Ukraine Command knows they can win because Russia will break before Ukraine breaks. the problem for Ukraine however is they need uninvolved countries to pay their soldiers salaries, rebuild their electrical infrastructure, and provide the ammunition. Which means Ukraine's political considerations are subservient to their benefactors conditions. And their benefactors demand results. Ukraine has to deliver, so time is not on Ukraine's side in this respect.
First part is really optimistic. Russia has 4x ukraine's population. They can keep this up for a long time, and slowly take Ukraine. That "50 years to Kiev" is a viable option for Russian ambitions.
The second part - solid agree. They need to demonstrate they can win, that they can do something with all that they've been given besides just hold the line and wait for sanctions.
This is the point. Those Leopards and Bradley's don't need to last for the next 20 years. They need to last for the next 6 months. Ukraine needs to break the Zaporizhian Line and drive for Simferopol before Russia can respond. Ukraine can leave every single one of these platforms on the side of the road, provided the Blue and Yellow is run up the flagpole once more at the Ukrainian Army Barracks at Pervalne.
IF you don't have a good logistics chain they won't last that.
In additon, a good salvage crew can get a tank you'd swear was scrap back on the front in two weeks or less if they have the parts. Part of the reason Desert Storm went as smoothly as it did for the allies was Iraq was on constant retreat with no opportunity to recover and rehabilitate their armor.
And that's questionable about how long they need to last; while there's a good stock of mothball armor, Lima hasn't gone over to three-shifts yet. Rhinemetal isn't opening the throttle at their factories (carbon footprint you know). France hasn't restarted LeClerc production (they haven't even meaningfully accelerated their upgrade package timeline). South Korea is still just shipping 155.
While the Leopard II lines are going, and Lima never ever really stopped, its going to take years to ramp up production enough to burn Russia's cold war surplus. France's lines have been completely dormant for a decade and a half, and its questionable if they even COULD restart them let alone how long. And while we can all agree 1500 new tanks is some wild cope only a fucking retard would believe, Russia is producing a not-insignficant number of new T-72s and T-90s, likely as fast as they can manage while being completely starved of any external parts.
Even if they can grasp the controls (and I'm sure they can), Bradleys and Abrams (Abramses?) can do things the BMP and T-72 can only dream of doing, and so the crews need to be trained in how to use those new capabilities, because using an Abrams in combat like its a T-72 will give you performance that's not much better than a T-72. An Abrams crew is not just capable of but expected to put a round on target every six seconds while racing across uneven terrain at 30 miles an hour. A T-72 would probably be lucky to hit 30 miles an hour on rough ground, never mind the gun's stability at that point and the fact the autoloader takes ten seconds to load a round.
This a great stating of what I forgot to expand on in my post:
Just because they can drive and shoot with Leopard/Abrams or a BMP crew can start a Bradley doesn't mean they can use the platform to its full effectiveness, and that is something they will need to do given Russia's weight in numbers. Yes, Ruski equipment is garbage with garbage crews but they have a lot of it.
I can see this war dragging out for years. Why does Ukraine need to win a counter-offensive now, rather than in 2024 or 2025?
I agree with you about the war dragging on, but if Zelensky really wants pre-2014 borders he's going to need to really churn some ground to show they're worth the continued investment. The Eurocuck politicians aren't going to stand behind him forever - Ukraine was so so lucky 2022 was a mild winter. They had some bigly gains at the end of the year, but ever since its been Russian missles hitting civilian infrastructure and RUSSIA TOOK ANOTHER HALF YARD OF BAHKMUT! TWO MORE WEEKS HOHOLS! which while these actions aren't very effective tactically or strategically, they don't paint a very rosy picture - "Why should we send equipment/money to Ukraine if they are just slowly losing ground? They should really make a deal and end the fighting". And that's to say nothing of the domestic audience.
I wouldn't say its for all the marbles, but if there is no "sellable" success in 2023 is going to put Ukraine in a bad spot and make them look like another wasteful endeavor.
So this theory is bad. For a number of reasons.
Its not a theory. Its cope; "Here is how
Hilary Putin can still win"
Might as well speculate what if Zelensky and Putin are really using the war to distract from Iranian research that will make anime real.