Dylan James Mulvaney / Days of Girlhood / Day __ of Being a Girl - Dylan Explains It All, a gay man interprets 'girlhood' in all glorious technicolor.

JULAY said:
The idea that there is no such thing as bad publicity is simply untrue. Any marginal gains that Bud Light might make with the alphabet mafia crowd are going to be offset by cannibalizing their core market. Gen Z might be "more tolerant" than older generations, but most guys in their early 20s, which is a large part of that core market, are still going to rip on one of their bros for drinking the tranny beer.

The other part of that core market are blue-collar rednecks, and I have had two people in the last week who are in that demographic bring up to me totally unsolicited that they won't drink a beer they've literally been drinking since high school anymore because they don't want to endorse a brand that endorses a faggot.

This is get woke, go broke in action, and it's pretty awesome to watch happen.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure I agree. The problem that I don't think Budweiser understands about tapping into the new market is that they are in a situation much like Domino's. Gen Z doesn't like their fucking product. They drink it when they have to and that's about it. They won't go out of their way to attack or defend Budweiser because they're obsessed with other beers and faggy White Claws. Budweiser is not the drink of young people, it is the drink of poor people. Even, the poor people can drink literally ANYTHING ELSE. There are other options for their customer base. The booze market is one that's now flooded with choice, and these zoomers don't HAVE to drink piss water outside of house parties. That's why the boycott is so effective. All they did was piss off their existing audience and they gained 0 new customers as a result. Bad press is still press, it's only bad if you have no leg to stand on in the first place. Budweiser severely overestimated the leg they have to stand on because they have plenty of metrics of how big they are. As an avid and raging alcoholic, I can and will happily cut out Budweiser and all associated products and will lose nothing in my life. Hell in many bars, it's not even my cheapest option anymore.

This is also the end for Dylan Mulvaney as a major influencer. Other marketing executives are watching Budweiser's handling of this issue very closely and are taking notes. Dylan's PR Stock as a result has just plummeted to a crash. I'm sure some ESG and DEI hungry zealots will still give him work, but the rest of the marketing world is understanding that Dylan is toxic poison. Many trannies don't like him because they think he's making fun of them. Many leftists don't like him because they don't believe he's actually trans. The right doesn't like him. Dylan managed to crack the algorithm and that's why he's famous. Over time though people got to see through the charade and the jig is up. Dylan is not as popular as everyone thinks he is. He is a fucking nobody and they can replace him just as easily with another token Trans Activist, just as they did for Jazz Jennings. I don't see any brand other than diehard woke ESG obsessed companies touching Dylan Mulvaney for a long time. It'll be fun to see how he handles it.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Alamo basement dweller, Chester Rigby, Harvard Covington III and 57 others
Featured on Apr 13, 2023 by Null: Anheuser-Busch's $BUD has lost 3% since partnering with Dylan Mulvaney, a drop worth more than $6 billion in market cap.
:null: Reminder that featured posts ≠ a license to shit up the thread. Please read replies before replying yourself.


Fapcop said:
So Bud Light kissed the girl dick, and it only cost them 3 billion dollars, as their stock cratered.

Excuse me while my sides hit the orbit!
Click to expand...
NY post says it's over 5 billion so far. Hope it was worth it to stick it to those transphobes.

https://nypost.com/2023/04/12/anheu...ue-amid-dylan-mulvaney-bud-light-controversy/
https://archive.is/oo0bO

https://www.zerohedge.com/political...six-days-execs-never-signed-trans-ad-campaign
https://archive.is/AS87d

1681423917737.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: ivoryink, Balanced Boomer, Malarkey Magdelen and 261 others
Grift Garrison said:
I've been to around 20 bars since the marketing campaign dropped since I've been on vacation, albeit in the South, and people are mocking their friends for drinking Bud Light. "I knew you were a faggot"

It warmed my heart.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure people mocked each other for drinking Bud Light (or any light beer) in that manner long before Dylan appeared on the scene.
Still funny though.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: ivoryink, Local Fed, Nanashi no kiwi and 120 others
FatalTater said:
Pretty sure people mocked each other for drinking Bud Light (or any light beer) in that manner long before Dylan appeared on the scene.
Still funny though.
Click to expand...

Yeah that is a common joke but it was followed by talk about Kid Rock and woke shit. I didn't hear anyone mention Dylan by name though.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Rondo Richter Belmont, user176, DYLAN ‘DIELAWN’ VOLK and 11 others
Party Hat Wurmple said:
They won't go out of their way to attack or defend Budweiser because they're obsessed with other beers and faggy White Claws. Budweiser is not the drink of young people, it is the drink of poor people.
Click to expand...
This is the interesting thing, because Bud is likely trying to take the hypothetical social status gain from supporting trans people, and attaching it to their beer. Anyone who wants to gain status from being worldly or "smart" about their booze won't be drinking Bud Lite, but if this campaign can attach a SPRINKLE of "Well, I have the choice of putting a pack in my cart now, I'll gain from supporting Dylan!" into a consumer's mind while at the liquor store, it achieves the advertisers' goal.

That's kind of why the Stonetoss "Burgers?" comic is pretty effective at summarizing this: sure, it's not about the hamburgers, but about attaching the status and signalling of "I am on the right side of history" to something as small and inconsequential as a beer purchase. Bud is literally telling people "it's not about the beer, stupid. You can think we're shitty beer, but you're supporting the right thing by buying our stuff."

Like you said, students/Lefties who can afford to, will buy better — there's more status to be gained. Students (and other people) who can't afford better get alienated, or just are keeping with the habits they already had.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Flamin Park, Traditional Tet, Blacktimus Prime and 50 others
Gentamicin said:
To be fair, I don’t know of any women who buy Nike women’s sports wear. It’s not popular or cute. I buy their tennis shoes/sneakers (they hold up well and I walk a lot, although next time I need a pair hopefully I can find something that’s not Nike). If a woman is going to buy sports wear and she can afford to spend more than Walmart, she’ll go for something like Lululemon. I personally buy from Old Navy because I feel like their workout clothes are good quality and comfortable. Now if they start sticking ugly men in Lululemon, you might see a bit more hostility from women.

Someone posted a screenshot of the comment section from Dylan’s tiktok and I can’t stop thinking about how the positive comments have the same tone as comments women say when they’re hyping up an uggo or someone who is special needs (or in Dylan’s case, both).
Click to expand...
Lululemon is deranged boss level woke.

‘Representation Is Huge’: Trans, Nonbinary Pro Runner Nikki Hiltz Signs With Lululemon​


From 2014:

Presented By lululemon: Transgender Models Strike a Pose​

 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
  • Agree
Reactions: Hellblazer, Malarkey Magdelen, Nanashi no kiwi and 33 others
OttoWest said:
As much as we in this thread may enjoy the Daily Mail’s coverage of Dylan, do not for a moment believe it is not supported by CAA and Dylan’s PR team, even if it doesn’t come from them directly (and I suspect some of it does).
Click to expand...
There's two Daily Mails. Both are crap, but in different ways.
Anything headed as Daily Mail is actually written by staff reporters/writers (with varying but low degrees of accuracy and editing).
Anything headed as Mail Online is cobbled together from press releases, twitter, and the writer's fetishes.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Nanashi no kiwi, The Woop-Town Supper, Blacktimus Prime and 59 others
Shig O'nella said:
There's two Daily Mails. Both are crap, but in different ways.
Anything headed as Daily Mail is actually written by staff reporters/writers (with varying but low degrees of accuracy and editing).
Anything headed as Mail Online is cobbled together from press releases, twitter, and the writer's fetishes.
Click to expand...

And the daily mail was the very paper which sponsored the British Union of fascists lead by Oswald Mosley.

I know that was a century ago but their “reporting” is the kind of xenophobic jingoism designed to trigger knee jerk reactions and outrage that fascist propaganda depends on.
 
  • Political Sperging
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: Nigor, Pig Cups, part time friend and 110 others
Croppered said:
That's kind of why the Stonetoss "Burgers?" comic is pretty effective at summarizing this: sure, it's not about the hamburgers, but about attaching the status and signalling of "I am on the right side of history" to something as small and inconsequential as a beer purchase. Bud is literally telling people "it's not about the beer, stupid. You can think we're shitty beer, but you're supporting the right thing by buying our stuff."
Click to expand...
I understand this, but the truth is that boycotts are gay and faggy and fail against these monolithic corporations often because there's niggercattle who can't be bothered as there's no other viable options. That's not the case with Budweiser though. People have a choice and Budweiser is a bad choice. Nobody will lose anything from their lives by dumping Budweiser.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: ElAbominacion, Overpriced Gaming Chair, Smar Mijou and 47 others
Dizzydent said:
NY post says it's over 5 billion so far. Hope it was worth it to stick it to those transphobes.

Click to expand...
“These people, they don’t understand me, and anything that I do or say then somehow gets taken out of context and is used against me and it’s so sad because everything I try to put out is positive. It’s trying to connect with others that maybe don’t understand me. It’s to make people laugh or to make a kid feel seen.”

Yeah, maybe, but let's be real: above all else, you're doing it because it's profitable, and it brings you the attention that you crave. I've never met a theater kid that wasn't "look what I can doooo!" personified.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha, Alamo basement dweller, Nanashi no kiwi and 47 others
eggnog fan #83 said:
“These people, they don’t understand me, and anything that I do or say then somehow gets taken out of context and is used against me and it’s so sad because everything I try to put out is positive. It’s trying to connect with others that maybe don’t understand me. It’s to make people laugh or to make a kid feel seen.”

Yeah, maybe, but let's be real: above all else, you're doing it because it's profitable, and it brings you the attention that you crave. I've never met a theater kid that wasn't "look what I can doooo!" personified.
Click to expand...
I explained this to a friend last night. Dylan Mulvaney is not in this for the money. Dylan Mulvaney may have made a lot of money during his time as an influencer, but that's not a win for him. He wants to be famous and a diva for the rest of his life. The idea of the entire world hating him and turning against him is too much for him and he WILL have a spiral arc. Marketing execs aren't stupid. They may be dense but aren't stupid. How Budweiser handles this situation is how all of them will learn from. Influencers are garbage and a dime a dozen. The modus operandum will soon become dump and replace at the first sign of trouble. They won't apologize, but they will quietly phase out.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha, Nanashi no kiwi, Xander from the Future and 51 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back