Science Newer School Buses Could Cut Student Absences - Diesel buses make kids skip school

Replacing all of the oldest school buses in the nation could lead to 1.3 million fewer daily absences annually, according to a new study.​

APRIL 14TH, 2023
POSTED BY KIM NORTH SHINE-U. MICHIGAN

1681701275489.png
"The average bus is on the road 16 years before it is decommissioned. That means millions of children are still riding older, highly polluting buses to school," says Sara Adar. (Credit: Getty Images)

The suspected cause of these preventable absences is exposure to high levels of diesel exhaust fumes, which can leak into school bus cabins or enter buses through open windows. Over time, exposure can exacerbate respiratory illnesses and other conditions and lead to missed school days, the researchers say.

“Even relatively short commutes on school buses can dominate students’ daily air pollution exposures,” says Meredith Pedde, an environmental epidemiology research fellow at the University of Michigan’s School of Public Health and lead researcher for the study in Nature Sustainability.

Pedde conducted the research with senior author Sara Adar, associate professor and associate chair of epidemiology at the School of Public Health. Their study is the first to evaluate the effectiveness of the Environmental Protection Agency’s School Bus Rebate Program, which launched in 2012, Pedde says.

“It is well established that traffic-related pollutants can have harmful effects on the body such as inducing inflammation, reducing lung function. and increasing asthma attacks,” she says. “Given the EPA’s random allotment of its clean bus funding, we believe our research clearly establishes the link between upgrading school buses and student attendance. Moreover, it demonstrates the need for continued and increased support for school districts to replace or upgrade their buses.”

For the study, the researchers analyzed data from nearly 3,000 school districts that applied to the EPA’s school bus replacement funding program between 2012 and 2017 and compared changes in attendance rates in 383 school districts that received funding and 2,400 districts that did not.

On average, they found that districts with upgraded buses had a 0.06 percentage point higher attendance rate compared to districts not selected for the clean bus funding. In a district of 10,000 students, that change means six additional students attended school each day. In total, replacing older school buses with newer models prevented at least 350,000 absences in one year in schools across the country.

In districts with higher levels of estimated ridership on replaced buses and older fleets of buses, the numbers were higher, with 14 more students per day attending school in high ridership districts and 45 more students attending each day in districts that replaced buses built before 1990.

Applying their results nationwide, the researchers extrapolated that replacing all pre-2000 model school buses would lead to more than 1.3 million additional days of attendance a year.

Approximately 25 million children ride buses to school in the US each year. While it is considered the safest mode of transportation from a traffic accident perspective, concerns about levels of emissions are well documented.

The EPA set out to hasten the transition of school bus fleets to cleaner vehicles in 2012 with its School Bus Rebate Program. The program is ongoing. It provided an average of nearly $6 million annually to school districts to upgrade school buses with cleaner alternatives during the period covered by the study.
The cost of upgrading buses—about $10,000 to retrofit and between $100,000 and $300,000 to purchase new buses—puts districts in the position of using buses as long as possible.

“The average bus is on the road 16 years before it is decommissioned. That means millions of children are still riding older, highly polluting buses to school,” Adar says.

“These findings demonstrate the importance of continued funding for new, clean school buses since we saw measurable improvements in attendance when school districts update their buses,” she says. “Most importantly, we found that replacing the oldest buses will result in the largest benefits for children and their caregivers.”

Additional coauthors are from the University of Washington and the University of Michigan.

Source: University of Michigan

Original Study DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01088-7

Source (Archive)
 

Attachments

TBF, the reason why parents take their children to school in this way is because of security concerns. They don't want their children to get jumped or kidnapped or wander away from home, so the only thing to do is pick them up.

Then again, the best way to make sure children are safe is to homeschool, but I guess parents would rather deal with traffic than teach their kids.

Then there's the fact that letting your kids walk alone for a block or two is considered to be child abuse.

We've all read those "nosy neighbour calls Child Protective Services on parent letting their children play alone at the playground" news stories.
 
Can’t they use propane buses if they’re so worried about diesel fumes?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: KiwiFuzz
First of all, these ebil busses are spewing out emissions from the shittastic and polluted age of... 2007?

Second of all, I never rode a school bus when I was a kid because I always lived within walking distance or public transportation distance of my schools. I got some walking in, I rode some busses with sketch-ass gang-bangers, it wasn't the best time but it wasn't the worst.

My point being that rural and suburban kids ride the school bus and urban kids (who are presumably exposed to more pollution during the day) do not.

Seems like this 0.06% difference is just noise in the machine.

Edit: Third of all, what's the expected life span of a bus and what are the emissions from driving a bus already in service versus ordering a new bus to be created?

Hell, in college we rode busses that had probably been in service for 40 years.

Getting good use out of an older model seems like a better use of money than buying something new and improved,
 
First of all, these ebil busses are spewing out emissions from the shittastic and polluted age of... 2007?

Second of all, I never rode a school bus when I was a kid because I always lived within walking distance or public transportation distance of my schools. I got some walking in, I rode some busses with sketch-ass gang-bangers, it wasn't the best time but it wasn't the worst.

My point being that rural and suburban kids ride the school bus and urban kids (who are presumably exposed to more pollution during the day) do not.

Seems like this 0.06% difference is just noise in the machine.

Edit: Third of all, what's the expected life span of a bus and what are the emissions from driving a bus already in service versus ordering a new bus to be created?

Hell, in college we rode busses that had probably been in service for 40 years.

Getting good use out of an older model seems like a better use of money than buying something new and improved,
If you aren't buying, then they can't grift off the procurement process and "consultant" fees.
 
This article is retarded. I’ve dealt with school transportation, bus contractors and their shitty school busses. Only thing new busses will provide are new seats to vandalize and floors to trash.
Fix the school system and toss useless parents off rooftops, then ship their crotch demons to boot camp. New busses are junk anyway.
 
Don't think eliminating absences has to do with education the children.

Nope.

It's all about the school district getting the money for little Johnny and little Janey's asses in the seats.

They give two fucks about your kid's education, attendance, or welfare.

As long as they're in the seats, the school district gets money, and that is ALL that matters to these people.

Oh, that and the money they can get from the EV grift.
What happens a lot is the principle tells the parents were trying to get this new bus and send your kids to school on a count day and they also do the counting on a day where there half the student body like Wednesday half days. Though in this case the study does not prove what they said and proves no link between diesel bus and absence.
 
I recall the school bus as always crowded, stinky, too rowdy, and kids could be jerks to other kids.

Also American public schools can more or less regimented like a boot camp or prison to kids. Waiting in lines, no talking out of turn, no getting up without permission, recess reminiscent of a prison exercise yard, having to always sit up straight and pay attention, etc. Then there's all the homework. And that's not even getting into the SJW indoctrination after Current Year began.

I too doubt that changing the school bus will increase attendance.
And that's lots of good reasons for homeschooling.
 
Yet their parents now insist on taking them there in their monstrously oversized Range Rovers and BMW X5s.
We walk to school, and as a kid I also walked to school. It’s about an hour for me to walk there, get them all from various buildings and walk home. I don’t blame parents who drive though - letting young kids walk alone through most British cities is not safe. Cars, traffic, insane and violent people etc. and if you then have to drive to work, then you’d have to spend that time walking then walking home then getting back in the car to commute.
 
We walk to school, and as a kid I also walked to school. It’s about an hour for me to walk there, get them all from various buildings and walk home. I don’t blame parents who drive though - letting young kids walk alone through most British cities is not safe. Cars, traffic, insane and violent people etc. and if you then have to drive to work, then you’d have to spend that time walking then walking home then getting back in the car to commute.
But then it becomes a feedback loop, where it's not safe for the kids to walk to school because of all the people in cars... leading to more kids being dropped off in cars, making it even less safe to walk to school.
 
But then it becomes a feedback loop, where it's not safe for the kids to walk to school because of all the people in cars... leading to more kids being dropped off in cars, making it even less safe to walk to school.
It’s not just the cars to be honest. I walk becasue we are quite close and there’s a safe ish route. People are also a concern - there’s been cases of guys trying to grab kids or lire them into cars. It’s good to walk when / of you can. It’s be better than cars to have safe clean buses with decent behaviour on them but that’s maybe a stretch.
 
As a non-American the idea of school buses has always seemed like a very good one. Where I live schools (generally, there might be some exceptions) don't have buses, instead the parents have to take the kids themselves. Until about twenty years ago this meant walking there or taking a train or regular bus, but over the past twenty years or so more and more parents are driving their kids to school. This has led to the phenomenon of the school run, where twice a day the roads are completely clogged by parents taking their kids to school.
Here is almost the same. Most parents take their kids to school, either by car or walking or with private transportations called "movilidades". And yes, they are chaotic.

img-2023-04-17-12-50-40.png

They are often vans and often driven by women (moms making extra cash while taking their own kids to school). Even in public school they are a thing. They exist because our public transportation is even more chaotic and dangerous. IMO, if this was more organized, it could work better.
 
It’s about an hour for me to walk there
They exist because our public transportation is even more chaotic and dangerous.
It's BS how people can't teleport. Or fly. Or run really fast. Or even just run without getting tired so much.*

*(heard there's a rare condition where that's possible but rare condition is rare)

And that's lots of good reasons for homeschooling.
Depends on the parents though. There's surely some who are more competent than others.
 
Depends on the parents though. There's surely some who are more competent than others.
It’s not hard to be more competent than the vast majority of public school teachers. A homeschooling parent doesn’t have to be better than the best teacher in the world in order to improve their child’s education, they only have to be better than the teacher the kid would have had in public school.
 
Why do leftists do this? I'm willing to accept the conclusion that diesel pollution is bad and that electrification of school buses could do some good for the environment and public health, but why do they don't they understand that if you take two things that are weakly correlated, but the second thing is effected much more strongly by a fuck ton of other factors, and then start talking about this weak correlation you found like it's a silver bullet that's going to fix the second thing, then you sound like a fucking idiot?
 
Back