Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

When Russ got turned down for a payday loan, he complained that college kids can take out tens of thousands in student debt, but he can't borrow the same amount for his business, so I'm guessing when he did get this loan he put the $1000 towards a business license and the shitty website for the Mile High Neon/Intimate Dealings/the Lupinor.
I think his "explaining" for why he doesn't have to pay it will be attempting the asshole business tycoon move of "I invested the money in a business, but the business didn't turn a profit, so I don't have to pay it back, I'll just get a government bailout and a tax credit, and make a fortune off this bankruptcy!"
Russ'll find out he doesn't actually have the legal acumen to pull that off. I'm pretty sure you need to borrow in the company's name and then file the company for bankruptcy to pull that off, and I'm pretty sure payday loan places lend personally, not to companies.

As for the 3rd hooker suit, I guess you can say Russ has learned SOMETHING by not bragging on Facebook "Woohoo! I'm suing this lying cuntface hooker and using her money to fuck more hookers. Big thing are happening!" He seems to know people find him repulsive for his litigiousness and to actually know not to brag about his frivolous lawsuits against women anymore, because it'll end up on the farms and be added to the evidence against why any hooker should ever take his money. I suppose learning not to sue hookers in the first place is too much to ask.

Most importantly, does fake titty bitch who says Russell can be "defeated with a lawyer" have the money bags to hire a Nevada Skordas to rip Russell a new mouth hole in court and declare him a vexatious litigant?

I thought Skordas offered to work pro bono against Russ because he took it personally.

Or am I incorrect on my Greer lore?

 

[AnOminous]

I thought Skordas offered to work pro bono against Russ because he took it personally.

Or am I incorrect on my Greer lore?

I doubt he'd work pro bono for people who could afford to pay him. He hasn't for nool, although his rates have been very reasonable, and I think he even took it for a flat fee.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

I doubt he'd work pro bono for people who could afford to pay him. He hasn't for nool, although his rates have been very reasonable, and I think he even took it for a flat fee.

Yeah, he gave a flat fee for Null (we can only speculate why), but at the end of the day, Based Skordas is a lawyer. He's got a job to do, and he'll be charging money for that job. That said, he may still hold a grudge against Russ, which is why he agreed to a flat fee (again, only Skordas and possibly Null know the reasons.)

 

[Disgruntled Pupper]

It's like Russell is a plague sent by God to teach his family, friends, and general community to curb their enabling habits, but THESE PIECES OF CRAP JUST DON'T LEARN! They coddled him and ignored his bad behavior as a kid because he had a gimp face so he grew up to be a demanding narcissist. They overly praised his mediocre piano playing and efforts in general so he decided he was owed stardom and songs were a way to be an annoying sexpest to women. They pay for a lawyer in his electronic harassment case and he decides a year later to shit all over the deal the lawyer worked out for him and whine about BIAS JUDGES!!! They drop him off in Vegas with a car (I know we don't know exactly where the car came from, but given it showed up during the ride out to Vegas with his dad and Russ had never had a car before then, I really don't think it was something Russ got for himself without some help) and he fucking rams it into a limo. It'd be very comedic, except Shit Lips is a real person actually out there inflicting chaos and negativity in other people's lives while the ones who had a hand in helping this all come about get to sit two states away and ignore the damage Russell causes.

Also lol I can't believe he was dumb enough to take out a payday loan for his cockamamie PAC/buying brothel land/mile high neon w/ limos ideas.

 

[InteracialBowelSyndrome]

These payday loan companies are extremely aggressive about pursuing debts. It's part of how they maintain their profit margin. You have to present proof you have some kind of regular income for them even to loan to you, so if you owe them a grand, they know you're good for it, are just fucking with them, and apparently Vegas even has a special procedure for them to collect swiftly and expeditiously.

Since they can garnish whatever paycheck he's getting, and getting your paycheck garnished is a good way to get fired, there's a lot of incentive for him to cough it up.

The "kind of people they're lending to" are people with a regular income, because they don't even give you a loan if you don't have one. They usually don't lend to tards and cripples because they can't actually garnish on their tard/cripple bucks.

You make a great point about Vegas having a special procedure.

Considering it's the gambling capital of the USA, I wouldn't be surprised if millions of dollars changes hands in those loan stores.

"Need more slot money? Just won big? Just lost big? Have a payday loan at 40% interest! NEXT!"

So it makes sense their recovery laws would need to be stricter then most.

We know a lot of escort sites have posters of ol Frankenface saying "Do not provide service to this man", I bet a bunch of Nevada payday loan companies have the same.

 

[SunburnNation]

I'm not an expert but I'm pretty sure if you hit a car from behind it is automatically your fault.

The only way it couldn't be is if they'd breaked for no reason(which you'd only do if you wanted to wreck your own car) or if they really did merge right in front of someone so close that there was no time to stop. But somehow I doubt that that's what really happened to the man who is literally never at fault for anything bad that happens to him, source: himself.

 

[Kosher Salt]

That said, he may still hold a grudge against Russ, which is why he agreed to a flat fee (again, only Skordas and possibly Null know the reasons.)

I mean, we can guess. Didn't he find out that Russ followed his (high school aged, IIRC) daughter's Instagram or something equivalently creepy?

The only way it couldn't be is if they'd breaked for no reason(which you'd only do if you wanted to wreck your own car)

If they did and were stupid enough to admit that the only reason they brake-checked you was to try to get you to hit them for the insurance. If they claim that they had a legitimate reason to brake so suddenly, the accident's your fault.

 

[AnOminous]

If they did and were stupid enough to admit that the only reason they brake-checked you was to try to get you to hit them for the insurance. If they claim that they had a legitimate reason to brake so suddenly, the accident's your fault.

Not necessarily. The general principle is you can't be held liable for something you couldn't have avoided. So if you were tailgating them and that's the only reason you couldn't stop in time, that definitely is your fault, as it is considered your obligation to be prepared to stop for any foreseeable event.

Sometimes an accident legitimately is either nobody's fault or equally the fault of both drivers.

The rear-end rule is just a presumption, not a conclusion that can't be rebutted.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Not necessarily. The general principle is you can't be held liable for something you couldn't have avoided. So if you were tailgating them and that's the only reason you couldn't stop in time, that definitely is your fault, as it is considered your obligation to be prepared to stop for any foreseeable event.

Sometimes an accident legitimately is either nobody's fault or equally the fault of both drivers.

The rear-end rule is just a presumption, not a conclusion that can't be rebutted.

Most likely both drivers would be partially at fault, because stopping on a busy road for no reason is a hazard and generally there's a law against it.

 

[AnOminous]

Most likely both drivers would be partially at fault, because stopping on a busy road for no reason is a hazard and generally there's a law against it.

Actually intentionally stopping with the express purpose of causing a crash is generally considered vastly more culpable than negligently but inadvertently failing to stop when presented with such a situation.

There are also situations where someone was prepared to brake but their brakes failed due to a defect, and in that case, the manufacturer or last person maintaining the brakes would be at fault.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

I mean, we can guess. Didn't he find out that Russ followed his (high school aged, IIRC) daughter's Instagram or something equivalently creepy?

Yeah, and I believe (and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong) he also contacted her and tried to turn her against her dad. This was during the Ariana Grande trial (2017), and was brought up to the judge when Russ was running late. Not long afterwards, Russ abruptly stopped following her; it's believed Skordas contacted him and threatened him.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Actually intentionally stopping with the express purpose of causing a crash is generally considered vastly more culpable than negligently but inadvertently failing to stop when presented with such a situation.

There are also situations where someone was prepared to brake but their brakes failed due to a defect, and in that case, the manufacturer or last person maintaining the brakes would be at fault.

Yeah.

Worth mentioning is that if the person in front of you stops, and they don't do something absurdly stupid like admit that the only reason they stopped was that they were trying to cause a collision, the onus is going to be on you to demonstrate that you weren't either following too closely, or not paying attention, or in some other way negligent to actually hit them. Good luck proving this, because you can't.

And even if they did admit that they meant to cause the crash, the onus would still be on you to prove that you weren't also partially responsible for not avoiding it.

 

[AnOminous]

Good luck proving this, because you can't.

This is why people have dashcams where shit like this is common. Also someone who pulls this scam probably has priors.

 

[Pee Cola]

This is why people have dashcams where shit like this is common.

It's also why Russian dashcam videos are a meme.

 

[AnOminous]

It's also why Russian dashcam videos are a meme.

My favorite, which I have looked for in vain to watch it again, is one where someone pulls the "jump backwards into a car to fake that it hit you" and the guy then got out of his car and beat the shit out of him.

 

[Pee Cola]

My favorite, which I have looked for in vain to watch it again, is one where someone pulls the "jump backwards into a car to fake that it hit you" and the guy then got out of his car and beat the shit out of him.

I can't help but wonder if a bunch of the more spicy Russian dashcam videos were purged by YouTube. That being said, I'm pretty sure a lot of those vids were on LiveLeak, and may not have been on YT to begin with.

 

[joebobmurphy]

Hey, can we please stop talking about accident liability and the fucking Russians? Does anyone have any fresh info on why he's suing that rando pornstar? BTW, he's totally changed his way, guys.

Lookin back, I still can't believe he had the balls to reiterate that while threatening to sue the state of Nevada while simultaneously attempting to make them help him sue a law firm for not hiring him. Never change, Rapey.

 

[The Great Citracett]

Hey, can we please stop talking about accident liability and the fucking Russians? Does anyone have any fresh info on why he's suing that rando pornstar?

I'm wondering if it's something to do with his hooker rom-com movie. The trailer was supposed to be released in May along with the incel song, and he was trying to audition for the hooker character for it. Maybe he figured an actual hooker would be able to play one in a movie. Or at least on his casting loveseat.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Does anyone have any fresh info on why he's suing that rando pornstar?

I am working on it (though it will cost me a pretty penny)

 

[joebobmurphy]

I am working on it (though it will cost me a pretty penny)

I'll take you to Olive Garden, then.