Karl Kasarda / InRangeTV / 2gACM / Karl-InRangeTV - satanist cuckold guntuber with cringe haircut and a Kubelwagen hates yt

[Archie_Kimkicker]

In the video, Ian mentions that they had to change a stage because some of the competitors couldn't climb over a short wall:

Clip starts at 18:13 if the timestamp embed doesn't work.

Someone in the thread claims that One Shepherd was the actual designer of the stages and that InRangeTV's only contribution was complaining that it was too hard to scale the walls.
He got both Karl and Russell to angrily respond:
View attachment 5058975
Unddit (Archive)

tl;dr -- FAAAAAAAAT!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Melipe Fassa]

I'm just baffled why grown men are so butthurt over not being publicly credited with stage design. For one, I've never seen any other competition organization credit stage designers by name. Secondly wasn't the whole point of 2GACM to be open source? And the stages are so ridiculously simple and repetitive compared to anything you would see in USPA, IPSC, or even 3 gun. Not exactly a major accomplishment.

 

[make_it_so]

Actually the early Bundeswehr Panzergrenadier Divisions who were located in the former British sector have been equipped completely with British Army surplus equipment, except the tanks which were solely either M-47 or M-41's.
The M-47's were pretty soon replaced by the M-48 when they became available.
Artillery was also completely from the US, they had the M2A1, 155mm Howitzer M1, 155mm Long Toms, 8 inch Howitzers (203mm) M1, 105mm M7, M44, M52, M53/M55 and all of at the same time. Later they were all repaced by the M107, M110 and ofc the M109.The Bren Carriers they used were pretty quickly replaced by the M39 tho. But the No.4 Lee Enfield served until it was replaced by the H&K G3.

View attachment 5054414

I was not aware of the .303 Enfield use by the West Germans. However, the Bundeswehr and other services still made use of the M1 Garand and M1 Carbine, which the US had made generous donations of just like in the case of so many other postwar recipients of US military aid.

I'm just baffled why grown men are so butthurt over not being publicly credited with stage design. For one, I've never seen any other competition organization credit stage designers by name. Secondly wasn't the whole point of 2GACM to be open source? And the stages are so ridiculously simple and repetitive compared to anything you would see in USPA, IPSC, or even 3 gun. Not exactly a major accomplishment.

I think it might have to do with the fact that their YouTube/online presence is their "brand" and they want recognition so that their "brand" can grow and have success.

 

[Archie_Kimkicker]

I think it might have to do with the fact that their YouTube/online presence is their "brand" and they want recognition so that their "brand" can grow and have success.

Karl's only growth potential will be among Trannywaffen.

 

[TerminalTryHard]

Karl's only growth potential will be among Trannywaffen.

Unfortunately only 41% of them are regular viewers for some reason.

 

[DocAwe]

In the video, Ian mentions that they had to change a stage because some of the competitors couldn't climb over a short wall:

Clip starts at 18:13 if the timestamp embed doesn't work.

Someone in the thread claims that One Shepherd was the actual designer of the stages and that InRangeTV's only contribution was complaining that it was too hard to scale the walls.
He got both Karl and Russell to angrily respond:
View attachment 5058975
Unddit (Archive)

I wanted one of those KP15 poly lowers just because I think it's neat.
The more sinistral posts, the less I want to buy one.
Maybe I'll get lucky and find a used one.

 

[Uber driver reviewer]

anarcho-communism? am i stupid for thinking that's a contradiction in terms?

It’s the end means of anarcho-syndicalism.

Both are fairy tale systems that only exist in Portland Co-Ops, bicycle shops, and coffee shops

I wanted one of those KP15 poly lowers just because I think it's neat.
The more sinistral posts, the less I want to buy one.
Maybe I'll get lucky and find a used one.

They make an awesome lightweight lightweight AR. I had a 14.5” (plus flash suppressor) pencil barrel on one with A2 front sight and a fixed rear. It was a hai4 under 6Lbs and very quick handling. I sold it in a panic market for a price I couldn’t refuse (which enabled me to seriously stock up on ammo before prices skyrocketed)

Ideally, I wanted an old 20” M16A1 upper on one but the prices on retro AR shit went kinda crazy.

I don't think Karl actually 'works' a real job anymore. And me, being a wage slave, is having my freedom restrained by the likes of idiots like Karl.
Soooooooooo looks like he should get busy doing what his patch says.

Ah yes the intellligistia….. things always go so well for that group of pricks.

 

[Wilhelm Bittrich]

I was not aware of the .303 Enfield use by the West Germans. However, the Bundeswehr and other services still made use of the M1 Garand and M1 Carbine, which the US had made generous donations of just like in the case of so many other postwar recipients of US military aid.
View attachment 5060920View attachment 5060922
View attachment 5060951

Yes they used mostly US Equipment except the Units which were located in the former British sector. Albeit Tanks and Artillery were completely from the US and they also used the M1911 which was actually very well liked within the new Bundeswehr. M3 Grease guns and BAR's were also used. The new Navy got six EX-USN Fletchers and the new Luftwaffe got almost all planes for the start from the US too.

Zerstörer 1, ex USS Anthony DD-515

Zerstörer 3, ex USS Wadsworth DD-516



Jagdgeschwader Richthofen, CO at the time Erich "Bubi" Hartmann

I wonder where they got the idea for the black tulip from.

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

Well, a lot of the mags are kinda shit. Find good mags for a M1 Carbine and that thing is just downright fun to plink with. The problem is getting those mags. We got someone in our range group who's sunk a fair amount of cash into just three good, reliable magazines for his M1 and he loves that thing to death.

(His only complaint are the prices.)

It’s the end means of anarcho-syndicalism.

Both are fairy tale systems that only exist in Portland Co-Ops, bicycle shops, and coffee shops

They tried doing it in Spain, but they got snuffed out by the Soviets

 

[Blasterisk]

In the video, Ian mentions that they had to change a stage because some of the competitors couldn't climb over a short wall:

Clip starts at 18:13 if the timestamp embed doesn't work.

Someone in the thread claims that One Shepherd was the actual designer of the stages and that InRangeTV's only contribution was complaining that it was too hard to scale the walls.
He got both Karl and Russell to angrily respond:
View attachment 5058975
Unddit (Archive)

There's only four walls because Russell climbed the fifth one and it broke because [steiner] HE'S FAT! [/steiner]

 

[Mr. Confederate Man]

Unfortunately only 41% of them are regular viewers for some reason.

Upon reviewing the data, I’ve found that the regular viewership is a more concerning 59%

 

[Bogliacci]

I wanted one of those KP15 poly lowers just because I think it's neat.
The more sinistral posts, the less I want to buy one.
Maybe I'll get lucky and find a used one.

I got suckered in by the GWACs lawsuit to pick one up to support them and man, it sucks. Ergo sucked, the controls felt like they would break the polymer when manipulated and Im pretty sure the safety DID in fact break with how it felt switching after a range session.

Let my sacrifice of 130 bucks or whatever it was with the discount serve a higher purpose

 

[White Devil]

I got suckered in by the GWACs lawsuit to pick one up to support them and man, it sucks. Ergo sucked, the controls felt like they would break the polymer when manipulated and Im pretty sure the safety DID in fact break with how it felt switching after a range session.

Let my sacrifice of 130 bucks or whatever it was with the discount serve a higher purpose

But this is the rifle Stoner would have made!

 

[Romulus augustulus]

But this is the rifle Stoner would have made!

I like how they just ignored the existence SR25 an SR15 during the who process.

 

[Full Spectrum]

I like how they just ignored the existence SR25 an SR15 during the who process.

They ignored it because Karl wanted to put the idea of what he already thought the AR15 should be and rationaliz it with (fake) headcannon of what Stoner would do. Karl is obviously part of a particular community of competitive shooters in the AZ area that are obviously friends with one another and they have their particular ideas about what is good. Paul Shanks of the Cav Arms shooting team, for instance, had as nearly identical a gun to the WWSD back in 2010 as you could expect back then that Karl obviously knew about: Cassette trigger with under-powered spring, CF free float tube, poly lower, no buffer detent, Young chrome BCG, etc. Coupled with his pre-existing belief in muzzle devices and pencil barrels, it's easy to see that Karl took what was already a competition gun and did the whole homework meme of changing it up enough to make it "his" while Ian was just tagging along since at least at that time Ian did not have a strong grasp of competition shooting or modern assault rifles.

Warrior Talk Forums

Warrior Talk Forums is the new leader in tactical forums with discussion of weapons of all types, combatives, tactics and current events.

www.warriortalk.com

Building the Lightweight Sniper Rifle

Warrior Talk Forums is the new leader in tactical forums with discussion of weapons of all types, combatives, tactics and current events.

web.archive.org

Interestingly, they managed to replicate all of the bad things and engineering oversights the original AR-15 had when Stoner was "designing" it, like overgassing to the point of unreliability and reintroducing the issue of primer sensitivity that was solved back in the 60s now poking its head again. I have one and it's obviously "designed" in such a way as to be obviously ignorant of what made the M16A1 categorically better and actually usable for combat in the military than the prototype stage AR-15 that Stoner/Armalite sold to Colt.
EDIT: Link to paul shanks gun: https://sinistralrifleman.com/2014/12/23/internet-rumor-control/

 

[Archie_Kimkicker]

They ignored it because Karl wanted to put the idea of what he already thought the AR15 should be and rationaliz it with (fake) headcannon of what Stoner would do. Karl is obviously part of a particular community of competitive shooters in the AZ area that are obviously friends with one another and they have their particular ideas about what is good. Paul Shanks of the Cav Arms shooting team, for instance, had as nearly identical a gun to the WWSD back in 2010 as you could expect back then that Karl obviously knew about: Cassette trigger with under-powered spring, CF free float tube, poly lower, no buffer detent, Young chrome BCG, etc. Coupled with his pre-existing belief in muzzle devices and pencil barrels, it's easy to see that Karl took what was already a competition gun and did the whole homework meme of changing it up enough to make it "his" while Ian was just tagging along since at least at that time Ian did not have a strong grasp of competition shooting or modern assault rifles.

Warrior Talk Forums

Warrior Talk Forums is the new leader in tactical forums with discussion of weapons of all types, combatives, tactics and current events.

www.warriortalk.com

Building the Lightweight Sniper Rifle

Warrior Talk Forums is the new leader in tactical forums with discussion of weapons of all types, combatives, tactics and current events.

web.archive.org

Interestingly, they managed to replicate all of the bad things and engineering oversights the original AR-15 had when Stoner was "designing" it, like overgassing to the point of unreliability and reintroducing the issue of primer sensitivity that was solved back in the 60s now poking its head again. I have one and it's obviously "designed" in such a way as to be obviously ignorant of what made the M16A1 categorically better and actually usable for combat in the military than the prototype stage AR-15 that Stoner/Armalite sold to Colt.

I've always enjoyed maverick gun designs even when they don't really work out, but this is clearly just an autistic vanity project and little else.

 

[White Devil]

lol Karl worked for Gabe Suarez? No wonder he's such a piece of shit asshole, like attracts like.

EDIT: lol that post was in 2012 too, 2011 is when Gabe went off the fucking rails about trigger discipline and whatnot.

 

[Neo-Nazi Rich Evans]

>not worried about sustained fire
>combat rifle
come on karl, you ought to know that you can pick one and only one.

 

[Full Spectrum]

lol Karl worked for Gabe Suarez? No wonder he's such a piece of shit asshole, like attracts like.

I'm only just finding out, too. I had that link to pencil barrels saved from about a year ago and it was showing only "Gold Member" like the muzzle brake link does. Apparently the link died and the wayback machine had the sniper thread saved from 2012 and I guess he worked for Gabe back then. At any rate Ian and Karl (and Phangan iirc) have all taken classes or been involved with Suarez being another local AZ business.

 

[White Devil]

I'm only just finding out, too. I had that link to pencil barrels saved from about a year ago and it was showing only "Gold Member" like the muzzle brake link does. Apparently the link died and the wayback machine had the sniper thread saved from 2012 and I guess he worked for Gabe back then. At any rate Ian and Karl (and Phangan iirc) have all taken classes or been involved with Suarez being another local AZ business.

That just explains so fucking much.