ContraPoints / William Nicholas Parrott / Natalie Wynn Parrott / Nykytyne2 - GamerGhazi Cannibalism Victim, Youtube "Intellectual"

[KF went down for me, so I'm late, but I wrote my own recap]

The Witch Trials of JK Rowling

So the video nobody expected and even fewer people asked for: The Witch Trials of JK Rowling.

Interesting, because in a livestream, Parrott literally said that he didn’t like making topical videos because his output is so slow that by the time he wants to discuss a current event, said current event is obsolete or has been disproven.

Now, early thoughts. You begin the video and see a throwback costume to the glamourous decadent drapery and getup of the JK Rowling video, but the contrast is striking.
photo-output.jpeg


I personally thought Parrott’s costume in JK Rowling was one of his most elegant ones, but the 2023 remake was an actual jump scare. He looks genuinely sick, discoloured, and puffy in places. And that’s only the beginning. There are four or five different costumes in this video—not out of the ordinary for him—but each one is the bear minimum and irrelevant to every scene. Furthermore, the sets have very little detail, and almost no background music is used. This was clearly a last-minute production—a hack job, as one kiwi assessed—wherein he seems to have freaked out over the JK Rowling witch trials process, slapped together a 50 paged essay, filmed for a few hours, and speedily edited it into a two-hour-long ramble that lasted ten times as long as it should have.

So as you can guess from the title, the video is about the podcast Parrott participated in that tried to reveal the truth about JK Rowling outside the twitter drama defaming JK Rowling as a TERF, conservative, bigot, and Nazi. Parrott splits the video in about six or seven parts, but I’ll break it down into four.

First, Parrott goes on a long ramble about Anita Bryant and her activism against gay rights in the 1970s. He paints her into a demonic villain and then patronisingly offers, “But what if she was the victim?” and then juxtaposes this to JK Rowling. “Anita Bryant was so incredibly homophobic and bigoted that to see her as the victim of the situation is retarded,” he basically says. “This is just like JK Rowling.”

The second part of the video is Parrott denouncing the Witch Trials podcast, condemning Megan for being dishonest about the intention of the podcast, and condescending to Noah, the teen ftm who presented a disapproving but hopeful stance on JK Rowling.

In the podcast, Noah’s transition story is disturbing. She admits that as a child, she was traditionally feminine, so her parents were surprised when she later came out as trans. She suffered from anxiety, depression, and dissatisfaction for most of her teen years and saw multiple therapists who one by one all pressured Noah’s parents into letting the teen take testosterone and have top surgery before she turned eighteen. To make matters worse, Noah does not present any symptoms of gender dysphoria, nor does she claim to. When describing her experience as a girl, she says she grew up enjoying traditionally feminine things, but adolescence and puberty were when things started to go wrong. At first, she really wanted to become a woman and thought that she would feel better once puberty was over and she had a fully adult female body. But then she felt worse, and it was her therapists who told her that she was trans. Noah says that her parents were not on board with her transition until more than one therapist basically bullied them into consenting the mutilation of their daughter. Noah should never have transitioned and is going to be a miserable and lost adult when she’s forced to live in the world as a man and may eventually opt for the nonbinary rout before attempting to detransition.


The third part of the video is basically Parrott complaining that he, as a marginalised twans pesson, should not have to debate people in a civilised way over the supposed rights trans people are demanding. He spends about half an hour saying that marginalised claim a right to be uncivil and to expect them to be civil is simply privilege.

The final part is that debate does not work, and everyone should block JK Rowling instead of engaging with her. He shit-talks Megan Phelps-Roper for leaving the Westborro Baptist Church because, even though she managed to escape and has been trying to reverse her actions and share her story around the world, the only reason she escaped is because people convinced her nicely, and the only reason people convinced her nicely is because they thought she was hot. Parrott in fact mentions several different feminists, conservatives, and public figures and shits upon all of them in an extremely petty and insufferable way.

In conclusion, you are not missing anything by skipping this video. It felt complete after thirty minutes, when Anita Bryant had been discussed and the JK Rowling podcast had been denounced. Instead of calling it The Witch Trials of JK Rowling, it should simply be called Parrott’s current stance, Why You Should Never Debate Anyone Ever.


His old content was much more open to wider audiences and much more entertaining. Well, I guess it just wasn't for me.

This video had a different feel than both the old ContraPoints videos from 2016-2017 where he made light-hearted energetic videos about white nationalism and Trump. In his videos about Trump and white nationalism, there is a bit of unnecessary alarm raised over Trump being "the worst President in American history" and "all immigrants are going to die" and such, but more jokes were sprinkled throughout, and he actually looked like he wanted to be there.

This video is clearly, "Oh, right, I'm ContraPoints, I make exorbitantly long videos about politics and culture and pander to my far-left Twittard audience. And I think I have nice sets and costumes? I don't remember."

The video also had a different feel than the videos from 2018-2022, where you could tell he was putting in so much effort that it was killing him. Sure, the arguments never held up, but the videos were ethereal, the costumes elaborate, and the tone and lighting hypnotic. I actually knew a friend who never watched his videos stumble upon one and express that it was noticeably hypnotic and a bit satanic.

This video has none of that. It's just as whiny as a Jessie Gender video and, even worse than that, Parrott disparages and elevates himself above every single person he talks about in this video.

@Itterasshai (can't quote you for some reason)
I agree with you; he's always pandered to a chronically online Twitter audience, whether it was disillusioned young men who believed in alpha males and that Donald Trumps was the messiah in 2016, or the same disillusioned men seven years later who are now radical communist trans cat girls who believe mis-gendering is literal violence.
 
(can't quote you for some reason)
Null disabled quoting long posts in whole. Users would reply with a line to a text wall, and that was at once ugly and unhelpful, as it was not obvious which part of the text wall they were replying to.

To quote from a long post such as mine, highlight the part that you want to quote, then click either Quote or Reply on the menu that pops up.
 
NEW VIDEO IS UP!
View attachment 5065460
AND HERE IT IS: "THE WITCH TRIALS OF JK ROWLING"

It is almost 2 hours long. I myself cannot be bothered to even click on it … he looks fat in the thumbnail, though.:lol:
I sat through it.
The main thing that I got from it was his take on "debate" (50:11) that just confirmed my outlook on the inevitable shortcoming of the West's belief in the universalism that everyone can come to a non-zero-sum compromise.
I actually agree with him that both sides can not have it both ways on this issue. Ether conservatives buckle again, leaving next generation to deal with an even more left wing norm stress testing the stability of our technological society, or do mainstream conservatives finally give up and clamp down on tolerance as a cultural pillar.
d01eb50835c4058c164c0065866e24b15fd891eaf2daef6766691f67478b62bd_1.jpg
 
Contra has a real chip on his shoulder when it comes to debates. It seems he never recovered from his loss to Blaire White in 2017, which makes his choice to appear on Rowling's podcast all the more bemusing.
Very fun to revisit that. It's just one of those perpetual mysteries how the best-passing tranny outside of Thailand is the realist and the skinny dude with a pink wig is the one who actually believes he's a woman. Also when you're in a heated argument, don't stare at your desk like a psycho 13-year old.

The third part of the video is basically Parrott complaining that he, as a marginalised twans pesson, should not have to debate people in a civilised way over the supposed rights trans people are demanding. He spends about half an hour saying that marginalised claim a right to be uncivil and to expect them to be civil is simply privilege.
This is one of the progressive articles of faith. They continue to be stumped by the basic abstract ability to put yourself in someone else's shoes and wonder, hmm, how do I know these complaints are accurate? Why not apply the same standard to white nationalists who claim marginalization? Does threatening to shoot people directly after a tranny killed children make me look demonic?
 
Last edited:
NEW VIDEO IS UP!
View attachment 5065460
AND HERE IT IS: "THE WITCH TRIALS OF JK ROWLING"

It is almost 2 hours long. I myself cannot be bothered to even click on it … he looks fat in the thumbnail, though.:lol:
What I don't understand about this is, if you don't care about the optics of your activist movement even a little bit, how do you expect the public at large to ever accept you? It's true that the gay movement did as was said in the video, but it took them many decades to appeal to the common person and win their acceptance as opposed to the trans movement which is being blatantly rammed though the door at mach 5 with a billion objectionable and dubious positions. Also people in power are pushing the trans movement, that's how it's gained ground so quickly. Your "rebellion" is a state and corporate-sanctioned rebellion.
 
What I don't understand about this is, if you don't care about the optics of your activist movement even a little bit, how do you expect the public at large to ever accept you? It's true that the gay movement did as was said in the video, but it took them many decades to appeal to the common person and win their acceptance as opposed to the trans movement which is being blatantly rammed though the door at mach 5 with a billion objectionable and dubious positions. Also people in power are pushing the trans movement, that's how it's gained ground so quickly. Your "rebellion" is a state and corporate-sanctioned rebellion.
I think the big internet echo chambers like twitter, reddit and the general corporate support have done a lot to make them think that they already got the public support.
Now they just need to use force squash the last of right wing political establishment resistance, is how they see it.
 
Last edited:
Incoming sperg...
The one thing more smug than Contrapoints are the assholes that uphold this moron as a clear voice of guidance to "debunk" Jordan Peterson.

Not a fan of JP myself, but I swear, it's like if you're even engaging with the JP talk and then throw Contrapoints on the table as "correct", then you're on the same short bus as the JP fans. The difference is, the shit you're flinging is a whole lot softer.
 
Contra is correct in that gay rights activists overrode the democratic will of the people by legislating from the bench and leaning on media, academia, NGOs and the private sector to disorient and browbeat public opinion—much like trans rights activists today. We’ll get to you through your kids as Allan Ginsberg said.

Anita has sadly been vindicated. RIP.
Homosexuals cannot reproduce- so they must recruit. And to freshen their ranks, they must recruit the youth of America. I shall continue to fight against that recruitment.
To talk about the "rights" of someone who has chosen to rebel against responsible living is nonsense. It is simply not true that all human beings have the same rights.
 
how do you expect the public at large to ever accept you?
They do not expect that, not all of them, and they do not even necessarily wish that. What they want is for those who do not accept them to either not show it at all or show it in a materially impotent manner.

Consider the neverending ‘bake the cake’ litigation: those suing the bakery do not really care whether the bakers think homos and trannies are devil’s spawn; what they want is for it to be made the law of the land that they must bake the homotranny cake regardless.

It is not at all necessary to win approval of the 51% of the public to enact change. Swaying the minds of politicians, bureaucrats, and managers is another way, and whichever is more effective is up to circumstance.
 
Most of the third of his JK Rowling video I watched were rehashes of this Groomer spiel.

Now, early thoughts. You begin the video and see a throwback costume to the glamourous decadent drapery and getup of the JK Rowling video, but the contrast is striking.
photo-output.jpeg

Yep, the same way his script has gotten self-parodic, so has his styling. It literally looks like he YouTube’d a tutorial “How to set up lighting for content creators” video in the second pic.
 
i love how nyk taking his biggest L was also his fastest filming-to-upload turnaround in years. it must be easy when all you have to do is dig your heels into an untenable position, misrepresent your opponent to an unquestioning and uninformed audience, and pretend to not be a bitter feminist-hating straight man.

That being said, i was pleasantly surprised at the end when he told his audience to stop treating jkr and mpr and all the other evil terves like theyre the ones signing the tranny bannies into law. of course he ruined it by calling terves "the REAL handmaidens!!!11!" as if he doesnt have an entire constituency of adoring (mostly young, intellectually stunted, and female) fans who look to him for approval before forming a single complete thought in their heads, keeping them in a state of confusion about sexual material reality, lest they see the truth and peak, leaving him handmaidenless.
 
CP does look fatter, but that is less noticeable than his face. It does not look fat as much as puffy. His lips especially look stung by bees. Odd. I suppose this is the outcome of his plastic surgery — or weeks of drinking
1. Drugs
2. Surgery
3. Estrogen. He's bulging around the middle.
AKA: saying the quiet part loud. We can't actually win in a fair fight of Our Ideology vs Theirs, so we need to fight dirty
Legislate from the bench. A classic tactic, as well as judge shopping.
Contra is correct in that gay rights activists overrode the democratic will of the people by legislating from the bench and leaning on media, academia, NGOs and the private sector to disorient and browbeat public opinion—much like trans rights activists today. We’ll get to you through your kids as Allan Ginsberg said.

Anita has sadly been vindicated. RIP.
There is also Paul Singer, vulture capitalist and bankruptcy international in a human suit. He is one of the GOP's biggest donors, and when they didn't want to back pro gay marriage laws, he directly threatened their funding. He has pull on similar to how pro life groups do on state legislatures. Same tactics, different politics. Singer made fucking sure you were going to support his gay son.
 
I've listened up to the Debate part, and as expected, I am annoyed, as I tend to be with liars that think their lies should be treated with respect and societal inclusion. No, no, we did not build an entire sand castle on a foundation that's completely inexistent, held together by activist bullying, government anti-hate speech laws where appliable, and massive corporations taking incredible steps to protect the Castle of Lies.
It is YOU who is in the wrong for clinging to that dumb "truth" in 2023, and no we cannot debate that, as that makes me feel bad as my identity and existence are put in doubt.
Surely it is you, the bigot, who is at fault for that, not me the smolbeansuwu outrageous liar and perverse deconstructionist of biological and medical reality. Those things are easily changed, just send a mob of angry faggots to the medical events, and bully them into submission wink-wink.
 
Last edited:
Contra understands that only a use of power from the top of the hierarchies results in his group's survival, like the government with its ability to send soldiers to die for "rights" of some minority, or some uberrich corporation able to remove from discussion any reactionaries.
It's so much easier to understand why progressives have started to side so heavily with the power centers when you get to dig a bit deeper into their fears.
Contra knows that there cannot be "organic consensus" against reality itself, you have to send the National Guard and terrorize the locals, sue and bankrupt anyone opposing "the agenda".
Only through application of force and waging war can society be forced into submission so Nick can feel safe in his mansion with his fetishes.
 
He shit-talks Megan Phelps-Roper for leaving the Westborro Baptist Church because, even though she managed to escape and has been trying to reverse her actions and share her story around the world, the only reason she escaped is because people convinced her nicely, and the only reason people convinced her nicely is because they thought she was hot. Parrott in fact mentions several different feminists, conservatives, and public figures and shits upon all of them in an extremely petty and insufferable way.
Something something incel to troon pipeline
Take your time, now that you've shat something out you can wait at least another 6 months before people start complaining again :smug:
Capture.JPG
Its all so tiresome
Also Nysysnottrans come back you schizo
 
Back