Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Swole McPole]

As much as Nicky's beclowned himself over this past almost a year, trying to invoke Alex Jones in a trial makes Schneider into a faggot of such colossal proportions, the scales tip decisively in Rekieta's favor. I welcome your rainbows.

This just makes me root for Schneider though. He's so obviously outgunned and outclassed in every possible sense, it's like a David vs Goliath battle. Nick is the more charismatic and personable client, by far. Randazza is a much more skilled and successful lawyer. In a sane world, Schneider would never have taken the case, and as soon as Nick indicated his unwillingness to settle, he'd have packed up Monty's bags and sent him home.

And yet here we are. For all Monty and Schneider's failings, it's really hard for me to not want to root for the underdog. And in my imagination, the whole thing plays out like some James Stewart/Henry Fonda legal drama from the 1940s, in which the slick firm of big city lawyers storms into town to take on some hayseed lawyer in front of a jury of hicks.

And we all know how those movies played out.

 

[5t3n0g0ph3r]

This just makes me root for Schneider though. He's so obviously outgunned and outclassed in every possible sense, it's like a David vs Goliath battle. Nick is the more charismatic and personable client, by far. Randazza is a much more skilled and successful lawyer. In a sane world, Schneider would never have taken the case, and as soon as Nick indicated his unwillingness to settle, he'd have packed up Monty's bags and sent him home.

And yet here we are. For all Monty and Schneider's failings, it's really hard for me to not want to root for the underdog. And in my imagination, the whole thing plays out like some James Stewart/Henry Fonda legal drama from the 1940s, in which the slick firm of big city lawyers storms into town to take on some hayseed lawyer in front of a jury of hicks.

And we all know how those movies played out.

Imagine wanting to root for a guy who takes pictures of nude children as an underdog.

 

[dustnight]

Imagine wanting to root for a guy who takes pictures of nude children as an underdog.

As opposed to rooting for the one prepping the bull to save his children?

 

[Swole McPole]

Imagine wanting to root for a guy who takes pictures of nude children as an underdog.

You know the story of The Boy Who Cried Wolf? Rekieta tells so many lies that I just don't believe anything that he says any more. And if he *really* wanted to defeat an expensive defamation law suit -- stop it in it's tracks, right at the start -- then the thing to do would be to start entering evidence of Monty's paedophilic tendencies into evidence. Yet I heard no mention of any nude pictures of children in Randazza's address to the court. Some talk of melons, and mention of him acting out the scenes from two girls one cup, but nothing at all about nude children.

You want to win your case? Win over the jury's opinion? You really need to provide some evidence in support. Enter those nudes into evidence. But Rekeita's position seems to be 'I don't really believe the guy's a paedo, I was just making jokes, man!'

If Rekieta doesn't think he's a paedo, why will the jury?

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

Post receipts, newfag.

I'm still writing a program to compile all my facebook messenger messages. Then I'll put them all in excel and spam them every page. Just for you.

 

[5t3n0g0ph3r]

You know the story of The Boy Who Cried Wolf? Rekieta tells so many lies that I just don't believe anything that he says any more.

I'm not talking about Rekieta. I'm talking about Null's phone call with Monty that's in the OP of Monty's thread.

 

[AnOminous]

If Rekieta doesn't think he's a paedo, why will the jury?

You'd think if Nick had some evidence of this dude actually "sucking little boys' dicks," he'd have put it into evidence

But maybe that was bullshit. Maybe that was a lie.

Maybe Nick said the most defamatory thing it is possible to say about a person, despite it being false and despite having literally zero evidence to support it.

Maybe that's why he had to hire the most expensive First Amendment lawyer in the country to defend him for his obviously false and defamatory claim.

 

[Nothing To Say Here]

I'm not sure but he probably should have had a part in this video:

The forgotten Gooch verse

My name is GOOCH and I’m a Nick R fan -
I only wish I could drink like he can;
My one true hope when I grow up -
Is for a trailer trash wife so we can Balldo it up!
So why am I here is what you’re wondering -
Because the farms rightfully suspect me in a CP ring!

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Imagine wanting to root for a guy who takes pictures of nude children as an underdog.

This sounds damning until you realize the people who make those claims are literal mental case freaks who think that Monty has governmental connections at the highest level, is part of a Satanic murder cult, and that he is implicated in the JonBenet Ramsey case.

The 2012 YouTube video that purports to show Monty admitting to the allegations does not actually show him admitting them, and the other piece of evidence it presents makes no sense. It presents a screen grab of a 2002 ad seeking models except the ad SPECIFICALLY states he's seeking models aged 21-40.

Monty is a psycho himself and also creepy as hell but his deranged alogs could claim that he committed an act of jaywalking and I wouldn't believe them.

You really need to provide some evidence in support.

Don't worry, Randazza has submitted the deranged YouTube video from 2012 which cites an ad that seeks models aged 21+ as proof of Monty abusing children as evidence.

It's Exhibit 15 of his reply to Schneider's response to the motion to dismiss.

Rekieta's problem is that he thought he could make the same evidence-free claims as Monty's alogs while also bragging about his millionaire lifestyle and still not get sued. It's too bad "JUICYLITIGATIONTARGET" is too long for a vanity plate, because that's more fitting for him than "LAWPOPE" at this point.

I'm not talking about Rekieta. I'm talking about Null's phone call with Monty that's in the OP of Monty's thread.

Timestamps?

I listened to it a couple months ago after this lawsuit was filed and don't recall him admitting anything relating to the photography business. I recall him saying he'd want to physically attack anyone he sees who started those rumors and later asking why he hasn't been arrested yet if it was true he was openly posting this material online.

I just scanned the thread, and there were 0 mentions of Monty admitting to heinous crimes during the call. There are multiple people posting about how their impressions of Monty went up after listening to the call, which makes me think that it's a pretty safe bet that no such admission was made. Null himself said he had "seen no credible evidence" which contradicts Monty making any sort of major admission during the call.

I think you're mixing up the call with Null with this clip of Monty talking to the camera which was edited in the October 2012 YouTube video to emphasize one sentence to make it look like he was admitting it when even within the clip the surrounding context makes it sound like he's denying it, ignoring any additional material which was cut out entirely.

 

[Swole McPole]

I just scanned the thread, and there were 0 mentions of Monty admitting to heinous crimes during the call. There are multiple people posting about how their impressions of Monty went up after listening to the call, which makes me think that it's a pretty safe bet that no such admission was made. Null himself said he had "seen no credible evidence" which contradicts Monty making any sort of major admission during the call.

If anything, this thread could serve as evidence for Monty that his reputation has been damaged by Rekieta's defamation. There's been no shortage of people here repeating the assertions that he's a paedophile who likes to take nude photographs of children, despite there not being the slightest bit of evidence in support of that claim that I've ever seen.

If that doesn't count as damage to your reputation, I don't know what would.

Edit: He doesn't even fuck the melon! Here's @Null in that Monty thread just after the phone call.

"I've also added the melon to the OP. I almost left it out because I found it the most disappointing thing of the entire shitshow. I was promised a man fucking a melon and what I got was a man tenderly fingerbanging a melon and selling it to weird sex perverts as a joke. The people pushing this shit sell it in deceptive packaging."

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

This sounds damning until you realize the people who make those claims are literal mental case freaks who think that Monty has governmental connections at the highest level, is part of a Satanic murder cult, and that he is implicated in the JonBenet Ramsey case.

The 2012 YouTube video that purports to show Monty admitting to the allegations does not actually show him admitting them, and the other piece of evidence it presents makes no sense. It presents a screen grab of a 2002 ad seeking models except the ad SPECIFICALLY states he's seeking models aged 21-40.

Monty is a psycho himself and also creepy as hell but his deranged alogs could claim that he committed an act of jaywalking and I wouldn't believe them.

Schneider and his client have both directly referred to the edited or misleading nature of the "evidence" Rekieta is trying to rely on, and that's why Schneider is so adamant about the discovery because it will set out the uncut statements and unedited clips.
Monty's peculiar "art" doesn't disturb me as much as some of the Rekieta content and in terms of who looks like more of a sleazy pervert on camera - it's a dead heat or Rekieta's ahead imo. The greasy face, haunted eyes with the drunk bags, the silly ranting and raving in his high pitched voice, the whiny shouting, gonna look and sound real good in court, Rekieta. Lookin' real good there boss.

 

[Chibitzen]

Both lawyers sounded "just OK" but relied too much on character smears. "But his client is worse than my client, your honor!11" Lefty talking points such as threatening Dr Fauci and sounding like Alex Jones were pretty lame. I think they were checking for any potential biases the Judge might have and maybe wanted to dissuade her looking too hard into their client's SEO record. "My client isn't really the alt right talking dick that you might've seen on Google, your honor..."

 

[Owlbear]

Monty's peculiar "art" doesn't disturb me as much as some of the Rekieta content and in terms of who looks like more of a sleazy pervert on camera - it's a dead heat or Rekieta's ahead imo. The greasy face, haunted eyes with the drunk bags, the silly ranting and raving in his high pitched voice, the whiny shouting, gonna look and sound real good in court, Rekieta. Lookin' real good there boss.

On one hand, you can believe that Monty is just giving some very creepy people what they want, including fingering a melon and attacking a "teen" actress wearing a pig mask (that hides the fact that she is not actually a teenager). On the other hand, the creative brain that thinks of satisfying the people by fingering a melon is almost certainly attached to a man who wants to torture teenagers and fuck melons.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

On one hand, you can believe that Monty is just giving some very creepy people what they want, including fingering a melon and attacking a "teen" actress wearing a pig mask (that hides the fact that she is not actually a teenager). On the other hand, the creative brain that thinks satisfying the people by fingering a melon is almost certainly attached to a man who wants to torture teenagers and fuck melons.

The Monty burlesque is no different from the Rekieta burlesque except Rekieta clearly genuinely enjoys his exhibitionistic anal expletive fetish behavior where Monty seems more like an opportunistic loser looking for a shock value gimmick. In no way shape or form do I think Monty's predilections can be deduced but I can absolutely conclude from what Rekieta has actually done and been photographed doing who and what he is. And that has implications for this silly lawsuit.

 

[localsinsight919]

Did nick leave drex home alone with lady rackets when he drove into the twin cities today? Cause drex is live now so he's still there

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

This is a promising show. Big Herc's channel has some good stuff

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayXLhkb8yLQ

I mean...
Lookin' real good there, boss.

nana nana nana nana RAT-MAN

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Nick did a car stream as he drove to Minneapolis for 'an appointment' by himself.

- Nick wants to race Coomalot. He applauds his pivot to conversational streaming content.

- Nick heard that Schneider got BTFO'd for lying in court and his only prayer is getting the judge to hate Nick.

- Nick can't wait to see Coomalot again at Nashville and Matsuru. He actually clarified that it wasn't gay. He's just fun. Lol!

- Legal Minset amd Vices are going to Houston in August. Mindset maybe for Nashville.

- His midlife crisis gets about 3 American miles per gallon... with high octane fuel.

- He called out that Crowder was right that he was 'a practicing attorney' because he COULD take a case; he just does not want to. Lol!

- He has had mixed experiences with this judge, apparently.

- Kayla has not uploaded to her channel because she is 'busy'

 

[feral cat #6385]

This is a promising show. Big Herc's channel has some good stuff

Agreed. Nick is at his best sandwiched by large black men.

 

[quackrock]

This is a promising show. Big Herc's channel has some good stuff

They're now shitting on cuckoldry and Nick looks very uncomfortable.