General GunTuber thread

Don't ever forget that from 2004 to 2007 the ATF thought that shoestrings were machine guns so of course they'll go after people that hand out metal cards with cut-out templates. And always remember the most important rule with firearms: if you think it might be illegal, don't fucking tell anyone.
They argued that a sliver of metal was a machine gun as well. That article is written by that gay retard Crump but his source is FOIA request documents. The ATF is counting on a lot of self policing involving gun owners making mgs/cans/whatever and bragging about it whether online or in person. The dumbest thing you can do is take a picture and post it anywhere, the second dumbest thing you can do is tell someone. That is of course if you're white, if you're a nigger using a switch to shoot ops at the gas station on ig live you get a pass.

Just another reminder to keep your mouth shut and make your basement into a Faraday cage.
 
Do you guy's think that Ian will start his own shooting thing or maybe get invited to showcase other shooting events now that the 2 fat asses have booted him out. I can see other events trying to get him since he has a big following and does not seem to mind selling shit and he does not come with a shit ton of baggage like the other one.
 
Do you guy's think that Ian will start his own shooting thing or maybe get invited to showcase other shooting events now that the 2 fat asses have booted him out. I can see other events trying to get him since he has a big following and does not seem to mind selling shit and he does not come with a shit ton of baggage like the other one.
I don't think Ian has the time or the inclination to organize his own shooting competitions. It's a lot of work, after all. So he'll probably just keep joining his friends' matches. AFAIK he has zero involvement on the admin side of things like Finnish Brutality, he only shows up as a competitor and advertises it on his channel. Same with the BUG matches he uses to showcase pistols. So if another friend in his corner of Arizona decides to start their own 2-gun-with-crossfit-characteristics competition, it's likely Ian will start attending those instead of any "brutality" matches.
 
Last edited:
Don't see why it can't be, turns old lawnmowers into frag just fine.


That sounds like it'd be hard to convince a judge and jury over.
Their goal is to never get a case before a judge and jury. Very few cases end up at trial with just one specific gun charge, for example 1 unregistered SBR. Most of the time in cases like this there are other charges and they will use those other charges as chess pieces to get the offender to take a plea deal. In this specific case this guy got popped with a homemade can, exhibit 3 in the scribd document of charges, and a SBR which is exhibit 1. They knew they had enough juice to throw on whatever charges they wanted because the case was never going to go to trial which is how we get the ATF to declare a sliver of metal as a machine gun.

There's a reason federal prosecutors have an above 95% conviction rate. In the CRS case they managed to convince a judge and jury that those 2 guys were distributing machine guns so who really knows anymore.
 
Do you guy's think that Ian will start his own shooting thing or maybe get invited to showcase other shooting events now that the 2 fat asses have booted him out. I can see other events trying to get him since he has a big following and does not seem to mind selling shit and he does not come with a shit ton of baggage like the other one.
I would hope Ian gets involved in PCSL. It seems to be the best mix of challening shooting stages like USPSA with more free equipment rules like outlaw matches.

 
Don't see why it can't be, turns old lawnmowers into frag just fine.
So looking into it there has been a case of Tannerite being used for Terrorism.
In 2016 the New York and New Jersey bombings happened and the main explosive part of the bombs was Tannerite, no one died. The thing is that Tannerite requires something to detonate it, either a high power rifle or a explosive charge, you can't rig it up as easily more conventional explosives, and that extra layer of difficultly cuts down on its effectiveness as a explosive. While use you COULD use it for a IED or some sort, it would add a layer of complexity that wouldn't be worth the trouble for most wannabe bombmakers.
 
While use you COULD use it for a IED or some sort, it would add a layer of complexity that wouldn't be worth the trouble for most wannabe bombmakers.
Considering how easily it's available, I don't see why it'd be such a bother, make a short pipegun with a shotgun shell as your blasting cap essentially, with a solenoid for releasing its firing pin (and here you can apply any number of methods for detonation), then either embed that inside of the mixed Tannerite compound, or as a separate detonator assembly you attach to your redneck IED if you want to be really fancy.
Kludgy setup, but with some tweaking and trial and error, it oughta work. Considering you can shoot Tannerite from a distance to make it explode, you wouldn't need to take any unnecessary risks dealing with dud detonations during development.

btw to anyone else reading, this post is not load data, don't go blow yourself up or get v& or shit
 
Considering how easily it's available, I don't see why it'd be such a bother, make a short pipegun with a shotgun shell as your blasting cap essentially, with a solenoid for releasing its firing pin (and here you can apply any number of methods for detonation), then either embed that inside of the mixed Tannerite compound, or as a separate detonator assembly you attach to your redneck IED if you want to be really fancy.
I'm not an expert on tannerite since I think it's kinda cringe, plus I kinda got my fill of being near explosions in the army, but I'm 99% certain a shotgun won't set off tannerite, especially out of a jury-rigged short barrel. I've seen people shoot standard tannerite targets with a .45 and not set them off, although IIRC there might be some more sensitive versions that can be set off with lower power shit.
 
Considering how easily it's available, I don't see why it'd be such a bother, make a short pipegun with a shotgun shell as your blasting cap essentially, with a solenoid for releasing its firing pin (and here you can apply any number of methods for detonation), then either embed that inside of the mixed Tannerite compound, or as a separate detonator assembly you attach to your redneck IED if you want to be really fancy.
Kludgy setup, but with some tweaking and trial and error, it oughta work. Considering you can shoot Tannerite from a distance to make it explode, you wouldn't need to take any unnecessary risks dealing with dud detonations during development.

btw to anyone else reading, this post is not load data, don't go blow yourself up or get v& or shit
Its not the fact you couldn't do it (though i think the shotgun shell method wouldn't work), but you are adding so many steps just to use over the counter stuff when someone could just make/steal actual explosives. the only benefit to tannerite is that fact its easily purchasable, there is not a single reason to chose it over literally anything else.

Now for the sake of Optics i am NOT telling anyone to use Tannerite for a bomb or even make bombs, this is merely the discussion on why tannerite would be poorly suited for bomb making. With that being said personally the only use i see for Tannerite in any sort of Red Dawn type situation is as a ambush starter, I.E you shoot tannerite to destroy a lead vehicle before lighting up a enemy patrol/convoy with machine guns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: likeacrackado
I've seen people shoot standard tannerite targets with a .45 and not set them off, although IIRC there might be some more sensitive versions that can be set off with lower power shit.
There's a more sensitive variant, the Rimfire Target, which you could use as a primer charge.

Its not the fact you couldn't do it (though i think the shotgun shell method wouldn't work), but you are adding so many steps just to use over the counter stuff when someone could just make/steal actual explosives
Higher risk of getting caught or being killed for someone stupid, though there's probably much simpler ways to set the stuff off than building a pipegun, like a big enough firecracker in the rimfire mix.
 
Reddit's most hated guntuber has confirmed he has recorded an episode of a podcast with known fence sitting bald cuck Tim Pool
I didn't make it very far in before turning it off. Any time anyone steered the conversation a little too right Tim was there to wrestle it back to center. Apparently being a guntuber is very dangerous for Lucas because of lead exposure and his feet and knee hurt. I left after Tim was talking about how great the boycott of Bud Light is because conservatives are attacking the brand and not attacking Dylan Mulvaney and how great that is. Surprised to see Phil Labonte there, it seems he shed his Libertarian stance over the years and is much more right leaning. If they ever go on tour again I'll go and get him to sign some m14 mags for me.
 
I really feel bad for Matt, but he's pretty much screwed. He kept going on about how good his odds were, but I sure thought that was hopeless. Jury convictions like this are virtually guaranteed to stick too.

 
Lost what I was wanting to quote as I read through to catch up because multi-quote is broken, even after refreshing going all the way from page 302. I'm not going back to find them. Instead, I'm just gonna give short responses to the ones I had from memory, so sorry if this is outta fuckin' left field:

In the Brandon Hererra video, Pro-gun people try to appeal to anti-guns in hopes of possibly dispelling the redneck-who'll-blast-darkies-on-sight image that most city tards have in their mind. It doesn't usually work and has it where soyim walk all over him and just treat him like Davido-kun.

Secondly, PSAK-74s (and 47s) have improved compared to before but it requires sufficiently more bitching attem because they're not improving it fast enough to at least be very long-lived as @White Devil said. I usually compare PSA AKs to my WASR-10 and AMD-65 (Different cartridges I know, but AK is AK and I have to rely on a friend for the experimentation with his PSAK-74) but I think PSA is honestly slowly improving in quality and I think their AR's are on point for the price. Albeit, I built my first AR from the bottom up with PSA parts with my dad and then built a second lower and just bought the upper, so maybe my experience isn't the same as a complete out of box gun. Both have ran fine for years as long as you maintain them—as you should any gun. Basically, make fun of PSA all you want, but I can get behind what they're trying to do. Even if trannies are buying them because it's all they have left after spending it on Troonshine that doesn't work.

Two more I forgot. Forgive me, Jesus. Also, thanks for the Karl karsada thread.

So looking into it there has been a case of Tannerite being used for Terrorism.
In 2016 the New York and New Jersey bombings happened and the main explosive part of the bombs was Tannerite, no one died. The thing is that Tannerite requires something to detonate it, either a high power rifle or a explosive charge, you can't rig it up as easily more conventional explosives, and that extra layer of difficultly cuts down on its effectiveness as a explosive. While use you COULD use it for a IED or some sort, it would add a layer of complexity that wouldn't be worth the trouble for most wannabe bombmakers.

Explosive charge. So you're gonna have to recreate how the Atomic bomb was made? But instead of a bullet hitting uranium, a bullet hitting a fuck ton of tannerite?

Also, any opinions on buying an OEG sight? Maybe second hand? I closed the front of my optic to try the occluded eye effect at the range and I was giggling like a retard while plinking away feeling as if I was playing some FPS game. I kinda want one and I got the bug because they look cool too.
 
Back