Dylan James Mulvaney / Days of Girlhood / Day __ of Being a Girl - Dylan Explains It All, a gay man interprets 'girlhood' in all glorious technicolor.

[Pope Urban]

"Birthing Person"
"Chest Feeder"
"Bleeder"

I am not female or 'feminist', but good god even I am offended by this.
These are terms I can imagine the most foul, drunkard wife-basher using in a fit of DV rage.

Absolutely revolting.

men would never tolerate this, but apparently women largely are. I thank God I'm not going through public school now.

 

[RatJoe]

There is something none of you have brought up: manufacturing. Through a little research, I found that Bud Light is only made in one place:
Houston Texas

That's actually surprising. I would have thought they would have breweries scattered all over the continent.

 

[Sneeder Griffin]

Not to powerlevel too much, but I work as a sales analyst for a major CPG company (unrelated to the alcoholic beverages industry) and have access to POS data from major retailers across the country through various software.

When I have some downtime with work, I was thinking of running some reports to analyze how successful Bud Light's campaign has been. I'm really busy with work right now unfortunately and it'll be a few weeks before the systems get updated with the most recent data, but I think it would be interesting to look at.

Just based off of what I know about Bud Light, I don't understand this marketing strategy. I know this type of thing may appeal to some zoomer girls and celebrity endorsements, even controversial ones, always generate a ton of publicity and hype, but I don't think zoomer girls are going to flock to Bud Light just because they put an ugly tranny soyjaking on the can. This strategy would at least make some sense with Bud Light Seltzer or Michelob Ultra since they are traditionally marketed to young women, but doing this with the base Bud Light brand was doomed from the start.

 

[Bob_]

Kinda OT, but one thing that has confused me about this whole Bud Light thing is what 'light' actually means.

In Australia, light beers are low alcohol beers of 2-3٪, existing so you can have a few beers at a BBQ and be legally able to drive home. They aren't drunk to get drunk, just to have something in your hand at a social event.

So I thought this was the same with Bud Light, and was so confused why good ole boys down cases of low alcohol beer.

I'm also confused why a guy can get away with appropriating female culture to this extent, imagine the reception if the can had Dylan in blackface on it.

 

[LiquidKid]

To be fair, I don’t know of any women who buy Nike women’s sports wear. It’s not popular or cute. I buy their tennis shoes/sneakers (they hold up well and I walk a lot, although next time I need a pair hopefully I can find something that’s not Nike). If a woman is going to buy sports wear and she can afford to spend more than Walmart, she’ll go for something like Lululemon. I personally buy from Old Navy because I feel like their workout clothes are good quality and comfortable. Now if they start sticking ugly men in Lululemon, you might see a bit more hostility from women.

Someone posted a screenshot of the comment section from Dylan’s tiktok and I can’t stop thinking about how the positive comments have the same tone as comments women say when they’re hyping up an uggo or someone who is special needs (or in Dylan’s case, both).

Anecdotal, but back in college I worked in a high end department store across from the athletic department. Women constantly bought Nike sports bras and shorts. I also can’t tell you how many blonde women I’ve seen with the generic Nike cap.

 

[RatJoe]

Kinda OT, but one thing that has confused me about this whole Bud Light thing is what 'light' actually means.

In Australia, light beers are low alcohol beers of 2-3٪, existing so you can have a few beers at a BBQ and be legally able to drive home. They aren't drunk to get drunk, just to have something in your hand at a social event.

So I thought this was the same with Bud Light, and was so confused why good ole boys down cases of low alcohol beer.

Always thought it was odd that commercials for American beer seem to always be for the light beers.

Not sure if they are actually more popular there, or if it's some regulation.

 

[Bob_]

Always thought it was odd that commercials for American beer seem to always be for the light beers.

Not sure if they are actually more popular there, or if it's some regulation.

Quick googling found that normal Bud is 5% (VB is 4.9% for comparison) so it seems light just means lower alcohol then normal? Maybe there is a taste difference?

Need some Americans to confirm what is going on here.

 

[Chickenpolar]

Quick googling found that normal Bud is 5% (VB is 4.9% for comparison) so it seems light just means lower alcohol then normal? Maybe there is a taste difference?

Need some Americans to confirm what is going on here.

"Lite" is about calories. Bud Lite is 110 calories in a 355ml can while Budweiser is 145.

So stupid people can think they're watching their weight by saving a French fry worth of calories or whatever on each of the 6 beers they're drinking.

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

"Dylan James Mulvaney" is one of the most astroturfed media "personalities" I've ever had the misfortune to have heard about, so it amuses me to see that his ugly-ass face is going to be eternally associated with business failure and the idiocy of the entire troon movement at large.

Who are they trying to appeal to with trannies? Millennials don't drink alcohol at least not much as Boomers did. Millennials are more likely be to dope smokers and heroin addicts than drunks. We don't hang around in bars either. Now I am not saying drug use is high amongst millennials either. Alcohol and drug use is also supposedly low amongst Zoomers as well.

So, who the fuck are they trying to appeal to?

Middle-management marketing types, "nice guy" internet celebrities, and Twitter people.

That's literally it.

 

[Shadfan666xxx000]

Not to powerlevel too much, but I work as a sales analyst for a major CPG company (unrelated to the alcoholic beverages industry) and have access to POS data from major retailers across the country through various software.

When I have some downtime with work, I was thinking of running some reports to analyze how successful Bud Light's campaign has been. I'm really busy with work right now unfortunately and it'll be a few weeks before the systems get updated with the most recent data, but I think it would be interesting to look at.

Just based off of what I know about Bud Light, I don't understand this marketing strategy. I know this type of thing may appeal to some zoomer girls and celebrity endorsements, even controversial ones, always generate a ton of publicity and hype, but I don't think zoomer girls are going to flock to Bud Light just because they put an ugly tranny soyjaking on the can. This strategy would at least make some sense with Bud Light Seltzer or Michelob Ultra since they are traditionally marketed to young women, but doing this with the base Bud Light brand was doomed from the start.

They're trying the same thing they do with women on men: appeal to the cool authority brand and everyone will flock to it. After all, you're a man which means you like bud light because that's manly. The problem is that men don't work that way. They'll gladly tell you to fuck off and drop out if they don't care for your tastes and that's what happened.

 

[Klichka]

Who are they trying to appeal to with trannies? Millennials don't drink alcohol at least not much as Boomers did. Millennials are more likely be to dope smokers and heroin addicts than drunks. We don't hang around in bars either. Now I am not saying drug use is high amongst millennials either. Alcohol and drug use is also supposedly low amongst Zoomers as well.

So, who the fuck are they trying to appeal to?

They're just trying to score woke points, literally. Companies get ranked on inclusivity via their Corporate Equality Index score, it's a whole thing and there was an article about it recently. Brands like dylan because they consider him relatively safe for a troon, as in he appears to bathe regularly and doesn't seem like an autistic neet, plus his follow count/views ensures that paying for a tiktok sponsorship from him will be probably be profitable

 

[V4L_Penis]

I finally realized why Dylan looked so familiar:

 

[AltisticRight]

Only trannies drink this pisswater and the steep decline is nothing but a blip.

Still good to see a company embracing the systematic annihilation of 50% of the population getting their stocks wrecked, but they'll bounce back in probably a year, if not shorter, and this will be nothing but an example of bad management instead of a lesson to not lick an autogynephile's rotten hole.

 

[CashMoney!]

I'm also thinking this is to do with ESG scores. Can anyone else who's familiar with this WEF bullshit explain why they would choose to do this kind of retarded business decision instead of wearing the consequences of not meeting an ESG bulletpoint?

 

[Mexican Molotov Marauder]

Only trannies drink this pisswater

Maybe this is the point. Maybe Budweiser is the single most based brand in the world and the whole thing was a psyop to get troons drunk on shitty beer and lower their inhibitions to make them more likely to 41%. Or they are buck broken cucks treated like cheap gas station whores by Blackrock.

 

[LiquidKid]

This is the interesting thing, because Bud is likely trying to take the hypothetical social status gain from supporting trans people, and attaching it to their beer. Anyone who wants to gain status from being worldly or "smart" about their booze won't be drinking Bud Lite, but if this campaign can attach a SPRINKLE of "Well, I have the choice of putting a pack in my cart now, I'll gain from supporting Dylan!" into a consumer's mind while at the liquor store, it achieves the advertisers' goal.

That's kind of why the Stonetoss "Burgers?" comic is pretty effective at summarizing this: sure, it's not about the hamburgers, but about attaching the status and signalling of "I am on the right side of history" to something as small and inconsequential as a beer purchase. Bud is literally telling people "it's not about the beer, stupid. You can think we're shitty beer, but you're supporting the right thing by buying our stuff."

Like you said, students/Lefties who can afford to, will buy better — there's more status to be gained. Students (and other people) who can't afford better get alienated, or just are keeping with the habits they already had.

This will be a long post, but I am uniquely qualified for this topic.

I went to college for marketing, and truthfully marketing was some of the worst work I have ever done. But I remember the very first day of my first class. My Chinese immigrate professor came up and said “what is marketing?”

She the described it as “marketing is the selling of ideas and using a product as a means to get that idea across. The goal is to make a statement and make people believe that their life will be better or they’ll be a part of that statement if they support the product.”

Now this was before I had heard of or encountered SJWs, but it immediately sounded odd to me. And the more I thought about it, the more I realized it was just propaganda school.

So you’re not wrong. You see, the marketing department’s main goal is always to do whatever they want and get the company to approve it. I can’t tell you how many days I just didn’t go to work, or I’d come into the office late and say “I was doing market research” an get away with it. That’s just how the field works. But many use it to push their agenda with corporate backing, and it seems this time it failed pretty badly

Coincidentally, in 2017 I was the director of marketing for a company that distributed beer and wine. I have literally never had alcohol in my life, but because of this job I know a fuck ton about it. It also so happened that Bud Light and the whole Busch mega corp was our biggest competitor. My job was to convince college kids and older people looking to seem hip that craft beer and the like was cooler and that the big corporate beers were bad.
This was around the time the IPA was really coming into mainstream prominence as the beer of choice and when the average consumer was becoming more aware of the different types of beer and different flavor profiles.

Only once did I ever get someone defend bud light. It was a Mexican dude and he said “bro, bud light’s the best!”

Bud light always had an interesting strategy, unlike Budweiser itself, bud light sort of took on the Pepsi marketing style. Larger than life ads, sponsoring concerts and festivals, Spuds McKenzie, in the 80’s and 90’s it was the definitive party beer and the industry really shifted to try and match it’s flavor profiles.

But today, while it still does that(remember the Area 51 festival they sponsored a few years back?) bud light is a relic that was mainly still being drank by people who were in college in the 80’s and 90’s and then drank by the people who drank it because it’s the beer their dad drank or because the mainstream pushed it as the “standard” beer. Sure, but the 2000’s other brands were considered better and people generally had the stigma that if you drank bud light you either were poor, couldn’t handle real beer, or were a chick watching her weight, but it did maintain the presence with a core demographic. A demographic that survived solely off of the familial bonds. The Pepperidge Farms or Folger’s Coffee of beers. A terrible product that you drink because it reminds you of the time you stole your dad’s beer at 12 years old.

The issue is that because of this, the primary demographic that drank bud light were they people who grew up in stable households with both parents present. AKA: conservatives. The people who wouldn’t necessarily want trans values out onto them. The only other audience drinking bud was the spring break party audience. And they only drink what’s cheap and available, they don’t a fuck about pushing a cause and have no loyalty to the beer they drink.

In essence: they were trying to appeal to those who align with instragram influencers, when their audience was actually the Hank Hills of the world.

I exploited this fact countless times in that job, it’s very easy to make someone turn on bud light when you can show them a local craft brew and give them the history lesson about how it’s a family business, making it even more wholesome than what they considered bud light.

For the record, this won’t kill bud light. They’re far too strong of a brand. But it will weaken them. I guarantee a different brand will step up soon enough and point out of the beer that branded itself as “America” during July was more divisive than ever.

 

[TerribleUser09]

What's the deal? Morons sold shares because they don't support trans rights but overall the commercial is a tremendous success because everyone is talking about it and the brand got more audacity with trans women promoting beer.

Now if you had at least a slight retardation you would buy these shares.

 

[A Grey Cat]

A straight white male??? What are you, some kind of fascist?

uh hello spuds was very clearly a trans ftm dog since he was was born female playing a male dog. Clearly spuds was a trailblazer who walked one decade so dulan could run in current year.


transphobe.

 

[Trianon]

When Dylan's dad unexpectedly came to the stage, Dylan at that moment thought his dad was preparing to take the spotlight and steal the show from him.

Well, this says a lot. Not that I buy for a second that it was unplanned, it's too perfect of a narrative for that, but I do buy that they are both flamboyant attention-seekers with addictive personalities, and the fact that Dylan lives in fear of being "upstaged" by his square dad who bakes cookies is funny.

 

[Ghostse]

I buy their tennis shoes/sneakers (they hold up well and I walk a lot, although next time I need a pair hopefully I can find something that’s not Nike).

I switched up to Brooks. They are only about $20-30 more than the midlevel Nikes and super fucking comfortable. The company isn't mega based or w/e but at least they aren't doing ad campaigns with a disloyal nigger or men in the women's section.