Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"


89D29C59-F5F6-4F80-A1D3-87BA42C2E12A.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: broken chiyron, Stay safe, dead76 and 28 others
I'm not sure if Rowling ever addressed the Hogwarts Legacy boycott, I had the feeling she mostly ignored everything about the game because she was not directly involved, but she now is all prepared for the next round!
374t4we8red.png
(Archive)

That aside, I needed something to do in between genociding troons, so I started reading the Cormoran Strike novels. I was looking forward to the horrible cross dressing villain they promised me and all. Turns out there is already a hysterical troon in book 2, and now I wonder whether this was when she started peaking, but the book was released in 2014.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: ApeBass, World Famous Quasi Payer, broken chiyron and 49 others
Der weiße Teufel said:
I'm not sure if Rowling ever addressed the Hogwarts Legacy boycott, I had the feeling she mostly ignored everything about the game because she was not directly involved, but she now is all prepared for the next round!
View attachment 5076995
(Archive)

That aside, I needed something to do in between genociding troons, so I started reading the Cormoran Strike novels. I was looking forward to the horrible cross dressing villain they promised me and all. Turns out there is already a hysterical troon in book 2, and now I wonder whether this was when she started peaking, but the book was released in 2014.
Click to expand...
God, she's hilariously good at making them seethe.

Is this the first time she's acknowledged the existence of the Hogwarts Legacy game on her Twitter feed? She says "activists in her mentions are trying to organize yet another boycott", and the only recent boycott would be her HL. If it is the first time she's alluded to it, I wonder if WB had a stipulation that Rowling couldn't mention or promote the product on her social media because they are afraid of the backlash. But now that it was wildly successful, they don't care about that anymore?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: broken chiyron, Stay safe, Soup Sammiches and 8 others
Der weiße Teufel said:
I'm not sure if Rowling ever addressed the Hogwarts Legacy boycott, I had the feeling she mostly ignored everything about the game because she was not directly involved, but she now is all prepared for the next round!
View attachment 5076995
(Archive)

That aside, I needed something to do in between genociding troons, so I started reading the Cormoran Strike novels. I was looking forward to the horrible cross dressing villain they promised me and all. Turns out there is already a hysterical troon in book 2, and now I wonder whether this was when she started peaking, but the book was released in 2014.
Click to expand...
I think JK's inconsistency with addressing the hate she gets is part of what makes the trannies so mad. They want her to be as furious as they are. To live in constant fear of being attacked and react thusly. Always making posts defending herself or siding with "nazis" but she doesn't do that, so really the smartest thing she can do is just randomly drop in and see what's happening.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: lolcow yoghurt, Ma'am I Am, assigned Karen at birth and 22 others
Gondolindrim said:
I think JK's inconsistency with addressing the hate she gets is part of what makes the trannies so mad. They want her to be as furious as they are. To live in constant fear of being attacked and react thusly. Always making posts defending herself or siding with "nazis" but she doesn't do that, so really the smartest thing she can do is just randomly drop in and see what's happening.
Click to expand...
It bothers a troon just enough to also throw em sideways too. They never foerget but always get new enough content to keep seething.
 
  • Like
Reactions: broken chiyron, lolcow yoghurt, Stay safe and 8 others
1440p Curved Monitor said:
God, she's hilariously good at making them seethe.

Is this the first time she's acknowledged the existence of the Hogwarts Legacy game on her Twitter feed? She says "activists in her mentions are trying to organize yet another boycott", and the only recent boycott would be her HL. If it is the first time she's alluded to it, I wonder if WB had a stipulation that Rowling couldn't mention or promote the product on her social media because they are afraid of the backlash. But now that it was wildly successful, they don't care about that anymore?
Click to expand...
I think she just treats being online in a healthy way (unlike her critics and let's be honest, most of us on here)

She pops on the internet to say something when she thinks she has something to say, spends a little time interacting with people, and then logs off and carries on with her life.

Her having a life outside the internet is one of the small things that makes the trans seethe.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: autogynephobia, lolcow yoghurt, Average Pepsi Enjoyer and 27 others
Chickenpolar said:
I think she just treats being online in a healthy way (unlike her critics and let's be honest, most of us on here)

She pops on the internet to say something when she thinks she has something to say, spends a little time interacting with people, and then logs off and carries on with her life.

Her having a life outside the internet is one of the small things that makes the trans seethe.
Click to expand...
Seeing people respond to her tweets trying to pull a GOTCHA on her is really funny. They think they destroyed her with facts and logic, but in reality she's not even paying attention to these terminally online freaks.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: lolcow yoghurt, Average Pepsi Enjoyer, Stay safe and 14 others
Daily Mail: "JK Rowling mocks trans activists threatening to boycott her new Harry Potter TV show as the £850m author says she'll hit back by throwing party as boasts she has 'taken the precaution of laying in a large stock of champagne'"

My pet cow is Rudy Hartmann (real name is 'The Dragon Demands' and his Kiwifarms thread is here).

He has been careful about posting for a while now, but he has started to attack J.K. Rowling. What is interesting is that he used to be a permanently online person, and it provides us with a documented example of how these narcissists adapt to and follow whatever the current thing is. When they do, they are suddenly holier-than-thou.

Is Rudy Hartmann 'based'?​

He gave a talk on 'Gender & Sexuality' at a Long Island nerd orgy called "Cradle Con" in 2019. Listen to him make a joke about pronouns:



"My pronouns are 'Dragon', 'of the Dragon' and 'to the Dragon'. Moving on from that ... <heavy breath from effort of standing up for the intro>."
Click to expand...

How many transgender peoples lives were put in peril at that moment? None. Look at the television. Look deeper. Look at the reflection. Nobody went to his talk.

Then 2 years later, he is a changed man:
tdd pronouns donkey dick.png

Now he shits on J.K. Rowling:
2023-04-23 The Dragon Demands JK Rowling You know who.jpg2023-04-23 The Dragon Demands JK Rowling 2.png
https://twitter.com/ladymultifandom/status/1650032708871921664

Treats her name as a curse. Classy.

Why such a big change?​

Well the star of the new Thrones show is Emma D'Arcy, an actor, whose gender is 'non-binary' and is in a relationship with another person of same sex.

The actor is playing Rhaenyra. You've heard the name in the phrase 'Rhaenyra Has An Army' which The Dragon Demands used as his battle cry.

He is utterly smitten with the actors Emma D'Arcy:


Emma is a they/them. He is white knighting for M'Lady/M'Lord/M'Whatever - who is also gay. This para-social crush is futile and a little off, given her orientation, and him being a big fat hairy Long Island Italian-American man.

'... you mock my queen?'
Click to expand...

Umm ya ... facked it, kid. Should have said 'you mock my monarch?' Maybe 'you mock my monarchs?' I don't know. It's all so tiresome.
 
  • Lunacy
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Outer Space Traveller, lolcow yoghurt, Humbert Humbert and 5 others
YourFriendlyLurker 2.0 said:
Imagine proclaiming himself an atheist only to fall to the deepest imaginable bullshit, less logical and rational than any religion ever.
Click to expand...
I completely agree. I made the mistake we are dealing with typical left vs right politics. We aren’t. That’s what they want you to think and then hide under the “All art is political excuse”.

Estreme wokeness is actually a religion. A literal cult in fact.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Vivian, Small G genocide, Wright and 15 others
Der weiße Teufel said:
I'm not sure if Rowling ever addressed the Hogwarts Legacy boycott, I had the feeling she mostly ignored everything about the game because she was not directly involved, but she now is all prepared for the next round!
Click to expand...
I think that is a common misconception. JKR controls the IP with an iron fist and she is ALWAYS involved. Not on the creative side always but she is the person that decides ye/nah on every single detail. Everything and anything has to be approved by her or the project will not happen.

This is IMHO what every responsible IP holder should do. You need to have 100% control of everything or else the danger-faggots will sneak weird degenerate shit into to your IP and devalue it.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Vetinari, p0mm3rz, SecretMagicalGirl and 20 others
Cuckoman said:
I think that is a common misconception. JKR controls the IP with an iron fist and she is ALWAYS involved. Not on the creative side always but she is the person that decides ye/nah on every single detail. Everything and anything has to be approved by her or the project will not happen.

This is IMHO what every responsible IP holder should do. You need to have 100% control of everything or else the danger-faggots will sneak weird degenerate shit into to your IP and devalue it.
Click to expand...
Absolutely, they even addressed it on the Hogwarts Legacy website. They say she didn't contribute to the game creatively, so it was my assumption that she did not care/see any reason overall to comment on it (like the game's release or the failed boycott or even its success). And not sure if she would really bother to confirm every detail herself, I do assume she has people working for her that she trusts with it. Especially if it's not about Harry Potter's story.
I usually only catch bits and pieces of what she says online but it probably would have made the news if she had either said anything to promote the game, her involvement in the game or about the whole "if you play it, you are a bigot!!!" meltdown.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Stay safe, Manat, TVB and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back