Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[mitro]

She keeps saying it hadn't be edited, but there clearly seems to be an edit 23 seconds into the clip. Then there is another obvious edit at 2:17.
I would think timeskips within the content would normally be considered editing. By my looking at it, the longest continuous content in the clip is about 114 seconds.

She edited out some of nick calling Aussie a faggot and other BS at the 23 second mark and the edit towards the end is from a litle later. Sorry, can nail down exact timestamps while out and about.

The elissa clip starts at 4:23:50 in the Rumble stream. I recommend watching that AND from 4:28:04 until the Mandy response is over, so you can seen him soliciting Jess.

The last part is here:

EDIT: couple mistakes in timestamps

 

[Cynthia Behave]

I think Elissa is just making an excuse. She bent the knee way too quickly based on what she's saying. I don't think she's Noseguarding so much as she's protecting the wahmens. It's a little disappointing and as some have pointed out leaves a lot of opening for someone to swoop in and usurp her position as the main Rekieta Clipper if she starts hiding or refusing to clip various content due to personal qualms with doing so. As I said before the best move would have been to make him DMCA/strike it and then she could remove it but use the fact that he took action on her to Streisand herself into multiplying her viewerbase. I think she's smart enough to realize that, so there's probably an alternative motive at play.

I'm actually not interested in fighting with you or anyone else who are "on the same side" .... the 3D chess on identities is just stupid.

Here's the issue: Elissa is no strategist. She works 8-12 hour days stocking shelves. She lives on Michael Long's parent's property in an actual trailer.

And your comment here is exactly right. (Except it's not for Mandy. I doubt Elissa gives 0 fucks about Mandy.)

All receipts available upon request...

I've spent months telling Elissa that she survives by Nick's grace. She does not transform her clips and she's gathered an increasingly rabid group of dissenters in her community for which, we all know, he reads constantly. Meanwhile, she's unmonetized. (That's very odd considering 1) her views and 2) Nick's partner woman at YT who he loves - *ahem*.)

In fairness, Elissa has financial issues (I've helped, btw). She has no computer - she does her entire channel all via her phone. Impressive, actually.

Nick's striking her would be insanity for him, right? But, atp, I wouldn't put it past him.

He's still smart, though. Instead, he's trangulating. Elissa doesn't trangulate. She's hanging with bottom feeders like Thermo, Nova (who likely did edit the reupload or Elissa did), Koolfrog, Spectre, Madcore Mofo... and sometimes Divinity Said, CatnipDave, and Tim of Tams.

Instead, she loves that she can DM with Nick. She buckled immediately to his wishes. (Also to be fair, she gets a ton of views on his Locals streams which are behind a paywall. He could cut that off without much effort, likely without a strike.)

And, yes, Faran offered to sell her monetized channel to Elissa. I was happy to front the funds - it wasn't much - with a small payback, over time, favoring Elissa bc she needs the money and is doing good work with little resources.

She ran away from that so damn fast, and burned bridges. Insanity. Even Faran detractors would be totally cool with Elissa buying a channel so she could be properly monetized for her work. Hell, when Faran was selling her channel, her detractors (THERMO!) offered to buy it.

Btw, I also took the recording of the Nick v Monty audio for which she got 6K views and fed it to her.

Elissa would have been good to keep the clip up and dare Nick to strike her. Mandy will be fine. The uproar if Nick went after Elissa would eclipse anything that happened with Divinity v Faran.

She should know who her community and friends are.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

All receipts available upon request...

I have no reason to doubt you, Cytnhia, but this is the Farms. You've been told to learn the culture. Archive everything, receipts are required. Otherwise, it's just fan fiction.

 

[Chibitzen]

The elissa clip starts at 4:23:50 in the Rumble stream. I recommend watching that AND from 4:28:04 until the Mandy response is over, so you can seen him soliciting Jess.

Damn it Elissa, for forcing us to watch Nick's content for fucking context.

The inevitable excuse that comes next: "Look, I was so trashed. I don't remember a DAMN thing!"

 

[Kopasea]

All receipts available upon request...

Share or don't share. But things said without proof on here are worth as much as Nick's balldo

 

[Not Who You Think]

She keeps saying it hadn't be edited, but there clearly seems to be an edit 23 seconds into the clip. Then there is another obvious edit at 2:17.
I would think timeskips within the content would normally be considered editing. By my looking at it, the longest continuous content in the clip is about 114 seconds.

(And for reference, I did this analysis on the Nova re-up of the clip).

Indeed, and the reasoning (however accurate) baits the implication. There is no way to believably spin it. It's as bad as it looks in Elissa's clip.

If Nick is finally done pretending he doesn't care about what people think about him, then Nick could easily decide "You mess with the Nose, you get the Balldo!" and needlessly escalate any given situation as lolcows do. Just look at Nick's dealings with Montegraph; Nick thought he was punching down for an easy win and managed to harm his reputation and drain his funds in the process.

I am not expecting that much from a relatively small clip channel belonging to someone who just clips things that are interesting to her. Elissa may have taken the video off of her Youtube channel, but she's directed interested parties to where they can find/download it.



If Elissa trying to protect anyone, she's doing a bad job. Alternatively, if Elissa looking to generate interest and have it pop-up on other small channels who are also interested in Nick, she's doing a good job.

 

[Swole McPole]

If Elissa trying to protect anyone, she's doing a bad job. Alternatively, if Elissa looking to generate interest and have it pop-up on other small channels who are also interested in Nick, she's doing a good job.

I thought Elissa has always prided herself on having a good relationship with Nick. They have each other's phone numbers, and she's acquiesed in the past when Nick has asked her to take things down.

I always had the sense that she felt she was 'allowed' to post clips because Nick wasn't objecting, and if he ever started to object, she didn't have a lot of faith in her ability to withstand any take-down demands.

Though she's sometimes critical of him in public, I always had the sense that they were still cool with each other privately.

 

[Strix454]

I went back and looked at the archived original video. It was clearly edited at the same two timestamps. If you look at Nick's original video, you can see why those edits were done.
This whole "Awe sucks I'm just a dumb girl living in a trailer park who can't edit videos or do nothin" is really wearing thin. Credibility is one of those things you can't get back once you lose it.

 

[AnOminous]

Even there, he was considered an exceptional talent. But because of the time (the 1970s), he took all those skills into stand-up comedy and started using enormous amounts of cocaine.

He had a joke about that period. Basically, I tried cocaine and it made me feel like a new man. The only problem was all the new man wanted to do was more cocaine.

 

[Skint]

In regards to that Mandy clip on Elissa's channel. It's still unlisted and had its comments purged. Caught this though:

Just for posterity.

 

[feral cat #6385]

Oh, Nick went dark a long time ago if you know what I mean. I have reason to believe that he wasn't lying when he said Drexel wasn't his wife's bull.

I'm not following. Could you please elaborate in explicit, graphic detail.

I think Elissa is just making an excuse. She bent the knee way too quickly based on what she's saying. I don't think she's Noseguarding so much as she's protecting the wahmens. It's a little disappointing and as some have pointed out leaves a lot of opening for someone to swoop in and usurp her position as the main Rekieta Clipper if she starts hiding or refusing to clip various content due to personal qualms with doing so. As I said before the best move would have been to make him DMCA/strike it and then she could remove it but use the fact that he took action on her to Streisand herself into multiplying her viewerbase. I think she's smart enough to realize that, so there's probably an alternative motive at play.

Sup with Racket's pull on slatternly women?

I'm actually not interested in fighting

You need to pontificate less and provide the receipts more. Or at all.

 

[Not Who You Think]

I thought Elissa has always prided herself on having a good relationship with Nick. They have each other's phone numbers, and she's acquiesed in the past when Nick has asked her to take things down.

I always had the sense that she felt she was 'allowed' to post clips because Nick wasn't objecting, and if he ever started to object, she didn't have a lot of faith in her ability to withstand any take-down demands.

Though she's sometimes critical of him in public, I always had the sense that they were still cool with each other privately.

Elissa seems less and less proud of her association with Nick as time wears on. There still seems to be some goodwill there (as social currency), but Nick is using it up rather than building it up. Overall, there appears to be a decline in the relationship.

If Nick treats Elissa the way he treated Null, Nick will attempt a victory lap over a perceived detractor via passive-aggressive statements and criticism when she experiences hardship.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

"You mess with the Nose, you get the Balldo!"

If only Nick was clever enough to come up with a line like that! I am literally LOL'ing.

 

[Cynthia Behave]

You need to pontificate less and provide the receipts more. Or at all.

What receipts have I ever NOT provided on any facts that matter regarding Rekieta and his fans? Ever? I've earned my credentials on providing receipts, thanks. I'm actually not about further exposing a woman who survives just above the poverty line and does the most effective mainstream criticism of Rekieta (Kiwi is not mainstream) despite her lacking any backbone with Nick on this particular matter. I will provide those receipts when/if necessary.

In regards to that Mandy clip on Elissa's channel. It's still unlisted and had its comments purged. Caught this though:

Yeaaaaah, okay. None of that makes sense. Elissa is the only one who could delete all comments. In all my years on YT - with scores of creators having issues with YT - I've never heard of all of a vid's comments being magically deleted.

 

[Spaded Dave]

I will provide those receipts when/if necessary.

Not coming from a confrontational place here, but receipts are always necessary and presumed requested. It's a bedrock principle of the Farms and that is likely why you get pushback on the topic. If you are unwilling to provide receipts for any reason that is up to you of course, but any time you find yourself typing "receipts available upon request" or something similar you should replace that sentence with said receipts.

I've never heard of all of a vid's comments being magically deleted.

It is very convenient, isn't it.

 

[Swole McPole]

What receipts have I ever NOT provided on any facts that matter regarding Rekieta and his fans? Ever? I've earned my credentials on providing receipts, thanks.

Cynthia, nobody's interested in your providing documentation on Elissa's income levels or the double wide trailer she occupies. What people are saying is that you need to separate opinion from statements of fact, and where you do provide statements of fact, you need to provide documentation before they'll be taken seriously.

That doesn't just apply to you -- it applies to anyone who posts here. But as far as I can tell, your only secure credentials here are related to your ability to stir up drama that doesn't actually concern you, and insert yourself into the middle of it.

The fastest and easiest way to change reputation is that is when you do post factual claims, just link to the archived documentation. And try and remember -- we're not here to participate in your jihad against Rekieta -- we're only here to point and laugh at the lolcows. How 'mainstream' or otherwise we might be is utterly immaterial. If you've got the evidence, then post it. If you don't, then maybe STFU and lurk more.

Edit: Ah. @Spaded Dave beat me to it -- and was nicer about it.

 

[200MB]

In regards to that Mandy clip on Elissa's channel. It's still unlisted and had its comments purged. Caught this though:
View attachment 5144309
Just for posterity.

@Pippa's Greasy KB did archive the Youtube page (onion), but I'm not sure the archive got all the comments (doesn't look anywhere near 298 comments to me at least) and you can't access replies. There's a decent chunk there though.

 

[Cynthia Behave]

Cynthia, nobody's interested in your providing documentation on Elissa's income levels or the double wide trailer she occupies. What people are saying is that you need to separate opinion from statements of fact, and where you do provide statements of fact, you need to provide documentation before they'll be taken seriously.

That doesn't just apply to you -- it applies to anyone who posts here. But as far as I can tell, your only secure credentials here are related to your ability to stir up drama that doesn't actually concern you, and insert yourself into the middle of it.

The fastest and easiest way to change reputation is that is when you do post factual claims, just link to the archived documentation. And try and remember -- we're not here to participate in your jihad against Rekieta -- we're only here to point and laugh at the lolcows. How 'mainstream' or otherwise we might be is utterly immaterial. If you've got the evidence, then post it. If you don't, then maybe STFU and lurk more.

Edit: Ah. @Spaded Dave beat me to it -- and was nicer about it.

Sweets, this platform's regular jihad is WAY more vitriolic than mine has ever been.

I don't happen to think Nick's ever engaged in swinging - that's alleged daily here without receipts, nor does anyone demand them. Nor is it stated for humor atp. It's all just boring wallpaper Kiwi-blather assumptions.

Ditto for Kayla wanting a divorce. Ditto for Kayla being bi-sexual. Ditto for Nick being some version of gay or bi. Ditto for their church kicking them out. Ditto for some homeschooling family leaving the co-op due to his antics.

As for facts about his fandom - and anything I have on him - I've always provided receipts.

I don't need to be educated by you. I watch the speculation, rumors, and vitriol fly here - without any receipts, nor are they demanded - on the daily. About all sorts of things - even away from Rekieta.

The facts: Elissa has always tried to play both sides and it's getting more and more difficult for her.

Edit: I could go on. Not ONE single receipt about Kayla's or Nick's cosmetic procedures despite Himedall following his flippin' car around. Not one single receipt about Kayla being on any serious drugs (has she even done Molly with Nick?). And, since TIC has left, the only real humor here is @AnOminous one-off commentary and @Himedall All-seeing Waifu logging of Locals (they're always unintentionally funny). It's not exactly a thread of hilarious commentary.

 

[Spaded Dave]

There's more that goes into these but I'll give you the gist of each.

I don't happen to think Nick's ever engaged in swinging - that's alleged daily here without receipts, nor does anyone demand them.

Ditto for Kayla wanting a divorce.

Perhaps we just assume any self-respecting woman would want a divorce in this situation and are giving her too much credit?

Ditto for Kayla being bi-sexual.

"Lady Rackets would ABSOLUTELY FAWN over Mandy"

Ditto for Nick being some version of gay or bi.

*literally drinks a viscous white fluid shirtless with a redneck faggot on stream*

Ditto for their church kicking them out.

That speculation was fueled by their sudden lack of conversation about church as well as attendance of said church.

Ditto for some homeschooling family leaving the co-op due to his antics.

That speculation was fueled by the sudden lack of conversation about the homeschooling/co-op activities.

I don't need to be educated by you.

Well you certainly need to be educated by someone because you're pretty fucking retarded. I'm going to sign off on that prescription for "Lurk Moar" and you can have it filled at any pharmacy without free WiFi.

 

[Strix454]

Ok.

So what we know now is that Elissa privated the video and lied about the reasons for doing it. She claimed that there were no edits in the video and there clearly were edits in the video.

She initially made the video private on youtube. Then she purged all the comments from the video, Then she made it public again, but switched it to unlisted. Presumably so that others could review it to make sure it was ok.

And wouldn't you know it, just by chance when its made public CGoody just happens to show up in the new comments to take a victory lap.

After this, I would not believe one word that Elissa says about anything. This isn't a person who is conflicted. This is a person who is a liar and is lying aggressively to cover something up.

t's all just boring wallpaper Kiwi-blather assumptions.

"STOP TALKING ABOUT MY CLOSE PERSONAL FRIEND ELISSA. THIS LOOKS SO BAD....MAYBE IF I CAN JUST FORCE THEM TO TALK ABOUT SOMETHING ELSE. ANYTHING ELSE. I'VE BEEN DEFENDING HER ALL DAY LONG AND NOW I LOOK LIKE A LIAR TOO"

Its funny how your close relationship with Elissa has suddenly changed now that questions are being asked that neither of you are going to answer.

(and apologies for the double post)