Debate user @secret watcher on the ethics of using post reactions without posting himself

How can we "debate" Watcher when he has no brain nor apparent opinions of his own?
There is no rule requiring people to post if they want to use an account...
What are they contributing to the site then?
They are just consooming compute power and bandwidth and create nothing.
Posts are content and grow the site.
Lurking does nothing but use, without giving anything in return.
 
You should be more in awe of the fact that one of your fellow jannies, uselss fuckwit banned him from stickers for a week on the whim of a poster in the Russia gayops convo.
View attachment 5063905
It's interesting the bitching about "hugboxes" and "lefty cabals" is always from the same set of people...
 
Can also confirm that he isn't a HHH sock, as is a popular conspiracy theory amongst us A&Ners. I unironically follow him and periodically check up on who he's giving stickers. I also bet he's never been threadbanned because someone who just gives out stickers by definition can't derail a thread.

Edit:
You should be more in awe of the fact that one of your fellow jannies, uselss fuckwit banned him from stickers for a week on the whim of a poster in the Russia gayops convo.
View attachment 5063905
Janny scum. I guess I understand why he did it. Assblasted users have literally gay oped the forum in the past. Maybe the solution is to be less ass-blasted.
 
Last edited:
Back