Hollywood writers vote on strike: ‘At stake is the viability of TV as a career’


Hollywood writers vote on strike: ‘At stake is the viability of TV as a career’​

WGA union argues companies have ‘leveraged the streaming transition to underpay writers’

Michael Sainato
@msainat1
Sat 15 Apr 2023 01.00 EDT


Hollywood writers have until Monday to authorize their union to call a strike amid contentious contract negotiations with major studios.
The authorization, based on a vote by guild members, would grant the leadership of the Writers Guild of America (WGA) the ability to call a strike if it can’t reach a contract with Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) by 1 May.

“Writers are not keeping up,” the WGA argues in a 2023 report. “The companies have leveraged the streaming transition to underpay writers, creating more precarious, lower-paid models for writers’ work.”
In the report, the WGA, which has more than 11,000 members, argues the shift in the entertainment industry to streaming services has resulted in cuts to pay for writers, despite an increase in investments in content and consistent profitability.

“What’s at stake is the viability of television as a career,” said Brittani Nichols, a writer on Abbott Elementary and WGA member. “Right now a lot of people are struggling to string together quality jobs that can allow them to exist in a city like Los Angeles.”
Nichols compared the demands of members to those of other workers facing increasing pressures of economic inequality and rising costs of living.
“It’s not that the studios can’t afford these things. It’s, in my opinion, that they don’t care about what’s right or fair and they want to extract as much value from us for the least amount of money as possible, and that’s something we’re standing up to.”
The AMPTP represents entertainment media corporations that include Amazon, Apple, CBS, Disney, NBCUniversal, Netflix, Paramount Global, Sony and Warner Bros Discovery.
Since 2013-2014, the proportion of writers working at minimum pay levels has increased from 33% of all TV series writers to 49% in 2021-2022, with recorded increases in all writer positions, according to the report. Over the last decade, median writer pay has declined by 4%, or 23% when adjusted for inflation.
The WGA is calling for increased compensation and residuals from features, ending the practice of mini-rooms (smaller writing rooms where a showrunner and a limited group of writers develop scripts), and increases in contributions to pension and health funds for workers.
In a message to members, the WGA stated that the AMPTP had pushed for “rollbacks designed to offset any gains” in contract negotiations. “In short, the studios have shown no sign that they intend to address the problems our members are determined to fix.”
“The way that writers’ rooms work now, the way that we’re being paid, the way that we’re dealing with cuts in episode orders, all of that has slowly eroded our ability to make a living doing this,” said Susan Hurwitz Arneson, a writer in the industry for 15 years who has worked on shows such as AMC’s Preacher and the forthcoming John Wick prequel television series The Continental. “For a showrunner, it’s excruciating and impossible. For younger writers coming up, they’re never getting the mentoring and teaching to be showrunners because they are never allowed to be on set.”
Mini-rooms were originally meant to be supplementary support for a project but have been exploited as a loophole to pay minimum compensation to writers and avoid paying producer or showrunner fees for additional production duties, Hurwitz Arneson argued. She voted “yes” on the strike authorization, she said, in an effort to oppose trends she says are deteriorating pay and working conditions for writers.
“This is about people that create, from nothing, a product that everybody across the world enjoys, a product that makes billions of dollars for giant corporations. What we’re asking for is less than 2% of the dollar of what these companies are making, in order for us to benefit from our hard work and be paid fairly for it,” said Hurwitz Arneson. “We should be paid for the talent, hard work, the heart, the sweat, the tears and for the generation of worlds and products that employ thousands of people in this industry.”
The union has also taken aim at arguments by the studios of financial woes in the industry, as several entertainment media corporations have conducted layoffs in the past year; Disney announced cuts of 7,000 jobs that began this year, Netflix cut 450 jobs in 2022, citing decreases in subscription revenue, and about 120 workers were laid off at Showtime this year after a merger with Paramount.
Operating profits at the largest entertainment media companies in 2021 were about $28bn, a decrease from pre-pandemic profit levels, but the WGA cited continuing investments in streaming services, mergers and restructurings, and spending billions on stock buybacks.
CEOs of the largest entertainment media corporations receive exorbitant salaries. The Warner Discovery CEO, David Zaslav, received $39.3m in total compensation in 2022. The Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos received $40m, his co-CEO Reed Hastingsreceived $34m, and the Paramount Global CEO, Bob Bakish, received $32m.
The last time Hollywood writers went on strike was in November 2007, an action that lasted 100 days and halted production of major TV shows. The strike of 12,000 writers largely focused on disagreements with the AMPTP over emerging digital media platforms and streaming residuals. The Directors Guild of America and Screen Actors Guild will begin their new union contract negotiations this year with AMPTP.
The Actors’ Equity national council, which represents more than 51,000 professional theater workers, authorized a strike as new union contract negotiations with the Broadway League, the trade association for the Broadway industry, continue, with 90% signing a strike pledge if an agreement isn’t reached.
It is hard to predict which shows would be affected by a WGA strike, but during the 2007-2008 strike, top programs including Breaking Bad and Prison Break went on hiatus or had shortened seasons.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I was hoping you would consider taking the step of supporting the Guardian’s journalism.
From Elon Musk to Rupert Murdoch, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest – not profit motives.
And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media – the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. While fairness guides everything we do, we know there is a right and a wrong position in the fight against racism and for reproductive justice. When we report on issues like the climate crisis, we’re not afraid to name who is responsible. And as a global news organization, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective on US politics – one so often missing from the insular American media bubble.
Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone – whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.
 
TERF brain rot on display. New consoom good, old consoom bad. Maybe people like you with your beliefs are part of the problem (but of course, you like newer Hollywood compared to old, so this new shit is your jam).

Maybe the enlightened take is that ALL eras were bad and we should pick and choose good media? Hell, in the 1800s there were "Penny Dreadful" novels that line up with modern schlock our resident TERF @KiwiFuzz enjoys.
Yeah, that's not what I'm saying.

Movies have gotten demonstrably shittier in this century, but TV?

Streaming allows the development of more complex story lines and characters. (It also allows a lot more sex and violence, but that's neither here nor there.)

You can watch episode 50 of "Bonanza" or "Murder, She Wrote" and understand everything you need to know about the show. I mean, hell, how many people here, the first time they saw "Star Trek," saw the whole thing in the order it was originally filmed and aired? I sure didn't.

Powerlevel but I watched an ungodly amount of TV in my wayward youth, including many hours of the three shows I just mentioned. They were fun and I enjoyed watching them at the time.

That being said, I'd rather watch "Bosch" than "Murder, She Wrote" or "Yellowstone" than Bonanza.

My favorite show right now, they just ATE someone. That never happened on "Gilligan's Island."
 
Let's look at the "best" shows from every other year since 2013:

2013 (first google hit):

Breaking Bad
House of Cards
Banshee
The Returned
Game of Thrones
The Americans
Borgen
Rectify
Vikings
Supernatural

2015 (first google hit):

Mr. Robot
Mad Men
Broad City
The Americans
Difficult People
Empire
Fargo
Veep
Better Call Saul
John Oliver

2017 (second google hit):

Twin Peaks
Big Little Lies
The Handmaid's Tale
The Good Place
The Leftovers
Master of None
The Deuce
The Vietnam War
The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
At Home With Amy Sedaris
(Mindhunter came in at #12 and was robbed)

2019 (first google hit):

Watchmen
Fleabag
Succession
Russian Doll
Fosse/Verdon
Lodge 49
Barry
Better Things
Mr. Robot
David Makes Man

2021 (first google hit):

For All Mankind
Reservation Dogs
Only Murders in the Building
The Underground Railroad
Station 11
It's a Sin
Succession
Maid
The White Lotus
WandaVision

This is a fraction of what's come out in the last 10 years. I can think of a dozen pretty good shows not on any of these lists.

I'd rather sit through a whole season of the #15 show from any of the last 10 years than a whole season of one of the top 10 shows from the entire decade of the 1980s.

Tell me you really want to watch 22 episodes of "Knight Rider" over "Squid Game" or "The Crown."

I just have to question what y'all's expectation is for TV if you think every one of these shows is not just not to your personal taste but is unequivocally utter shit.
The problem with your list (and I'm not going through all of them) but how many of those are based on already existing movies/books/other media? Game of Thrones, Watchmen, Wandavision (which having a Marvel show on a list should invalidate the entire year) - are all actively made worse by the TV series.

So yes I'd rather watch "Knight Rider" - although it's an unfair compairson because "Knight Rider" wasn't even a hugely popular show in it's time. The comparison should be to the hit shows of 1982, which would be M*A*S*H, Three's Company, Newhart, Police Squad, Happy Days, and so on.
 
Ask ChatGPT give you an [insert genre here] TV show synopsis and see what happens. Chances are it will be more creative than what 90% of these writers could produce.
Oh, please. A chatbot could write better stories than you do. My 27 year old tamagotchi could replace you and your wasted career.
Forget ChatGPT, I'll ask NovelAI. It was fed different shit so let's see what it puts out:

This year, the top 5 most anticipated live-action shows of the summer 2023 season will be:
1. "The Legend of God", a show about a god who appeared in the modern world that has been making waves on social media since last week! The plot follows the story of how this 'god' came to America ー and why he looks so Japanese.
2. "Three Hundred Days of Night", a drama about the three hundred days after the world ended, when humanity was forced to live underground.
3. "God's Will", a mystery drama about a priest at a temple where the spirits of dead people go to pass into heaven or hell. This one is the only series with no supernatural elements whatsoever.
4. "Black Rain", an action thriller about a special police unit tasked with cleaning up the streets from the illegal drugs that are spreading across the city. But they can't arrest all the drug dealers, so the group must resort to violent measures and take them out by any means necessary...
5. And finally, "I'll Make You Mine", a romance between two high school girls who have both lost their mothers. One day, they discover each other's existence through an online chat room for orphans, and ultimately fall in love despite their age difference.

Fucking weeb.
 
Yeah, that's not what I'm saying.

Movies have gotten demonstrably shittier in this century, but TV?

Streaming allows the development of more complex story lines and characters. (It also allows a lot more sex and violence, but that's neither here nor there.)

You can watch episode 50 of "Bonanza" or "Murder, She Wrote" and understand everything you need to know about the show. I mean, hell, how many people here, the first time they saw "Star Trek," saw the whole thing in the order it was originally filmed and aired? I sure didn't.

Powerlevel but I watched an ungodly amount of TV in my wayward youth, including many hours of the three shows I just mentioned. They were fun and I enjoyed watching them at the time.

That being said, I'd rather watch "Bosch" than "Murder, She Wrote" or "Yellowstone" than Bonanza.

My favorite show right now, they just ATE someone. That never happened on "Gilligan's Island."
TV has both gotten better as a medium but also has lower lows of trash now that we're in the era of "prestige TV".
For every Bosch (excellent taste, btw) or Yellowstone, there's a dozen Star Trek: Discovery, Walking Dead, and other awful, zombified shows shambling along because their owner desperately needs the content to fill their streaming service.
 
4. "Black Rain", an action thriller about a special police unit tasked with cleaning up the streets from the illegal drugs that are spreading across the city. But they can't arrest all the drug dealers, so the group must resort to violent measures and take them out by any means necessary...

Above-the-law supercops is probably too based for today's television.
 
Ask ChatGPT give you an [insert genre here] TV show synopsis and see what happens. Chances are it will be more creative than what 90% of these writers could produce.
I had a text generator write a story about elves taking over Poland. It was better than half the stuff people are paid to write these days.
 
I dislike both sides of this fight and hope both don't get what they want. I think that Hollywood corps are greedy and will screw anybody they can over, and I think the writers suck at their jobs. I do not enjoy modern television. When I want to watch TV, I have DVDs of the old Poriot, Nero Wolfe, DS9, Brisco County Jr to watch among others. Last "current year" shows mentioned on the lists above that I watched was breaking bad and game of thrones, and I didn't even finish game of thrones. Fuck both sides.
 
@NoReturn Actually you make a good point. AI scripts making ideas are fucking rad. In that they make good fucking inspiration for new ideas for example:

1. Jesus 100% comes back as a third coming. People wonder about the validity of his claims, not cuz of magic. But because of his appearance. The Vatican start hatching a conspiracy to murderfuck him cuz political issues. Demons arrive, cuz fucking duh rapture. Culminating in that blue demon scene in castlevania, but with jesus there, actually pessimistic about humanity as a whole, so when the demon eats the corrupt priest's face, the cut to a picture of jesus uncaringly looking at the carnage, it's actual jesus.

2. Season 1 plot, season 2 plot is that the people 300 days after the apocalypse sent a warning about the apocalypse to people 300 days before the apocalypse. Exploring time fuckery. Did the apocalypse happen because of the warning, in spite of it, or because of the time paradox itself? Also cthulu. Cuz fuck it. Squids.

3. Actual plot is the exploration of theology and whether the heaven/hell dilema is a morally good thing. Series finale then shows that the priest was using the "ghosts" as a coping mechanism for some character reason. Akin to that scrubs expisode of that one guy hallucinating his dead friend as still alive, with the "where do you think we are" as reference for the people that didn't fucking get it. Maybe a more pessimistic rendition is that the world they're in ALREADY IS HELL.

4. Idk. Batman Alternate universe? I've never been a fan of hardboil shit.

5. This is an anime. Fuck anime.
 
It's on now: https://www.wgacontract2023.org/announcements/wga-on-strike

Monday, May 1, 2023

Dear Members,
We have not reached an agreement with the studios and streamers. We will be on strike after the contract expires at midnight.

Your WGA Negotiating Committee spent the last six weeks negotiating with Netflix, Amazon, Apple, Disney, Discovery-Warner, NBC Universal, Paramount and Sony under the umbrella of the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP).

Over the course of the negotiation, we explained how the companies' business practices have slashed our compensation and residuals and undermined our working conditions. Our chief negotiator, as well as writers on the committee, made clear to the studios’ labor representatives that we are determined to achieve a new contract with fair pay that reflects the value of our contribution to company success and includes protections to ensure that writing survives as a sustainable profession. We advocated on behalf of members across all sectors: features, episodic television, and comedy-variety and other non-prime-time programs, by giving them facts, concrete examples, and reasonable solutions. Guild members demonstrated collective resolve and support of the agenda with a 97.85% strike authorization.

Though we negotiated intent on making a fair deal—and though your strike vote gave us the leverage to make some gains—the studios’ responses to our proposals have been wholly insufficient, given the existential crisis writers are facing. The companies' behavior has created a gig economy inside a union workforce, and their immovable stance in this negotiation has betrayed a commitment to further devaluing the profession of writing. From their refusal to guarantee any level of weekly employment in episodic television, to the creation of a "day rate" in comedy variety, to their stonewalling on free work for screenwriters and on AI for all writers, they have closed the door on their labor force and opened the door to writing as an entirely freelance profession. No such deal could ever be contemplated by this membership.

Therefore, earlier today the Negotiating Committee unanimously rejected the AMPTP’s final offer before deadline and recommended to the WGAW Board and WGAE Council the issuance of a strike order. Based on that recommendation, the Board and Council unanimously voted to strike after the current MBA’s expiration at midnight tonight.

A strike by the WGAW and WGAE against all companies signatory to the 2020 MBA will begin on Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 12:01 am PT/3:01 am ET.

We must now exert the maximum leverage possible to get a fair contract by withholding our labor. All WGA members are obligated to follow the strike rules. The FAQ about the strike rules includes forms to assist with notice requirements as well as contact information for Guild staff to provide additional guidance.

Members of the Negotiating Committee, Board and Council will be out with you on the picket lines. The initial picketing schedule can be found here and will be updated regularly.

Writers Guild members can hear a full report from the Negotiating Committee in Los Angeles at the Shrine Auditorium at 7:00 pm PT on Wednesday May 3 (RSVP here) and in New York at Cooper Union at 7:00 pm ET (RSVP here). Members outside of Los Angeles and New York or who are otherwise unable to attend a meeting will receive information in the coming days to hear from leadership and receive information about additional ways to support the strike.

Here is what all writers know: the companies have broken this business. They have taken so much from the very people, the writers, who have made them wealthy. But what they cannot take from us is each other, our solidarity, our mutual commitment to save ourselves and this profession that we love. We had hoped to do this through reasonable conversation. Now we will do it through struggle. For the sake of our present and our future, we have been given no other choice.

IN SOLIDARITY,
WGA NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE
David A. Goodman, Co-Chair
Chris Keyser, Co-Chair
Ellen Stutzman, Chief Negotiator
John August
Angelina Burnett
Kay Cannon
Yahlin Chang
Robb Chavis
Adam Conover
Travis Donnelly
Ashley Gable
Hallie Haglund
Eric Haywood
Eric Heisserer
Greg Iwinski
Luvh Rakhe
Erica Saleh
Danielle Sanchez-Witzel
James Schamus
Tom Schulman
Mike Schur
David Shore
David Simon
Patric M. Verrone
Nicole Yorkin
Ex-Officio
Meredith Stiehm, WGAW President
Michele Mulroney, WGAW Vice President
Betsy Thomas, WGAW Secretary-Treasurer
Michael Winship, WGAE President
Lisa Takeuchi Cullen, WGAE Vice President of Film/TV/Streaming
Christopher Kyle, WGAE Secretary-Treasurer
 
Weird timing, since I was playing about with ChatGPT and NovelAI to see what either of them were capable of.

It's about what I expected at the moment. NovelAI seems wholly dependant on the prompts I feed it, and can't come up with anything unique/compelling on it's own. In which case, NovelAI seems perfect for people have good ideas but are too lazy to write.

Everything ChatGPT spits out is utter garbage. It's great at rebranding existing ideas, it just can't come up with any new ones. Again, it might be useful for people who have ideas but can't be bothered to write them down.

As an experiment, I have an old script for a short film I made decades ago. After giving both chatbots the same initial prompts - who the characters were, where it was set, and the central premise - it took about half an hour of pushing and prodding to get both to create something that was largely identical to what I'd written 20 years ago.

That's the main use I can see - you've got an idea, and these things help bang it into shape with very little effort from the "writer" - or rather, operator, since that's how it felt.

If AI helps unlock the creativity of people who previously wouldn't have had the commitment (or time) to develop ideas, great. If it just makes the existing creative ranks even lazier than they currently are, that's not so good.
 
Are writers in the US incapable of negotiating better deals for their services? I make it sound simple, but if you can convince everyone that your writing is what makes a show a smash hit, surely you can extract a better deal for writing future seasons. Just like last time, deferring your negotiations to big daddy unions failed, and now you have to picket for your lives.

Pickets? Really? Some of these writers write about fictional characters convincing other fictional characters for better deals, and they can't convince their clients for a better pay?
 
Weird timing, since I was playing about with ChatGPT and NovelAI to see what either of them were capable of.
NovelAI's market is a little different though. You can create finetunes (they call "modules") to tailor the output and there's no janny oversight so it can be as pornographic, weird or politically incorrect as you please. Plus they've invested a lot of resources into their image generation stuff, basically iterating on Stable Diffusion and adding a bunch of extra tools. It's too bad they only offer furry and anime models. I guess they know their market.
 
Those crazy bastards actually did it and went to strike over AI. Despite knowing for the last 60 years the goal of a computer is to automate damn near everything and knowing that at least as far back as 2010 work has been done to advance applications of convolution and decision making. As well as the fact that Markov chain has worked its way into pseudo Science vernacular these radical writers still refused to see the writing on the wall. Now it is too late and all I can say is get fucked. The only reason to keep them around is to keep them contained in California. Attached are the WGA current demand and below is their demand reguarding AI. The counter off was a polite, "Let's talk later."
Regulate use of artificial intelligence on MBA-covered projects: AI can’t write or rewrite literary material; can’t be used as source material; and MBA-covered material can’t be used to train AI
Variety article
Archive
 

Attachments

Back