Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.9%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 607 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,594
I'll admit I'm actually a little surprised they'd go after someone for a thousand bucks. Mostly because it's not a very big amount compared to the cost of collecting it through the courts, but also because they should already know there's practically zero chance of ever collecting a judgment since they know the kind of people they're lending to. If you're using a payday loan shop in the first place, there's no blood left inside you to squeeze.

I'd always just assumed they ate those defaults and adjusted their rates accordingly, letting the victims who do make their payments subsidize the deadbeats who don't.
The law firms who prosecute these line them up like an assembly line. The complaints are identical except for dates and amounts. They call the courts and arrange to get a bunch of them scheduled the same date and time so they can send just one junior associate to rip through twenty or so defaults. If a defendant tries to defend, the defense is usually not good, but to save time and effort, they tend to settle them as a cost of doing business.

Since they have a paycheck, they know where to garnish wages. It's just a matter of having a secretary fill out some forms and send them off. Maybe a lawyer will look at them, maybe not.

It's a volume business.
 
The law firms who prosecute these line them up like an assembly line. The complaints are identical except for dates and amounts. They call the courts and arrange to get a bunch of them scheduled the same date and time so they can send just one junior associate to rip through twenty or so defaults.
I figured this would be the case. Keep using the same template, only with new defendant details. Heck, for all we know it could be a fully automated process where the payday lender exports data and sends it to the law firm and a paralegal performs a mail merge. Between running the merge and double checking the docs, this might only take 5 minutes per filing.

I wouldn't be surprised if lawyer only charged their payday lender clients $100-$200 for each filing, as it's money for jam. They may even be on a flat rate/retainer sort of deal.

If/when the debtor doesn't pay up, the law firm can extract more costs from the debtor, and would probably charge full freight rather than giving the bulk discount a frequent flyer payday lender most likely gets.

Someone like @AnOminous or @Useful_Mistake would have a better idea of whether my speculation is on the right track.
If a defendant tries to defend, the defense is usually not good, but to save time and effort, they tend to settle them as a cost of doing business.
I have mixed feelings about this. On one hand I'm looking forward to another lolsuit. On the other hand, the gloating from Russhole on FB once he claims he beat the system would be hilarious.

Ah well, at least we have the Sybil Stallone lolsuit to look forward to.
 
He was apparently approved for at least one, because he's being sued over it.
I wouldn't be surprised if lawyer only charged their payday lender clients $100-$200 each, as it's money for jam. If/when the debtor doesn't pay up, the law firm can probably extract more costs from the debtor (and would probably charge full freight rather than giving the bulk discount a frequent flyer payday lender most likely gets).
That's probably about right, and they may even have a captive firm that more or less acts as in-house counsel and just cranks out these cookie-cutter lawsuits by the hundreds or even thousands, or fairly often just use actual in-house counsel who get salary and then just have to do whatever they're told (on occasion it is useful to have the litigators be at least nominally separate for reasons I won't go into). As @talk talk talk pointed out, they try to make this process as smooth as possible so as not to annoy the courts and just schedule a bunch of these things on a single day since most of them are as simple as just proving up the debt and going straight to collection.
 
Last edited:
He was apparently approved for at least one, because he's being sued over it.
Looks like a different lender (Cash Kingdom). I'm picturing Russhole going to a second payday lender to pay out the first payday loan, with Cash Kingdom knocking him back because even payday lenders have standards.
 
It's what's called a rebuttable presumption. If you hit a car from behind, the burden of proof is on you to prove it wasn't, and if you don't, you're assumed to be at fault. Failure to obey a yield sign can (depending on the circumstances) make it the fault of the other driver, as can deliberately causing an accident by brake-checking someone.

There's also something called last clear chance that sometimes comes into play, where the party who had the last clear chance to avoid the accident and didn't do so either willfully or by negligence is responsible. So for instance, you're not just entitled to deliberately crash into someone because they didn't yield, but if their failure to yield made the crash inevitable and you couldn't have avoided it, it's their fault.

I think Russ isn't showing the actual crash damage because it would show he was the one at fault, as the insurance adjuster he's seething about apparently decided.

If anyone wants to do this get an estimate and I'll throw some crypto your way to cover it if it isn't outrageous.
My brother in Christ....legal theories aside, if you talk to your insurer after an accident (especially a fairly minor one), they'll tell you that 99/100, they're going to call it that if you were behind the other car, you're deemed at fault; whoever's insurer covers that driver, they'll pay (unless you have weird cruddy insurance, I guess).
 
My brother in Christ....legal theories aside, if you talk to your insurer after an accident (especially a fairly minor one), they'll tell you that 99/100, they're going to call it that if you were behind the other car, you're deemed at fault; whoever's insurer covers that driver, they'll pay (unless you have weird cruddy insurance, I guess).
And yet somehow, in this situation, they decided Russ was at fault.
 
And yet somehow, in this situation, they decided Russ was at fault.
Lol, oops, yes, given his photo was from the rear [showing what is unclear], you may have a point.

OK, so I revert to my first position: Russ is an idiot and whatever happened and however it occurred, his dippy self was at fault. :)

And if he was behind, that puts him into the 1/100 - exceptional - category.
 
Once again..........

Screenshot_20230609-075244_Instagram.jpg

Screenshot_20230609-075231_Instagram.jpg

He updated his fb cover banner today too.
dk.jpg
 
Last edited:
He's posted this pic before, but now he's made it his cover photo.

Sounds to me like he got called out for creeping again, or got a warning for a comment he made.

View attachment 5156183

Looks like he deleted some stuff from instagram too. The car crash post was his 115th. This morning he only has 111 posts.
I don't spend time on fb, but I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that's not an actual warning. Just Russ dunking on himself thinking he's dunking on the world.
 
I don't spend time on fb, but I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that's not an actual warning. Just Russ dunking on himself thinking he's dunking on the world.
Yeah it's just some dumb meme he posts when someone blocks him, he gets a ban, someone laugh reacts, etc.

He's just never used it as his main background photo before.
 
I think he has taken lots of hits of late that he is back to victim status.
His big songs to drop are not happening, getting blocked and sounding so desperate when posting on thots, getting sued for the check payday loan fuck up, the car wreck, no ruling from his lolsuit against Null and his money problems.
His thot chasing is going nowhere and if he did drop quite a lot of cash and I believe he dropped at least 500 bucks on the Mariah song and I suspect he venmoed Sumner quite a lot more cash than normal.

The one I'm looking forward to is the Sybil lolsuit. She is a porn star and escort with some high paid lawyers by her side,
She being the queen bitch many make her to be, she will make an example of Shit Lips.
Everything he has been planning just blows up in his face.
We will see more of victim Russ a lot more.
 
When Russ got turned down for a payday loan, he complained that college kids can take out tens of thousands in student debt, but he can't borrow the same amount for his business, so I'm guessing when he did get this loan he put the $1000 towards a business license and the shitty website for the Mile High Neon/Intimate Dealings/the Lupinor.
I think his "explaining" for why he doesn't have to pay it will be attempting the asshole business tycoon move of "I invested the money in a business, but the business didn't turn a profit, so I don't have to pay it back, I'll just get a government bailout and a tax credit, and make a fortune off this bankruptcy!"
Russ'll find out he doesn't actually have the legal acumen to pull that off. I'm pretty sure you need to borrow in the company's name and then file the company for bankruptcy to pull that off, and I'm pretty sure payday loan places lend personally, not to companies.

As for the 3rd hooker suit, I guess you can say Russ has learned SOMETHING by not bragging on Facebook "Woohoo! I'm suing this lying cuntface hooker and using her money to fuck more hookers. Big thing are happening!😎" He seems to know people find him repulsive for his litigiousness and to actually know not to brag about his frivolous lawsuits against women anymore, because it'll end up on the farms and be added to the evidence against why any hooker should ever take his money. I suppose learning not to sue hookers in the first place is too much to ask.

Most importantly, does fake titty bitch who says Russell can be "defeated with a lawyer" have the money bags to hire a Nevada Skordas to rip Russell a new mouth hole in court and declare him a vexatious litigant?
 
Most importantly, does fake titty bitch who says Russell can be "defeated with a lawyer" have the money bags to hire a Nevada Skordas to rip Russell a new mouth hole in court and declare him a vexatious litigant?
Probably. She may look freakish but apparently there's a market for this bizarre sex doll larp porn. Usually porn actresses blow it on drugs but if she doesn't do drugs, that's definitely enough to sue ratmouth.
 
Back