Dylan James Mulvaney / Days of Girlhood / Day __ of Being a Girl - Dylan Explains It All, a gay man interprets 'girlhood' in all glorious technicolor.

He has to be aware now of how unpopular he is amongst broad swaths of America
Judging by his confused face as he was chased into that elevator, it's come as a surprise to him. Dylan seems to have lived in a bubble where every mincing drag queen can be as popular as Rupaul or Liberace. It's just a few weeks since he had a famous woman literally kneel before him on national TV. He must be amazed to learn that a lot of people find him repulsive.

I've had to read more about beer in these recent pages than I ever have for my entire life up to this point
It's because Dylan's gone to ground, nothing new on Tik Tok for days. Any video he could make right now can only make things worse, so he's just hiding like the faggot he is, and in the meanwhile, this thread turns into Beer Review.
 
Wow, who could have seen this coming? I'm shocked that people who drink bud wouldn't want to have political propaganda literally shoved into their faces whenever they take a swig from their beer cans!

It's almost like people feel disgusted by having a corporation trotting out a narcissistic gay man as the bastion of trans progressivisim on their product, a gay man who's perception of womanhood is dressing and acting like a caricature of femininity that you would have seen in Chappelle show sketches from the early 2000s that people would laugh at.

I'M SHOCKED! SHOCKED I TELL YOU!......well not that shocked.
 
Last edited:
*Don Draper, in a wig, purple lipstick and fetish gear sits before Bud Light executives*

“Every agency you’re going to meet with feels qualified to advertise Bud Light because the product itself is one of the most successful piss swills of all time. And its relationship with America is so overwhelmingly positive. Everyone in this room has their story to tell. It could be using Bud to wash the taste of your wife's boyfriend out of your mouth in the movie theater on their first date.

But most of them are from childhood. Mine was my father taking me to a drag show after I’d mowed the lawn and telling me the anal sex wouldn't hurt so much if I was drunk at the time. There was a lot of beer to pick and I picked a Bud Light. The piss yellow liquid looked how it tasted. And as a linebacker in a dress ripped open my large intestine my father tasseled my hair and diversity and bud light were forever tied together.

That’s the story we’re going to tell. Bud Light is the currency of affection. It’s the childhood symbol of love. . . . ”
 
43FB367F-6F4B-4B3C-BB3C-CC7276E2C939.png
Stick to weed, folks. Weed is not a drug; it’s a plant.
 
Last edited:
Tired of winning yet?


Bud Light’s decision to dive into the culture wars was a “bad decision” that defied “virtually every rule in building brands and marketing,” a national beer-industry analyst said. He cited a nightmare scenario for Bud Light sales reps in Texas, where the brand has for years has sponsored a large weekly dart league with 100-plus players each Thursday night The bar sold only four 12-ounce Bud Light bottles this week.
 
Tired of winning yet?

Surprise, the alphabet mafia is now crying over Bud Light not sucking the girldick hard enough:


Archive: https://archive.ph/ZtzDb

As a long-time PR veteran, I have always been skeptical about brands engaging social media stars for ads, social posts, or campaigns.

Without being too specific, about six years ago, I helped coordinate a publicity initiative on a global issue, where an advertising nonprofit engaged an Instagram star as a spokesperson.

For me, alarm bells went off.

We knew nothing about this person, only that she was a teenage social influencer who had several million followers and spoke out about the issue we were promoting. I went along with it after I voiced concern, and well, because it wasn’t my decision to hire her.

The day before we launched the initiative, an “I told you so” controversy erupted. Turns out the teen in question had a history of re-posting some inflammatory remarks from her mother who was an ultra-right wing xenophobe and anti-Semite. We had to scramble hard and fast to find a replacement on very short notice.

Since that incident six years ago, times have changed — somewhat. Desperate to reach the almost untouchable demographic that comprises Gen Z or zoomers, brands are grabbing whoever they can from this generation’s stars of TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram in hopes of striking gold. The more provocative they are, the more media attention these influencers create for the brand — and that comes with consequences.

Sometimes, I still get to say, “I told you so.” Cosmetics company Morphe snapped up young social influencers Jeffree Star and James Charles, and then the bottom fell out. Star was accused of being a racist, and there were sexual misconduct claims logged against Star and Charles, which negatively affected the company’s bottom line. That’s what it’s all about in the first place.

Nevertheless, some brands still choose to roll the dice.

This brings us to Anheuser-Busch’s engagement with actress, social influencer, and transgender rights activist Dylan Mulvaney. The star has 10.8 million followers on TikTok, and in March she celebrated the one-year anniversary of her transition. As part of the celebration, the beer giant sent Mulvaney Bud Light cans with her image on them, and she posted a digital ad promoting the beer.

In this situation, the theory of a social influencer damaging the reputation of a brand was turned upside down. It was Mulvaney who turned out to be too good for Budweiser after the beer behemoth refused to defend Mulvaney from a deluge of vitriol leveled against her.

All hell broke loose for Budweiser and for the innocent Mulvaney. Anti-trans invective continues to be directed at Mulvaney. Digital videos of transphobes ridding themselves of Bud Light started popping up on social media, along with threatening messages directed at the trans community. These narrow-minded beer drinkers called for a boycott of Bud Light.

Kid Rock, no friend to our community, posted a video of him shooting a rifle at cases of Bud Light – there are so many things wrong with that, I don’t even know where to begin. Texas right-wing Republican congressman Dan Crenshaw made a video saying that he was going to throw out all his cans of Bud Light. When he opened his refrigerator, there was no Bud Light. Being impulsive is clearly not Crenshaw’s forte. Ted Nugent also called for a boycott...some of you are reading this, and saying, "Who's he?" Exactly!

The decision for Bud Light to associate itself with Mulvaney was a good, gutsy call for a brand wanting to reach a younger, more open-minded audience. In this case, Mulvaney was a brilliant choice, and the decision showed a stodgy old brand embracing love and acceptance. The CMO of Bud Light recently said, paraphrasing here, that the company needed to veer away from a stale brand image. That's an image more associated with old-timers like Kid Rock and Nugent, and, with Mulvaney, they took a giant step.

Bud Light was getting massive PR for its partnership with Mulvaney, and initially, it probably met their expectations of engaging a younger demographic. The old-timers and bigots, however, started yelling boycott while younger audiences praised the move.

Speaking from experience, and validating what other experts say, boycotts rarely work. That's because they peak fast, and then just go away. The trick for a brand is not to get caught up in the swirl of debate around the protests. It's better just to remain quiet.

That's what Nike did when they signed Colin Kaepernick. Sales for Nike spiked. Racists said they were boycotting Nike because Kaepernick took a knee. The protestors called themselves "true patriots," because rather than take a knee during the national anthem, they stood, barely, on their feet, chugging Budweisers — the American way to "proudly we ale."

At first, Budweiser made a statement that seemed to tacitly support their involvement with Mulvaney, “Anheuser-Busch works with hundreds of influencers across our brands as one of many ways to authentically connect with audiences across various demographics. From time to time we produce unique commemorative cans for fans and for brand influencers, like Dylan Mulvaney. This commemorative can was a gift to celebrate a personal milestone and is not for sale to the general public.”

They should have left it there.

If you'll recall, former Disney CEO Bob Chapek, at first came out in opposition to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill, and then, again, after threats of boycotts, he came back out and waffled. It was a huge mistake that partly cost him his job.

Now comes Anheuser-Busch's CEO Brendan Whitworth who couldn't leave well enough alone. There's nothing that consumers loathe more than a brand that's wishy-washy. In a press release entitled, "Our Responsibility to America," (PR guy is SMH!), Whitworth blathered, "We never intended to be part of a discussion that divides people. We are in the business of bringing people together over a beer.”

He then said this gag worthy sentence, “Moving forward, I will continue to work tirelessly to bring great beers to consumers across our nation.”

Yes, Whitworth is magically going to have Kid Rock and Mulvaney do an ad together. Budweiser is no longer known as the King of Beers, but the Froth of Friendliness. As you can imagine, his comments made the haters dig deeper, and now all hope is lost for Budweiser, because, he did not speak out against hate.

In essence, Whitworth mimicked the horrifying comments Donald Trump made after a white supremacists rally in Charlottesville, Va., when he wrongly said there were "very fine people on both sides."

Budweiser's statement was indefensible, and it exacerbates the disgust for trans people that is seething in Republican-led state legislatures all across the country.

Budweiser's approach to legitimatize the wrong side was validated when Donald Trump, Jr. came to the brand's defense. Middle-aged, angry, homo- and transphobe Trump, Jr. said the boycotts should end because “We looked into the political giving and lobbying history of Anheuser-Busch. And guess what? They actually support Republicans." Trump, Jr. also claimed that the company supported GOP right-wing nut Sen. J.D. Vance of Ohio and the ultimate waffler himself, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

To try and be fair here, Budweiser has done the requisite Pride month ad blitzes and even had a commercial with Joe Rogan and Amy Schumer attending a same-sex wedding. However, according to Newsweek, "Some data shows the company gave even more to anti-LGBTQ lawmakers. According to a database compiled by Accountable for Equality Action—an LGBTQ advocacy group—Anheuser-Busch has donated some $107,000 to state lawmakers who have supported anti-trans legislation since 2015."

Newsweek added, "In the 2022 election cycle, more than 62 percent of the PAC's overall contributions went to Republicans, compared to just 37 percent toward Democrats, according to data compiled by OpenSecrets."

Then, Budweiser poured itself another flat beer for us, and a hefty pint for the very conservatives they're supporting. Over the weekend, it released a "pro-American" video. It looked like Ronald Reagan's morning again in America campaign ad from 1984. There was one person of color, its signature Clydesdale running from one small white town to another, and 22 years after the fact, it shamelessly showed downtown Manhattan, evoking 9/11.

I don't have to tell you that it made no reference to the struggles of the trans community.

Remember that special beer can sent to Mulvaney with her picture on it to celebrate her womanhood? Of course, you don't, because the right wing took over the conversation, and rather than let it die out, Budweiser and Whitworth, and their lily-white ad have turned it into a bar crawl of misanthropes gone wrong.

Rather than come to the defense of a transgender woman, rather than defend a noble campaign that sought to reflect acceptance, and rather than let the campaign with Mulvaney speak for itself, Budweiser poured alcohol all over an extremist's fire, and that will continue to singe our community.

Maybe the worst thing Budweiser did was leave Mulvaney all alone, twisting in the wind, abandoning any kind of defense of her. That is an utterly repugnant reflection of the brand.

Anheuser-Busch, weakly, did not stand up against hate. And while boycotts don't work, they do make a statement. It's not Kid Rock and Ted Nugent that should be boycotting Budweiser — it should be us.



Also, off-premises sales numbers for the week ending April 8th are out!


Archive: https://archive.ph/D9m4e

"For the week ending April 8, Bud Light posted declines in off-premise dollar sales (nearly -7%), volume (-10.7%) and dollar share (-3.7%). By comparison, for the week ending April 1, Bud Light recorded declines in dollar sales (-1.6%), volume (-6.4%), and dollar share (-0.7%), according to NIQ data, shared by Williams."

Molson Coors’ light lager challenger brands were both in the black for the week. Coors Light increased dollar sales (+10.7%), volume (+5.5%) and dollar share (+1.5%), while Miller Lite increased dollar sales (+16.9%), volume (+11.7%) and dollar share (+2.3%) for the week ending April 8."

Considering that this really didn't start to pick up steam until after Easter, I think that when the new numbers come out, it's going to show a much larger decline. So now you have the troons crying because Anheuser Busch didn't immediately double down and call the boycotters ebil twanzphobes, and you still have a bunch of very pissed off rednecks who are doubling down and saying fuck you to Bud Light. This seriously might have been the biggest marketing disaster since New Coke, and I think it's only going to get much, much worse for Bud Light going forward.
 
And while boycotts don't work, they do make a statement. It's not Kid Rock and Ted Nugent that should be boycotting Budweiser — it should be us.
Brilliant, they can't sell their gay beer to either side now. It's going to be a long time before a tranny is the face of any product that's not specifically aimed at faggots.

Dylan should be named Transphobe of the Year, he's done more to mass-discredit troons that Matt Walsh could dream of.
 
Dr. Grande used she/her pronouns but was pretty terfy here.
I'm pleasantly surprised by this video mostly because I was just expecting him to just scream "FAR RIGHT FAR RIGHT FAR RIGHT" while gobbling on Mulvaney's tranny cock.

:null: Reminder that featured posts ≠ a license to shit up the thread. Please read replies before replying yourself.




NY post says it's over 5 billion so far. Hope it was worth it to stick it to those transphobes.

https://nypost.com/2023/04/12/anheu...ue-amid-dylan-mulvaney-bud-light-controversy/
https://archive.is/oo0bO

https://www.zerohedge.com/political...six-days-execs-never-signed-trans-ad-campaign
https://archive.is/AS87d

View attachment 5045413
But what happened to muh modern consooomer that won't buy product unless it has a gay/trans flag on it? The ones that the cunt who's the head of marketing said was who they were trying to reach out to and made up 99% of the population now while only 1% of the country who all live in flyover country are ebil transphobic bigot racists who shouldn't be able to enjoy their shitty beer. Still blackrock can make up the difference. No amount of finance lost matters as long as blackrock is still propping them up and making them quadruple down on troon worship.
 
This brings us to Anheuser-Busch’s engagement with actress, social influencer, and transgender rights activist Dylan Mulvaney. The star has
I still have no idea what makes anyone think that he is a transgender rights activist. Unless making tiktok videos dressed up as "a woman" qualifies him for that title.
 
You know I saw Dunham last week and I was wondering what the sudden riffs on Budlight were about.
Now it's even funnier
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr. Butt
I'm pleasantly surprised by this video mostly because I was just expecting him to just scream "FAR RIGHT FAR RIGHT FAR RIGHT" while gobbling on Mulvaney's tranny cock.


But what happened to muh modern consooomer that won't buy product unless it has a gay/trans flag on it? The ones that the cunt who's the head of marketing said was who they were trying to reach out to and made up 99% of the population now while only 1% of the country who all live in flyover country are ebil transphobic bigot racists who shouldn't be able to enjoy their shitty beer. Still blackrock can make up the difference. No amount of finance lost matters as long as blackrock is still propping them up and making them quadruple down on troon worship.
Dr. Grande seems to have some pretty based views but because he picked one of the fields most packed with faggots and happy merchants he’s also had to get pretty good at hiding his power level.
 
Bud Light was getting massive PR for its partnership with Mulvaney, and initially, it probably met their expectations of engaging a younger demographic. The old-timers and bigots, however, started yelling boycott while younger audiences praised the move.
I fucking hate leftoids. It wasn't just 'old-timers and bigots', it was generally reasonable people having a strong reaction when confronted with Dylan's simpering skinwalking of Audrey Hepburn.
 
I fucking hate leftoids. It wasn't just 'old-timers and bigots', it was generally reasonable people having a strong reaction when confronted with Dylan's simpering skinwalking of Audrey Hepburn.
Let's just face it there are better films with Audrey Hepburn and then breakfast at Tiffany's. Every time I see a celebrity try to dress up like her character from it either be Ariana grande or our boy Dylan it just makes me want to ever regret having that movie made in the first place.
 
Back