Debate user RACISM about why racism is bad. - A discussion sure to be over in a single page.

In the span of 30 years while rejecting all foreign aid Eritrea has:
  • Essentially terraformed it’s land going from virtually all desert to 15% forest cover
  • Built dozens of dams and an efficient irrigation system that renders it famine proof unlike its neighbours
  • Approaching full literacy
  • Only country on track to meet Millenium Development goals
  • Maintained rich history of Orthodox Christianity
  • Not been infiltrated by Jews who spread faggotry and degeneracy unlike those in Britain

You beat Romania with the literacy part already! Hairyfoots can't into reading.

Racism has a holy goal. Keep Romanian gyppers out of Aryan Hungary!

Also, kikes spread faggotry. Or worse.

I would say put Soros in a soup bowl if he comes to Africa but that would be cruel, to the tastebuds.
 
  • Deviant
Reactions: AgendaPoster
You beat Romania with the literacy part already! Hairyfoots can't into reading.

Racism has a holy goal. Keep Romanian gyppers out of Aryan Hungary!

Also, kikes spread faggotry. Or worse.

I would say put Soros in a soup bowl if he comes to Africa but that would be cruel, to the tastebuds.
Romanians are literate smarts, but what about Slovakians, Czechs or the Polish?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: AgendaPoster
Judging people on the color of their skin is just stupid. You should hate black people because they throw their fatherless babies in the trash and they smell like burnt popcorn, not because they have dark skin.
 
Judging people on the color of their skin is just stupid. You should hate black people because they throw their fatherless babies in the trash and they smell like burnt popcorn, not because they have dark skin.
I would never judge a nigger based on skin color. Hell, some niggers are near-white.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: TVB
Racism is like trying to keep your wardrobe organized exclusively by color. Does it really make sense to put your underpants and your suit jackets in the same drawer if they're both black?

Racism maybe made sense when people barely moved 9 miles within their entire life spans but now it doesn't. "Whiteness" is a Frankenstein race that covers everyone from Slavs to Irish to Italians (!) to Icelandics; "Blackness" is a race that spans 3 continents (Black Africans, Black Americans, Black Aborginal Australians), and who knows where those people with the middle-shade brown colors come from? Could be North India, Mexico, the Middle East... and you'd just be guessing by accent mostly.

Is that a reasonable and logical way to categorize people to you?
 
Last edited:
Racism is like trying to keep your wardrobe organized exclusively by color. Does it really make sense to put your underpants and your suit jackets in the same drawer if they're both black?

Yes, human beings and clothing are clearly the same thing. Great analogy.

Is that a reasonable and logical way to categorize people to you?

People seem to think so, as proven by the fact that racial groups still tend towards self-segregation even in today's supposedly "anti-racist" culture.

The problem with the term "racism" is that it's semantically overloaded. If people see that word they will imagine vastly different things depending on their politics. You have to be specific and define what is meant by the term before you could say whether it is good, bad, or anything else.
 
@RACISM, how ought the White Man treat the savage races of the world? Should he avoid and leave them be? Should he use them as beasts-of-burden? Must he teach them civilization in accordance to the Will of God? May he even take one as a wife and father new races with her, and if not what is to be done with the mixed children already here? And if destroying them be most just then which race earns your first choice for annihilation?
I just don't want to live near them.
Racism is like trying to keep your wardrobe organized exclusively by color. Does it really make sense to put your underpants and your suit jackets in the same drawer if they're both black?

Racism maybe made sense when people barely moved 9 miles within their entire life spans but now it doesn't. "Whiteness" is a Frankenstein race that covers everyone from Slavs to Irish to Italians (!) to Icelandics; "Blackness" is a race that spans 3 continents (Black Africans, Black Americans, Black Aborginal Australians), and who knows where those people with the middle-shade brown colors come from? Could be North India, Mexico, the Middle East... and you'd just be guessing by accent mostly.

Is that a reasonable and logical way to categorize people to you?
Another retarded take from Margaret Pless. I expected no less.
 
I just don't want to live near them.

Another retarded take from Margaret Pless. I expected no less.
For some people, one specific race is not allowed to have the indigenous status. The rest sure do. As a pasty East European that lives in a place that was colonized and invaded for like 2K years, I find it incredibly idiotic that these spergs put me in the same basket as the offspring of conquistadores and various other Western empires.
And the "it's just skin color" is just more modern lies, as if biology stops at the melanin secretion.
I never wanted to fuck with others, so I just expect that others mind their own business, far away from me and my kin, in their own homelands. Come visit sometimes! Then, off you go back home, nigga.
 
racism isnt bad. its just an opinion that people have. like all other opinions, it affects no one, and there's no reason anyone should care, let alone get mad about it

imagine if people got as mad about not liking denim as they did about races
 
Another retarded take from Margaret Pless. I expected no less.
The fucks that supposed to mean? Saying my name doesn’t win the points for you champ.

Whiteness is a shibboleth of cultures and races put in a blender set to purée. The same “white europeans” who see themselves as all playing on the same team today were quite divided against one another in 1910. Irish and Polish discrimination is within living memory, not that anyone thinks of them “non-white” now.

Do you have any good reason to see whites as a coherent race at all, when the term could reasonably be applied to cultural and genetic bloodlines as disappears as Russian Slavs to Spaniards?
 
Last edited:
What if I lived near you? Would that be fine?
:3c
Reinstate the Edict of Expulsion!

The fucks that supposed to mean? Saying my name doesn’t win the points for you champ.
Here it kinda does.
You've done nothing but shit up the Holocaust thread with rage filled butthurt for months. You are a low IQ poster who gets frothing at the mouth at the thought someone, somewhere doesn't like kikes like you or even worse your pet niggers. You're a stupid kike bitch who has never made a single decent post here, ever. Holocaust yourself (by which I mean die of typhus).
 
@RACISM i haven’t posted in the Holocaust thread for over a year.

If all you can say in response to the question “why does it make sense to you to categorize people by skin color” is “your name is Margaret Pless, you affirm the Holocaust happened, you’re low IQ and also Jewish” (none of which answers my question) then you’re basically saying “I have no coherent response besides attacking you personally and have lost this debate.”

So I’ll give you another punch, try to aim at the bag this time instead of my face. (I know, it’s very beautiful and distracting but please do your best.) Why does it make sense to categorize a very disparate genetic and cultural group of people (whites) as being all of the same race?
 
Last edited:
Because I've noticed that niggers are black. Now fuck off with your long winded butthurt, don't you have foreskins to steal?
I’ve noticed that many dogs are black, and yet black dogs can be different in terms of size, temperament, and the job they were bred to do. (Unless you seriously want to debate that a Scottish Highland Terrier is the same as a Labrador is the same as a Newfie.) Are they all the same because their coat color is the same? Obviously not.

Now debate me or admit defeat. I’m not Jewish, either, so you’re barking up the wrong tree with your antisemitic nonsense.

PS I’m happy to dial back my post length and grade level of writing; but it kind of suggests you’re the one with a low IQ score.
 
Last edited:
Now debate me or admit defeat
I'll do neither, you've already been BTFO with the 100% fact statement that niggers are black. Also, you're a complete fucking clown who has their own ED page lol.
On top of this, you are fat and I would not have sex with you.
LochPlessMonster.jpg
 
I'll do neither, you've already been BTFO with the 100% fact statement that niggers are black. Also, you're a complete fucking clown who has their own ED page lol.
On top of this, you are fat and I would not have sex with you.
View attachment 5082319
STAN: 2
RACISM: 0

I’m being patient with you here and having a debate you said you want to have, and all you can do is post pictures of my face and insult my appearance?

Are you just unwilling to do the mental work of addressing my ideas or are you unable to answer my questions coherently, so you keep coming back to my photo?

Also, I don’t want to have sex with you either, so I’m glad we agree on that. You’re a starfish of a debate partner (“nuh…. Niggers are black and blacks are niggers… 100% win BTFO”) who has 0 motivation to even defend his views. You’re just restating a tautology as if that’s a fact.

This is theoretically a debate forum, we’re you expecting other people just to jerk you off about how *right* you are and not have to answer any opposition? Because that’s not a debate; that’s preaching to a racist choir.
 
Last edited:
^-- standard kike tactic above. Claim you haven't lost, keep posting. I am not replying to that fat timewasting nigger any more. They did the same thing in the Holocaust thread, get BTFO (with stats and sources there) but just kept employing the pigeon playing chess technique.
 
Back