- Joined
- Dec 20, 2019
That is not how I recall Chinese military campaigns going, c.f. Battle of Siuyang.It’s very much a Chinese style of warfare, gain your objective with just about zero blood spilled, and quite possibly no fighting at all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is not how I recall Chinese military campaigns going, c.f. Battle of Siuyang.It’s very much a Chinese style of warfare, gain your objective with just about zero blood spilled, and quite possibly no fighting at all.
Don't worry, I know my Chinese history. It's as long and bloody as anyone's, and better recorded. But surely you agree that modern China is conflict averse and prefers clever diplomacy over brute fighting? Apart from a brief struggle with India over a passage to the Tarim Basin and one with the Soviet Union and Vietnam over Cambodia, the PRC hasn't engaged in warfare since its inception. That's a remarkably short list even for a weak country, let alone for one so large and powerful as China.That is not how I recall Chinese military campaigns going, c.f. Battle of Siuyang.
Don't worry, I know my Chinese history. It's as long and bloody as anyone's, and better recorded. But surely you agree that modern China is conflict averse and prefers clever diplomacy over brute fighting? Apart from a brief struggle with India over a passage to the Tarim Basin and one with the Soviet Union and Vietnam over Cambodia, the PRC hasn't engaged in warfare since its inception. That's a remarkably short list even for a weak country, let alone for one so large and powerful as China.
You can't lose a town if you eat the townsfolk.That is not how I recall Chinese military campaigns going, c.f. Battle of Siuyang.
Sounds to me that the important bits (to international trade) of Taiwan would be relatively ok with being assimilated, while the ones that would fight the hardest are the ones that NATO wouldn't mind using as cannon fodder to get what they want?Culturally, seems like there's 4 groups with varying amount of affinity for the mainland: <snip>
"It became necessary to eat the village in order to save it."You can't lose a town if you eat the townsfolk.
Yin Ziqi had besieged the city for a long time. The food in the city had run out. The city dwellers traded their children to eat and cooked the bodies of the dead. Fear spread and worse situations were expected. At this time, Zhang Xun took his concubine out and killed her in front of his soldiers in order to feed them. He said, "You have been working hard at protecting this city wholeheartedly for the country. Your loyalty is uncompromised despite the long-lasting hunger. Since I cannot cut out my own flesh to feed you, how can I keep this woman and just ignore the dangerous situation?" All the soldiers cried, for they did not wish to eat [the woman]. Zhang Xun ordered them to eat the flesh. Afterwards, they caught the women in the city. When there were no more women left, they turned to the old and young men. 20,000 to 30,000 people were eaten. People always remained loyal.
— Old Book of Tang, Chapter 137.
I think that most of the engineers and other highly educated professionals who are essential to TSMC operations on the island would try to flee abroad rather than stay and work under Chinese occupation, but purely for financial motivations rather than political or cultural loyalty.Sounds to me that the important bits (to international trade) of Taiwan would be relatively ok with being assimilated, while the ones that would fight the hardest are the ones that NATO wouldn't mind using as cannon fodder to get what they want?
As for using regular ships. Yes and no. Most still need some form of harbor or dock facility. China did some drills with this a year or two ago. It's possible but not really ready for prime time. And falls apart without air and sea superiority.
I think that most of the engineers and other highly educated professionals who are essential to TSMC operations on the island would try to flee abroad rather than stay and work under Chinese occupation, but purely for financial motivations rather than political or cultural loyalty.
Most all of the middle class and upper class Taiwanese I met and worked with had or knew a family member or friend who emigrated to the West for education or work and made a successful life for themselves, and a lot of them know friends or family who went to boomtown China to make a quick buck or establish a pioneering enterprise and then lost it all when Chinese gov seized their company or locked everything down for the coof but refused to let them liquidate assets and get their money out.
And they know that West is cool with you to make your money and then take it back home when you have had your fill of the West. But when you make money in China, they make it really hard for you to take your money abroad.
Also, for the TSMC engineers in particular, they are willing to work for peanuts right now compared to dumber, higher paid engineers in the West, while having to be on call 24/7, tons of unpaid overtime, etc, so if they could get war-victim asylum in the West they would have no problem landing the same job but with better pay and working conditions, which would be even better for their career than getting poached by the Chinese companies.
Yes if the money is good enough, which often it is. Moving to America isn't necessarily forever, either. I've spoken to people who were or who know TSMC engineers and this was their opinion. I'm sure opinions vary but the logic seems pretty straightforward.Are they going to give up their god-given corporate positioning, home soil and being off the shore of their ancestral homeland in favor of an utterly alien country on a steep decline with diversity hiring, inclusion and random troon mass shootings?
It's easy to be peaceful to your neighbors when you've lacked significant force projection capabilities for nearly all of your current government's existence. Also, they were certainly willing to provide support for the Norks in the Korean War, and continue to support them in fomenting conflict in the area.Don't worry, I know my Chinese history. It's as long and bloody as anyone's, and better recorded. But surely you agree that modern China is conflict averse and prefers clever diplomacy over brute fighting? Apart from a brief struggle with India over a passage to the Tarim Basin and one with the Soviet Union and Vietnam over Cambodia, the PRC hasn't engaged in warfare since its inception. That's a remarkably short list even for a weak country, let alone for one so large and powerful as China.
Well besides those 2 attempts to invade Taiwan, in 1954 and 1958 respectively, where they got their asses kicked.Don't worry, I know my Chinese history. It's as long and bloody as anyone's, and better recorded. But surely you agree that modern China is conflict averse and prefers clever diplomacy over brute fighting? Apart from a brief struggle with India over a passage to the Tarim Basin and one with the Soviet Union and Vietnam over Cambodia, the PRC hasn't engaged in warfare since its inception. That's a remarkably short list even for a weak country, let alone for one so large and powerful as China.
Ah yes, nothing at all has changed since over half a century ago...Well besides those 2 attempts to invade Taiwan, in 1954 and 1958 respectively, where they got their asses kicked.
Yeah, that's why I specifically used the word warfare.Well besides those 2 attempts to invade Taiwan, in 1954 and 1958 respectively, where they got their asses kicked.
Don't worry, I know my Chinese history. It's as long and bloody as anyone's, and better recorded. But surely you agree that modern China is conflict averse and prefers clever diplomacy over brute fighting? Apart from a brief struggle with India over a passage to the Tarim Basin and one with the Soviet Union and Vietnam over Cambodia, the PRC hasn't engaged in warfare since its inception. That's a remarkably short list even for a weak country, let alone for one so large and powerful as China.
You’re right, that did happen after the PRC was formed. In fact, how bloody a conflict it was is probably a major factor in Chinese military thinking to date. China devoted literally half its GDP to the army, and one sixth of the whole Korean population were dead at the end of hostilities, both from bombings and from the US-backed south committing pogroms and other atrocities against northern civilians.Korea really is the forgotten war.