UK Rishi Sunak says 100% of women do not have a penis - It comes after Sir Keir Starmer said that ‘99.9 per cent of women’ do not have penises

1681469632078.png

Rishi Sunak has said he believes that 100 per cent of women do not have penises.

The prime minister has put himself at odds with Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer by declaring that 100 per cent of women do not have male genitals.

By contrast, Mr Starmer earlier this month suggested that as many as one in a thousand women have penises.

Asked whether 100 per cent of women do not have penises in an interview with Tory-supporting website Conservative Home, Mr Sunak said: “Yes, of course.”

He added: “We should always have compassion and understanding and tolerance for those who are thinking about changing their gender. Of course, we should.

“But when it comes to these issues of protecting women’s rights, women’s spaces, I think the issue of biological sex is fundamentally important when we think about those questions.

“As a general operating principle for me, biological sex is vitally fundamentally important in these questions. We can’t forget that.”


When Mr Starmer was asked by The Sunday Times whether women can have male genitals, he said: “For 99.9 per cent of women, it is completely biological ... and of course, they haven’t got a penis.”

Mr Sunak is hoping to exploit Labour’s division over transgender rights in the run-up to a general election, which is expected next year. He is pressing ahead with a pledge made during last year’s Conservative party leadership election to reform the legal definition of sex.

A review by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission concluded that amending the Equality Act 2010 to specifically refer to “biological sex” merits further consideration. The government had asked the watchdog to consider the pros and cons of such a change.

The change would mean, for example, that organisers of sporting events could exclude trans women without having to show the move was necessary because of fairness or safety.

Outspoken Conservative deputy chairman Lee Anderson has suggested the party fights the next general election on “a mix of culture wars and trans debate”.

Labour has been split over trans rights, with backbench opposition to Mr Starmer’s suggestion that some women have penises. Canterbury MP Rosie Duffield said the assertion left many “livid”, with women “frightened and furious” about the potential erosion of women’s rights.

Ms Duffield previously said it was “dystopian” that the leader of her party was reluctant to say whether women could have penises.

Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner said on Thursday that considering gender recognition reforms was not at odds with women’s rights.

She argued that protecting women-only spaces does not need to come at the expense of supporting transgender people.

Speaking to broadcasters during a visit to a food store in Derby on Thursday, Ms Rayner said: “I understand people’s concerns on both sides of the argument but I think we were the party of equality. We brought in the equality legislation. We are the best party for LGBT rights – we’ve got a history of doing that.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/rishi-sunak-transgender-penis-b2319675.html (Archive)

 
This is what counts as "based" in the West, now: stating that women don't have penises.


Why are we making positions of sanity the domain of the off-balanced feminists par excellence, again? You never had to be a TERF to say "boys have a penis, and girls have a vagina".
Hopefully 5 years from now the average Western conservative stance isn't "some women don't have penises". If we're at the point where people are saying "women shouldn't have penises is a TERF position" the linguistics war is already lost though to be honest that sadly seems to be the case more and more.
 
"And if - which I do not for a moment believe - this island, or a large part of it, were subjugated and starving trooned out: our empire, beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Indian fleet, will carry on the struggle until, in God's good time, the NEW WORLD, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old."
t. some old drunk retard
 
Some context here is important, he's talking with a guy from Conservative Home which aims to represent the party membership. I'd like to believe Sunak would say the same thing if he was being interviewed by a mainstream news outlet but have this niggling feeling that he wouldn't.
He’s not completely retarded, he knows full well that these words would be spread beyond the intended demographic of the outlet he’s interviewing for. He’s a politician, if he didn’t want this quote out there he could’ve just dodged the question.
 
He’s not completely retarded, he knows full well that these words would be spread beyond the intended demographic of the outlet he’s interviewing for. He’s a politician, if he didn’t want this quote out there he could’ve just dodged the question.

Really? There was that whole bit before he became PM, where he was in an affluent area reassuring voters that their tax money wouldn't go towards poorer neighbourhoods. Which, I don't necessarily disagree with on any level, but politically it didn't do him too well when that footage got out.

I don't think he's dishonest, I just think he's become entirely comfortable with the fact that he can say entirely different messsages for different groups and more or less get away with it.
 
An intersex woman might have a penis, but that's more like .0001% of women

Right. The way I see it, trannydom consists of the tiny center core of physically birth-defected people due to genetic anomaly or other factors; then they're surrounded by a larger amount of the genuinely mentally ill, in turn surrounded by the FAR larger bunch of cultists and LARPers.
 
Last edited:
Semantics versus Semantics.

99.9%, aka 00.01% actual, honest to god intersex women. versus the 100% If it has a Y , it's a guy, no exceptions.

This isn't troon shit, but I can easily see troons trying to make it about them.
 
Back