DarksydePhil / TheyCallMeDSP / Phil Burnell: General Discussion #2

Where is DSP?

  • He is in Connecticut visiting family/funeral

    Votes: 213 47.9%
  • He and Khet are on a honeymoon style trip

    Votes: 12 2.7%
  • He has an issue (s) with the HOA requiring immediate fixes

    Votes: 27 6.1%
  • Comcast/ISP/Internet Issues

    Votes: 16 3.6%
  • He is taking a Kino Casino style break by not announcing when he comes back

    Votes: 30 6.7%
  • Phil and/or Khet Health Issue

    Votes: 48 10.8%
  • This is a social experiment from DSP

    Votes: 99 22.2%

  • Total voters
    445
  • Poll closed .
Whatever soft boy.
Either clap back or not. This school girl tee hee look what I know shit is bitch drama level shit.


View attachment 4962420
Furthermore your fans just don't "send you stuff" out of nowhere unless they have been asked to do so before.
Oh no FRAUD! Phil Burnell has never admitted to commiting the fraud he did in bankrupcy court, he can totally sink other fraudsters. Pussy bitch doesn't have shit except a quickly declining whale account in WWE CHAMPIONS TIME and a guppy account in Street Fighter Duel time. Where did the 20% of missing tips month to month go the last 31 days Phil? Did your interview damage your grift from your usual gang of literal genetic defects who watch you and "support" you with sharts in their adult diapers? Maybe a cuck can pretend to be wealthy enough to keep your wife gaining weight for her Jim membership to work off on her to help you cope this month to make you feel less salty as a 41 year old permanent scrub yearning to be a real tryhard?
I just want to document here for posterity that ...

Phil also says that you can tell when a KF person shows up in his chat because they send him money to insult him.
1. I, as a mod of the DSP forum, will firmly state that if you're giving Phil money to troll him, KF disavows that action. You opting to get scammed is your own fault and I would never encourage you to do that. Much like Phil's video about unauthorized copyright strikes, this now absolves KF of all future liability for troll tips. One of his moles can screencap this post and send it to him.
2. Unless he's talking about one of his little bitches that has a sock account(s) here and talk shit about him behind his back while tipping him $10k. In which case, that's more of a him problem than a KF problem.
I want to add to this, as a long time user of the site, I will report your paypigging brag posts here in the hopes that you're banned from the forum by moderation for breaking the No Trolling Plans directive and being shit at it anyway.
Why does DSP have to record if youtube saves all of his streams? This whole OBS segment is overflowing with autism.

DSP is streaming 1080p with with a bitrate of 9000. Wow holy wow. DSP literally doesn't know how to stream.
He doesn't want mentally ill sneak diss detractors in chat to be seen. Also the other reasons offered up already, cuts out wagesalt beg portions, adds specialty wagesalt beg portions after the paypigs don't pay, that type of shit.
 
He doesn't want to grow his streams, he just wants them to stay the same size, want the same thing, and never have any turnover forever.
phil hates change more than he hates play vidya. he still uses windows 8 because its set up the way he wants and it works, hes probably waffling hard on a new pc, despite dents offering to pay for one, because it won't be windows 8. look at how he flips out when things are not consistently the same, he just wants everything to stay exactly the same. growing the buisiness means changing things and more importantly, more work, and we absolutely can't have that.

cuts out wagesalt beg portions, adds specialty wagesalt beg portions after the paypigs don't pay, that type of shit.
all he does is split the part and beg when hes not recording, its not any more "work". hes been trying to make it look like he doesnt beg as much ever since sir moist called him out on it and the laziest way he could think to do it is just beg while hes not recording. you can tell its not a good day when he begs while still recording. hes simply too lazy to edit it out because hes just too busy to edit.
 
all he does is split the part and beg when hes not recording, its not any more "work". hes been trying to make it look like he doesnt beg as much ever since sir moist called him out on it and the laziest way he could think to do it is just beg while hes not recording. you can tell its not a good day when he begs while still recording. hes simply too lazy to edit it out because hes just too busy to edit.
I agree with all this, I was answering, along with the others who offered up these valid reasons why, from Phil's point of view because the question was posed in the form of "why does pigroach do this in this manner?" As always, there's a few layers of obfuscation between the stated public reason why and the "real" reasons why behind da scenes. He was also recording excising beg segments constantly for years before that particular call out of it, but the one-two punch of literal long time wheelchair supporter Rob noping on him over it followed by the "punching down" call out made him finally get self-conscious over it because narc ego injury bleed.
 
Aside playing videogames at a below average level and provide basic commentary, what can he actually do?

From what I have seen so far:

- Embarrass himself for 5 hours on a podcast
- Drive his wife around
- Order food
- Drink wine

Think that about sums it up. Nothing that will actually help better his life.
 
Why did he go back to elden ring?
Why does Phil do anything? For the money. Elden Ring was one of his biggest earning games of all time. It's a bit of a slow period for games right now and he wanted something to fill the void. Big earning game he already owns and he can spin it an an all new, all different magic build playthrough. This guy played the original Dark Souls three times and every other Souls game at least twice. No brainer for Phil. The stated reason he gives is that he is preparing the the eventual DLC release, but c'mon. I don't think it even has a release date yet.
 
The Wall Street Journal has an interesting article today about the IRS and social-media "influencers" business expense tax write-offs:


The whole article is quote-worthy. The comments are interesting too:
  • Thomas Paine
    • 22 minutes ago

    I spent 30 years as a film and video producer and you wouldn't believe the props we wrote off... Furniture, toys, artwork, you name it. Never had a problem finding an accountant who understood that, never had a problem with the IRS because they were all legitimate. The key is you have to have enough income to offset the deductions. If you are near or below breakeven the IRS will definitely call it a hobby and you will have trouble if you are audited.

[EDIT: Hell now it's paywalled. It wasn't when I first clicked it and now can't find the original page I clicked through]
[EDIT2: Found it from Drudge and it opens if you click it from there. Here's the full article


Cotton Candy and $864 in Sex Toys: Influencers Go Big on Tax Write-Offs
People who earn income off social-media posts test the limits of the IRS; ‘I need an accountant that understands outrageous.’
April 12, 2023 5:33 am ET



In recent weeks, Ali Spagnola has been carefully compiling receipts for thousands of dollars worth of supplies, including 40 pounds of cotton-candy sugar, 15,000 Lego pieces and a red baby grand piano.

File that under ‘huh?’
Based in Los Angeles, Ms. Spagnola makes goofy music and art videos to post online for a living. She’s looking to write off as many of the items as possible when she files her 2022 tax returns.
Now she has to prove to a tax preparer—and the Internal Revenue Service—that these purchases qualify as bona fide business expenses.
“I need an accountant that understands outrageous,” says Ms. Spagnola, who’s on her third bean counter, after the first two couldn’t grasp why, for instance, buying an elf suit and enough fake snow to fill a van was essential.

Will Ali Spagnola and the IRS be in tune when it comes to her piano?Photo: Ali Spagnola
Content creators say they need to spend big to entertain their followers—but making the math work is becoming harder. Over the past year, big social-media companies such as Meta Platforms Inc., Snap Inc. and Pinterest Inc. ended or scaled back cash bonuses for viral posts, and soon ByteDance Ltd.’s TikTok could be banned in the U.S.




So influencers are increasingly testing the limits of what expenses will pass muster with the IRS. The livelihood is hard to explain to Aunt Betty, let alone Uncle Sam.

Rachael Johnson, who is 49 and lives on the road in an RV with her husband and their dogs, had gotten used to receiving monthly payments from Facebook for posting three to four videos a day about the cross-country adventures of the pooches, Peanut Butter Brickle and Fruitycake. That has now been cut, so she hopes the IRS will allow her to deduct pet-related purchases she made last year, such as the $200 she spent on costumes that she and the dogs wore in the fall to re-enact a scene from the movie “The Sound of Music.”

“We did an actual video on top of a mountain,” says Ms. Johnson.

The hills are alive with Rachael Johnson’s dogs, whose activities include appearing in videos. Photo: Rachael Johnson
She’s confident the government will come through for her since she says she already wrote off $100 she spent on four shoes for Fruitycake—one for each paw—after she adopted him two years ago. (Of course, the government could still opt to sniff out Fruitycake’s footwear in the future.)

“He’s afraid of water so we have to put shoes on him,” Ms. Johnson adds. “Those are pretty expensive.”

The creative-software company Adobe Inc. estimated in a report last year that about 14 million people in the U.S. earn money through posting social-media content and have more than 5,000 followers on their main platform.

Creators make money in a variety of ways, such as by hosting advertisers, selling merchandise, charging subscription fees—and, until recently, some also received regular payments from social-media companies for popular posts. The livelihood has grown tougher as tech companies reduce spending over concerns about a slowing economy.

When it comes to filing returns, creators are at a disadvantage because their profession is so new, according to Sima Gandhi, chief executive and co-founder of San Francisco-based Creative Juice, a startup that provides funding and financial services to such workers. And the tax code was largely written “before the internet existed, let alone YouTube,” she says.

Ms. Gandhi, who used to work for the U.S. Treasury Department, says many creators don’t realize they can deduct even basic expenses including the cost of setting up a limited liability company and equipment such as microphones and selfie sticks. “These things should be reasonable and necessary in the eyes of the IRS,” she adds.

Thomas Jackson has claimed some more unusual business expenses on his taxes before.Photo: Thomas Jackson
Outside Las Vegas, 43-year-old YouTube creator Thomas Jackson, who makes videos about cars and various antics, once live-streamed himself lobbing sex toys at a building. He says YouTube asked him to take the prank video down, but that he still claimed $864 worth of dildos as a business expense on his taxes. “Nobody asked me any questions about it,” he says.

According to the IRS, workers in the gig economy “may be able to deduct expenses related to their gig income, depending on tax limits and rules.”

Paul Matreselva, who does social-media posts about betting on mixed-martial-arts fights, is seeking a deduction for tickets to a December match in Orlando, Fla., that cost him around $3,000. The tickets were prizes for the first eight of his followers to sign up to receive text messages with his betting tips.


“It was a nice night out for my subscribers,” says Mr. Matreselva, who adds he bought the most expensive seats available. “We were right in front of the cage sitting with celebrity fighters.”

Joe Honey, an accountant in Chattanooga, Tenn., got his first creator client last year—Mr. Matreselva—and his second this year.

“They present some challenges,” he says.

In St. Augustine, Fla., Tommy King, who makes YouTube and TikTok videos about videogames from his bedroom, became a full-time creator last year and says a tax expert he consulted was “dumbfounded” when he handed over receipts for $1,000 worth of outfits for his avatar in the game “Fortnite” and fees for making it perform dance moves.


Tommy King says a tax expert he met with ‘couldn’t believe I made money from videogames.’Photo: Tommy King
Mr. King says he ended up doing his own taxes last year. In addition to the “Fortnite” goodies, he says he deducted expenses such as $3,000 worth of computer parts and a $500 gaming chair to support his 6’5” frame.

“I’m a really big guy and I need a nice chair,” he says. “It was probably one of the best investments of my setup.”

For his 2022 taxes, Mr. King plans to write off a $180 outlay on four pieces of gear called scroll wheels, which help him build things faster online in games.

“Once you get a good understanding of everything, it’s pretty easy,” he says of filing tax returns. “You just have to make sure you’re doing your due diligence.”
 
Last edited:
I just wanted to share this screenshot, it looks like phil has no neck, his head just sprouts right out of his body like some sort of growth. like a gouty polish patrick.
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    272.8 KB · Views: 17
  • received_198333119580300.jpg
    received_198333119580300.jpg
    98.6 KB · Views: 21
The Wall Street Journal has an interesting article today about the IRS and social-media "


The thing about this. Even as eggrigous as some of the shit listed in the article. They have a case. Regardless of how gaudy or outrageous the expense. I don't agree with someone's dog needing 100$ shoes. But if that dog does appear frequently in those videos, and in those shoes, and is using them to do things a shoeless dog may get tired of quickly... well you gotta a case there. I don't think it qualifies but I can see why someone at the irs would.

Out of all the outrageous shit in this article people tried to claim. It's all prefaced with that they actually used the shit. You can and find a video of them using it. Even these people who tired getting reimbursed for pet supplies, lame, but at least I can go and find a video of said pets in question needing supplies.

None of shit really applies to Phil outside of buying games.

And as wild as some of these tax claims are. I could see them going either way. They are based somewhat in reality and the least these people try to "prove" their claim. Phil just threw up a fucking hail mary and nobody bothered to check if that was alright. He can't tell you or what 5k a month buisness expenses entail.


If Phil was pressed like these people were he would have never gotten away with it.
 
The thing about this. Even as eggrigous as some of the shit listed in the article. They have a case. Regardless of how gaudy or outrageous the expense. I don't agree with someone's dog needing 100$ shoes. But if that dog does appear frequently in those videos, and in those shoes, and is using them to do things a shoeless dog may get tired of quickly... well you gotta a case there. I don't think it qualifies but I can see why someone at the irs would.

Out of all the outrageous shit in this article people tried to claim. It's all prefaced with that they actually used the shit. You can and find a video of them using it. Even these people who tired getting reimbursed for pet supplies, lame, but at least I can go and find a video of said pets in question needing supplies.

None of shit really applies to Phil outside of buying games.

And as wild as some of these tax claims are. I could see them going either way. They are based somewhat in reality and the least these people try to "prove" their claim. Phil just threw up a fucking hail mary and nobody bothered to check if that was alright. He can't tell you or what 5k a month buisness expenses entail.


If Phil was pressed like these people were he would have never gotten away with it.
I've been arguing the same thing here since the bankruptcy. Technically he doesn't even need to use something in a video or play a game he buys on-stream to write it off. Props for movies that never end up in the final cut are still tax write-offs too. It sucks that he'll get away with it but he will. The most that can be hoped for is an audit that crawls up his ass and costs him a ton more before nothing else happens since with the IRS and every other gov't entity the process is the punishment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: myone
why does he manually split parts, why does he still manually upload his garbage after streams? why does he do extra work when he doesn't need to?
1. Begment hiding: Piggy pauses the recording to hide begging, guilt trips, and extended chat abuse segments from the youtube viewer.
2. Chat hiding: Leaving the livestream up "as is" would include his dent chat window. He doesn't want any rando normies that somehow find his garbage tier gameplay watchable to see his toxic cesspool of derichs, sneak dissers, and sycophants and realize they are watching a clown show for adult babies.
EDIT: I think hiding chat also hides superchats from the official record which is just a bonus, not that it matters since PoP is tracking that manually
 
Last edited:
Why does DSP have to record if youtube saves all of his streams? This whole OBS segment is overflowing with autism.

DSP is streaming 1080p with with a bitrate of 9000. Wow holy wow. DSP literally doesn't know how to stream.
Because he has to make more work for himself because of his autism. He can't use making it watchable for viewers as an excuse because they're still hour long chunks of garbage. It's all to try and milk more ad revenue from YouTube.
So the replay Elden Ring the exact same way with handholding exactly like before option won the poll over NG+? Are his fans even dumber than I thought or did he just pick what he wanted to do as usual?
Just with magic spam and not jump attack spamming. At least the fact he still has no awareness of terrain is still present. Fucking retard literally lacks skills toddlers have regarding spacial awareness.
 
Here is a summary, Memology spreads the word!


DSP is soo punchable!

EDIT:
"The terrain is the enemy, not the boss"
lmao crying
Professional businessman tells his audience to fuck off repeatedly.

I think Dave's income being down is getting to him.

Why does DSP have to record if youtube saves all of his streams? This whole OBS segment is overflowing with autism.

DSP is streaming 1080p with with a bitrate of 9000. Wow holy wow. DSP literally doesn't know how to stream.
Cause in Dave's mind if someone watches the entire stream it's better if the video is broken up so that he's getting more views overall. This is why he persisted at splitting his streams up into ten to fifteen minute segments for years before "giving in" and bumping it up to hour long segments. The problem is the youtube algorithm is more complex than that and I believe it looks more at engagement/unique viewers rather than the overall view count.

Also bigger resolution numbers=more quality stream=more meaningful/fun stream, duh.
 
Back