Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Swole McPole]

I suspect most the people parroting the claim aren't parroting Nick.

That might be true here on the Farm, but I suspect most people have only heard of Monty because of Nick (or Metakur). If you look at the comments on Elissa Clips' YouTube channel, references to Monty all seem to be either quoting Nick verbatim, or they're Farmers and don't believe a word Nick says.

I'd never heard of Monty until this lawsuit, and I initially took the claims of his being a paedophile at face value -- because of the number of people repeating them in this thread, and because -- for a long time, they tended to go unchallenged. It was only when I sought out Umbrella Man and found that it bore no resemblance to the claims that were being made about it that I started to be a bit more sceptical about them.

Which isn't to say he isn't creepy and weird. He's definitely those things in large measure. But I couldn't find any evidence of his admitting to taking nude pics of kids. The closest I could find was him saying whenever he takes photos, he has to have a contract. For the contract to be legal, the model has to be 18 or over. The only cases when this isn't true, and he's photographing under-18's, he needs to have parents signing the consent form. But there's nowhere could I find him admitting that he's photographed under-18's nude. I think people extrapolated that from the statements he made.

And I would imagine that Rekieta has been searching for such evidence far harder than I have, and he hasn't turned up any evidence either. If he had done, it'd blow Monty's case right out of the water. And given that he wants this case dismissed via summary judgement, I'm guessing he would have shown that evidence in his most recent hearing. It would have sent Monty and Schneider running home with their tails between their legs.

Why would you sit on it at this stage? From Rekieta's point of view, the best thing that could happen would be for Randazza's bills to stop ballooning as soon as possible. If you were a kid and you'd had creepy Monty taking your pics while you were in the nude, you'd be a young adult by now. Surely you'd want to stick it to the crazy old pervert and earn some money by helping Nick out. Yet nobody's come forward.

It seems like an urban legend at this point. A friend of a friend had Monty take their nude pics when they were a kid. But when you try to locate that friend of a friend, nobody seems to know quite who they are.

 

[Strix454]

It seems like an urban legend at this point. A friend of a friend had Monty take their nude pics when they were a kid. But when you try to locate that friend of a friend, nobody seems to know quite who they are.

The other thing about the "Monty is a pedo" stories is that most of them that don't trace back to Nick or Jim's programs are all tied up in theories that Monty is a freemason government agent who probably murdered JonBenét Ramsey. The boomer conspiracy theorists who care about Monty are all over that stuff. And being conspiracy theorists, all their stuff about Monty usually turns out to be overstatements.

The only thing that concerns me slightly about Monty is the questions about his identity and who he actually is. I was expecting that Nick's legal team, given the amount of money they are spending, would have spent time figuring that out. But they didn't. In spite of all the money Nick has spent, Nick could have had a budget rando lawyer gather up about the same information on Monty by reading Monty's thread on the farms.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

His local counsels office is 15-17 minutes from his location, and i assume the specific '9 minute' mark was from a GPS system.

I doubt it's local counsel. There's not much reason to talk to the guy since although he's sponsoring Nick's attorney there's not much he needs to do... unless Nick wanted him to pick up some of the slack at less-than-Randazza rates if this goes to discovery, which is something I've been waiting to see signs of happening. I don't think we'll see movement until the judge rules one way or another on the motion to dismiss.

But I don't think he'd be meeting with him in person at this stage.

PRP Hair Restoration - it’s well documented he‘s balding like no one’s business, is this a hair plug arc?

Interesting theory. @Himedall All-seeing Waifu where was he when he ended the stream? Was he still in the lot of the BP station? If so, this is my preferred theory.

 

[Procrastinhater]

never heard of Monty until this lawsuit, and I initially took the claims of his being a paedophile at face value -- because of the number of people repeating them in this thread, and because -- for a long time, they tended to go unchallenged. It was only when I sought out Umbrella Man and found that it bore no resemblance to the claims that were being made about it that I started to be a bit more sceptical about them.

Seems to me this Balldo wielding literal cuck just slandered some unlikeable faggot as a pedo and thought he could get away with it because hes an arrogant bastard who figured hed just crowd fund an overpriced lawyer because he's the "Law Pope" a big shot that likes to throw his weight around like nigger masseuses throw around his Our Wife, so he'll just grift the money to pay for it from the stupid fans he reviles, not counting that since he went mask off as a cuck and a degenerate and shit on his fans as incel prude faggots, theres not that many people willing to support him anymore, as his failed GoGriftMe shows.
Anyway you cut it this is a huge loss for Balldo, he's wasted tens of thousands of dollars he could have spent flying Our Wife to the Caribbean to get railed by niggers while he watches, all because hes too much of an arrogant prick to admit his drinking has got him writing cheques his limp dick cant cash.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

I doubt it's local counsel. There's not much reason to talk to the guy since although he's sponsoring Nick's attorney there's not much he needs to do... unless Nick wanted him to pick up some of the slack at less-than-Randazza rates if this goes to discovery, which is something I've been waiting to see signs of happening. I don't think we'll see movement until the judge rules one way or another on the motion to dismiss.

But I don't think he'd be meeting with him in person at this stage.


Interesting theory. @Himedall All-seeing Waifu where was he when he ended the stream? Was he still in the lot of the BP station? If so, this is my preferred theory.

He was in the BP getting fuel at stream end.

I suppose I could have latched on to '9 minutes' in the wrong way. LOCALS still does not have any useful timestamps in the chat or stream post headers, but the '9 minutes until my scheduled time' could make sense. If we see sudden changes, it would reinforce the theory.

Whenever Nick makes cagey statements, I get flashbacks to 'An island resort on Jamaica'. He had no credit with me on assuming it us something benign and the wide was not with him.

 

[Maraschino]

His brain is fried. Hobbies or a job is cheating, but what about jacking your monkey using lewds you solicited from Locals? Remember “Nice tits girl” was gleefully exclaimed to Mandy. Nope not cheating, we’re monogamous he says. What a fucking idiot.

The Bible that Nick clearly doesn't believe in states in the literal Sermon On the Mount that if you even lust after a woman (that isn't your wife), you already committed adultery. I'm pretty sure it was a part of the whole "If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off etc." thing that was in the New Testament.

(Just checked, it's literally 2 verses before)

Unfortunately for Nick, basic morality and the concept of "not being a retard" keep you from having "fun", whatever that means at this point.

Unironically go back to Jesus, Nick, and not in Minecraft.

 

[Potatoherder]

Checked Nick stream after a couple of weeks... and I ended up seeing Nick talking about some weird ass shit on locals, how he "loved" hearing about all that cuck shit (what the actual fuck?), and how "intriguing" and "exciting" it is. (absolute cuck language right there).

This is going to be another "i only said this to get the a-log chuds upset!" cope. No one is surprised a right-wing commentator is a beta cuck. It's just disappointing that Nick turned out to be one. At this point I'd respect him more for just coming out and owning it. Trying to boil the frog only makes him look more pathetic.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

This is going to be another "i only said this to get the a-log chuds upset!" cope. No one is surprised a right-wing commentator is a beta cuck. It's just disappointing that Nick turned out to be one. At this point I'd respect him more for just coming out and owning it. Trying to boil the frog only makes him look more pathetic.

I was going to post highlights of that post Tuesday LOCALS, but this pretty much covers it.

The only extra context I can add is that Nick was talking about people who don't like 'degeneracy' and that hearing about it (like a cuck) was alright becuase he wasn't DOING it.

I get where he might be coming from with the cheating on partner with work or hobbies, but the point of 'not checking out of a relationship mentally' and making time for your partner a priority was lost.

We can look forward to further expounding on this becuase this and his own perceived 'failings' are going to be the basis of his first 'theology' type stream. Get ready for some real heresy, religious bros...

 

[Kopasea]

I was going to post highlights of that post Tuesday LOCALS, but this pretty much covers it.

The only extra context I can add is that Nick was talking about people who don't like 'degeneracy' and that hearing about it (like a cuck) was alright becuase he wasn't DOING it.

I get where he might be coming from with the cheating on partner with work or hobbies, but the point of 'not checking out of a relationship mentally' and making time for your partner a priority was lost.

We can look forward to further expounding on this becuase this and his own perceived 'failings' are going to be the basis of his first 'theology' type stream. Get ready for some real heresy, religious bros...

I tried watching the post locals stream, but I couldn't make it through longer than 30 minutes. I don't know what it was, but I didn't have the stomach for it this time.

 

[Balldo]

If anything, this thread could serve as evidence for Monty that his reputation has been damaged by Rekieta's defamation. There's been no shortage of people here repeating the assertions that he's a paedophile who likes to take nude photographs of children, despite there not being the slightest bit of evidence in support of that claim that I've ever seen.

You make a good point above. But I think your memory of the previous thread is slightly off.

The original Monty thread seems to suggest that the girl behind the piggy mask is one Alexander 'Sasha' Lord, who seemed to have two jobs. One is booking bands for Comet Pizza Party, the other was head of the Girl Scouts.

If by "thread seems to suggest", you actually mean "a One-Post Andy named BD 222 who never posted again made an evidence-free claim that Sasha Lord makes movies with Monty", well I would agree with you on that point as well.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/steve-...rreignz-imyourghost.57918/page-5#post-4925245

Here is the brilliant sleuthing of BD 222:

"The name of the girl mentioned as starring beside (under?) Montagraph in the short film "Little Piggy and the Umbrella Man" is Sasha Lord, forum posts connect her as the music booker at Comet Ping Pong, with speculated aliases of Anita Lord and Alexandra C Lord. Of course, it is all speculative bullshit and there is no actual evidence of that it is her in the film.. I mean, the girl in the still shots from the film is in a mask, how the hell could anyone identify her?"

He really makes a great case with certainty for his opinions, right? Then he strokes out, apparently, with the second sentence below:

"I am not going down this goofy ass conspiracy theory shit rabbit hole. It isn't that neat, not that neat."

Honestly, I don't even know much about Monty and barely pay attention to the trial, which is far less interesting than the BPD Wine Mom Nudes arc. He probably is a piece of shit, considering the amount of attention he gets. But to claim that there is some solid evidence that he was involved with Sasha Lord just smells like bullshit to me. If somebody has some more evidence to share, I'd love to see it and change my mind.

 

[Not Who You Think]

He has already lost in every true sense of the word.

He has spent so far maybe 2x money on the case than there was at stake in it.
He has generated a whole lot of documentation to show that Monty is indeed the same weirdo he was shown to be by others in 2019. And as far as I can tell, he & his expensive attorneys have added nothing to the information already known about Monty.
He made a fool of himself trying to raise money for the case.
The case doesn't generate any good content. I mean he is down to talking about it with non-law nobodies like Drex and some fat bald guy. And bragging about not watching the hearing.
He still has hopes I guess of getting financial information about Monty. But proving Monty has little to no money and that he isn't making big money from Youtube doesn't seem worth much.
He also has hopes of getting an anti-SLAPP judgement against monty. Presumably to SAVE THE INTERNET(tm) from Monty. If Nick gets a judgement, then he can spend yet more money on attorneys every time Monty files a lawsuit against someone else to look into Monty's finances. But given that Monty has (lifetime) been involved in one lawsuit that survived filing the papers, is that worth anything?

I still don't think Monty will win a verdict at trial or collect meaningful damages. But I don't see any outcome of the case for Nick where he gains anything of value.

Nick did try to redeem his actions by asserting that he was sending a message to anyone else who would sue him. The message was; if you try to sue Nick Rekieta, you will lose.

Being known for going overboard on legal representation may not be the deterrent that Nick pretends it to be since it smacks of insecurity, poor decision-making, and poor wealth management skills. Nick can do what he wants with his money, but (good) financial/legal advisors exist for a reason.

This trend of self-inflicted frivolous lawsuits may continue if Nick keeps "punching down" by making overly aggressive statements toward financially insignificant lolcows, and it will always be a net loss if Nick goes to Randazza every time. Nick can still make fun of them and use them for his own content, but there's a smart way to do it and a much more costly way to do it. Nick intentionally chose the latter. Funny stuff.

Rather than try to send a "message" to an unknown number of accusers (real or imagined), a better deterrent regarding future frivolous lawsuits would be for Nick to avoid being overly antagonistic on a public platform by exercising some self-restraint like a mature adult rather than leverage his remaining assets for clout like a child.

 

[Strix454]

Nick did try to redeem his actions by asserting that he was sending a message to anyone else who would sue him. The message was; if you try to sue Nick Rekieta, you will lose.

That isn't really an effective way to discourage lawsuits. Its kind of stupid. What Nick is doing is telling the world that he will respond to lawsuits by disproportionally harming himself financially. That will actually tend to encourage nuisance litigation against him.

The way to protect yourself against this kind of thing is:

1) Insurance (Nick doesn't seem to have any)
2) Careful financial planning such that contingency litigation is discouraged (Nick's LLCs are defunct and his assets seem poorly protected from litigation).
3) Don't say obviously stupid things that set you up for a lawsuit. (calling someone a pedo and daring them to sue is incredibly stupid).
4) The way to deal with people like Monty if they show up taking victory laps in your chat is to just to ban them. Trying to "get even" with a nobody like Monty because he laughed at you getting banned from YT is lunacy.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Nick and Drex complained about what in my opinion can only be this thread for several minutes last night.

Nick is NOT MAD at the the people here and recognizes that people are reflexively trying to speculate about Nick's personal life because they "allergic to having someone that they can look up to" ... Yes, he actually said this.

Nick then brings up Tiger Woods at length before insisting he's not comparing himself to Tiger Woods.

Nick is NOT angry at people speculating about a future divorce, he just thinks it's ridiculous. Drex is NOT angry at the idea of Internet anonymity or a duck collecting all of the "weird disparate things that you said" about a certain topic (while he doesn't name the site or poster, it seems likely he's talking about this post by @Not Who You Think at the end of this clip).

Here's the clip (with an irrelevant portion sped up).

 

[MudPeople]

Being known for going overboard on legal representation may not be the deterrent that Nick pretends it to be since it smacks of insecurity, poor decision-making, and poor wealth management skills. Nick can do what he wants with his money, but (good) financial/legal advisors exist for a reason.

1) Insurance (Nick doesn't seem to have any)
2) Careful financial planning such that contingency litigation is discouraged (Nick's LLCs are defunct and his assets seem poorly protected from litigation).
3) Don't say obviously stupid things that set you up for a lawsuit. (calling someone a pedo and daring them to sue is incredibly stupid).
4) The way to deal with people like Monty if they show up taking victory laps in your chat is to just to ban them. Trying to "get even" with a nobody like Monty because he laughed at you getting banned from YT is lunacy.

Rekieta really doesn't show much management skills you'd expect from a father of five.
Back when I started watching his show, learning he was a father of of five really increased his air of respectability. It's the level of responsibilities and care/wisdom you'd expect from someone with a large family to manage. The more I learn the lower my opinion dips.

But my opinions don't matter, I'm just here to point and laugh.

 

[200MB]

Nick and Drex complained about what in my opinion can only be this thread for several minutes last night.

Nick is NOT MAD at the the people here and recognizes that people are reflexively trying to speculate about Nick's personal life because they "allergic to having someone that they can look up to" ... Yes, he actually said this.

Nick then brings up Tiger Woods at length before insisting he's not comparing himself to Tiger Woods.

Nick is NOT angry at people speculating about a future divorce, he just thinks it's ridiculous. Drex is NOT angry at the idea of Internet anonymity or a duck collecting all of the "weird disparate things that you said" about a certain topic (while he doesn't name the site or poster, it seems likely he's talking about this post by @Not Who You Think at the end of this clip).

Here's the clip (with an irrelevant portion sped up).

View attachment 5036494

5:40 - 6:28 I wonder if Drex sees the irony here considering what Nick is currently being sued for.

 

[RotPockets]

allergic to having someone that they can look up to

You have no accomplishments. Having Daddy pay for your college is not your accomplishment, its his. You behave like a scumbag older brother that won’t move out of his parents house in regards to your own kids.

Mom and Dad won’t talk to you about pussy, but I will because I’m cool. They are just prudes. Now get out of my room you fags, I’m drinking with Discord.

Which almost makes sense since your parents are the only people providing for your kids’ future, so you view them as peers. You are both mutually dependent on your parents to survive. The only person that does less is your bug-eyed bitch, Kayla is a parasite’s parasite.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Rather than try to send a "message" to an unknown number of accusers (real or imagined), a better deterrent regarding future frivolous lawsuits would be for Nick to avoid being overly antagonistic on a public platform by exercising some self-restraint like a mature adult rather than leverage his remaining assets for clout like a child.

This hits the nail on the head.

The risk is demonstrably not worth it. As much as his chat eggs him on to say ridiculous things, he does not get much benefit from it. He is not getting superchats from it. LOCALS chats are nowhere near YT chats and Rumble is notch better. Look at the failure of his GSG.

Do a simple cost-benefit analysis and STOP IT! Get help.

 

[Blood Unit]

my musical tribute to the balldo man

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

Nick and Drex complained about what in my opinion can only be this thread for several minutes last night.

Nick is NOT MAD at the the people here and recognizes that people are reflexively trying to speculate about Nick's personal life because they "allergic to having someone that they can look up to" ... Yes, he actually said this.

Nick then brings up Tiger Woods at length before insisting he's not comparing himself to Tiger Woods.

Nick is NOT angry at people speculating about a future divorce, he just thinks it's ridiculous. Drex is NOT angry at the idea of Internet anonymity or a duck collecting all of the "weird disparate things that you said" about a certain topic (while he doesn't name the site or poster, it seems likely he's talking about this post by @Not Who You Think at the end of this clip).

Here's the clip (with an irrelevant portion sped up).

View attachment 5036494

both of them rubbing their chin in what they think means thoughtful but actually is a tell for lying looks great.

 

[KingOfHypocrisy]

Checked out his interview with Big Herc since I'm familiar with Herc's content and unsurprisingly Nick was mostly interested in talking about porn and cuckolding. Don't know much of the Rackets lore but he mentioned that he's been a fan of and has been watching hardcore porn since he was in high school, specifically mentioning a video of multiple guys gangbanging one woman. He also said he's fine with women being whores and getting tons of plastic surgery but they just shouldn't promote it. Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't he used to larp as a conservative Christian and shame "degenerates" not too long ago? lol

Paused the video at one point and was greeted with this

Spoiler: exploitable