Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

For anyone that's doubting the rape claim, LFJ has everything necessary to sue Josh for defamation, but he never will. It would make the whole story around his sexual assault accusations public and it's not defamation when it's the fucking truth.
Or it could just be he knows damn well Josh would have absolutely no reason at that point not to countersue, because this chink has committed actual crimes and been pretty open about it.
 
We don't know the original accusation or the original accuser. All we have is Elliot's admission that he had a "consent accident" with passive-aggressive threats against the accuser.
In fact, Elliot with his clout in the tech industry most likely pressured the accuser into deleting their messages, directly or indirectly.
That's a bit of a begging the question though, isn't it. What I'm asking is did anyone save the accusations from the other party. Story as it is could totally be explained by "hysterical person starts drama about dog hair" and it seems the simplest explanation to me.
Obv I'm biased, yadda yadda.
No, the accuser didn't start drama over dog hair. The dog hair retardation is Elliot's explanation, an "oops! teehee, I just had a consent accident!" innocent-seeming explanation. The accuser definitely accused him of straight up rape, no teehee consent accident euphemisms. The only reason we're talking about dog hair at all is because of Elliot's response.
 
That's a bit of a begging the question though, isn't it. What I'm asking is did anyone save the accusations from the other party. Story as it is could totally be explained by "hysterical person starts drama about dog hair" and it seems the simplest explanation to me.
Obv I'm biased, yadda yadda.
You're basically not wrong. We're extrapolating the story to make fun of No-Dong as an outright rapist, in response to his attacks on the Kiwi Farms through questionably legal and outright illegal means. But as far as the truth is concerned, we don't know for sure what happened. It could well be just a mentally ill person accusing him of rape after seeing some dog hair, as suggested by this tweet from someone who apparently knew the accuser:

Screenshot 2023-05-19 at 10.05.20.jpg
a

Or he could be a rapist, that's not out of the question. But do we have evidence to say that with absolute certainty? No.
 
We have Elliot's admission that he performed sexual activity against the will of the victim.
No, what we have are the tweets below. Now, he certainly could be lying about the details, but it's not an admission of sexual activity against the will of the victim.

Screenshot 2023-05-19 at 11.11.51.jpg
Screenshot 2023-05-19 at 11.07.00.jpg
a

To be clear, I think Fong-Jones is a despicable person, and I will make fun of his ridiculous consent accidents all day, but I don't believe there is sufficient evidence to say he is definitely a rapist.

One of the strengths of the Kiwi Farms is in being able to back up claims with archived evidence. In contrast to what our opponents say, we don't just make shit up to attack people. Is Fong-Jones a brick-faced freak who's trying to ruin the Internet to take down a site he doesn't like? Clearly yes. Is he a rapist? Impossible to say for sure at this point, maybe that could change in the future if the accuser or other possible victims come forward and talk about their side of the story.
 
Last edited:
What could "play" conceivably mean in this situation? Yahtzee?
Liz's stance has always been that they had consensual gay tranny BDSM sex but then the recipient saw dog fur and had a total meltdown and has been accusing Liz of rape for years now. This accusation has been impossible to find because Liz is litigious and has obliterated this person's account from the Internet.

That's why I tend to frame it as "Liz has been credibly accused of sexual assault" - because what we know is only the shattered second-hand retelling of someone on damage control and who can't see things very well on a good day. But, the accusation was so credible that Liz felt the need to address it and minimize it in public on social media. What he addresses is that he was accused of rape.

All we know for sure is that Liz Fong-Jones was credibly accused of sexual assault.
 
What I'm asking is did anyone save the accusations from the other party.
As far as I know the only evidence that a "consent accident" ever happened is Elliot's own admission, no one has been able to find anything, despite the sheer number of autistic manhours spent investigating this creep. If he had simply said nothing, no one ever would have known. How curious!
 
As far as I know the only evidence that a "consent accident" ever happened is Elliot's own admission, no one has been able to find anything, despite the sheer number of autistic manhours spent investigating this creep. If he had simply said nothing, no one ever would have known. How curious!
Story of Brickface’s life. He wouldn’t even be on the kiwi radar if he had personally set out to make himself a target by trying to destroy this website.
 
Why is it always the Software engineers in the Bay Area that end up being troons?
  1. Same reason clownfish turn female when finding themselves in a male-only school.
  2. Only bullshit astronomical salary can give one
All we know for sure is that Liz Fong-Jones was credibly accused of sexual assault.
Fair, thanks. Sorry for being autistic about it, I just strongly feel that ill-supported crowdsourced rape accusations are cancer whether it's against a vidya developer on blue bird site or troon developer on green bird site.
But, the accusation was so credible that Liz felt the need to address it and minimize it in public on social media. What he addresses is that he was accused of rape.
Given twitter culture of "always believe victims always ask no questions", if I were keeping that kind of company and being relatively big, I would probably do damage control even on bullshit accusations. People get cancelled by crazy stalkers in the blink of an eye nowadays. So, it's kind of a toss-up.
Sure does make him mad enough to want to take it off the internet, though.
What could "play" conceivably mean in this situation? Yahtzee?
Frankly, I don't want to speculate. From how Elliot lays it, they must've been fully clothed.
 
He doesn't have a dick. He cut it off. He even wrote lengthy diary entries about how horrible it was dilating.
I can't even imagine boring my crotch out, let alone writing about dilating it, and then telling the Internet all about it.
As far as I know the only evidence that a "consent accident" ever happened is Elliot's own admission, no one has been able to find anything, despite the sheer number of autistic manhours spent investigating this creep. If he had simply said nothing, no one ever would have known. How curious!
He should have just called bullshit instead of creating a tale not even the worst people on fanfiction.net will write.
 
This accusation has been impossible to find because Liz is litigious and has obliterated this person's account from the Internet.
If I had somebody accusing me of rape because I had dog hair on my clothes I would want to give them the biggest, loudest platform imaginable, because the best possible way to clear myself of the accusation is to just let them tell the story.
 
If I had somebody accusing me of rape because I had dog hair on my clothes I would want to give them the biggest, loudest platform imaginable, because the best possible way to clear myself of the accusation is to just let them tell the story.
Yeah, precisely. If you're trying to delete someone's account of events and only allow your own to exist, you're probably a fucking liar.
 
If I had somebody accusing me of rape because I had dog hair on my clothes I would want to give them the biggest, loudest platform imaginable, because the best possible way to clear myself of the accusation is to just let them tell the story.
When you're right, you're right.
 
Yeah, precisely. If you're trying to delete someone's account of events and only allow your own to exist, you're probably a fucking liar.
That aside, imagine the e-clout you could farm by having an obviously deranged person following you around accusing you of dog hair rape. Even the hard-left uwu snowflake crowd aren't going to that that retard shit seriously ; you'd be a victim of callout culture to literally everyone from both sides of the aisle. You could even get in the news as a quirky human interest story. You could get the sickest ratios by clowning on them with dog puns. It would be amazing.

Why on earth would you possibly ever want to cover that up unless you actually just raped them in a normal and depressingly non-whimsical way?
 
Honestly, I think it was straight up, proper rape and the dog hair thing was just something Elliot made up to frame the victim up as more mentally ill than him.

How the fuck someone would notice dog hair on someone else's clothing while being fucked in the ass? Think logically. If you're being fucked in the ass (I presume that), you can't notice shit, apart from the dick in your ass.

The victim should speak up (if it's able to) and tell the truth.
His excuse of it being a "Consent Accident" sounds like the most cringe, faggoty and outright asinine thing I've ever heard. Even playing devils advocate for this ugly bastard is difficult because of the sheer stupidity of his statement and how lousy of the defense it is. The only way this could be called a "consent accident" is if both parties were blackout drunk and fucked each other silly and that is stretching it to the limit. There are numerous factors that would disprove it otherwise such as body language showing discomfort, struggle and clearly telling dong-gone that the person he raped didn't want him near them at all. Using that term makes it pretty clear that He didn't give a damn about the person he wanted to violate and then said it was an accident in lieu with the "I was just pretending to be retarded" meme of stupid and denial.

I don't know what exasperates me most, the crime or the stupidity of the alibi. Because either way, he just confessed to rape.
 
Back