Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

Who passes better as a woman?

  • Autphag:

    Votes: 36 9.9%
  • Robert Wayne Stiles

    Votes: 327 90.1%

  • Total voters
    363
Look into a job where you mostly work alone or in a small team? Like most trade jobs for example or maybe something like Software Devolopment where you work towards a clear goal?
He has a 92 IQ, so that rules anything systematically complicated out of the question. He works in a supermarket with comparatively stupid or even stupider people, however, you know, your usual eclectic mix of metizos and other subhumans, so he most certainly does, and has had in the past, opportunities for promotion he's taken in other supermarkets. He has gotten into the ranks of supervisorial and in one job even low-management staff before. He's not devoid of people interaction ability and was mostly speaking on my behalf.
 
He has a 92 IQ, so that rules anything systematically complicated out of the question. He works in a supermarket with comparatively stupid or even stupider people, however, you know, your usual eclectic mix of metizos and other subhumans, so he most certainly does, and has had in the past, opportunities for promotion he's taken in other supermarkets. He has gotten into the ranks of supervisorial and in one job even low-management staff before. He's not devoid of people interaction ability and was mostly speaking on my behalf.

I thought he was your friend?
 
"Meaning fluent Korean", but she made nothing inferrable from the case in which she had denied your ability to do so outright. We typically don't look at absolutes, especially from people of repute like her, at the way we typically do look at ambiguities, especially from people without repute like yourself.

If she agreed to intermediate at your insistence, depending on how thoroughly that insistence was made, then she was probably being nice lol. Koreans have a habit of judging people in a black-and-white manner. If you're wagukim and you haven't even speech conventionally acceptable by the standards of countryside peasants then it doesn't matter if you do know any, it matters that you can't use it.

I have no interest in your ridiculous babble.
 
This thread right now

tumblr_n8du7oNRTr1tq4of6o1_400.gif
 
You're a litigious little Celtic pike from the gutters of Wales so I'll make it clear to you: the Courts aren't your personal army, they've standards for the submission of complaints you'll invariably fail to meet.

Sheep shagger then?
 
He reckons himself the Aryan master-race. It was barely plausible in my case with a slither of something else to compensate for my Celt. Is this the case for him? Nooope.

It's interesting watching you two debate to be honest.
 
You're a litigious little Celtic pike from the gutters of Wales so I'll make it clear to you: the Courts aren't your personal army, they've standards for the submission of complaints you'll invariably fail to meet.

You honestly think you are immune to prosecution? A slightly odd position. Are you a diplomat?
 
You honestly think you are immune to prosecution? A slightly odd position. Are you a diplomat?
Not to prosecution, pending on the case you submit to the Court. First, it has to succeed in being something chargable and actionable. I doubt you would have the evidence beyond circumstance to prove my identity. The police will first be asking questions about that foremostly. Plausible deniability is more than exercisable here. Then, subsequent evidence on all the particulars need to be found, which is something I doubt exists in all the things you apply your flimsy definition of 'libel' and what you mistakenly, in addition, misnomously refer to as 'slander' with.
 
He reckons himself the Aryan master-race. It was barely plausible in my case with a slither of something else to compensate for my Celt. Is this the case for him? Nooope.

For a self-considered intellectual it's pretty retarded to assume everyone in Wales and Ireland is Gallokelten, let alone Germanokelten (most British). There are many of Anglo and Nordic stock. "Celt" is a cultural term of no relevance to racial affiliation.

In short: you're a pseudointellectual fuckwit.

Not to prosecution, pending on the case you submit to the Court. First, it has to succeed in being something chargable and actionable. I doubt you would have the evidence beyond circumstance to prove my identity. The police will first be asking questions about that foremostly. Plausible deniability is more than exercisable here. Then, subsequent evidence on all the particulars need to be found, which is something I doubt exists in all the things you apply your flimsy definition of 'libel' and what you mistakenly, in addition, misnomously refer to as 'slander' with.

So "lol no u cant"?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
Reactions: Begemot
For a self-considered intellectual it's pretty retarded to assume everyone in Wales and Ireland is Gallokelten, let alone Germanokelten (most British). There are many of Anglo and Nordic stock. "Celt" is a cultural term of no relevance to racial affiliation.

In short: you're a pseudointellectual fuckwit.
Except I highly doubt you're Germanokelten to any degree of an emphasis on the word-root prefix Germano-. Meanwhile, @LagoonaBlue is a wonderfully Aryan princess.

You're a dirty Gall. A stinky Boudecean atavistic throwback.

So "lol no u cant"?
In effect, that's what it will be when your wild goose-chase is conclusively conducted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Except I highly doubt you're Germanokelten to any degree of an emphasis on the word-root prefix Germano-. Meanwhile, @LagoonaBlue is a wonderfully Aryan princess.

You're a dirty Gall. A stinky Boudecean atavistic throwback.

And you're a shit talking pseudointellectual fuckwit with exactly zero credibility.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Begemot
And you're a shit talking pseudointellectual fuckwit with exactly zero credibility.
So that would still be, in net terms, higher credibility than what you have? I mean, you've done enough to discredit yourself without the need to consider that there might be such a thing as negative credibility in your case. Food for thought.
 
Back