Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
sixgorillion.png

Well, if I find any troons hiding under the floorboards I'll be sure to turn them in to the authorities.
 
I'm surprised Willoughby doesn't have a thread, what with forcing himself on ginuwine, temporarily being part of GB news, and getting into chinese footbinding to have dainty ladyfeet over lockdown.
India Willoughby definitely deserves his own thread. I get the feeling there's a whole municipal waste system's worth of shit there.
 
Troon seeks help for gender dysphoria, leaves with potential autism diagnosis and soul-crushing invalidation.
View attachment 5076166
Based and compassionate psychiatrist.

Refusing to validate him, and instead looking at other things that might be the true root cause is so much kinder than encouraging him to chop his dick off.
 
I can't get over the not being able to define woman. How can you say you want to be something but can't even say what that thing is? You can't define something with that thing. "A woman is a woman." What the fuck? Bloody hell, I hate this idiocy.
Oh don't worry, the comment section of that reddit thread is using the same tiresome arguments such as this comment. "Here's the thing about "defining" woman - it's almost impossible to do it without either including trans women or excluding some cis women."Has the capacity to give birth" - excludes infertile/menopausal women. "Has a uterus" - excludes women who have had hysterectomies. "Doesn't have a penis" - so a trans woman who has a vaginoplasty counts? What about a man who had a penectomy in an accident or something? Does he become a woman? What about intersex people? Etc etc" Seriously, these arguments are so dumb.
How can you be defined as infertile or menopausal if you don't belong to a category that has the CAPACITY (That's the keyword)of giving birth in the first place? How can you have a hysterectomy if you never had a uterus to begin with?
How are these arguments so widespread??? It feels like speaking a different language/logic.
 
Last edited:
Oh don't worry, the comment section of that reddit thread is using the same tiresome arguments such as this comment. "Here's the thing about "defining" woman - it's almost impossible to do it without either including trans women or excluding some cis women."Has the capacity to give birth" - excludes infertile/menopausal women. "Has a uterus" - excludes women who have had hysterectomies. "Doesn't have a penis" - so a trans woman who has a vaginoplasty counts? What about a man who had a penectomy in an accident or something? Does he become a woman? What about intersex people? Etc etc" Seriously, these arguments are so dumb.
How can you be defined as infertile or menopausal if you don't belong to a category that has the CAPACITY (That's the keyword)of giving birth in the first place? How can you have a hysterectomy if you never had a uterus to begin with?
How are these arguments so widespread??? It feels like speaking a different language/logic.
Say what you will about Matt Walsh, but he covered that pretty definitively in that event where trannies queued to try to gotcha him, which you can find some pages back (10 or 20? Not sure how many but it wasn't that long ago. Almost certain it also had its own thread somewhere in the forum as well).

Infertile and/or menopausal women are still within the category that is biologically expected to be able to get pregnant. They are people who would go to the doctor to see what's wrong with their reproductive system. No man, not even the most delusional of trannies will go to an obstetrician and ask them "doctor, I can't get pregnant and I need you to find out why". And if they do, not even the most brainwashed of woke doctors is gonna actually try to examine their womb and ovaries, because they don't exist.
 
Oh don't worry, the comment section of that reddit thread is using the same tiresome arguments such as this comment. "Here's the thing about "defining" woman - it's almost impossible to do it without either including trans women or excluding some cis women."Has the capacity to give birth" - excludes infertile/menopausal women. "Has a uterus" - excludes women who have had hysterectomies. "Doesn't have a penis" - so a trans woman who has a vaginoplasty counts? What about a man who had a penectomy in an accident or something? Does he become a woman? What about intersex people? Etc etc" Seriously, these arguments are so dumb.
How can you be defined as infertile or menopausal if you don't belong to a category that has the CAPACITY (That's the keyword)of giving birth in the first place? How can you have a hysterectomy if you never had a uterus to begin with?
How are these arguments so widespread??? It feels like speaking a different language/logic.

41+KKGED2iL.__AC_SX300_SY300_QL70_ML2_.jpg
There. Easy peasy.
 
No man, not even the most delusional of trannies will go to an obstetrician and ask them "doctor, I can't get pregnant and I need you to find out why". And if they do, not even the most brainwashed of woke doctors is gonna actually try to examine their womb and ovaries, because they don't exist.
Think again.
 
And if they do, not even the most brainwashed of woke doctors is gonna actually try to examine their womb an
Never underestimate an unethical MD's capacity to bill insurance for a full examination searching for a cause to a problem that doesn't exist (because it can't exist).
 
One of the things that makes me Mad At The Internet is how trannies take genuinely marginal intersex cases, such as XYs with androgen insensitivity, and warp the science so far out of all measure that the category of "woman" dissolves like USFS toilet paper in a biffy.

It's like saying that because lions and tigers can breed under some circumstances, there's no such thing as a lion.

Like I'm not going to sit here and argue that these people are men, I can't do that. Should they be in sports? I don't know. (Some of them are less than attractive, for sure, but IMHO it looks like a group of Australians.)

Orchids01-1.jpg


These people, on the other hand? It's a MAN, baby!

download-10.jpg
 
One of the things that makes me Mad At The Internet is how trannies take genuinely marginal intersex cases, such as XYs with androgen insensitivity, and warp the science so far out of all measure that the category of "woman" dissolves like USFS toilet paper in a biffy.
I've known at least one person that claimed to be intersex. How accurate that claim was, I have no fucking idea, but they were based as hell and did not want to be a poster child of the alphabet club.

More intersex people need to be peaked. They are generally not discriminated against (not any more than any other traditionally unattractive androgynous blob) and I would be furious if my genetic snake-eyes was being twisted into an argument for physically normal people to publicly live out their fetishes.
 
1682171892686.png

"Trans liberation, not trans assimilation"
Assimilation into what exactly, Pubert? A healthy, functioning society that doesn't tolerate fetishist freaks that jack off to loli and call themselves "lesbians in male bodies" getting into the same changing rooms as little girls? Liberation from what? Seeing pretty women on the street and getting assmad because you will never look as pretty as them and you won't ever have sex with them?

I simply don't know where is the "genocide" and "assimillation" they speak of, exactly? Must be inside their heads, since I don't really see them hanging off the lightpoles, them getting doxxed and killed on the street in broad daylight, sent to concentration camps en masse etc.And what the fuck happened to REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE BAN ALL GUNS shit?

Oh wait, i forgot, the rules they make don't apply to them. :story:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh don't worry, the comment section of that reddit thread is using the same tiresome arguments such as this comment. "Here's the thing about "defining" woman - it's almost impossible to do it without either including trans women or excluding some cis women."Has the capacity to give birth" - excludes infertile/menopausal women. "Has a uterus" - excludes women who have had hysterectomies. "Doesn't have a penis" - so a trans woman who has a vaginoplasty counts? What about a man who had a penectomy in an accident or something? Does he become a woman? What about intersex people? Etc etc" Seriously, these arguments are so dumb.
How can you be defined as infertile or menopausal if you don't belong to a category that has the CAPACITY (That's the keyword)of giving birth in the first place? How can you have a hysterectomy if you never had a uterus to begin with?
How are these arguments so widespread??? It feels like speaking a different language/logic.
Its a massive cope of moon logic so they dont have to come to terms that trans women arent women and just men who has taken pills and had surgery. Literal definition of cognitive dissonance
 
Back