Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 385 26.1%
  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 53 3.6%
  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,038 70.3%

  • Total voters
    1,476
FFS! Alex, most normal, sane people don't have an issue with Tinkerbell being black! That's not it at all! This is all so tiresome.

I mean, some people have an issue with it, but it’s more about pointless raceswapping in general and not “she’s black now, so she sucks!”
 
A few IRA funds today began divesting themselves of Disney stock, basically saying they stopped their dividend and that there is zero chance of growth or success in the foreseeable future. Motley Fool and HR Block managed funds sent out notices today, essentially blaming Iger. I expect this will briefly bump the stock and then who the fuck knows.

But if these guys are dumping, there may be blood.
 
I mean, some people have an issue with it, but it’s more about pointless raceswapping in general and not “she’s black now, so she sucks!”
I have an issue with it which is; race swapping is racist and if that racist pulls the "racism only applies to certain races" card that racist is 1, being inception level racist to justify their racism; 2, a gaslightling POS; and 3, retarded.
 
A few IRA funds today began divesting themselves of Disney stock, basically saying they stopped their dividend and that there is zero chance of growth or success in the foreseeable future. Motley Fool and HR Block managed funds sent out notices today, essentially blaming Iger. I expect this will briefly bump the stock and then who the fuck knows.

But if these guys are dumping, there may be blood.
As well they should. A competently made Little Mermaid would have been a guaranteed $1 billion+ worldwide; I can't believe any investor would put up with leadership this incompetent.
 
As well they should. A competently made Little Mermaid would have been a guaranteed $1 billion+ worldwide; I can't believe any investor would put up with leadership this incompetent.
Well for the past 10 years they've been able to recoup losses on IDPOL bombs with movies that actually make money and (much moreso) with money from the parks. But now they have no movies that actually make money. Even the few that don't bomb make only a relative pittance (even Avatar 2 made little for Disney after all the payouts). But now the parks are in rebuilding mode, having ro dump billions to modernize/expand/keep up with competitors, and none of that investment actually brings in more money to the parks, just allows them to tread water.

And then the black hole of cash that is Disney+. I mean how a company that owns all its content can manage to lose billions for years and years on a streaming service is almost unthinkable. You'd have to actually TRY to be that bad.

I had my buddy send me what Motley Fool said. My folks have HR block, who said they were dumping Disney, but didn't elaborate.
Prior to the pandemic, The Walt Disney Company paid a healthy dividend. They cut it in 2020 as their theme parks were shut down. We kept the investment, waiting to see what would happen next, as it took until late 2021 for the parks segment to fully recover. Meanwhile, the company was using its excess cash generation to grow its Disney Plus streaming service. Throughout 2022, we continued to wait and see, given the long-term value we see in the company’s brands and assets. In late 2022 Bob Iger returned as CEO. However, we are selling now because we are concerned about how the company is using the cash it generates. There appears to be no intention of resuming the dividend, and the company has admitted that its previous strategy of growing Disney Plus with little regard to profitability was a mistake. Now, the company is pouring billions of dollars over the next few years into major revamps of its theme parks. The company is capable of generating enormous amounts of cash flow, but we are concerned about that cash providing a benefit to shareholders.
 
As well they should. A competently made Little Mermaid would have been a guaranteed $1 billion+ worldwide; I can't believe any investor would put up with leadership this incompetent.
The competently made and entirely soulless Lion King “””live action””” (AKA photorealistic CGI) made 1.6 billion fucking dollars! Beauty and the Beast live action, which IIRC was a mostly straightforward adaptation with the vague implication that one minor character was a faggot made 1.26 billion. Literally all they have to do is be as greedy and soulless as possible and the money would print itself, but it seems they value virtue signaling over money.
 
Last edited:
As well they should. A competently made Little Mermaid would have been a guaranteed $1 billion+ worldwide; I can't believe any investor would put up with leadership this incompetent.
Instead of making a live-action Little Mermaid at all, why not just - re-release the original in theaters? You know, like they did two and a half decades ago -
little_mermaid_ver5.jpg
We know damn well why -
But they can't subvert and create racial tension with that!
Speaking of soulless remakes, Tim Brayton put out his review of the Peter Pan one and this made me chuckle -
Tim said:
Also, the film has some vague instinct that it wants to be an edgy girl power version of the story, but it absolutely does not know how to go about such a thing:

"In this version, it's not even about Peter Pan. It's about Wendy, and how she learns to be her own self-confident person as a young adult."

Yeah, that has been what every prior version of Peter Pan was about also.

"In this version, Peter Pan isn't an admirable hero, he's kind of an arrogant prick whom the other characters need to grow beyond."

Yep, sounds like Peter Pan in every telling of the story going back to the Edwardian period.
 
The competently made and entirely soulless Lion King “””live action””” (AKA photorealistic CGI) made 1.6 billion fucking dollars! Beauty and the Beast live action, which IIRC was a mostly straightforward adaptation with the vague implication that one minor character was a faggot made 1.26 billion. Literally all they have to do is be as greedy and soulless as possible and the money would print itself, but it seems they value virtue signaling over money.
And the last of the Renaissance big four, Aladdin, also made $1 billion in spite of (because?) Will Smith in blueface as the genie. Live action Little Mermaid was about the most 'sure thing' as there ever was in the history of cinema.
 
FFS! Alex, most normal, sane people don't have an issue with Tinkerbell being black! That's not it at all! This is all so tiresome.

this guy was always a faggot
Instead of making a live-action Little Mermaid at all, why not just - re-release the original in theaters? You know, like they did two and a half decades ago -
View attachment 5110975
We know damn well why -

Speaking of soulless remakes, Tim Brayton put out his review of the Peter Pan one and this made me chuckle -
the Little Mermaid thing is weird to me because the original story is public domain, if Africans remade Little Mermaid and made everyone black I dont think you could or should complain. however the Little Mermaid thing is another example of progressive Americans being arrogant on using European properties to bring some sort of racial justice to their culture. Like no, stuff trying to tell Europeans they dont have a culture you're just saying that to justify giving money to a billion dollar evil corporation. The other thing is animation fans will go see this movie despite the lead actress literally disparaging animation as a medium. Theyre idiots.

It's also weird to see Disney try to like subvert themselves and the thing is Disney were subverting more mature stories with their original adaptions. So they're just playing catchup. Disney writers are hacks and will never be real auters like they want to be, because they're inherently hacks as part of their blood. They want to be 'it', but 'it' was those original stories and the company was always trying to get away from 'it' before. It's weird.
 
As well they should. A competently made Little Mermaid would have been a guaranteed $1 billion+ worldwide; I can't believe any investor would put up with leadership this incompetent.
I'm still reeling at the idea that this woke bullshit is being funded by investment groups like Blackrock.
 
I’m both tired and appalled at these writer’s stupidity.
to be fair, that could be interesting going with the angle @Kari Kamiya mentioned and would also be inclusive. that's a "subverted expectation" twist I could go behind.
that's why it will never happen...

meanwhile:
pan.jpg

 
Back