Lost what I was wanting to quote as I read through to catch up because multi-quote is broken, even after refreshing going all the way from page 302. I'm
not going back to find them. Instead, I'm just gonna give short responses to the ones I had from memory, so sorry if this is outta fuckin' left field:
In the Brandon Hererra video, Pro-gun people try to appeal to anti-guns in hopes of possibly dispelling the redneck-who'll-blast-darkies-on-sight image that most city tards have in their mind. It doesn't usually work and has it where soyim walk all over him and just treat him like Davido-kun.
Secondly, PSAK-74s (and 47s)
have improved compared to before but it requires sufficiently more bitching attem because they're not improving it fast enough to at least be very long-lived as
@White Devil said. I usually compare PSA AKs to my WASR-10 and AMD-65 (Different cartridges I know, but AK is AK and I have to rely on a friend for the experimentation with his PSAK-74) but I think PSA is honestly slowly improving in quality and I think their AR's are on point for the price. Albeit, I built my first AR from the bottom up with PSA parts with my dad and then built a second lower and just bought the upper, so maybe my experience isn't the same as a complete out of box gun. Both have ran fine for years as long as you maintain them—as you should any gun. Basically, make fun of PSA all you want, but I can get behind what they're trying to do. Even if trannies are buying them because it's all they have left after spending it on Troonshine that doesn't work.
Two more I forgot. Forgive me, Jesus. Also, thanks for the Karl karsada thread.
So looking into it there has been a case of Tannerite being used for Terrorism.
In 2016 the
New York and New Jersey bombings happened and the main explosive part of the bombs was Tannerite, no one died. The thing is that Tannerite requires something to detonate it, either a high power rifle or a explosive charge, you can't rig it up as easily more conventional explosives, and that extra layer of difficultly cuts down on its effectiveness as a explosive. While use you COULD use it for a IED or some sort, it would add a layer of complexity that wouldn't be worth the trouble for most wannabe bombmakers.
Explosive charge. So you're gonna have to recreate how the Atomic bomb was made? But instead of a bullet hitting uranium, a bullet hitting a fuck ton of tannerite?
Also, any opinions on buying an OEG sight? Maybe second hand? I closed the front of my optic to try the occluded eye effect at the range and I was giggling like a retard while plinking away feeling as if I was playing some FPS game. I kinda want one and I got the bug because they look cool too.