US BREAKING: Tucker Carlson leaves Fox News as they 'agree to part ways' - Fox News Media and Tucker Carlson have agreed to part ways.

Source

NEW YORK — April 24, 2023 — FOX News Media and Tucker Carlson have agreed to part ways. We thank him for his service to the network as a host and prior to that as a contributor.

Mr. Carlson’s last program was Friday April 21st. Fox News Tonight will air live at 8 PM/ET starting this evening as an interim show helmed by rotating FOX News personalities until a new host is named.

FOX News Media operates the FOX News Channel (FNC), FOX Business Network (FBN), FOX News Digital, FOX News Audio, FOX News Books, the direct-to-consumer streaming services FOX Nation and FOX News International and the free ad-supported television service FOX Weather. Currently the number one network in all of cable, FNC has also been the most watched television news channel for more than 21 consecutive years, while FBN ranks among the top business channels on cable. Owned by Fox Corporation, FOX News Media reaches nearly 200 million people each month.

 

[Antenna7]

Do you know the history of the OSS?
Have you read any books about sykewar?
There is no one on TV or on mainstream social media with any popularity who is not a puppet.
The propaganda that is obvious to you when you look at north-Korea or China is amateur stuff to the propaganda you are subjected to in the west.
There is a reason the oligarchs are willing to sink billions into YouTube to keep it afloat, centralized control of information is the most important aspect of propaganda.
And if you got popularity on a side issue the synagogue doesn't care about and you open your mouth about subjects that they do care about then you will face consequences.

Propaganda - Goebbels' Principles

"Propaganda must be planned and executed by only one authority"
They are still mostly following this.

Tucker like Trump sided with Bibi's Likud, but Bibi isn't interested in having their backs. Some Donor Class faggot probably wanted Tuckers head and since Tucker sided with the wrong people he has no one defending him.

I don't believe humans operate in such a simple binary manner. Trump was able to get the Presidency, despite the best efforts of the entire American system. So there is some support there. I don't believe in the simple "The Jews control everything" argument people like to assume it is. Maybe it's comforting to some people that one group of people have control over everything. But I believe just like here at the serf level, there are competing groups of influence at the upper level.

 

[Ishtar]

You don't become a TV talking head or a major public figure working for a major corporation or the government unless you either keep your truly radical opinions to yourself(and it better be only in your head) or you agree with their program, explicitly or tacitly.

If not, if you have views outside the imposed range of acceptable discourse, you will quickly find doors barred, invitations rescinded and your name blacklisted.

 

[Elmo]

Somehow this feels a bit like the Crossfire cancellation all over again but with way worse implications/consequences. Another one bites the dust, I guess.

 

[Devout Muslim]

This isn’t really much a loss for Fox. The staff writers will continue to plagiarise the No Agenda show for whoever replaces Tucker and the content won’t change.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

I don't believe humans operate in such a simple binary manner. Trump was able to get the Presidency, despite the best efforts of the entire American system. So there is some support there. I don't believe in the simple "The Jews control everything" argument people like to assume it is. Maybe it's comforting to some people that one group of people have control over everything. But I believe just like here at the serf level, there are competing groups of influence at the upper level.

Europeans fought each other quite a bit while they were conquering the world during the age of colonialism. Their competition for control and influence didn't mean they would see for the most part, other people/countries as their equals. It is 100% possible for any group to have intergroup competition and still share some united ideas, like the idea that christianity is the right religion (although they fought over which version of it, of course).

Europeans then controlled the destiny of the world, even if they competed over parts of it.

 

[John.Doe]

incidentally, this is teaching conservatives to keep Jews and/or women out of your inner circle because they will inevitably betray you and drag your formerly private communications into the public square.

Everybody knows this already, the problem is that they have so many levers to inject themselves into your company or groups through their legal and financial controls. If that doesn't work, they'll use fully controlled shabbos puppets for infiltration to achieve the same purpose. If they can't do either, they'll just destroy your organization using lawfare and Justice Department puppets.

Don't get blackpilled, though, all their control rests on highly complex systems that require economic prosperity and very expensive propaganda organizations - all of which are being mismanaged into the ground. Like Toto tearing down the curtain to reveal the 'wizard' everyone will see who and what is going on, but instead of a nice girl from Kansas it'll be the hardest, meanest, maddest motherfuckers that survived the collapse who'll be waiting. They'll eat kosher that day, and I only hope they don't get some degenerate parasite from the feast.

 

[Antenna7]

You don't become a TV talking head or a major public figure working for a major corporation or the government unless you either keep your truly radical opinions to yourself(and it better be only in your head) or you agree with their program, explicitly or tacitly.

If not, if you have views outside the imposed range of acceptable discourse, you will quickly find doors barred, invitations rescinded and your name blacklisted.

Do you realize how long Tucker has been in the game for? Actively shilling the establishment? He said so himself "I can't believe I supported the Iraq war". So he has developed a certain level of institutional protection. So that's why it took so long to remove him.

 

[Ishtar]

Do you realize how long Tucker has been in the game for? Actively shilling the establishment? He said so himself "I can't believe I supported the Iraq war". So he has developed a certain level of institutional protection. So that's why it took so long to remove him.

Obviously it isn't a cut and dry line. Tucker was popular and audiences reacted well to stuff like that. Then again, a lot of media commentators and public figures have apologized for supporting the Iraq War or disavowed themselves of it. Institutional protection as we have just seen, only goes so far.

You have to be a team player though, especially when your treading on ice. As Tucker no doubt was. Rub enough producers the wrong way, offend enough coworkers, and make Lachlan Murdoch less than pleased even in a day, well Fox is clearly willing to take the hit.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

Tucker Carlson isn't a White nationalist, anyone who knew anything about the man(and how marginalized open support for White identity politics is) could have told you that.

I get the impression it was a combination of a Jewish producer, the dominion lawsuit-likely the alleged anti Trump comments, and maybe I dunno some sort of power struggle in the Murdoch family.

From a strictly business perspective, this is like shooting the golden goose. So there might have been some external pressure as well.

The problem with this assumption is Tucker Carlson wasn't going along with the stop to steal nonsense and other anchors on Fox News were much more enthusiastic about stop the Steal

 

[Antenna7]

Obviously it isn't a cut and dry line. Tucker was popular and audiences reacted well to stuff like that. Then again, a lot of media commentators and public figures have apologized for supporting the Iraq War or disavowed themselves of it. Institutional protection as we have just seen, only goes so far.

You have to be a team player though, especially when your treading on ice. As Tucker no doubt was. Rub enough producers the wrong way, offend enough coworkers, and make Lachlan Murdoch less than pleased even in a day, well Fox is clearly willing to take the hit.

What do you mean rubbing co-workers the wrong way? Schumer was actively attacking him after the J6 footage, after the election segments, AOC was actively attacking him. Among the several MSM hit pieces. Therefore you have to assume, they got the institutional go ahead. Tucker was eventually going to be taken out. Because he stepped out of line. He wasn't sticking to the Neocon soap opera bullshit.

"Durr America good we must spend all money on Ukraine because Putin is Voldemort urrrgh"

Does any normie even know the history of Eastern Europe before 2014? No.

 

[Ishtar]

The problem with this assumption is Tucker Carlson wasn't going along with the stop to steal nonsense and other anchors on Fox News were much more enthusiastic about stop the Steal

That probably had a lot to do with it. In terms of Fox's PR anyway.

 

[SBG]

It'll be interesting to see what Tucker does after this. Like does he have a non-compete clause in his contract? Because I think Fox News has tried non-compete clauses in their contracts for a while now which could mean Tucker would have to fight it if he wanted to do another show.

He still is getting paid for the next couple years, I think, so could always startup something new down the line like Megyn Kelly did with her Youtube show, or just end up being semi-retired trying to write books.

 

[The Tall Man]

I don't believe humans operate in such a simple binary manner. Trump was able to get the Presidency, despite the best efforts of the entire American system. So there is some support there. I don't believe in the simple "The Jews control everything" argument people like to assume it is. Maybe it's comforting to some people that one group of people have control over everything. But I believe just like here at the serf level, there are competing groups of influence at the upper level.

If the word Jews makes you cringe then use oligarchs, the most correct way to call them would be oligarchs with Jewish overrepresentation.

It doesn't matter what you or I believe.
Epstein was an Israeli blackmail operation and Les Wexner payed for it. This was never discussed in the media and the people who discussed this on youtube, facebook or twitter got banned.
These oligarchs spend the majority of their money on media and "PR" (just a modern word for propaganda).
MSM, Hollywood, the big social media platforms mostly operate with a loss.

If you are too scared to put one and two together, then nobody can help you.

It's blatantly obvious that only a handful of subjects are being discussed on all these platforms and that only a handful of answers to these subjects are being given.

Why is there no holocaust revisionism on any of these platforms, isn't US media supposed to be free speech?
Why is the involvement of the Israelis in the 9/11 attacks and the pre-war propaganda lies never discussed?
Why is the USS liberty never discussed on any of these platforms.
Why is the theft of US nuclear secrets and materials by the Israelis never discussed.

You can choose to believe it's because the Eskimos control the media if you want to.

Trump was able to get the Presidency, despite the best efforts of the entire American system.

They talked about him didn't they? If there is something the oligarch really don't want you to know then they don't talk about it at all.
Trump has his own connections, he was never an outsider.
He got bailed out by Wilbur Ross a Rothchild banker.
He is connected to the Kushners and the Kushners are quite tight with Bibi.

The left right media paradigm is for the plebs it doesn't mean anything, on the important issues they all vote unanimously.

 

[MetokurGroomedMe]

The proof is in that drop of votes that came in for Biden at 4 AM in Wisconsin.

if it hadn't been milwaukee it would be even more suspicious, but if i were a better, i'd say milwaukee was always gonna be voting blue.

 

[DancingIsraeli]

Dominion is the company that operated the voting machines for the 2020 presidential election. Fox News has been accusing them of rigging the voting machines for the longest now, and they got sued by them for it. They ultimately settled the lawsuit for $787.5 million.

The thing is, as much as I want to believe that this election was rigged, I have to provide proof. I can’t just go by conjecture. It’s easier to just say Trump was set up for failure due to the pandemic.

This would make more sense to me if the cheaters in question could have excercised enough self-control to keep themselves from making the claim that Joe fucking Biden received the most votes in US History. There ARE NOT 82 million ppl in America who voted for Joe Biden, period.

 

[Antenna7]

If the word Jews makes you cringe then use oligarchs, the most correct way to call them would be oligarchs with Jewish overrepresentation.

It doesn't matter what you or I believe.
Epstein was an Israeli blackmail operation and Les Wexner payed for it. This was never discussed in the media and the people who discussed this on youtube, facebook or twitter got banned.
These oligarchs spend the majority of their money on media and "PR" (just a modern word for propaganda).
MSM, Hollywood, the big social media platforms mostly operate with a loss.

If you are too scared to put one and two together, then nobody can help you.

It's blatantly obvious that only a handful of subjects are being discussed on all these platforms and that only a handful of answers to these subjects are being given.

Why is there no holocaust revisionism on any of these platforms, isn't US media supposed to be free speech?
Why is the involvement of the Israeli's in the 9/11 attacks and the pre-war propaganda lies never discussed?
Why is the USS liberty never discussed on any of these platforms.
Why is the theft of US nuclear secrets and materials by the Israelis never discussed.

You can choose to believe it's because the Eskimos control the media if you want to.

I know there is a certain amount of leeway given if you are in the Murdoch news empire. I've seen those stories across multiple outlets. But eventually establishment actions will push them out if they consistently go too outside the bounds. Why else would Schumer name Rupert Murdoch directly? Things aren't so black and white in the real world.

 

[LiquidKid]

I love the fact that the last thing he ever did on Fox was eat pizza

 

[The Tall Man]

I know there is a certain amount of leeway given if you are in the Murdoch news empire. I've seen those stories across multiple outlets. But eventually establishment actions will push them out if they consistently go too outside the bounds. Why else would Schumer name Rupert Murdoch directly? Things aren't so black and white in the real world.

You have to realize a simple truth billionaires don't want money they want to spend money for control.

This perceived leeway is to keep people on the plantation.

There is leeway on the leftoid side as well sometimes there is light criticism of the treatment of Palestinians by the Israelis on leftoid MSM.

There is nothing Tucker said that ever got close to being outside the narrative.
All he ever did was point to something that is obviously fucked that everybody already knows is obviously fucked and says "this is crazy".

This is to keep the plebs thinking that there are still parts of the media that represent the common view.

Why else would Schumer name Rupert Murdoch directly?

There are factions within the oligarchy, for example some align more with Russia (Bibi wants the US to fight Iran not Russia) and some with Ukraine, some more with the Democrats and some more with the Republicans.
At the end of the day they all agree that Americans should die for Israel.

You do realize that American underaged girls were sex trafficked by Epstein who got all his money directly from Wexner in an Israeli operation to blackmail US scientists and business people, and nobody cares about it.

What you see there is a bunch of wolfs arguing how to cook the sheep.

 

[ArnoldPalmer]

Honestly, yeah, if Daily Wire has enough money, getting Tucker would be a HUGE investment that would increase their audience dramatically.

But I shudder to think of him actually running for president. As mentioned earlier, he has the worst foreign policy perspective of anyone out there, actually advocating for isolationism, which is a fantasy notion. He also is a Luddite and thinks that technology that potentially puts people out of a job (like when cars put horse carriage drivers out of business) shouldn't be done at all.

Isolationism and Neo-Luddism are based and objectively-correct-pilled though

 

[Antenna7]

There is nothing Tucker said that ever got close to being outside the narrative.
All he ever did was point to something that is obviously fucked that everybody already knows is obviously fucked and says "this is crazy".

Bring yourself down to the level of a normie for a moment. This is WAY out of bounds, for what the establishment wants discussed.

And I wouldn't put the elite on such a pedestal. They are not there due to some superior intellect. Many of them were grandfathered in. You have to mediate exactly who you are dealing with. It's not what you know, it's who you know. If they didn't have their riches and knowledge and connections, they'd be just a regular retard. But obviously, they are so self absorbed, they don't see it that way.