- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
Classic narcissism. Who gives a shit about them? It is all about ME!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reminder that proof of Tony's name change was posted earlier in the thread (hat tip to @JY's Tampon)You know in his heart of hearts, he's resting on a technicality. A person named Erin Reed has no felony record, but some other guy (who may be "dead") named Anthony Reed II does.
(Then again, it's not like you can just change your name to wash away a criminal record.)
The more my normie friends get exposed to the tranny bullshit, they see why I can't stand these fucks and stop thinking I am some weird anti tranny activist. They see the trannies want to break everything in society, anything in biology (like if you see Zack or Tony, your mind automatically goes to "that's a dude"), only because they want their weird fetishes pleased.It's just another example of what happens when troons or their ideals actually interact with normies, which is happening more and more now. Normie contact with actual troons almost never goes well.
It doesn't affect all the control they have over institutions, but at best the conflict between institutions and normies just creates a "mom says you have to play with me!" scenario.
Do you have the original conviction documentation?Tony's claim that he is not a "convicted drug felon" is a technicality, just like the court ordered to not wear his wife's clothes thing.
Tony was convicted of third degree felony fraudulent practices (for selling FAKE illegal drugs) rather than a crime under Florida's drug control statutes because the MDMA charge was dropped as the drugs weren't real. So he's a convicted fake drug felon and a fraud besides.
View attachment 5093139
That said, he can screech about muh lawyer and libelous statements all he wants, but I bet it won't play in a court of law.
"Zooey Zephyr" sounds like an alt stripper from 2008. It makes me laugh whenever there's a big, serious news article and they have to play along and pretend that's a name a real politician would have.Unrelated, but troons who change their surnames always seem double-sketch to me. Like, changing your first name to something feminine? Sure, whatever. But what's the logic of changing your surname? It's not really a personal thing the way you given name is, it just (usually) tells people you're the kid of some guy.
In one interviews he did he said this is because his family disowned him and does not want to have any contact with him. I think they are very happy he dropped their surname. It's somewhere in this thread, no clue tho where or when he said this.Unrelated, but troons who change their surnames always seem double-sketch to me. Like, changing your first name to something feminine? Sure, whatever. But what's the logic of changing your surname? It's not really a personal thing the way you given name is, it just (usually) tells people you're the kid of some guy.
I do not; my comment was based on what Tony said to the author of the OpenDemocracy article.Do you have the original conviction documentation?
I did some digging yesterday looking for Zack lore. These posts are too large, and imo too valuable, to break up for a quote reply. Plus, I'm retarded.Someone up thread wondered if Zac should get his own thread... I was on the fence until I read Jeremy's article. That wonderful nigger had to wade through Tony's thread for enough information on Zac to write an article about him and his perversions. Since he's now a person of interest in the MSM, I think he should have his own thread... if for no other reason, actual journalists don't have to click through hundreds of pages of bullshit to find the dirt they're seeking.
No kidding. I'm just amazed he was coherent enough to post anything on day 0. Those hospital pain meds are amazing, but boy do they make you loopy/foggy.Lol I damn near forgot about his stench trench saga. God, how fucking weird and gross and hilarious. This sick bastard was running for office and thought it was a good idea to publicly discuss his man cave... and he continued to discuss it long after the Dilaudid wore off. What a creep.
Their original surname is what's on the sex offender registry.But what's the logic of changing your surname?
The same can be said about any other group.When George floyd died and the MSM made it seem like cops were hunting down black people, nobody herd anything about black people killing themselves.Heck, say what you will about BLM but i never once herd black people go"Give us police reforms or we'll kill ourselves."Trans is the only group i can think of where it's "Give us so and so or we'll die."What bugs me about it is how people keep falling for it.I know this same sentiment is just everywhere and not original or enlightening by any means, but I still can't wrap my brain around the logic behind "if you pass legislation that we do not like, trannies will kill themselves en masse."
How is that an argument for a cause? "Do what we say or we rope!" I'll take my moai stickers, but I definitely didn't see actual women in the US doing that when Roe V Wade got negated. I don't see how Zac and Tony and their ilk can keep this as a talking point. It's fucking absurd.
And Tony claiming all this stuff that we have meticulously archived is libelous is just. . . So Tony. For those wondering about his lawyer, I'm sure he has some terrifying creep with giant hands who fancies himself a "Lily" who will help a "sister" out.
But I hope that Jeremy or whatever that random reporters name is keeps going. Libel suits are great for the truth coming out, Eh Tony?
It's irrelevant, there's no need to upgrade Tony to "public figure" because he's not being defamed in any way. It's not defamation to correctly say that he has a felony drug conviction and was ordered not to wear his wife's clothes. The "NUH UH TECHNICALLY I only pled guilty and I agreed to not wear my wife's clothes!" doesn't meet the "reasonable person" standard for someone using slightly more colloquial language.Yeah, but I'm wondering if that, combined with his Twitter "activism", would be enough to consider him a public figure as opposed to a private figure for the purposes of a libel/defamation suit, since it becomes much more difficult to prove if so. This law firm's site defines private figures as "ordinary individuals who have not sought out the public spotlight or thrust themselves into the discussion of highly public and contentious issues", by which standard Tony would seem to be the very opposite of a private figure, but IANAL. Maybe one of our legal kiwis can weigh in.