What should the age of consent be? - Government sex license at what age

[Kill a Troon for Pikamee]

Big thank you to the other guy who voted for I'm libertarian No age of consent. Together we are the voice of reason (age of consent for homosexuals should still be 99 years old btw)

 

[Spud]

Big thank you to the other guy who voted for I'm libertarian No age of consent. Together we are the voice of reason

This is why no one takes you people seriously. Yes you, as in the royal you.

 

[Balalaika Z Bree]

Big thank you to the other guy who voted for I'm libertarian No age of consent. Together we are the voice of reason (age of consent for homosexuals should still be 99 years old btw)

Having an age of consent is perfectly reasonable, even if the age limit is chosen arbitrarily.

How can people in their right mind consent to this?

 

[Kill a Troon for Pikamee]

Having an age of consent is perfectly reasonable, even if the age limit is chosen arbitrarily.

How can people in their right mind consent to this?

Age of consent for homosexuals: 99 with death penalty for transgressing it
Age of consent for heterosexuals: as in the Bible - as long as it's one of your wives it's okay

 

[Godlike]

I agree with a poster earlier in this thread that sex outside of marriage should be illegal and that under 18, the marriage should be determined by the parents. However, I don't care about any age gap if both partners have developed enough physically. Tell me what is wrong with a 22 year old wifing up a 14 year old.

Also, it goes without saying that all homosexual sex should also be illegal and that any "age of consent" for that is meaningless at that point.

 

[Balalaika Z Bree]

Age of consent for homosexuals: 99 with death penalty for transgressing it
Age of consent for heterosexuals: as in the Bible - as long as it's one of your wives it's okay

I don't think the law should ever condone such acts, even for people who are 999 years old. I think the death penalty should be reserved for murder, rape, child abuse etc. That means you must set an age (I would suggest 18 ) at which you stop executing groomers. I would suggest treating homosexual behavior as sin and mental illness.

There is no age of consent concept explicitly set in the Bible. Polygamy, like divorce is prohibited by the Church who recognized and preserved the Bible text. It is not OK to marry somebody who cannot understand what marriage is, what the vows mean.

I agree with a poster earlier in this thread that sex outside of marriage should be illegal and that under 18, the marriage should be determined by the parents. However, I don't care about any age gap if both partners have developed enough physically. Tell me what is wrong with a 22 year old wifing up a 14 year old.

I think 14 is very young to claim a boy or girl is developed enough to be a parent, not physically, and certainly not emotionally and spiritually.
Sex outside of marriage ought to be illegal, but not so as to glamorize or encourage it, it ought to be clearly associated with shameful behavior like prostitution and pimping. I would suggest three categories of crime:
Rape - death sentence.
Prostitution/Pimping - prison with hard labor.
Fornication - fines or prison with hard labor for repeat offenders.

 

[Godlike]

I don't think the law should ever condone such acts, even for people who are 999 years old. I think the death penalty should be reserved for murder, rape, child abuse etc. That means you must set an age (I would suggest 18 ) at which you stop executing groomers. I would suggest treating homosexual behavior as sin and mental illness.

There is no age of consent concept explicitly set in the Bible. Polygamy, like divorce is prohibited by the Church who recognized and preserved the Bible text. It is not OK to marry somebody who cannot understand what marriage is, what the vows mean.


I think 14 is very young to claim a boy or girl is developed enough to be a parent, not physically, and certainly not emotionally and spiritually.
Sex outside of marriage ought to be illegal, but not so as to glamorize or encourage it, it ought to be clearly associated with shameful behavior like prostitution and pimping. I would suggest three categories of crime:
Rape - death sentence.
Prostitution/Pimping - prison with hard labor.
Fornication - fines or prison with hard labor for repeat offenders.

Homosexual rape should warrant the death penalty. Heterosexual should be 5 years in prison. As for the age thing, it depends. I was just citing 14 as an example (there are some 14 year olds who are qualified).

 

[Balalaika Z Bree]

Homosexual rape should warrant the death penalty. Heterosexual should be 5 years in prison. As for the age thing, it depends. I was just citing 14 as an example (there are some 14 year olds who are qualified).

I think 5 years in prison for rape is a joke. The rape victim has a life sentence, the rapist could commit a dozen rapes in their life, serving a sentence for each before committing the next.

There are no 14 year old children that are "qualified" to be a parent, it's certainly not a safe bet they're physically ready and it's a very safe bet they have a lot of mental development left before they'd be remotely "qualified" to be a good father or mother. The kind of development that takes a few years.

 

[AgendaPoster]

Everyone that's obsessing over the age of consent laws just wants to fuck people that cannot legally consent. In the case of the OP, I assume it's loliconia, a well documented form of degeneracy.

 

[Godlike]

I think 5 years in prison for rape is a joke. The rape victim has a life sentence, the rapist could commit a dozen rapes in their life, serving a sentence for each before committing the next.

There are no 14 year old children that are "qualified" to be a parent, it's certainly not a safe bet they're physically ready and it's a very safe bet they have a lot of mental development left before they'd be remotely "qualified" to be a good father or mother. The kind of development that takes a few years.

Most women won't tell you this but they have fantasies of that happening, that is why I don't believe it is as mentally damaging as a homosexual one. Yes, there are many different kinds of rapes, so 5 years covering all heteosexual occurances ain't it. Spousal "rape" shouldn't warrant any time, a random 2 person event should mean several years. Actually participating in gang rape should require much more serious time. Rape using an object other than genitalia, or through a hole other than the vagina, should also mean much more than 5 years.

I wouldn't say that for all 14 year olds. I agree it's not a safe bet, but that is why it should be left up to the parents.

 

[Balalaika Z Bree]

Most women won't tell you this but they have fantasies of that happening, that is why I don't believe it is as mentally damaging as a homosexual one. Yes, there are many different kinds of rapes, so 5 years covering all heteosexual occurances ain't it. Spousal "rape" shouldn't warrant any time, a random 2 person event should mean several years. Actually participating in gang rape should require much more serious time. Rape using an object other than genitalia, or through a hole other than the vagina, should also mean much more than 5 years.

I wouldn't say that for all 14 year olds. I agree it's not a safe bet, but that is why it should be left up to the parents.

Adults and children have fantasies of many things, like flying, being emperor, or being intimate with someone or something real or imagined. I wouldn't trust that to inform me on the harms of different kinds of child abuse, adult rape or much else to be honest.

I definitely think a court should not be obliged to give a death sentence for all sexual assaults or acts that might be considered rape by some definitions. I would suggest 5 years for threatening to rape someone while mugging them, on top of say 20 years for the mugging.

I disagree parents can be the arbiters of when a child is truly ready, some might believe a 12, 13 or 14 year old is ready. We don't have to look to the distant past to see parents sending boys off to be soldiers and marrying off children, particularly girls, when they are only half grown. Child soldiers and child marriages are evil. Jesus warned us to not mislead the young and vulnerable:
Matthew 18:6 but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened round his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.

 

[Agamemnon Busmalis]

Everyone that's obsessing over the age of consent laws just wants to fuck people that cannot legally consent. In the case of the OP, I assume it's loliconia, a well documented form of degeneracy.

There is no reason to argue about the age of consent unless you're an adult who wants to molest children.

Laws already exist to protect consensual relationships within a close age range around legal adulthood, so that's a moot point. You're not going to prison because you 're 18 and your girlfriend's still 17.

 

[Hitman One]

16 but there should be laws against people in positions of power or influence like teachers boning 16 year olds.

 

[New Bromantics]

If you thought adult women were whacky you haven't seen shit till you mess with an underage girl.

Are you speaking from experience?

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

I think it should be more the age gap than the actual flat age.

But I put >21 because if we have to settle on a cold hard number, then might as well make it 21 or older to make the "ephebiophiles" or whatever cope seethe and diltate.

 

[Soggy paper straw]

acts that might be considered rape by some definitions

Errrr, what does this mean? Rape tends to be defined in law, and I doubt judges get their definitions from their local community college's gender studies department

Spousal "rape" shouldn't warrant any time

If a man "has sex" with his wife who has severe dementia, is that rape? If she in coma? These would not be she said/he said scenarios

Tell me what is wrong with a 22 year old wifing up a 14 year old.

If you need to ask -

 

[Agamemnon Busmalis]

If you need to ask -

Sometimes this place really takes your breath away. That pedophile's rhetorical question was one of those times. He also incidentally admitted he's 22 and is perving on a 14 year old girl, lol.

Or boy, he did seem to be compensating a lot with the spousal rape bit.

But I put >21 because if we have to settle on a cold hard number, then might as well make it 21 or older to make the "ephebiophiles" or whatever cope seethe and diltate.

It should be 28 years old, but only after 10 years of military service in the legions.

 

[CuzinEd]

I don't know what people are so concerned about the age of consent for anyway. No one is fucking. Well except the niggers and beaners. Usually when you hear a story like "12 year old girl is pregnant" it's beaner or nigger. Most white girls won't become sexually active till they are 13 or 14 years old. It will most likely be with whatever shitbag 17 year old they can find in their neighborhood. Most white people aren't fucking anymore. We have the declining birthrates to prove it. Millennials and Zoomers can just get used to lying about how much sex they are having like the Boomers and Gen X used to. "oh yeah man, I just fucked this really hot chick the other day". You don't have to tell people that the really hot chick was in a porn movie and by fucking you mean jerked off.

Are you speaking from experience?

No. I couldn't stand putting up with teenage girls when I was a teenager. Much less as an adult. But you can find the horror stories all over the internet from guys in their 20's that thought messing around with a 16 or 17 year old girl would be all fun and games.

 

[Male Idiot]

I got a small brain, so I'll just offer an explanation.

14 in Hungary is because gypsies will be parents at that age.

We can't raise it to something like 15 or 16, much less 18, because than we would have to jail 90% of gypsies and Eu and US would nuke us full force for being le big nazi.

Some gyppos start shitting out purdé-s at 10. They are like roaches.

A gypsy is a virgin while she is stronger than her brother, can outrun her grandpa and small enough to hide from her dad.

 

[Balalaika Z Bree]

Errrr, what does this mean?

This thread has a variety of perspectives expressed on what the law should (or shouldn't) be. I was aware the poster I was replying to held very different views on consent and the ability to give it, thus very different views on rape. I included the phrase "acts that might be considered rape by some definitions" to allow for this apparent difference while side-stepping a detailed discussion on the lines between the different categories and foul details of crimes proposed. I wanted to continue focusing on the question of maturity and consent, hoping to hammer home the point that the children being discussed could not give consent to any sexual act.

Rape tends to be defined in law, and I doubt judges get their definitions from their local community college's gender studies department

Yes, and defined sensibly in most places as far as I'm aware. The cancerous growth of gender ideology gives me doubts.