT FAITH BAH MISTAKE YER HONAH!". The diary is a whole 'nuther thing because Faith has repeatedly asked for it and several other items to be returned to her and EOR has repeatedly told the court "AH DON'T HAVE THAT, YER HONAH!". Then it suddenly shows up in the hands of The Dayimo with several pages ripped out, and showing both Pantsu's (and I thought someone recently said Ralph's as well) handwriting in various places at the same time Ralph asked The Dayimo where "a fan" could send him something and then took off to Portugal at very late notice to get his ass kicked again when the moron got up in Cog's face and tried to slap Cog's cell phone out of his hand. This thing with FaiFai's diary is supposedly what set the wheels in motion for EOR to move his family to Mexico and if it can be proven in a court of law it'd be a world of unpleasantness for EOR.

Sorry ya HONAH I meant to tell Faith her pussy was loose on the parenting App!

Nah, the nature of what he said in my instances would also most probably represent a DVRO violation even if he did use his FailedFatherApp.

 

[MeltyTW]

enough evidence to prove Ralph's involvement, and I think Ralph has given himself enough plausible deniability

No not really, I think people give ralph too much credit when I think it's nore the court can't be assed to deal with every irrelevant Ethan Ralph sperg when they have rapes and murders on their hands and more lucrative people to fuck over.

I think if justice was the only factor he'd be found guilty easily

 

[Don'tAnalizeMeBro!]

Sorry ya HONAH I meant to tell Faith her pussy was loose on the parenting App!

Nah, the nature of what he said in my instances would also most probably represent a DVRO violation even if he did use his FailedFatherApp.

They're all DVRO violations. My point is that the whole thing with the diary is far more than the usual "AH USED THE WRONG APP! MY BAD YER HONAH!" or the "AH WAS PISSED OFF WHEN FAIFAI SAID MAH DRIVING WASN'T VERY GOOD AND SAID SUMTHIN' HORRIBLE ABOUT HER NETHER REGIONS OUT OF RAGE THAT AH COULD NAWT CONTROL YER HONAH!" that might see EOR do some more anger management classes to work off.

 

[Anonanon]

that might see EOR do some more anger management classes to work off.

This would be a good outcome for content as well. Imagine the hollering if forced to go to California just for court mandated anger management classes.

 

[Ivan Daniloff]

Just to confirm, is he continuing to entertain all this pesky court shit because he wants to maintain access to the US for his retarded events? We all know that it’s not to see guntling 1. It’s not like he’d get extradited for this nonsense, right?

 

[Telemeter]

Just to confirm, is he continuing to entertain all this pesky court shit because he wants to maintain access to the US for his retarded events? We all know that it’s not to see guntling 1. It’s not like he’d get extradited for this nonsense, right?

Even if he is found guilty on all the Vickers stuff, its probably like a $500-$1000 fine or something. Vickers is doing it purely to make his life hell and Ralph is too afraid to not play along with it.

 

[Ivan Daniloff]

Even if he is found guilty on all the Vickers stuff, its probably like a $500-$1000 fine or something. Vickers is doing it purely to make his life hell and Ralph is too afraid to not play along with it.

Afraid of what? Wouldn’t it be super Ralphamale to just ignore all of it and go about his business?

 

[Sock Cucker]

LIS > Bill Tracking > SB1515 > 2023 session

Props to:

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/us-porn-id-device-level-porn-filtering-megathread.158678/

Edit: removed poor imitation of Ethan Ralph- just can't go that low.

 

[NicoFountaine]

What's gotten into Ralph hollering so hard about the court cases? He does that shit when he's scared.