Business Target holds 'emergency' meeting over LGBTQ merchandise in some stores to avoid ‘Bud Light situation’ - Some southern locations move Pride displays, apparel away from storefronts


Some southern Target stores were forced by the corporation to move LGBTQ Pride merchandise away from the front of their locations after customer "outrage" to avoid a "Bud Light situation." Many Target locations across the country feature massive June Pride month displays on an annual basis, with items this year ranging from "tuck friendly" bathing suits for transgender people to mugs that say "gender fluid." But the retail juggernaut has been criticized by some conservatives for the displays, with children’s items particularly irking many customers. A Target insider told Fox News Digital that many locations, mostly in rural areas of the south, have relocated Pride sections to avoid the kind of backlash Bud Light has received in recent weeks after using a transgender influencer in a promotional campaign.

A Target insider said there were "emergency" calls on Friday and some managers and district senior directors were told to tamp down the Pride sections immediately. "We were given 36 hours, told to take all of our Pride stuff, the entire section, and move it into a section that’s a third the size. From the front of the store to the back of the store, you can’t have anything on mannequins and no large signage," the Target insider said. "We call our customers ‘guests,’ there is outrage on their part. This year it is just exponentially more than any other year," the Target insider continued. "I think given the current situation with Bud Light, the company is terrified of a Bud Light situation." The insider, who has worked at the retailer for almost two decades, said Target rarely makes such hasty decisions. They said Friday’s call began with roughly 10 minutes on "how to deal with team member safety" because of the amount of backlash the Pride merchandise has generated, noting that Target Asset Protect & Corporate Security teams were present on the call.

"The call was super quick, it was 15 minutes. The first 10 minutes was about how to keep your team safe and not having to advocate for Target. The last five was, ‘Move this to the back, take down the mannequins and remove the signage,’" the insider said, noting that bathing suits have replaced Pride merchandise in front-of-store displays despite Pride month not even starting until June 1. "It’s all under the guise of trying to increase swim sales," the insider said. "Everyone was like, ‘Thank God,’ because we’re all on the front lines dealing with it." Target did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Fox News Digital has confirmed rural Target stores in South Carolina, Arkansas and Georgia are among the locations to move the Pride sections. Most rank-and-file employees were left in the dark, with many not knowing the Pride sections would be moved until they noticed it themselves. Pride merchandise remains prominently displayed at other locations and on the Target website. Target Pride merchandise includes female-style swimsuits that can be used to "tuck" male genitalia. Some products are also labeled as "Thoughtfully fit on multiple body types and gender expressions." Pride merchandise also includes onesies and rompers for newborn babies, a variety of adult clothing with slogans such as "Super Queer," party supplies, home décor, multiple books and a "Grow At Your Own Pace" saucer planter.

Bud Light sales have plummeted since backlash to the infamous partnership with transgender activist Dylan Mulvaney continues to haunt the company more than a month since it came to light. The issue began when Mulvaney publicized that the beer company sent packs of Bud Light featuring the influencer’s face as a way to celebrate a full year of "girlhood." Mulvaney is one of many social media influencers Bud Light has tapped to promote the brand. Mulvaney said the cans were her "most prized possession" on Instagram with a post that featured "#budlightpartner." A video then featured Mulvaney in a bathtub drinking a Bud Light beer as part of the campaign. Some consumers mistakenly thought the cans with Mulvaney's face were being sold to the public. "Bud Light learned an important lesson about wading into the culture wars recently. But partnering with Dylan Mulvaney is nothing compared to what Target is doing," conservative pundit and author Bethany Mandel tweeted.
___________________________________________________
A company....actually kinda reading the room for once?! Consider me shocked.
 
Target (pronounced tar-ZHEA) has been the Walmart for affluent white women for decades. It’s not a surprise they went all in on virtue signaling because that’s what their customer base demands of them. It’s not a surprise that this led them to make a bunch of mistakes trying to virtue signal because it will never be enough for their customer base. It’s also not a surprise they are based in the Minneapolis area, ground zero for globohomo virtue signaling.
 
has target not always been slowly swirling the drain? any time i've been in one half the shelves are empty, they all have this weird unnatrual smell like mold made from plastic, there are like three people working there, and i haven't seen those huge cups with the dividers for three seperate drinks since i was a small shitty kid.
I think they have. I'm trying to pinpoint a dropoff point but I really can't. I remember Target being pretty great up through the 2000s, and then just kind of gradually dropping off in the 2010s. It is now 2023 and they have decent deals on cat litter occasionally and that's about all I've bought from there over the past few years. The place just feels weird. The nicest part of the store is now the considerably big makeup department that's apparently more or less an open-air Sephora within the store, while the electronics department is just a scattered mess now. Aisles feel narrower, prices are higher, the clothing doesn't seem as high quality, and lots of shelves look perpetually picked over.

Walmart is pretty much the same ol' shithole its always been. Here's how it looked 18 years ago:

My experience with the Walmarts and Targets in my area is the people shopping at Target are less disgusting, but somehow the products and shelves and everything at Target looks lower quality. Maybe it's the store lighting, it's much harsher at the Targets for some reason
My area:

Target: whites and aznz
Walmart: whites and also blacks
Costco:
1684950754841.png
 
Last edited:
everyone saying this is the worst it's going to get, everthing is finally going back to normal, corps are done with fag/tranny shit is delusional. it's not going to stop, it shows zero signs of stopping, this is not even a setback. fag month this year is going to be even louder and in-your-face than last year, which it has been doing for the past decade. corps know there was a point where they should've stopped and they've clearly passed it, but as long as BlackRock keeps subsidizing faggotry they'll keep going and see what happens.
 
Target fucked up their foreign launch so badly with uncompetitive pricing and inventory issues that they tucked tail and retreated back across the border within a year.
I was around for that. My local Targets were always lacking I felt. The stores themselves weren't the cleanest, the displays were always a mess if they weren't empty, and there never seemed to be enough registers open. Maybe those were just problems with those local stores, but they were overpriced, and their stuff was lesser quality than even Walmart. Moreover, Targets were usually super close to other big box stores that either had more selection, better prices or both.
 
The right launches a guerrilla war on Pride
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Phillip Bump
2023-05-24 16:20:46GMT

From Bud Light’s standpoint, the move was clever, if not somewhat optimistic. It customized cans of beer depicting influencer Dylan Mulvaney and sent them along, an eye on expanding its appeal to a new demographic in the face of declining sales.

What happened next is called “context collapse.” The beer manufacturer was targeting Mulvaney’s not-small audience, an audience that was interested in the story of her emergence as a trans woman. But the video Mulvaney made hyping the beer was plucked out of the context of that audience and shared widely by prominent voices on the political right. A narrow effort to engage Mulvaney’s audience — like Bud Light’s similar “Brewed in Texas” campaign — was presented as though Bud Light was deeply or primarily focused on shifting its brand to focus on transgender people. A firestorm resulted. Bud Light publicly apologized.

What happened with Target is different. This week, the retailer announced that it was “making adjustments to our plans” for marketing products centered on Pride Month, “including removing items that have been at the center of the most significant confrontational behavior.”

“Confrontational behavior” is a relatively gentle framing for the company’s concern that anti-LGBTQ activists who opposed Target’s Pride displays were (according to the company) threatening store staff. There’s no reason to think that such threats are exaggerated, given the escalation of anti-LGBTQ rhetoric over the past 24 months. A movement that appeals to the Proud Boys, a far-right group with a history of violence, is one that carries with it some inherent danger.

Again, though, this isn’t exactly what Bud Light experienced. Bud Light was trying to expand its audience. Target was trying to engage its existing one. Pride Month has been a part of American capitalism for years now, one that’s been viewed as cynical by many LGBTQ Americans. There was little reason, then, for Target to think that its 2023 Pride displays would invoke a sharper, more aggressive backlash than its 2022 or 2021 ones.

But 2023 is, in fact, different.

For one thing, the LGBTQ community — and, in particular, the “T” in that abbreviation — has become a political target on the right. This is not entirely organic; the New York Times reported in April that message-testing determined that isolating transgender Americans might be an effective political wedge for the right.

For another thing, the tactics that emerged online a decade ago as part of what came to be known as “GamerGate” have become pervasive in political attacks. Social media accounts such as Libs of TikTok or Gays Against Groomers — which contributed to the focus on Target — have generated audiences by plucking LGBTQ-related content and outreach from their intended context and presenting them to the political right as targets. Sometimes, the attacks extend offline. The big accounts inspire smaller efforts, with people jockeying for online attention by directing their ire in the same direction.

Online actors are heavily influential in right-wing and Republican politics. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), who is expected to announce his candidacy for president Wednesday, has expended an enormous amount of political energy in the past year targeting LGBTQ identity in his state. It’s generated a lot of approval from prominent right-wing voices, something he clearly sees as valuable for the 2024 nominating process despite the outcry. Or, perhaps, because of the outcry.

Matt Walsh, a right-wing, anti-trans commentator whose attacks on Target have included false claims about the products that the retailer was selling, outlined his desired outcome Wednesday morning on Twitter.

“The goal is to make ‘pride’ toxic for brands,” he wrote. “If they decide to shove this garbage in our face, they should know that they’ll pay a price. It won’t be worth whatever they think they’ll gain. First Bud Light and now Target. Our campaign is making progress. Let’s keep it going.”

The progression there is unintentionally revealing, since it elevates the difference between what the beer brand and the retailer were doing.

One out of every 14 adults in the country identifies as LGBTQ. By having a display of Pride-themed products, Target is trying to wring cash out of that market. We’re asked to believe that Target’s displays of rainbow flip-flops or T-shirts with messages of support for trans people are somehow influencing kids — it’s always framed as being about kids — to embrace an LGBTQ identity. It’s as silly as suggesting that Target having a display of NASCAR-themed shirts is getting kids to drive at excess speeds; the obvious intent is to appeal to an existing audience, not create a new one.

Right-wing voices have suggested that businesses engage in this sort of outreach because they’re being graded on how “woke” they are by nonprofits. This patently ridiculous idea is more palatable to them than the reality: There’s a market for Pride gear — and far more Americans support businesses welcoming LGBTQ customers than oppose the idea.

Polling shows that businesses, even small ones, see value in reaching out to the LGBTQ community. Employees are more likely to want to work for companies that support LGBTQ people. While a plurality of Americans indicated in polling released last year that a company’s support for LGBTQ customers didn’t influence their decision to give the company their patronage, more than a third said that LGBTQ support increased the likelihood they’d buy from that brand. By contrast, less than a fifth said it decreased the likelihood.

That’s the irony here. The attacks on Pride are often framed as efforts to curtail the small LGBTQ community from forcing its worldview upon others. But those attacks themselves fit that description: a subset of right-wing voices finding community and influence online seeking to force Target and other brands to adhere to their boundaries of acceptability.

For Target, the decision isn’t easy. There’s no question that their staff are, in fact, being put in situations that are at a minimum uncomfortable. Acquiescing to the pressure, though, increases the likelihood that pressure will be applied by small groups in similar ways in the future.

Former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley, herself a candidate for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, was in New Hampshire on Wednesday, where she sought to toss some red meat to the Republican audience.

“Everybody know about Dylan Mulvaney? Bud Light?” she said, according to reporter David Weigel. “That is a guy, dressed as a girl, making fun of women.”

This would have played well on right-wing social media, no doubt. But in the room she got nothing but crickets. This is not an animating fight for all Republicans, much less most Americans.
 
everyone saying this is the worst it's going to get, everthing is finally going back to normal, corps are done with fag/tranny shit is delusional. it's not going to stop, it shows zero signs of stopping, this is not even a setback. fag month this year is going to be even louder and in-your-face than last year, which it has been doing for the past decade. corps know there was a point where they should've stopped and they've clearly passed it, but as long as BlackRock keeps subsidizing faggotry they'll keep going and see what happens.
Expect the ESG money is all gone now and Blackrocks stock are half of what it was in 2021. Then on top of that several states are now divesting from Blackrock and you have Larry Fink selling billions in stock and wanting to retire.

This bullshit is all a distraction to hide how fucked the US economy really is.
 
Bud Light publicly apologized.
No, they didn't.

That wasn't an apology.

That was a "sorry we got caught, but will you inbred hicks go back to buying our shitty beer and shut the fuck up already? Just give us your money!"

the tactics that emerged online a decade ago as part of what came to be known as “GamerGate” have become pervasive in political attacks. S
HOLY SHIT, LET IT GO!

Social media accounts such as Libs of TikTok or Gays Against Groomers — which contributed to the focus on Target — have generated audiences by plucking LGBTQ-related content and outreach from their intended context and presenting them to the political right as targets.
By "intended context" you mean "Letting everyone see exactly what they are saying"

We’re asked to believe that Target’s displays of rainbow flip-flops or T-shirts with messages of support for trans people are somehow influencing kids — it’s always framed as being about kids — to embrace an LGBTQ identity. It’s as silly as suggesting that Target having a display of NASCAR-themed shirts is getting kids to drive at excess speeds; the obvious intent is to appeal to an existing audience, not create a new one.
A NASCAR shirt is not the same as skimpy clothing with "CUM DUMPSTER" written on it that's intended for grade schoolers, you fucking cockroach.

Right-wing voices have suggested that businesses engage in this sort of outreach because they’re being graded on how “woke” they are by nonprofits. This patently ridiculous idea is more palatable to them than the reality:
DOn't believe your lying eyes. ESG scores aren't real.
there’s a market for Pride gear — and far more Americans support businesses welcoming LGBTQ customers than oppose the idea.
Citation fucking needed.

And it isn't opposing the idea of LGBT, it's opposing selling children sexualized bullshit.

The attacks on Pride are often framed as efforts to curtail the small LGBTQ community from forcing its worldview upon others. But those attacks themselves fit that description: a subset of right-wing voices finding community and influence online seeking to force Target and other brands to adhere to their boundaries of acceptability.
How dare you not want LGBT to force everyone to fly gay pride flags, allow their kids to be molested, and not suck the girlcock!

The Right wanting their children left alone is forcing others to accept their boundaries.

YES, YOU FAGGOT!

We want you to accept our boundaries and stop pushing at OUR boundaries.

For fuck's sake, no means no, you rapey pedo faggots.
 
There are only 3 things that should be on baby clothes:

Pictures of baby elephants
Pictures of puppies
Pictures of kittens

That's it.
I had one with an igloo for some reason, I think those are safe too.

It's QAnon's doing!!!!!
target2.png
Those people are fucking retarded. I'm not religious, I wholeheartedly denounce girldick because it's usually attached to a violent, psychotic pervert.
 
Making flags seems to be a very Tumblr-tier activity, so there are hundreds of flags but they're all for their bullshit idpol genders/sexualities. There's probably fetish flags in there, I haven't checked, but really what you want only comes out when the gays are involved, like the old hanky code.

Sounds like a sewing project would be in your future...
What's really horrifying though is that none of these people are actual vexillographers in that they've studied what goes into flags and symbols so it all comes out a horrid mess like the updated pride flag with the tranny cock shoving its way in there. People who actually did study this stuff were horrified at Sweden removing the giant erect lion dick from their symbols because surprise, a giant raging boner suggests masculinity, virility, courage, and dominance, which is why way back when people who were convicted of treason were given a dickless coat of arms to represent their faggotry.
 
Bud Light was a perfect storm of the campaign and the market it was being advertised to. I doubt you'd get the same kind of boycott at Target because it's Walmart for left-leaning women who think they're too sophisticated for Walmart.
Target fills me with dread because it'd be absolutely silent if not for the sounds of a couple screaming children from across the store. Not a single piece of fresh food on any of the aisles, it's all marked up slop, half of it vegan substitutes like "Cheeze" and "Krab Stix". Not a single thing for home/auto repair or outdoor activity other than light gardening and a token swimsuit section where half of the products are gay like the article mentions. It feels incredibly sterile and dead, and it clashes with all the chipper built to last for a week consumer shit they're trying to sell. Anyone who can tolerate that environment has to be soulless yuppie.
That's been my experience also. You usually get a Dollar General and a Walmart that's a long, boring drive to get to.
Don't forget about good ol' Foodland.
 
Last edited:
Back